Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) New system for Research Ethics Committees Sure Start – April 2004 Joan Kirkbride OREC Manager for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NHS R&D Jessica Bisset Acting Research Operations Manager UH Bristol.
Advertisements

"How's our impact?: Developing a survey toolkit to assess how health library services impact on patient care" Alison Weightman July 2008.
The Research Ethics Process RPT Conference 28 th April 2006.
The HPSS Research Ethics Service Northern Ireland Dr Siobhan McGrath Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland Mar2007.
Research Policy & Management RACD INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH GOVERNANCE.
Nomination of IM&T Lead and Caldicott Guardian. Click hereClick here for guidance on the Caldicott Guardians Responsibilities. Work through the Information.
Research involving adults lacking the capacity to consent Legal, ethical and practical issues Dr Mikey Dunn Senior Research Associate in Health and Social.
Navigating the PhD – The Research Degrees Office.
A university wide electronic research ethics review system?
An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
New Trials If you are seeking a collaboration with the UCL CCTU we require you to apply: At least 3 months before the application deadline By using the.
Characteristics of research. Designed to derive generalisable new knowledge.
Working together for better Research - Collaborative research with BCUHB Dr Nefyn Williams & Dr Richard Tranter, NWORTH Associate Clinical Directors &
LEO: LSHTM Ethics Online Patricia Henley Quality & Governance Manager London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Management Through Systems Vicki Latter Biomedicine Research & Development Unit University College London.
CRC Protocol Documents Protocol Submissions Amendments Publications Study Closure.
Go Directly To Jail Adrian Hayes PHRN Researcher PHRN Conference 2006.
Managing Sponsorship Research Services University of Oxford.
Research Ethics-Integrity-Governance. University Initiative:The Catalyst? ‘02 Good Research Practice Standards & Procedure to Investigate Potential Research.
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) Research Studies UCSF HRPP Submission Process Overview Tuesday, December.
Identification & Distinction of Clinical Trial Participant Charges Bethany Martell Office of Clinical Research Associate Director- Financial Operations.
Tipologie di Audit e loro caratteristiche Riunione sottogruppo GCP-GIQAR 21 Marzo 2006 Francesca Bucchi.
National Institute for Health Research Coordinated System for gaining NHS Permission (NIHR CSP) A single system for processing and reviewing applications.
Research and Development 07/05/2015 Bala Thirugnanabalan & Dale Batham.
Consultant Pharmacists
Applying to a Research Ethics Committee
The Chief Scientist Office. Developments/Restructuring Of Research Funding In Scotland Overview of NHS Infrastructure funding ( ) What we have.
British Association of Dermatologists’ Biologics Intervention Register Approval Process July 2007.
North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust Application for Registration under the Health & Social Care Act 2008 Presentation to the Trust Board.
Patient groups’ topics and structure: yearly review Lizzie Stimson 9 December 14.
Records Managers’ Forum 28 February Draft standard on the appraisal and disposal of State records Catherine Robinson Senior Project Officer, Government.
Ethics and Regulatory Approvals Alison Robertson CMDHB Research Officer.
Welcome to BLT Online NQT Induction. Points We Will Cover: What is BLT Online NQT Service? What are the advantages of using it? User roles on the site.
Andrew Thornton, Chairman, RAH HREC
Joint Research & Enterprise Office Training The team, the procedures, the monitor and the Sponsor Lucy H H Parker Clinical Research Governance Manager.
The work of the Research Ethics Committee Dr Carol Chu.
Introduction to Evaluation Odette Parry & Sally-Ann Baker
The Role of the Research Office Joint Research & Enterprise Office (JREO) St George’s University of London and St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation.
Cardiff and Vale UHB Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Caerdydd a’r Fro NHS R&D Overview How to avoid the common pitfalls? Thomas Fairman Research Liaison Manager.
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM Office Location: 1350 N. Vine Ave. (one block west of Cherry Ave. & three blocks north of Speedway) PO Box Phone:
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting July 6, 2011 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
R&D – a perspective Dr Nana Theodorou Research Coordinator Sheffield Clinical Research Office.
Where does R&D fit? Dr Clara Kalu Senior Portfolio Co-ordinator UCL Students’ Research.
VALIDATION OF PLANNING & OTHER APPLICATIONS A brief guide for Planning Agents.
Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSSREC) April 2014.
Accessing the NHS for Research – NHS R&D Permissions Jemma Hughes R&D Manager ABMU Health Board.
LEO: LSHTM Ethics Online Patricia Henley Quality & Governance Manager Research Governance & Integrity Office London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
R&D Annual Report SLaM Board, Sept 2004 Graham Thornicroft Gill Dale.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) UKTMN 6 th June 2006.
Academic Registrars Council – Subjects Allied to Medicine meeting 27 June 2013 Update from the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) Brendon Edmonds,
NRES Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Version 4.0 April 2009 Training Modules for Research Ethics Committee Co-ordinators Lynda McCormack, Co-ordinator.
IRAS: Workshop Mike Morgan, R&D Governance Officer.
The Research Design Service & PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit Tatiana Taylor Salisbury Research Co-ordinator Dept. of Primary Care and Population Health.
OCR’s new GCE specifications in the sciences. Now A/AS Biology A/AS Human Biology A/AS Chemistry A/AS Chemistry (Salters) A/AS Physics A/AS Advancing.
The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.
© 2016 University at Buffalo Click Training Safety Module University at Buffalo Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development Electronic.
Asthma - diagnosis and monitoring guideline: primary care implementation feasibility project update Adoption & Impact Programme, NICE: Sally Chisholm,
Financial System Upgrade Agency Change Champion Deployment Session March 16 th, 2006.
Rebecca L. Mugridge LFO Research Colloquium March 19, 2008.
Stage 1: STUDY PREPARATION 1www.ihpa.gov.au. STUDY PREPARATION OVERVIEW Steps required to prepare for the study implementation.
London (South) Comprehensive Local Research Network
Tusla’s Research Ethics
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Regulation EU 536/2014 on clinical trials
Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18
And don’t forget… ethics and R&D
Lynne MacRae Research Practice Governance Manager
Application for research Ethical Approval in Practice
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S STUDY FILE
1st meeting of the CIOMS Working Group XI, 19 April 2018
Presentation transcript:

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) New system for Research Ethics Committees Sure Start – April 2004 Joan Kirkbride OREC Manager for North East/North West Central Office for Research Ethics Committees

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Driver for change: EU Directive on Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials /20/EC EU Directive on Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials /20/EC National Standards/Systems National Standards/Systems National Application Form National Application Form Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedures Standard Letters Standard Letters

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) EU Directive requires: Before a clinical trial of IMP commences all studies must be approved by a research ethics committee (REC) Before a clinical trial of IMP commences all studies must be approved by a research ethics committee (REC) One single ethical opinion for UK One single ethical opinion for UK RECs must reach a decision within 60 days RECs must reach a decision within 60 days RECs permitted only one set of questions RECs permitted only one set of questions

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) GAfREC Ethical approval is required for research studies which include: Patients & users of the NHS Patients & users of the NHS Relatives/carers of NHS patients Relatives/carers of NHS patients Access to data, organs, and other bodily material past & present Access to data, organs, and other bodily material past & present Fetal material Fetal material Recently dead in NHS premises Recently dead in NHS premises Use or access to NHS premises, and Use or access to NHS premises, and NHS staff as subjects NHS staff as subjects

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Research: Ethical Approval - YES Key Question: Key Question: About generalisable new knowledge - “what is the best thing to do” About generalisable new knowledge - “what is the best thing to do” Method: Method: Experiments involving drugs, new technology trials or new service delivery Experiments involving drugs, new technology trials or new service delivery Qualitative investigations such as interviews, focus groups or observation Qualitative investigations such as interviews, focus groups or observation Novel analysis of routine data Novel analysis of routine data

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Research: Staff involved might include: Staff involved might include: Local researchers. Local researchers. External researchers/organisations External researchers/organisations Subjects might be: Subjects might be: Patients (or their rcords), carers, staff, healthy volunteers Patients (or their rcords), carers, staff, healthy volunteers

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Quality improvement/Service evaluation: Ethical Approval - MAYBE Key Question: Key Question: Less generalisable – more developmental issues specific to locality/area of work Less generalisable – more developmental issues specific to locality/area of work Method: Method: Introduction of new service with formal review Introduction of new service with formal review Needs assessment Needs assessment Market research Market research

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Research: Staff involved might include: Staff involved might include: Local staff Local staff External organisations External organisations Subjects might be: Subjects might be: Patients, users, carers, staff, general public, external organisations Patients, users, carers, staff, general public, external organisations

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) MAYBE: Contact the REC Contact the REC Make a phone call Make a phone call Send an Send an Write a letter Write a letter

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Audit - No Archive – Newsletter – December 2000 Archive – Newsletter – December 2000

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Changes in terminology: Definitions: Site Domain Chief Investigator Principal Investigator Terminology Ethical review by a Main REC Site Specific Assessment Host R&D Management permission

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Electronic application form: New form is web-based – go to New form is web-based – go to No need to down-load form, complete online No need to down-load form, complete online Facility to print out and form to others before submission Facility to print out and form to others before submission Section D for R&D will still exist for those Trusts who wish to use it Section D for R&D will still exist for those Trusts who wish to use it

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Electronic application form Those who do not have good web access can down-load stand-alone form with form-filler software from COREC site now Those who do not have good web access can down-load stand-alone form with form-filler software from COREC site now Stand-alone form will also be available on disc from administrators Stand-alone form will also be available on disc from administrators

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Electronic Form - structure Sections A&B – ethical review Section C – site specific assessment Section D– R&D management approval (optional)

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) How to apply: All studies must be booked in advance by telephone when an agenda slot will be allocated and a reference number will be given All studies must be booked in advance by telephone when an agenda slot will be allocated and a reference number will be given All applications must be made using the new COREC form, this will be compulsory All applications must be made using the new COREC form, this will be compulsory

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Clinical trial of a medicinal product Study taking place in more than one domain Multisite within one single domain Single site study Central allocation system Local REC YES NO YES

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Where to apply after 1 st March 2004? All clinical trials with medicinal products have to go to a ‘recognised’ REC - even single site studies All clinical trials with medicinal products have to go to a ‘recognised’ REC - even single site studies All clinical trials with medicinal products have to be booked in through our central booking system in London All clinical trials with medicinal products have to be booked in through our central booking system in London

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Where to apply: All other multisite studies which take place in more than one domain also have to go to a ‘recognised’ REC via our central booking system All other multisite studies which take place in more than one domain also have to go to a ‘recognised’ REC via our central booking system Multisite studies within one single domain can go to any LREC in that area Multisite studies within one single domain can go to any LREC in that area Single site studies excluding all clinical trials of medicinal products can go to their nearest REC Single site studies excluding all clinical trials of medicinal products can go to their nearest REC

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) After March 2004: Multicentre Research Ethics Committees (MRECs) Multicentre Research Ethics Committees (MRECs) ‘Recognised’ RECs ‘Recognised’ RECs ‘Authorised’ RECs ‘Authorised’ RECs

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Validation criteria: Official current application form Official current application form Plus supporting documentation Plus supporting documentation Application complete Application complete Funding where applicable Funding where applicable Dates and version numbers Dates and version numbers signatures signatures

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Interface between R&D and Ethics Initial registration with R&D Peer review Submission to REC Indemnity Approval from REC Final approval from R&D

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) New system – in parallel 2+ sites MREC LREC 60 day limit 30 day limit

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) LRECs - Site specific assessment Suitability of the local researcher Appropriateness of the local research environment and facilities Specific issues relating to the local community

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Decision Making Process Favourable Opinion Favourable Opinion Unfavourable Opinion Unfavourable Opinion Provisional Decision Provisional Decision

Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Any questions? Central Allocation system tel: See website for uptdate information Joan Kirkbride