4/29/021 CAA REGULATIONS  IMPACTS ON MSW LANDFILL DEVELOPMENTS

4/29/022 FOCUS  LFG ENERGY RECOVERY  BIOREACTOR LANDFILL DEVELOPMENT

4/29/023 LFG ENERGY RECOVERY SCOPE  >325 LFG PROJECTS IN U.S.  > 60 UNDER CONSTRUCTION  > 150 ADDITIONAL CANDIDATES  ELECTRICITY, DIRECT USE, ALTERNATIVE FUELS

4/29/024 BENEFITS  POLLUTION CONTROL  CCG REDUCTION  FOSSIL FUEL OFFSETS  WASTE SERVICE ECONOMICS  COMMON SENSE RESOURCE RECOVERY

4/29/025 BUSINESS STRUCTURES  ON-SITE CAPTIVE FACILITY  ON-SITE 3 RD PARTY*  OFF-SITE 3 RD PARTY* * TAX INCENTIVE

4/29/026 CRITICAL INCENTIVES  TAX CREDITS  GREEN POWER, RENEWABLE RESOURCE INITIATIVES  REASONABLE REGULATORY BURDEN

4/29/027 REGULATORY INCENTIVES  FEASIBLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY  CLARITY  PERMITTING AND LIABILITY (3 RD PARTY ARRANGEMENTS)

4/29/028 LFG ENERGY RECOVERY EMERGING PROBLEMS  STATE TITLE V (PERMITTING) IMPLEMENTATION  TREATMENT DEFINITION  LIABILITY  CONFUSION & PROJECT DELAYS

4/29/029 APPEAL TO EPA  REGULATORY ISSUES WERE CREATING CONFLICT WITH LONG-STANDING EPA PROMOTION OF LFG RECOVERY PROJECTS AND THE PRESIDENT’S AND ADMINISTRATORS RESTATEMENT OF THEIR COMMITMENT TO THE ISSUE.

4/29/0210 VALUE OF EPA ACTION  CLARIFY GAS TREATMENT DEFINITION > EXEMPTION  DELINEATE LIABILTY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR 3 RD PARTY PROJECTS

4/29/0211 BIOREACTOR LF DEVELOPMENT  > DOZEN PROJECTS IN U.S.  EPA R&D AMENDMENTS WILL ACCELERATE DEVELOPMENT  BY 2010, 1/3 OR MORE OF MAJOR LFs OPERATING AS BIOREACTORS

4/29/0212 BIOREACTOR TECHNOLOGY  WET THE WASTE  ENHANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS  ACCELERATE LFG PRODUCTION

4/29/0213 BLF INCENTIVES  LF ECONOMICS  ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS  REASONABLE REGULATORY BURDENS

4/29/0214 BIOREACCTOR LF VALUE OF EPA ACTION  CLARIFY NSPS/MACT REQUIREMENTS, BLF DEFINITION  ADDRESS CHANGES TO GAS GENERATION SCENARIO  ISSUES – DEFINITION, START-UP SCHEDULES

4/29/0215 CONCLUSION  EPA RULE CHANGES BRING MUCH NEEDED CLARITY TO REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR BENEFICIAL LANDFILL TECHNOLOGIES.

4/29/0216