Data Summit July 27, 2012 Stephanie Smyka RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
To review the essential components in support of RTI implementation To assess state of RTI for School Improvement Plans PURPOSE
RTI is an approach that enables schools to provide support for all students in general education Includes: Ongoing assessment of student performance Use of evidence-based instructional practices to provide quality instruction targeted to meet individual student needs Data-based decision making WHAT IS RTI?
1.Strong leadership 2.Ongoing assessment 3.Evidence-based curriculum and instruction 4.Collaborative teaming 5.Data-based decision making 6.Fidelity of implementation 7.Ongoing training and professional development 8.Community and family involvement RTI ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS
RTI FRAMEWORK Tier 1Tier 2 Tier 3 Effective Core Instruction for All Supplemental Interventions for Some Strategic/Intensive Interventions for Individuals
RTI FRAMEWORK APPLIED TO GREECE SCHOOLS Tier 1Tier 2 Tier 3 Paddy Hill Pine Brook West Ridge Odyssey Craig Hill (AL) Buckman Heights (HR) Lakeshore (EV) Brookside Athena High Arcadia High Longridge Olympia Arcadia Middle Athena Middle
The leader: Promotes commitment of staff to process Fosters collaboration Provides time resources -makes adjustments in schedules Arranges professional development Assesses procedural fidelity as part of school improvement planning and evaluations Provides consistency for leading the way 1. ESSENTIAL LEADERSHIP
Universal Screening: involves all children and is usually done at set benchmark points to identify students at risk of not meeting standards (e.g., AIMSweb, ELP at elementary; Scholastic Reading Inventory at secondary) Diagnostic assessment: administered to smaller groups of students to help plan instruction by providing in-depth information about students’ skills and instructional needs (e.g., F&P Benchmark Assessment, Qualitative Reading Inventory, Acuity) Progress Monitoring: frequent measuring to determine if students are making adequate progress or in need of more or different intervention to achieve grade-level outcomes (e.g., Running Reading Records, Acuity, Common Formative Assessments, AIMSweb) Outcome assessments: provides evaluation of effectiveness of program and performance level (e.g., Regents exams, NYSED 3-8 ELA/Math Assessments) Assessment information is communicated to parents. 2. ONGOING ASSESSMENT IN RTI (ELEMENTARY & SPECIALISTS)
Universal Screenings: State exam results, SLO pre- assessments, Regents exams Diagnostic and Progress Monitoring: 5 week grade reports, common formative assessments Outcome assessments: Mid-terms, End of course exams, Regents ONGOING ASSESSMENT IN RTI (SECONDARY)
RTI LEVEL ASSESSMENTS: ELEMENTARY & INTERVENTIONISTS Tier 1Tier 2 Tier 3 AIMSweb Early Literacy Profile Scholastic Reading Inventory Running Reading Records F&P Benchmark Assessment Universal Screening: 3x/year AIMSweb tools Running Reading Records Acuity Common Formative Assessments Progress Monitoring: Every 3-4 weeks AIMSweb tools Running Reading Records Progress Monitoring: Every 1-2 weeks
All students receive instruction from the core program/curriculum Small differentiated group instruction based on needs from diagnostic assessment Explicit instruction targeting skills Opportunity for review, practice, feedback Most qualified teacher provides instruction 3. EVIDENCE-BASED INSTRUCTION
Evaluates school level processes and monitors fidelity of processes Identifies problems and concerns Manages data Systematic review of data to inform intervention 4. COLLABORATIVE TEAMING IN RTI
5. DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING Identify specific skills and knowledge (learning targets) that remain unmastered. Group students by target for intervention. Introduce students to the learning target. Begin instruction and/or intervention: select an appropriate measure of progress. Analyze results, modify intervention if necessary, and discontinue intervention(s) once mastery has been achieved. Analyze results, and identify students in need of continued and/or intensified interventions. Progress Monitoring Cycle
Systemwide Evaluation of RTI (Shapiro and Clemens, 2009) Four measures the district/school should monitor Tier placement against benchmark periods Rate of improvement across benchmark measures Movement between tiers Movement within tiers DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING
Outcomes can only be attributed to our efforts if we evaluate and provide documentation of: -curriculum -instruction -assessment -collaborative team problem solving process -RTI process 6. FIDELITY OF RTI
Upcoming professional development 7. ONGOING TRAINING AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT LeadersInterventionists August 20 PD DuFour model of RTI (long-range plan) Assessments Interventions Data analysis/progress monitoring
Involving families in all phases is a key aspect of a successful RTI process Parent and community support of our children’s education increases the likelihood of success Provide parents with written information (district-provided) about the RTI program and be prepared to answer questions about the process 8. FAMILY AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Can take up to 5 years to implement the RTI process fully Identify current state (using RTI assessment tool) Identify existing resources and components in place and how to increase time and professional development Include in school improvement plan STRATEGIC PLANNING
Strong building instructional leadership High expectations for student achievement A shared vision Team building and collaboration Believe you can do it and all students can achieve Redeployment of resources KEYS TO SUCCESS…
Use the tools provided (NYS Self-Assessment Tool for elementary, Mattos for secondary) to assess your school’s current state of RTI implementation Use the information to formulate goals and strategies for your School Improvement Plan EXPECTATIONS FOR RTI IMPLEMENTATION