Modern Management of Cholesterol in the High-Risk Patient.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atorvastatin in Type 2 diabetics on dialysis: 4D Study 1255 T2DM patients on dialysis for 8.3 mo; 29% with prior MI or revascularization or CHD; 35% CHF;
Advertisements

Coronary heart disease (CHD) event rates in secondary prevention and acute coronary syndrome trials A. Kumar, C.P. Cannon. Arch Med Sci 2007;3:S115-S125.
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Aggressive Hyperglycemia Management. Significant hospital hyperglycemia requires close follow-up Previously diagnosed diabetes and elevated A1C Without.
BLOOD PRESSURE LOWERING. UKPDS design Aim To determine whether intensified blood glucose control, with either sulphonylurea or insulin, reduces the risk.
Lipid Disorders and Management in Diabetes
Clinical Trials of Lipid Therapy in Diabetic Subjects (subgroup analysis) Haffner Diabetes Care; 1: 1998 StudyjournalNLDL-CBaselineCHD loweringLDL-Creduction.
Slide Source LipidsOnline CO O C CH 3 COOCH CH 3 Cl CH 3 OC COOC 2 H 5 CH 3 Cl CH 3 OCH 2 CH 3 COOH CH 3 C Fenofibrate Clofibrate.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT): Design Cannon CP.
Prescribing Information is available at the end of this presentation NHS Surrey Lipid Guidelines Dr Adam Jacques Ashford & St.
Benefits of intensive multiple risk factor intervention.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Cholesterol quintile (mg/dL)
Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with Hypercholesterolemia James Shepherd, M.D., Stuart M. Cobbe, M.D., Ian Ford, Ph.D., Christopher.
IHS SDPI COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM CVD RISK REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE? HOW ARE WE DOING? HOW CAN WE DO BETTER? Karl Hammermeister,
Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.
TM © 1999 Professional Postgraduate Services ® Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology Clinical Trials Management Nathan Wong.
TC LDL- C HDL- C Nonfatal MI/CHD death CHD death All- cause mortality *As compared to placebo. † P= CARE: Effect of Lipid Lowering on Lipid Values.
VBWG IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study.
Minimally Invasive Surgery Symposium Modest Weight Loss in T2 DM: Lessons from the Look AHEAD Trial Donna H. Ryan, MD Pennington Biomedical Research Center.
HYPERLIPIDAEMIA. 4S 4444 patients –Hx angina or MI –Cholesterol Simvastatin 20mg (10-40) vs. placebo FU 5 years  total cholesterol 25%;  LDL.
William B. Kannel, MD, FACC Former Director, Framingham Heart Study
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
Hypertension the Community - Overview HYPERTENSION IN THE COMMUNITY: OVERVIEW.
TM © 1999 Professional Postgraduate Services ® Diabetic Dyslipidemia.
Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes in Hispanics: implications on Cardiovascular Disease 2011 Eduardo de Marchena M.D., F.A.C.C., F.A.C.P. Professor.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
VBWG HPS. Lancet. 2003;361: Gæde P et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: Recent statin trials: Reduction in primary outcome in patients with diabetes.
The concept of Diabetes & CV risk: A lifetime risk challenge The Clinical Significance of LDL-Cholesterol: No Longer a Hypothesis? John J.P. Kastelein,
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) Type 2 diabetes mellitus Men and women.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
The Renin-Angiotensin- Aldosterone System: Linking New Data and Mechanisms for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction VBWG.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
AA-2-1 Jerome D. Cohen, MD, FACC, FACP Professor of Internal Medicine / Cardiology Director, Preventive Cardiology Programs St. Louis University Health.
LIPID: Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease Purpose To determine whether pravastatin will reduce coronary mortality and morbidity.
Diabetes... Common and underdiagnosed Causes macro- and microvascular events Reduces duration and quality of life.
SPARCL – Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Jim McMorran Coventry GP GP with Specialist Interest in Diabetes and.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Impact of Diabetes on Cardiovascular Risk C.Richard Conti M.D. MACC Oct 16,2004 GWICC Beijing, PRC.
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Part 3. Diabetes Report Card: HbA 1c Levels in the United States Hoerger TJ, et al. Diabetes Care. 2008;31: Patients (%) HbA 1c (%)
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
Over Time Additional Risk Factors Can Progress: Effect of Cholesterol and BP on CHD Risk in MRFIT Trial
HEARTS & MINDS Lowering Cholesterol with Plant Stanol Ester Opening Remarks Herbert Schuster, M.D., Ph.D. Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Blood Pressure and Lipid Trials: Rationale, Importance and Design
Title slide.
Reducing Adverse Outcomes after ACS in Patients with Diabetes Goals
Triglycerides Cholesterol HDL-C or N NIDDM N or or N IDDM.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
Triglycerides Cholesterol HDL-C or N NIDDM N or or N IDDM.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk Epidemiological evidence
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk
AIM-HIGH Niacin Plus Statin to Prevent Vascular Events
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Potential mechanisms whereby statins may reduce the risk of stroke
LDL - How low can you go? Terry Jacobsen, MD
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Presentation transcript:

Modern Management of Cholesterol in the High-Risk Patient

Overview Presentation Who are at risk Who are at risk –Secondary prevention –Primary prevention - Diabetes Mellitus type 2 Lowering Cholesterol Lowering Cholesterol –Secondary prevention –Primary prevention Beyond cholesterol lowering Beyond cholesterol lowering How low should we go How low should we go Guidelines Guidelines

Priorities for Lipid lowering Secondary prevention Secondary prevention Patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 Patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 Patients with genetic dyslipidemia's Patients with genetic dyslipidemia's Patients with multiple risk factors Patients with multiple risk factors

SECONDARY PREVENTION

Consequences of CHD 50 % of all MI’s in patients with previous MI 70 % of all fatal MI’s in patients with previous MI 4 -7 x increased risk of MI compared to people without CHD

Mortality in Hypercholesterolemic Men With CHD LDL cholesterol level Deaths per 1000 person-years 25 X 12 X CHD >160 mg/dl (4.1 mmol/l) CHD <130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/l) 1.64 No CHD <130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/l) 0.77 TikkanenJ. et al. N Engl J Med 1990:322(24):

( ) 180 (4.6) ( ) 204 (5.2) >218 (5.6) 245 (6.3) <167 (4.2) 149 (3.7) Serum cholesterol mg/dl (mmol/l) RangeMean Cumulative incidence of AMI per 100,000 screened subjects in 3 yr MenWomen Cholesterol/AMI Link in Low TC Population Wakugami K., et al. Jpn Cir J. 1998;52:7-14

PRIMARY PREVENTION

Diabetes Mellitus type 2

‘With an excess of fat diabetes begins and from an excess of fat diabetics die…’ Elliott P. Joslin MD 1927

National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes in America. 2nd ed. NIH;1995. Atherosclerosis in Diabetes ~80% of all diabetic mortality ~80% of all diabetic mortality –75% from coronary atherosclerosis –25% from cerebral or peripheral vascular disease >75% of all hospitalizations for diabetic complications >75% of all hospitalizations for diabetic complications >50% of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes have CHD >50% of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes have CHD

menwomen Framingham study: DM type 2 and cardiovascular mortality Annual cardiovascular mortality per 1000 persons DM+ Kannel et al, JAMA 241: DM -

MRFIT: DM type 2 and CVD mortality Stamler J et al. Diabetes Care 16(2): , <  7.3 mmol/l CV mortality per person years Diabetes No diabetes total cholesterol

UKPDS BMJ 1998 Impact of CHD Risk Factors in Patients with DM type 2 % risk increase % risk increase HbA 1C per 1 %+11 Systolic blood pressure per 10 mm Hg.+15 HDL-cholesterol per 0.1 mmol/l -15 LDL-cholesterol per 1 mmol/l+57

8 year CV mortality in Finnish DM (n=1059) and non-DM (n=1378) subjects following MI non DM DM MI +MI - MI + MI - non DM DM MI +MI - MI + MI - CV events (%) Strokes (%) Haffner et. al. NEJM July (Vol 339: )

Kannel WB. Am Heart J. 1985;110: Abbott RD et al. JAMA. 1988;260: Women, Diabetes, and CHD Diabetic women are at high risk for CHD Diabetic women are at high risk for CHD Diabetes eliminates relative cardioprotective effect of being premenopausal Diabetes eliminates relative cardioprotective effect of being premenopausal –risk of recurrent MI in diabetic women is three times that of nondiabetic women Age-adjusted mean time to recurrent MI or fatal CHD event is 5.1 yr for diabetic women vs 8.1 yr for nondiabetic women Age-adjusted mean time to recurrent MI or fatal CHD event is 5.1 yr for diabetic women vs 8.1 yr for nondiabetic women

Diabetes Mellitus and Reduction of CHD in the US individuals (670 DM+) Age: 35 – 74 years 9 year follow-up individuals (637 DM+) Age: 35 – 74 years 8 year follow-up K. Gu, et al. JAMA 1999; 281:1291

Overview Presentation Who are at risk Who are at risk –Secondary prevention –Primary prevention - Diabetes Mellitus type 2 Lowering Cholesterol Lowering Cholesterol –Secondary prevention –Primary prevention Beyond cholesterol lowering Beyond cholesterol lowering How low should we go How low should we go Guidelines Guidelines

/ Placebo MI rate per 100 subjects per 5 years WOS : NEJM 1995; 333 : CARE : NEJM 1996; 335 : LIPID : NEJM 1998; 339: S : Lancet 1994; 344 : TexCAPS: JAMA 1998; 279: Major HMG-CoA Trials CAREn=4,159 TC 5.4 mmol/l LIPIDn=9,014 TC 5.6 mmol/l WOS n=6,595 TC 7.0 mmol/l 4Sn=4,444 TC 6.8 mmol/l With CHD + high cholesterol With CHD + normal cholesterol Without CHD + high cholesterol TexCAPS n=6,605 TC 5.7 mmol/l Without CHD + low HDL

‘Numbers Needed to Treat’ Major Coronary Events (MACE) LDL cholesterol Low High 4-S nnt 13 LIPID nnt 26 CARE nnt 33 AFCAPS nnt 59 WOS nnt 43

*p=0.048 vs an adjusted significance level of p=0.045 atorvastatin vs angioplasty/UC. % of patients with an ischemic event 13% 21% -36% difference * (p = 0.048) Ischemic Events n = 22 of 164n = 37 of 177 Pitt B et al. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:70-76.

months>6-18 months % of patients with an ischemic event Atorvastatin 7% 6% Angioplasty/UC 10% 11% Pitt B et al. N Engl J Med. 1999;341: % difference 24% difference AVERT: Incidence of First Ischemic Event by Time

p=0.027 Cumulative incidence (%) Time since randomization (months) Time to First Ischemic Event Data on file. Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ, Study Atorvastatin (n=164) Angioplasty/UC (n=177)

Acute coronary event WOSCOPSAFCAPS Primary preventionSecondary prevention 03 m6 m9 m1 y2 y3 y4 y 03 m6 m9 m1 y2 y3 y4 y 4 S CARE LIPID MIRACL : unstable a.p. and non-Q infarct FLORIDA: AMI ( ischemie) A-Z: standard vs. aggressive care Start of Statin Therapy in Secondary Prevention

Ischaemic Stroke placebotreated reduction Primary prevention Woscop514610% Secondary prevention CARE785431% 4S987030% Hebert et al JAMA 1997; 278: Ischaemic Stroke Reduction in Statin Trials

Crouse JR et al. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157: *P= † 95% confidence interval of percentage of relative reduction. Effects of Statins on Stroke Events: A Meta-analysis of Primary- and Secondary-Prevention Trials Relative reduction in rates (%) 1° Prevention (-42 to -27) † 2° Prevention (13-45) † Combined (11-40) †

0 1 Cholesterol Reduction and Stroke Pre Statin Trials ( ) Intervention Cholestyramine Niacin Diet Gemfibrozil Clofibrate and Niacin Clofibrate Multiple Summary Odds ratio (N) Fatal Stroke - Clofibrate (3) Fatal Stroke - Other (11) Fatal Stroke - All (13) Total Stroke All Odds Ratio of Stroke Cholesterol Reduction and the Risk for Stroke in Men. David Atkins et al. Ann. Intern. Med. 1993;119: