Slide 1 Ethics and Complexity Exploring the relationship… Prof Lucas D. Introna…..………………… Lancaster University……..…………

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carper (1978) Fundamental patterns of knowing
Advertisements

Frameworks for Moral Arguments
The moral importance of agency Frederike Kaldewaij Philosophy Department, Utrecht University Expert Meeting Fish welfare:
Kant’s Ethical Theory.
Medical Ethics Lecturer :Noha Alaggad
Introduction to basic principles
Immanuel Kant The Good Will and Autonomy. Context for Kant Groundwork for Metaphysics of Morals after American Revolution and Before French- rights.
Individual Factors: Moral Philosophies and Values
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is defined in terms of the consequences of actions l Deontological Ethics: morality.
Consequentialist Ethical Theories Egoism: the good is whatever promotes my long-term interests Hedonism: we should pursue pleasures that are not mixed.
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is the means to achieve what is identified as good or valuable l Deontological Ethics:
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is the means to achieve what is identified as good or valuable l Deontological Ethics:
Ethics DEFINITIONS Values Morals Ethics Ethical dilemma
Consequentialist Ethical Theories u Egoism: the good is whatever promotes my long-term interests u Hedonism: the good is pleasure l Pursue pleasures not.
ADM Leadership Lecture 14 – Leadership Ethics.
PHILOSOPHY 102 (STOLZE) Notes on Dale Jamieson, Ethics and the Environment, chapter 4.
Ethics—The Basics by John Mizzoni
Ethical Issues.
Natural Law/Virtue Ethics. Morality and Human Nature  Natural Law Theory  Based upon assumption that the good is consistent with fundamental design.
REC 321 Keith Fulthorp, Ed.D. CSULB Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies.
Unit 4: Morality.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
Ethics & Leadership. Origin & Nature of Ethics Components of Ethical Actions & the Moral Life Motives Means Consequences.
Business Law with UCC Applications,13e
Ethics and Metaethics Based on Kernohan, A. (2012). Environmental ethics: An interactive introduction. Buffalo, NY: Broadview Press, Chapters 1 & 2. Prepared.
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
Philosophy and Ethics Is lying always wrong? Is conscience a reliable guide? Are all values relative?
 Ethics, also known as moral philosophy, is a branch of philosophy that addresses questions about morality—that is, concepts such as good and evil, right.
Kantian Ethics Introduction.
Basic Ethical Theories Soraj Hongladarom Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
Theories of Morality Kant Bentham Aristotle. Morality  Morality: Action for the sake of principle  Guides our beliefs about right and wrong  Sets limits.
The German Enlightenment & the teaching of business ethics in China Dr Robert Shaw Graduate School of Business Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.
You Are What You Do In Search of the Good, chapter 2.
Ethics and Moral Knowledge Choosing your ethical premises.
1 Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic Department of Computer Science and Engineering Mälardalen University 2004 PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CD5590.
Deontology Criticisms Too absolutist, inflexible, severe - no exceptions to moral rules Assigns no moral value to attitudes, feelings, or actions motivated.
ETHICS in the WORKPLACE © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 2 Ethical Principles.
CHAPTER ONE ETHICS MUSOLINO SUNY CRIMINAL & BUSINESS LAW.
Ethical Decision Making , Ethical Theories
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
Utilitarianism Utilitarians focus on the consequences of actions.
An act is moral if it brings more good consequences than bad ones. What is the action to be evaluated? What would be the good consequences? How certain.
Basic Framework of Normative Ethics. Normative Ethics ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’ or ‘controls’ ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’
Kant and Kantian Ethics: Is it possible for “reason” to supply the absolute principles of morality?
Definitions. Definitions to Know Morality: any major decisions that affect others becomes a moral decision. Immoral: refers to the way people ought not.
02 The Nature of Ethical Judgments Figures and diagrams.
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Deciding What’s Right: A Prescriptive Approach Chapter 4.
Theory of Consequences and Intentions There are two traditional ways of looking at the “rightness” or “wrongness” of an act. 1. Look at the consequences.
Ethical decision making in community legal centres.
The Study of Ethics How do we know how to do the Right Thing?
Philosophy, Logic and Human Existence ETHICS AND HUMAN CONDUCT IN THE SOCIETY.
Chapter 4 Ethical Standards. Introduction Limits to what law, regulations, and accrediting standards and requirements can govern In the absence of law,
Ethics and Moral reasoning
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 5: Virtue Ethics
MBA 641 Business and Labor Law
Introduction to Ethics
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS ETHICS
Theory of Health Care Ethics
INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS ETHICS
What is the difference between: Can you give an example of each?
Ethics of Duty Vs. Ethics of Virtue
Moral Decision-Making
What is Ethics? Monday, May 22, 2017.
A Review of Principles DR. K. Smith, PharmD, MPH.
Ethics and morals.
Contemporary Moral Issue
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 Ethics and Complexity Exploring the relationship… Prof Lucas D. Introna…..………………… Lancaster University……..…………

Slide 2 Agenda Introduction Why ethics? Ethics and (Complexity) Science Complexity and Ethics Traditional approach to the problem of ethics Rethinking the complexity of the ethical problem So what / what now

Slide 3 Why ethics? The question of Ethics emerges as the problem of the significant Other My actions affect the Other in a more or less significant way The ethical problem is often framed as conflicting / competing needs, rights, values, etc. of all significant Others implicated in my actions Ethics always implies some sacrifice (who bares the burden?) Ethics is how I conduct myself relative to these implicated significant Others

Slide 4 Why ethics? Simultaneity of Self and Other

Slide 5 Who are significant Others? Who or what is morally significant? –God / transcendent being –Self –Humans –Animals –Nature / The environment –Machines –Things Ego-centric Anthropocentric Bio-centric Ecocentric … >> Hierarchy?

Slide 6 Ethics and (Complexity) Science Fact / value distinction –Epistemology / ethics Science is a social practise… Science ought to concern itself with the implications of its theories…

Slide 7 Ethics and (Complexity) Science Isabelle Stengers

Slide 8 Traditional approach to ethics Human actions might have undesirable consequences for significant Others (justice, rights, values) Human in acting cause these consequences (cause / effect relationship) Because humans have autonomous agency (based on free will) they have moral responsibility How do we discharge our moral responsibility? Rational problem solving (calculative rationality) Reaching closure / equilibrium (justification)

Slide 9 Western ethical theory Act Motive Reason Consequences (significant Others) Deontological theory Consequentionalist theory Ethical Egoism Utilitarianism Hedonism Ethics of Duty Rights and Justice Ethics of Care

Slide 10 Complexity and Ethics Complexity theory’s critique of traditional approach: –Linear relationships (cause / effect) –Ahistorical nature of model (linear temporality) –Assumption of original causes (free will / autonomy) –Assumption of closure / boundedness Multiple feedback loops and second-order network effects (simultaneity of the local and the global) Already situated (compromised) nature of action (simultaneity of past / present / future) Agency is diffused and distributed (simultaneity intentional and the unintended) There is no ‘outside’ (simultaneity of self, other and all others)

Slide 11 Complexity and Ethics Complex Ethics Simultaneity of: * Other and All Others * Local and global * Past and future * Intended and unintended Ethics cannot be solved (…and that is what makes it serious)

Slide 12 Levinas’ Ethics Ethics: being disturbed; taking up our ethical obligations in everyday life… SelfOther All Other Others ETHICS JUSTICE

Slide 13 Derrida’s Aporia Suspension of the law (fresh judgement) Undecidability Urgency (needed now)

Slide 14 Virtue ethics as a complex ethics What is virtue? Strength of character Is the outcome of practice (habit / disposition) Involving both feeling and action Seeks to find the mean between excess and deficiency relative to us

Slide 15 Virtue ethics Seeks the mean between excess and deficiency relative to us DeficiencyVirtueExcess CowardnessCourageFoolhardiness StingyGenerosityWasteful Self-loathingHumilityArrogance Deceit Honesty Confessional ?Loyalty?

Slide 16 Virtue ethics as a complex ethics Why virtue ethics? Emphasis on character development (becoming) (good character  right actions) Emphasis on practice (habit / disposition) Morality becomes something I always do Encourages reflexivity…

Slide 17 Virtue ethics Seeks to maintain the simultaneity… Virtue OtherCare (fulness)All Others PastReflexivityFuture LocalMindfullnessGlobal IntendedOpen to reconsideration Unintended

Slide 18 So what? Ethics needs complexity to keep it serious Ethics is not something we can avoid (and scientists of human beings) Ethics cannot be solved (it is an ongoing obligation) Finding ways to deal with simultaneity is an ongoing ethical burden Ethics is a ongoing practice