An Introduction to opto-electronic CMOS architectures for ELT’s focal planes F. Pedichini (INAF - OARoma) A. Bartoloni (INFN – Roma 1, CERN) Firenze SDW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standard stars for the ZIMPOL polarimeter
Advertisements

P.Tisserand Rencontres du Vietnam Final results on galactic dark matter from the EROS-2 microlensing survey ~ images processed - 55 million.
Digital Camera Essential Elements Part 1 Sept
The V-SHARK Team: F.Pedichini 2, J.Farinato 1, E.Pinna 3, L.Carbonaro 3, M.Centrone 2, S.Esposito 3, F.Fiore 2, A.Fontana 2, E.Giallongo 2, J.C.Guerra.
LBT AO Progress Meeting, Arcetri Walter Seifert (ZAH, LSW) The LBT AO System and LUCIFER 1.Requirements for the commissioning of LUCIFER:
Microscopy with lens arrays
Kinematics/Dynamics  Chemistry/dust  Stellar populations  Searches for z ~ 6-7 « Hot » scientific researches at VLT in cosmology Mass Galaxy formation/gas.
CHARGE COUPLING TRUE CDS PIXEL PROCESSING True CDS CMOS pixel noise data 2.8 e- CMOS photon transfer.
All these Sky Pixels Are Yours The evolution of telescopes and CCD Arrays: The Coming Data Nightmare.
Observational techniques meeting #5. Future surveys Narrow (pencil beam): HDF UDF GOODs Cosmos MCT JWST.
ELT Stellar Populations Science Near IR photometry and spectroscopy of resolved stars in nearby galaxies provides a way to extract their entire star formation.
All these Sky Pixels Are Yours The evolution of telescopes and CCD Arrays: The Coming Data Nightmare.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
Microelectronics Design Group RAL - Microelectronics Open Day 28 th June 2005 Intelligent Digital Sensors Jamie Crooks.
Super Fast Camera System Supervised by: Leonid Boudniak Performed by: Tokman Niv Levenbroun Guy.
ENERGY a proposal for a Multi-channel Cmos Camera F. Pedichini, A. Di Paola, R. Speziali INAF Oss. Astr. Roma h e-
Photon Counting Sensors for Future Missions
1 Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Review Kirk Gilmore - SLAC DOE Review June 15, 2005.
Detection of Terrestrial Extra-Solar Planets via Gravitational Microlensing David Bennett University of Notre Dame.
Charge-Coupled Device (CCD)
CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine.
SARAN THAMPY D SARAN THAMPY D S7 CSE S7 CSE ROLL NO 17 ROLL NO 17 Optical computing.
T-REX OU4 HIRES The high resolution spectrograph for E-ELT E. Oliva, T-REX meeting, Sexten Pustertal (I)1.
 Johann Kolb, Norbert Hubin  Mark Downing, Olaf Iwert, Dietrich Baade Simulation results:  Richard Clare Detectors for LGS WF sensing on the E-ELT 1AO.
[1] Reference: QCam API reference manual document version Charge Coupled Device (CCD)
1 Digital Cameras Consumer digital cameras have been around since 1995 What features make a good camera? How do we optimize good features with a limited.
WELCOME. HIGH SPEED SMART PIXEL ARRAYS Guided by, Presenting by, Mr. RANJITH.CSHAHID.C &ROLL NO: 63 Ms. KAVYA.K.MREG. NO: CTAHEEC130.
Advanced Concepts & Science Payloads Office Eddicam/EST MeetingPage 1 CCD Procurement Schedule driven Review off-the shelf availability Specific mode of.
An Introduction to opto-electronic CMOS architectures for ELT’s focal planes and not-only F. Pedichini and M. Stangalini (75% TD TRex postdoc ) « The Outcome.
1 K. Gilmore - SDW The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) Status Summary Kirk Gilmore SLAC/KIPAC.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Position sensing in Adaptive Optics Christopher Saunter Durham University Centre for Advanced Instrumentation Durham Smart Imaging.
Edimburg June 2006 Fast detectors 1 Fast detectors (for E-ELT AO) Philippe Feautrier INSU/CNRS-LAOG.
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Telescope Guiding with a HyViSI H2RG Used in Guide Mode Lance Simms Detectors for Astronomy /2/09.
High Throughput Microscopy
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 Roger Hunter (Ames Research Center) & Kepler Team March 26, 2010.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
6/11/2012 Building on NEAT concept - M. Gai - INAF-OATo 1 Building on NEAT concept M. Gai – INAF-OATo (a) Extension of science case (b) Payload implementation.
Upgrade plan of the MOA 1.8-m telescope F. Abe MOA collaboration 19 Jan. 2009, 13th Microlensing Paris.
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
Database of Variable Stars Bingqiu Chen Dept of Astronomy Beijing Normal University.
Development of an ASIC for reading out CCDS at the vertex detector of the International Linear Collider Presenter: Peter Murray ASIC Design Group Science.
Aldo Dell'Oro INAF- Observatory of Turin Detailed analysis of the signal from asteroids by GAIA and their size estimation Besançon November 6-7, 2003.
KMOS Instrument Overview & Data Processing Richard Davies Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  What does KMOS do?  When will it do it?
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 31th IADC Meeting, April , 2013, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany Improved Space Object Observation Techniques.
To a brief summary E. Verroi and G. Naletto. The main problem is the instability of count rates in the 4 channels  Bad possibility of pointing the star.
J. Crooks STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
1 Optical observations of asteroids – and the same for space debris… Dr. D. Koschny European Space Agency Chair of Astronautics, TU Munich Stardust school.
CCD Imaging in amateur & professional astronomy What is a CCD?
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Data Reduction with NIRI Knut Olsen and Andrew Stephens Gemini Data Workshop Tucson, AZ July 21, 2010 Knut Olsen and Andrew Stephens Gemini Data Workshop.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Power Integrity Test and Verification CK Cheng UC San Diego 1.
What happens when you take a picture… When you take a picture with a digital camera, instead of a piece of film the light strikes a digital sensor array.
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
Comète axe 2 - TC1 : RSA n°2 - SPART/S t Cloud Workshop Leiden 2005 Performance of wave-front measurement concepts for GLAO M. NICOLLE 1, T. FUSCO.
Low Power, High-Throughput AD Converters
MPI Semiconductor Laboratory, The XEUS Instrument Working Group, PNSensor The X-ray Evolving-Universe Spectroscopy (XEUS) mission is under study by the.
Digital Cameras in Microscopy Kurt Thorn Nikon Imaging QB3/UCSF.
Short review of Modern Optical Instrumentation for Astronomy & Astrophisics LNF OAR Sinergy Workshop Frascati Aprile 2014 F. Pedichini.
Topic Report Photodetector and CCD
Alex Fullerton STScI / NIRISS Team Lead
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Institute of Cosmos Sciences - University of Barcelona
Photon counting CCDs as wavefront sensors for LBT A.O. systems
Astronomy 920 Commissioning of the Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph
Observational Astronomy
Presentation transcript:

An Introduction to opto-electronic CMOS architectures for ELT’s focal planes F. Pedichini (INAF - OARoma) A. Bartoloni (INFN – Roma 1, CERN) Firenze SDW 2013 conference

Pixel_One …a few years ago at San Diego SPIE 2010; Pedichini, Di Paola, Testa...a possible technology to exploit direct seeing limited imaging using the whole field of ELTs…

Overview of … Important numbers: Aperture~ 40 m Mirror surface> 1000m 2 F number17.7 # Focal lenght> 700 m Field of view~ 5 x 5 arcmin 2 Scale0.2 ÷ 0.3 arcsec/mm Focal plane surface~ 1m 2 5 arcmin) Seeing FWHM arcsec

Diffraction limited PSF vs. seeing The Airy disk diameter at λ=0.5µm is about 4 mas (18 µm) just two CCD pixels at ELT focal plane! 0.36 mm 100 mas

…a different view…. at the seeing scale 0.36 mm 100 mas 1.00 mm 300 mas 0.6 arcsec seeing FWHM 5 arcmin 1000 mm 4k x 4k detector with 15 µm pixels At a seeing limited ELT the use of standard detectors gives a factor thousand of oversampling Instead we would like a Pixel_One mm wide ESO Omegacam

The Pixel_One concept TLR:1 pixel camera, 1mm pitch, >1kHz, replicable

Optical and Silicon pixels… matching F# 17 F# 1… One Big focal reducer & One standard detector 3x3 binned very expensive glass very demanding optics detector cost is worth F# 17 F#1 F#1 F#1… One Million of tiny focal reducers microlenses & One Million of Pixel_One cameras a replicable CMOS process may be not expensive Need to develop it & 1m 2 of silicon (SPIE 2006 Gentile et al.) (SPIE 2010 Magrin et al.) (SPIE 2010 Ragazzoni et al.) Building of a few 100 small focal reducers to F#2÷4 with a binned off the shelf sCMOS detector in a FlyEye approach

Bottom level: the Pixel 1.A micro lens about 1 mm wide sample the focal plane. 2.A “small” cmos-pixel converts photons to electrons and integrates the charge. 3.A local A/D digitizes at bit and adds/stores the result. 4.The ASIC manages the self-reset, the control signals, the data transfer on the local busses and the integration time. A/D register State machine I/O data bus Ø 30÷40 µm 1000 µm

µ-lenses…! Ø 40µm r 20µm Ø 1mm

Pixel features: 1.The local A/D samples at kHz rates and digitally integrates the results in a register allowing a photometric impressive dinamic ≥ 32 bits not depending more on the pixel “fullwell” 2.The state machine manages all the processes and transfer data to host. 3.Actual CMOS tecnology produces pixels with RON of very few electron/sample. (Ybin Bay et al. SPIE 2008, Downing et Al. SPIE 2012, Fairchild sCMOS and others)

UMC CIS 180 IMAGE SENSOR ULTRA (4T) DIODE TECHNOLOGY (D.I.Y.) NODE -> 180 nm Interconnect -> 2P4M VDD -> 1.8V core / 3.3V I/O Min Pixel Size -> 2.6 um Capacitor -> Poly-Insulator-Poly, Metal-Insulator-Metal Digital design IP library Cadence & Sysnopsys design flow Analog design Cadence FDK available Pixel Design Optical simulation support Technology evolution -> 130 nm, 110 nm, 90 nm ready.. 65 nm planned ( ) Exist a MPW path at Europractice for a cheap early prototyping

ADCs IO LVDS Pixel / die = 5x5 (different) Total Pixels area 2500 µm2 Die area 5x5 mm2 Sampling at 250 Kfps SAR ADC (12 bit) I/O (slave mode) -> about 10 Kbit/s I/O (master mode) -> about 1 Mbit/s 32 bit Adder & comp Memory RF Control Logic (D.I.Y.) A LABORATORY ON A DIE Multiplexing

REMARKS ON DIY..! EUROPRACTICE allows research institution to develop CMOS cameras using 180 micron-litography 45 prototipes cost 30 k€; you pay the Si surface about 30€/mm 2 not the complexity of the ASIC Final production needs a less expensive procurement. ( i.e. a sample of few e2V CMOS_DSC_EV76C660 costs only 5€/mm 2 ) UMC CIS180 Image sensor 2P4M ULTRA diode Samples> 45 Matrix Chip2x24x45x510x10 Area Chip (mm2) APS x batch Chips x batch18045 Blocks x design1114 Cost (die) Packaging3000

Intermediate level: The Tile We can mosaic an array of 32 x 32 Pixel_One on a single substrate and interconnect the data bus and control lines by means of an I/O digital circuit to PINS. I/O logic This is a very sparse CMOS on chip camera made of only 1024 pixel on a surface of about 32 x 32 mm 2. The I/O logic must allow the independent control of each single Pixel_One (vital on an ELT’s imager) …and fill ONE squared meter of (curved..?) focal plane !

Backplane: Instructions for use Pixel_One Backplane is a real parallel array of “smart” imagers and each “pixel” of them can be programmed to accomplish different exposure times. This approach reduces the data rate and leave the fast sampling only where or when is really needed. (pre-imaging required) At an ELT a 32 bit equivalent photometric dynamic means to expose a 5 magV star for 500 ms with a gain of 1adu/e- without saturation of the full well. transfer data at end of the exposure saturation time 2E6 sec! Sky background 21 magV/arcsec e-/s 90% fast variable Star 22magV+sky 4000 e-/s transfer data at each sample you need for science 10% Bright field Star <15magV+sky transfer data before digital saturation of 32 bit storage register <1%

S/N optimization Optical pixel size 1x1 mm, 4T pixel architecture, global Q.E. 50% (optics+silicon) RON 4e-.

E.ELT Photometric S/N vs integration time in seconds for Pixel-One used as a fast photometer and for Pixel-One used as a faint sources imager at the Nasmith focus of the future E-ELT in V band with 0.8” seeing, sky mag. = V 21. * In the “Italian slang” PixelOne sounds like “a big pixel”.

Science cases for Pixel_One… (finally) High-frequency time sampling of compact objects : like pulsars, magnetars, etc, can be observed with a time sampling of the order of , Vmag~20 (10σ), while in 1s the 10σ limiting magnitude is V~24.3 Faint galactic halo objects : e.g. brown dwarfs. Faint objects around brighter sources : imaging big galaxies concentrating on spiral arms avoiding the bright bulges saturation Rapidly variable phenomena : it is possible to follow rapidly variable phenomena with high efficiency. Typical targets are contact binaries and short period variables. Other targets : in general any program that requires seeing-limited conditions can be carried out with Pixel_One. Even moderately crowded fields can be observed with a special attention to faint objects without “bleeding and saturation” “It is worth stressing that the relatively large field-of-view makes it possible to execute surveys, thus conjugating speed of acquisition with sky coverage.”

Conclusion EUROPRACTICE allows research institution to develop CMOS pixels at 30€ / mm 2 (minimum fee is 30k€) Mass production can be less 5€ / mm 2 (to be investigated) 400 well engineered cameras with focal reducers and lenses diameter of 70mm are about 400 x 10K = 4 M€ ! 1 Million of Pixel_One may be only 2 M€ ? (work in progress) A LAST SLIDE >>>>

W.F.S. (last but not least) LBT (8.4m) FLAO WFS system 1kHz if magR < 7 Oversampling (>> 1kHz) using autoregressive prediction of turbulence on a few ms timescale may increase the Strehl by 50% factor (see: Stangalini, Arcidiacono AO4ELT 2013) ! THANK YOU… f