Te Kotahitanga Phase 5 The Genesis of Te Kotahitanga.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Te Kotahitanga What can we learn from it? A powerpoint presentation to SCT cluster by Mary Jamieson School Support Services School of Education University.
Advertisements

The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Individual Professional Development Plan Santa Rosa District Schools School Year.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
What role does assessment play in curriculum planning? © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.
Professional Recognition: Gain the recognition you deserve
Teacher Leadership Initiative Trainings
The Main Influences on Māori Students’ Achievement The Narratives of Experience Te Kotahitanga Phase 5.
Becoming effective teachers for under 25 students: A model for professional development decision making Judith Honeyfield - Bay of Plenty Polytechnic.
Formative Assessment A Maryland Race to the Top Initiative Denise Hunt NCSA June 2013.
Do we need to Assess for Learning? Concordia University Michael Pellegrin, MEESR March 2015.
1 Professional Qualification for Headship (NI) Information Session.
Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instructions and Raise Achievement Overview Supporting School and District Improvement in Massachusetts.
Using Formative Assessment and Technology to Raise Student Achievement
Assessment for teaching Presented at the Black Sea Conference, Batumi, September 12, Patrick Griffin Assessment Research Centre Melbourne Graduate.
Research, evidence and engaging learning Profiling the influence of school librarianship Penny Moore
Goal Understand the impact on student achievement from effective use of formative assessment, and the role of principals, teachers, and students in that.
St. Budweiser Lutheran School Lutheranville, USA April 2015.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Queenstown Professional Learning. The state of play  PLD the strongest system lever in improving educational outcomes yet:  Plethora of providers; 
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Mission Statement: To Create Life- Long Learners.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Higher Education Advisory Council Indigenous Leaders Forum Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Higher Education.
What is the relationship between pedagogy, student engagement and literacy? Daniel Bayer & Geraldine Castleton.
Gifted and Talented: Self review Presented 28 Sept 4.15 – Webinar 3 of a series of 4 Carolyn English LEARNING MEDIA.
National Standards workshop phase 2: Mathematics What is important to know and understand about the Mathematics Standards when making an overall teacher.
Key Principles for Growing e-Learning Teacher Capability in NZ schools A Pilot Project With a focus on meeting the needs of Māori students
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Evaluation. HPS is a “change” process that takes place within a school community A key consideration is that the change needs to be sustainable.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) Professional Development Clusters 2010–2012.
Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Helen Timperley, Aaron Wilson and Heather Barrar Learning Languages March 2008.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
SCHOO L Implementation & Sustainability Noreen O’Haire April 22, 2008 HEALTH.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
School Effectiveness Framework Building effective learning communities together October 2009 Michelle Jones Professional Adviser WAG.
Effective Professional Development. Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. Blackboard Collaborate Communication Tools 3.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
The 2012 Ofsted inspection framework SCHOOLS North East 14 th October 2011.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
GEPRISP Te Kotahitanga. GEPRISP GoalExperiencesPositioningRelationshipsInteractionsStrategiesPlanning GEPRISP A framework for Te Kotahitanga.
REGIONAL TRAINING UNIT Leading and Managing Achievements and Standards in the Special School and the Learning Community.
The Genesis of Te Kotahitanga. 2001: The Scoping Exercise Research initiated by Professor Russell Bishop and Dr Mere Berryman with support from kuia and.
Jorge F. del Valle ( A monitoring system for program evaluation in family foster care CHALLENGES OF FOSTER CARE AT THE BEGINNIG OF THE 21st.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
KA HIKITIA Realising Māori Student Potential Knowing Our Learner Evidence informed decision making Kiri Rua School Support Services University of Waikato.
National Lutheran School Accreditation encourages, assists, and recognizes schools that provide quality Christian education and engage in continuous improvement.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
ABI Rehabilitation New Zealand
The main influences on Māori students’ achievement Te Kotahitanga The Narratives of Experience.
CATERING FOR DIVERSITY THROUGH WRITING NZLA CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2016.
Catering for diversity through writing
Southampton City Council School School Improvement Service
Introduction and Overview
Introduction and Overview
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Validation Team Exit Report
Sustaining Professional Development Initiatives
Presentation transcript:

Te Kotahitanga Phase 5 The Genesis of Te Kotahitanga

2001: The Scoping Exercise Research initiated by: Professor Russell Bishop (Māori Education Research Institute, University of Waikato) Mere Berryman (MOE SE Poutama Pounamu Research and Development Centre, Tauranga)

2001: The Scoping Exercise Researchers sought to understand more about what was behind the ongoing discrepancies in Māori students’ educational achievement compared with their non-Māori peers.

2001: The Scoping Exercise In order to do so they: interviewed a selection of Māori students and some of their educators from a range of secondary schools using a Kaupapa Māori research approach examined national and international literature

Findings of The Scoping Exercise Participants could clearly theorise their education experiences. There was a clear mismatch between the descriptions and explanations of the students and their teachers.

Teacher student relationships and interactions, together with structural issues, impeded and limited the progress of Māori students. Findings clearly revealed the value of a Kaupapa Māori research approach for identifying and talking about solutions. Findings of The Scoping Exercise

Te Kotahitanga Phase I 2001 – 2002 Researchers sought to: understand more about what was behind the ongoing discrepancies in Māori students’ educational achievement compared with their non-Māori peers identify how to raise Māori student achievement

Te Kotahitanga Phase I Research in 5 secondary schools by talking with: Year 9 and 10 Māori students (engaged and non-engaged) Their whānau Principals Teachers

: Te Kotahitanga Phase 1 Each group provided rich narratives of experience from which the basis for the Te Kotahitanga professional development intervention emerged. The intervention worked well for Māori students with a few trained teachers in these schools, but traditional relationships and interactions outside of these contexts and within the wider school proved to be counterproductive.

: Te Kotahitanga Phase 2 Te Kotahitanga Phase 2 trained more of the teachers in 3 schools in order to maximise the effects of the intervention across each school. The intervention worked well for many of the trained teachers, and learning opportunities for Māori students in these settings undoubtedly improved.

: Te Kotahitanga Phase 2 The collection and use of evidence of student learning outcomes to monitor and inform new learning was less commonly applied. Professional communities, rather than professional learning communities emerged.

: Te Kotahitanga Phase 3 In-school facilitators in 12 schools were trained to work with cohorts of teachers to implement the professional development cycle in their schools. Teachers were trained by in-school facilitators. Greater emphasis on the effective use of student learning outcomes to monitor and inform new learning.

: Te Kotahitanga Phase 3 Review of Practice and Development in observations, feedback and co-construction for both formative and summative purposes. GPILSEO: Sustainable school wide implementation

2006 – 2009: Te Kotahitanga Phase 4 Facilitation teams from 21 new schools began training in October Since 2006 ongoing professional development for facilitation teams through: Out-of school face to face PD hui In-school face to face Review of Practice and Development visits in 2008 and 2009 Distance support through online community and 0800 number

Māori studentsNon-Māori Māori University of Waikato Ministry of Education