1 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Identifying Student Errors to Align Teaching and Learning KJ Learning Partners, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Instructional Decision Making
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Theory of Action If teachers…. Curriculum: Teach targeted guided Math lessons based on reading data. Ensure student with disabilities are in the general.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
School Improvement Plan Results & Next Steps December, 2009 Central Elementary School Home of the Eagles.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
A306 Session 9: Examining Instruction PART II Apr. 8, 2008.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Math RtI Kickoff Meeting. Welcome/Introductions Mike Klavon K-12 Math Consultant Robyn Lucas K-5 Math Consultant Sara Gortsema Early Intervention Project.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Grade 1.
Boston Public Schools Elementary Math Plan: District-Wide Reform in Math Teaching and Learning Presented by: Linda Ruiz Davenport, Director of Elementary.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
D62 Response to Intervention
Strategies for School-wide Achievement
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
1 INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITATOR ORIENTATION August 15, 2011.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
Becky Martin Continuous Improvement Facilitator Paul Hayes Secondary Student Services Facilitator 17th National Quality Education Conference October 2009.
Michigan Coalition of Essential Schools Welcome to the Critical Friends Groups November 1, 2013.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Interventions.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Support for (rather than Evaluation of) Administrators Delaware Academy for School Leadership.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
A Productive Partnership
Classroom Walk-Through
Presentation transcript:

1 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Identifying Student Errors to Align Teaching and Learning KJ Learning Partners, Inc.

2 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Introduction KJ Learning Partners – Education Improvement Consultants –Dorothy Jensen, Pamela Kahlich, Marjorie Simic School corporations we currently support: –Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corporation (SWP; CSR, Reading First, 21 st Century, Even Start) –Gary Community School Corporation (SWP, CSR) –Indianapolis Public Schools (SWP, CSR, Reading First) –Greater Clark County Schools (SWP, CSR, Reading First, Ed Tech) –School City of Hammond (SWP, CSR) –Vigo County Schools (SWP, CSR) –Vincennes Community Schools (SWP) –Kokomo-Center Township Schools (SWP, CSR) –Morton Memorial School (neglected institution) (SWP, CSR) –Additional Title Schools (SWP, CSR, Charters)

3 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. What are the Characteristics of the Process? Data Collection & Analysis –Study Group/Meeting Records –KWLs –Charts for Identifying Error Patterns (reading, writing and math) Identify Errors & Use Samples of Student Work to Monitor Progress –Informal assessment –Formative assessment –District-wide and/or school-wide assessments (performance assessments) –ISTEP+ (Student Applied Skills Test Booklets & Teachers Scoring Guide) Grade Level/Team Collaboration (weekly) to monitor implementation and impact –Facilitated –Focused –Outcomes

4 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. How does the Process Work? Identify errors (reading, writing, math) Match strategies to errors (research based) Implement across the curriculum with consistency, frequency, and integrity (breadth and depth) Monitor for level of implementation of strategies (meeting records, KWLs, and student level of use (work samples) Adjust and inform (classroom instruction, intervention, professional development)

5 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. What are the Benefits? All staff know how to analyze and use data (focusing on errors using performance assessments and student work samples) to –inform whole group instruction, –provide intervention for students in the classroom using small flexible groups, –provide supplemental intervention for at-risk students, and –provide support (professional development) for teachers. All staff use data to clarify how to model strategies explicitly for impact. Strategies matched to critical errors provides a common focus across the curriculum reinforcing students’ ability to use the strategies when processing challenging information independently. Ongoing monitoring of implementation and impact data supports horizontal and vertical articulation of curriculum, instruction, and assessments to ensure student impact.

6 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Professional Development - Interventions Workshop #1 (September) Conduct kickoff workshop to identify common errors/solutions across schools Overview and purpose Introduction to the KWL Analysis –What we Know –What we Want to Know –What we have Learned Practice using the KWL worksheets Introduction to the Study Group/Meeting Record Form Review of research-based articles and publications Review Learning Model Across the Curriculum and definitions Review sample classroom chart for key errors/grouping by skill area

7 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Professional Development - Interventions Workshop #2 (November) –Overview and purpose –Debrief what you’ve learned from District end-of-year assessments (when available) Last year’s ISTEP+ reports –Analyzing and using results from assessments –Using ISTEP+ student response booklets to identify key errors –Next steps

8 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Professional Development - Interventions Workshop #3 (February) Agenda Overview and purpose Debrief what you’ve learned from –Performance assessments (when available) –Student work samples Using KWLs and Error Charts to analyze Fall ISTEP+ data: –Disaggregation Summary Report –Applied Skills Frequency Distribution –ISTEP+ student response booklets to identify key errors Next Steps

9 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Professional Development - Interventions Learn how to analyze ISTEP+ data to extract meaning and provide focus for improvement –Identify skill indicators with high non-mastery –Identify ranges among skill indicators Teachers must have common time by grade level to meet together –Facilitated –Focused –Based on student performance data and work samples (not student work sheets or practice sheets) such as –Multiple choice, True/False, or Fill in the blank

10 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. School Visits KJ Learning will visit each participating school four times during the current school year –Meet with grade-level teachers to determine Student errors the teachers have identified Causes of those student errors Strategies for students to correct those errors –Work with teachers to refine and improve the process –Determine next steps and assignments in preparation for the next visit

11 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Measures of Success Report submitted to the school principal and school corporation superintendent by KJ Learning –Evidence of learning –Evidence of effecting deployment of the process Work samples, KWL sheets, etc. –Results data –Implementation issues and corrective action required

12 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Contact Information Dr. Pamela Kahlich 1833 Southwest Paloma Lake City, FL (office) (cell)