Institutional Performance Evaluation (IPE) Prof. Dr. Farman Ullah Quality Enhancement Cell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Advertisements

National Review of Teacher Education: B Ed/ACE/PGCE April 2006 Institutional Preparation.
CIC Key Indicators for Hollins University Jamie Redwine Office of Institutional Research June 2005.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
University of Vienna Rectorate – Office of the Rectorate May 30, 2008 Claudia Kögler University of Vienna, Office of the Rectorate.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
1 Southern Connecticut State University Graduate Council Academic Standards Committee Procedures for Southern Connecticut State University.
University of Peshawar 13 th QEC Meeting August 18-19,2009, Karachi.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 12 th Meeting of QECs Heads By Dawar Hameed Mughal Deputy Director QEC
FERPA 101 Student Records: Institutional Responsibility and Student Rights What Every University Employee Should Know Prepared by the Office of the Registrar.
Online School Administration and Supervision Programs: Two Pathways for Success Online Information Session Wednesday, July 8, :00-7:30 PM EST.
Quality Assurance Programme Higher Education Commission, Islamabad (Prof. Dr. Riaz Hussain Qureshi)
Enhancing the Quality of Education through Self Assessment Procedures
QEC initiates SA through the dean one semester prior to the assessment Department forms the PT that will be responsible for preparing SAR QEC reviews.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Institutional Performance Evaluation (IPE) Dr. Farman.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care The Site Visitors Are Coming! Transitioning from Successful Self- Study to Successful Site Visit Bradley.
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RPT Workshop March 28, :30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Intermountain Network Scientific CC (INSCC) Building, room 110.
A Landmark Initiative of Higher Education Commission (HEC) for Quality Assurance in Teaching and Research at Higher Degree Level Quality Enhancement Cell.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
TIME LINE FOR PROGRAM REVIEWS. BASIC MAP OF PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESSES.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Asst. Prof. Thapanee Thammetar, Ph.D. Director of Thailand Cyber Univ. Quality Assurance, e-Learning content development and operation ASEAN-ROK Session.
SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes 2.Curriculum Design and Organization 3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities 4.Student.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
From Inputs to Process to Outcomes: the Quality Management Program at the American University in Bulgaria Steven F. Sullivan Dean of Faculty.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Powers, Duties, and Responsibilities of the Policy Commission.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
Presenter Prof. Dr. Aamir Ijaz Prof. Dr. Aamir Ijaz Director, Quality Enhancement Cell, Director, Quality Enhancement Cell, University of the Punjab, Lahore,
Introduction to IQAC Khawza I Ahmed, Director IQAC.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Ranking Parameters of Universities in Pakistan HEC Perspective
DIRECTOR QUALITY ASSURANCE
Donna Kragt: HLC Liaison April 11, 2017
Meeting Quality Standards when working in collaboration
The On-Site Evaluation Visit
External Examiner Reports
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Institutional Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) at north south university
External Examiners Induction Edge Hill University
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Fort Valley State University
The Program Evaluation Committee and the Annual Program Evaluation
Validation Programme Developers
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Co-Curricular Assessment
Assumption University
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Performance Evaluation (IPE) Prof. Dr. Farman Ullah Quality Enhancement Cell

The Institutional Review Process The institutional review process comprises of: a. University Portfolio Report (UPR) prepared by the University and is pre-requisite for the IPE process b. Visit by an external Review Panel/ visiting team to be appointed by HEC.

What is an Institutional Portfolio The “University Portfolio Report (UPR)” comprises of information about the university mostly based on answers to questions that have been provided at the end of each standard in the Manual. DONE

Performance Evaluation Standards Standard 1: Mission Statement and Goals Standard 2: Planning and Evaluation Standard 3: Organization and Governance Standard 4: Faculty Standard 5: Institutional Resources Standard 6: Academic Programmes and Curricula Standard-8: Students Standard-10: Assessment & Quality Assurance DONE

Standard-7: Integrity Standard-9: Public Discloser & Transparency Standard-11: Student Support Services _____________

The Institutional Review Process

Guidelines for the University Please provide answers to all the questions in UPR even if your answer is “not applicable.” Documents should be placed in the folders and each folder should be marked as standard #1, folder #1,etc. Please indicate the reference of the folder number with the answers to questions. In some cases the same documentation will be used for several standards and several questions. Just indicate in the answer in which folder the documentation can be found.

Review Panel The Review Panel has one team leader along with other members. The panel members are not assigned to their own institutions in order to ensure transparency. The Review Panel will undertake the institutional performance evaluation process against the 8 standards out of a total of 11 defined in the manual.

Visit by Panel a. Role of University i. A separate room/office is to be made available for the Review Panel, where all the documents related to University Portfolio Report are placed. There is no need to prepare photocopies of the documents/evidences as no documents will be taken out of the room.

ii. The room for the Review Panel will have a table for each standard and the folders containing the information are to be clearly numbered. Sufficient office space within the room for all Panel members is to be provided. (Committee Room-2 suggested) iii. Proper electrification for laptops/computers, internet facility and printout facility are also required in the room. (Laptop, Multimedia Projector, Internet facility, Printer and a person from NOC will be required in the committee room-2)

iv. In addition, any written reports, power-point presentations, or other information that the Review Panel has not requested but that the administration feels would be relevant to the review should be placed in the room. v. One soft copy and six hard copies of the University Portfolio Report will be provided by the university.

In order to achieve the desired objectives of the Review, University Portfolio Report must have answers to the questions listed in the Manual in conjunction with each of the standards as well as the university data to be collected by the University. This University Portfolio Report needs to be prepared before the visit of IPE Review Panel. The Review Panel will be at the university for three days.

The purpose of such a review is an honest appraisal of where there are existing strengths and where there is a need for improvement. Ultimately the university is fully responsible for its own functioning. External peer review is vital to a high quality university. That appraisal is a joint effort and a joint goal.

University-wide Data 1. Department and academic program wise Student/faculty ratio 2. For each department, the average number of students per class. 3. Total enrollment; enrollment by major; enrollment by department; number of full-time students and part-time students in undergraduate programs and in graduate programs 4. Number of applications and the number of students enrolled in undergraduate and graduate level. 5. Retention rate from first to second year; second to third year; third to fourth year – undergraduate programs.

6. Department wise / designation wise Number of full-time faculty; number of part-time faculty, on contract faculty, visiting faculty and adjunct faculty with qualification. 7. Designation wise list of Average salary for faculty on tenure track and without tenure track. 8. Total amount of financial aid given to the students from institutional funds; % of expense budget for last two financial years. 9. Average financial aid for first year students.

10.Net tuition rate (tuition income – institutional financial aid); % of revenue budget 11.Endowment assets per student (amount of endowment divided by total number of full-time equivalent students) 12.Total expense per student (educational and general expenses divided by the number of full-time equivalent students 13.% of credit hours for each undergraduate and graduate program. 14.Prepare information on % of each source of revenue – tuition and fees, government grants for operations; restricted grants from sources; etc. In a second chart, give the % for each source of expense – educational and general, auxiliary, etc.

b) Role of IPE Review Panel The original documents examined by the Review Panel and all discussions conducted with officials/students will be confidential. Individual names will not be mentioned in the report.

Schedule of Panel & Review Process a) Schedule of Review Panel: DAY #1 Meet with the Vice Chancellor (9:00-9:30 am) Review Panel works in room (9:30 – 5:00 pm with lunch provided in the room at 01:00 pm)

DAY#2 Panel meets with Chairmen / heads of departments (10:00-11:00 am) (List will be provided by IPE Review Panel) Review Panel meets with Asst. Professors/lecturers (11:00-12:00) (List will be provided by IPE Review Panel) Panel meets with the Post Graduate, Graduate and Under graduate students (one from each selected department) (12:00 – 01:00)

Panel meets with the Registrar, Head of Finance, Director P & D and Controller Examinations (01:00-03:45 pm) Review Panel works privately to work on putting together the questions and draft of the report (04:00-05:30 pm) Review Panel may request additional information and/or may request a meeting with other senior officers in order to seek clarification regarding certain points in the University Portfolio Report.

DAY #3 Review Panel visits selected class room facilities, laboratories and library (9:00-10:00 am) Review Panel continues its work (10:00-02:00 pm with working lunch) Exit interview with VC. It is on the discretion of the VC to whom he wishes to be present for the exit interview (02:00-03:00 pm).

The 1st Draft of IPE Review Report Draft Report will be prepared as per the format approved by the competent authority at HEC. The IPE Review Panel members will complete the draft of the report before the exit interview with the Vice Chancellor of the university. In the exit interview, Review Panel will share the salient features with the Vice Chancellor (and/or his team) and handover the draft report to the Vice Chancellor to correct the “Error of Facts” (if any). Vice Chancellor will submit the corrections (if any) to team leader with in the three days.

Post Review Process Team Leader of Review Panel will submit the report to QAA and QAA will submit the report to the competent authority at HEC for approval. After the approval, IPE Review report will be shared with the university.

Indicated Officers are responsible for Providing the required documents and make it available for IPE Panel All PC-I(Director P&D) Last 10 years minutes of Syndicate (Registrar) Last 10 years minutes of F&PC (Director Finance) Last Ten years minutes of Academic Council (Director Teaching) Last 10 meeting minutes of BASAR meeting (Director Advanced Studies & Research)

Indicated Officers are responsible for Providing the required documents and make it available for IPE Panel Teacher Evaluation Reports (QEC) List of Publications with Impact factor??? Budget Copy (Director Finance) Central Purchase Committee (CPC ) File (Director Finance) Copy of curriculum for each academic degree program (Director Teaching/DAS&R) syllabi for a course at each level (Director Teaching / DAS&R)

Indicated Officers are responsible for Providing the required documents and make it available for IPE Panel Learning outcomes for each major? Please provide a copy from five departments under different deans Alumni Survey Results (QEC) Faculty Survey Reports(QEC) Employer Survey Results (QEC) Research Progress Review Form (DASAR/QEC) Self Assessment Reports of all departments done. (QEC)

Indicated Officers are responsible for Providing the required documents and make it available for IPE Panel HEC Plagiarism Policy,(QEC) Faculty Appointment Criteria,(Registrar already received from Registrar) MS/Mphil and Ph.D criteria, (DAS&R) Criteria for Tenure Track System, (Registrar)

All Teaching and Administrative Departments will designate a Focal Persons with authority; to provide relevant information /documents asked by the IPE Panel during their visit, who must be present throughout the entire process.

Who will take care of: Lunch/ Dinner/Tea for guests Accommodation. Transportation/local commuting for guests. Laptop, Multimedia Projector in Committee Room#2 Note: No multimedia, No laptop and No access to official vehicle is available with QEC.

THANK YOU