School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: (Re)Overview George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustained Implementation of School-wide PBIS for All Students George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
Advertisements

Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007
Issues and Challenges in School-wide Prevention Carl Liaupsin University of Arizona pbisaz.org (with support and material from the National Technical Assistance.
Aligning Resource for School Improvement: Getting Everyone on Same Page George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
School Discipline & Classroom Management: Role of School Leadership George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of CT & OR
CT SWPBS: Coaching George Sugai Brandi Simonsen OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut March 28, 2007
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPBS: Implementing with Accuracy & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut May.
PBIS (Positive Behavior Intervention System) “Husky Pride”
General Session School-wide Reform Mary Kealy & George Sugai Loudoun Cty P.S., VA OSEP Center on PBIS July 20,
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Year One RI PBIS Team & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut March 10,
Getting Started: PBIS Overview Steve Wagner Day 1 Aug Megan Pederson Charlie Eisenreich.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Overview George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut May.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Overview George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut May.
PBIS Universal Level Reinvigorating Tier One Implementation VTPBiS Leadership Forum October 7, 2014.
Creating Positive Futures: Role of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Students: Coaching Implementation George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
SWPBS Coaching: More than Reminders Donald H. Eichhorn Middle School Team & Coaches George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education &
Sustained Implementation of School-wide PBIS for All Students George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Overview George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut February.
Review of School-wide Positive Behavior Support Maryland PBIS Summer Institute July 13,2004 Teri Lewis-Palmer.
Positive Behavior Intervention and Support: RtI for Behavior Jim Artesani, Ed.D. University of Maine College of Education & Human Development
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Updates & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Bridging Primary & Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems: Responding to Unresponsive Behavior Brandi Simonsen & George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Discipline & Beyond George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Follow-up Jon Dyson, Lavonne Nkomo, George Sugai Center on Disabilities University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Lou DeLoreto E.O. Smith High School George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Developing & Implementing a State Plan George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October 9,
Sustaining Systems Level Implementation of SWPBS: Lessons Being Learned George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education &
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Overview for Leadership George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut Oct 12,
Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Plants, Camps, Special Education, & Prevention Science George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut.
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Evolution of RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut January 23,
SWPBS & RtI for All George Sugai University of Connecticut OSEP Center on PBIS September 24, 2008
SWPBS: Readiness & Commitment George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut June 6,
Positive Behavior Support: Beyond Discipline George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
SWPBS: Establishing District & Community Capacity (Beyond Classroom Management) Carl Cole & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
Kayla Locklear- Behavioral Specialist Leon Maynor – Behavioral Specialist SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: DISCIPLINE & BEYOND.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Getting Started George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut April 6,
Reaching All Students: RtI & SWPBS
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Presentation transcript:

School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: (Re)Overview George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut September

Getting Tough Teaching to Corner Applied Challenge: Academic & behavior success (failure) are linked!

PURPOSE Provide (re)overview of school- wide positive behavior supports (aka PBIS) to determine implementation status Rationale Features Examples & Data

Predictable work environments are places where employees (Buckingham & Coffman 2002, Gallup) 1. Know what is expected 2. Have materials & equipment to do job correctly 3. Receive recognition each week for good work. 4. Have supervisor who cares, & pays attention 5. Receive encouragement to contribute & improve 6. Can identify person at work who is “best friend.” 7. Feel mission of organization makes them feel like their jobs are important 8. See people around them committed to doing good job 9. Feel like they are learning new things (getting better) 10. Have opportunity to do their job well. 1 million workers, 80,000 managers, 400 companies

Predictable work environments are places where educators, students, family members, etc…. 1. Know what is expected 2. Have curriculum & instruction to do job correctly 3. Receive recognition for demonstrating expectations. 4. Have teacher/parent/principal who cares, & pays attention 5. Receive encouragement to contribute & improve 6. Can identify someone who they can relate to.” 7. Feel mission of classroom/school makes them feel like their efforts are important 8. See students/teachers/principals around them committed to doing good job 9. Feel like they are learning new things (getting better) 10. Have opportunity to do their learning/teaching well. 1 million workers, 80,000 managers, 400 companies

SWPBS Logic! Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, and durable for all students (Zins & Ponti, 1990)

Rationale

Worry #1 “Teaching” by Getting Tough Runyon: “I hate this f____ing school, & you’re a dumbf_____.” Teacher: “ That is disrespectful language. I’m sending you to the office so you’ll learn never to say those words again….starting now!”

Immediate & seductive solution….”Get Tough!” Clamp down & increase monitoring Re-re-re-review rules Extend continuum & consistency of consequences Establish “bottom line”... Predictable individual response

Reactive responses are predictable…. When we experience aversive situation, we want select interventions that produce immediate relief –Remove student –Remove ourselves –Modify physical environment –Assign responsibility for change to student &/or others

When behavior doesn’t improve, we “Get Tougher!” Zero tolerance policies Increased surveillance Increased suspension & expulsion In-service training by expert Alternative programming …..Predictable systems response !

Erroneous assumption that student… Is inherently “bad” Will learn more appropriate behavior through increased use of “aversives” Will be better tomorrow…….

But….false sense of safety/security! Fosters environments of control Triggers & reinforces antisocial behavior Shifts accountability away from school Devalues child-adult relationship Weakens relationship between academic & social behavior programming

Science of behavior has taught us that students…. Are NOT born with “bad behaviors” Do NOT learn when presented contingent aversive consequences …….. Do learn better ways of behaving by being taught directly & receiving positive feedback

VIOLENCE PREVENTION Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) White House Conference on School Violence (2006)

SWPBS is about….

Worry #2: “Train & Hope” REACT to Problem Behavior REACT to Problem Behavior Select & ADD Practice Select & ADD Practice Hire EXPERT to Train Practice Hire EXPERT to Train Practice WAIT for New Problem WAIT for New Problem Expect, But HOPE for Implementation Expect, But HOPE for Implementation

SWPBS is

Features

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making Integrated Elements

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ALL SOME FEW

RtI Aka SRBI

Responsiveness to Intervention

1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Responsiveness to Intervention Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems Circa 1996

RTI Integrated Continuum Mar Academic Continuum Behavior Continuum

All Some Few RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Dec 7, 2007

RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Dec 7, 2007 Science Soc Studies Reading Math Soc skills Basketball Spanish Label behavior…not people

RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Dec 7, 2007 Prob Sol. Coop play Adult rel. Anger man. Attend. Peer interac Ind. play Label behavior…not people

~80% of Students ~15% ~5% ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound Person-centered planning PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Positive reinforcement Effective instruction Parent engagement SECONDARY PREVENTION TERTIARY PREVENTION PRIMARY PREVENTION

Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 31(6), “Is SWPBS evidence- based practice?”

Classroom SWPBS Practices Non-classroom Family Student School-wide Smallest # Evidence-based Biggest, durable effect

SCHOOL-WIDE 1.1. Leadership team 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation EVIDENCE- BASED INTERVENTION PRACTICES CLASSROOM 1.All school-wide 2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment 3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. 4.Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidence- based instructional curriculum & practices 5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior. 6.Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior. INDIVIDUAL STUDENT 1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels 2.Function-based behavior support planning 3.Team- & data-based decision making 4.Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes 5.Targeted social skills & self-management instruction 6. Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations NONCLASSROOM 1.Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged 2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, move, interact) 3.Precorrections & reminders 4.Positive reinforcement FAMILY ENGAGEMENT 1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all families 2.Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements 3.Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner 4.Access to system of integrated school & community resources

1.Leadership team 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation School-wide

All school-wide Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidence-based instructional curriculum & practices Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior, including contingent & specific praise, group contingencies, behavior contracts, token economies Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior, including specific, contingent, brief corrections for academic & social behavior errors, differential reinforcement of other behavior, planned ignoring, response cost, & timeout. Classroom

Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged Active supervision by all staff –Scan, move, interact Precorrections & reminders Positive reinforcement Non-classroom

“Good morning, class!” Teachers report that when students are greeted by an adult in morning, it takes less time to complete morning routines & get first lesson started.

Behavioral competence at school & district levels Function-based behavior support planning Team- & data-based decision making Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes Targeted social skills & self-management instruction Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations Individual Student

Continuum of positive behavior support for all families Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner Access to system of integrated school & community resources Family

1.Leadership team 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation School-wide

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: “Getting Started”

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Readiness agreements, prioritization, & investments 3-4 year implementation commitment Local capacity for training, coordination, coaching, & evaluation Systems for implementation integrity

Behavioral Capacity Priority & Status Data-based Decision Making Communications Administrator Team Administrator Specialized Support Student Community Non-Teaching Teaching Family Representation Start with Team that “Works.” Team-led Process

Initiative, Project, Committee PurposeOutcomeTarget Group Staff Involved SIP/SID/e tc Attendance Committee Character Education Safety Committee School Spirit Committee Discipline Committee DARE Committee EBS Work Group Working Smarter

Initiative, Committee PurposeOutcomeTarget Group Staff Involved SIP/SID Attendance Committee Increase attendance Increase % of students attending daily All studentsEric, Ellen, Marlee Goal #2 Character Education Improve character All studentsMarlee, J.S., Ellen Goal #3 Safety Committee Improve safetyPredictable response to threat/crisis Dangerous students Has not metGoal #3 School Spirit Committee Enhance school spirit Improve moraleAll studentsHas not met Discipline Committee Improve behaviorDecrease office referrals Bullies, antisocial students, repeat offenders Ellen, Eric, Marlee, Otis Goal #3 DARE Committee Prevent drug useHigh/at-risk drug users Don EBS Work GroupImplement 3-tier model Decrease office referrals, increase attendance, enhance academic engagement, improve grades All studentsEric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, Emma Goal #2 Goal #3 Sample Teaming Matrix Are outcomes measurable?

3-4 Year Commitment Top 3 School- Wide Initiatives Coaching & Facilitation Dedicated Resources & Time Administrative Participation 3-Tiered Prevention Logic Agreements & Supports Statement of Behavior Purpose

Self-Assessment Efficient Systems of Data Management Team-based Decision Making Evidence- Based Practices Multiple Systems Existing Discipline Data Data-based Action Plan SWIS

Avg Ref/Day/Month

Office Discipline Referrals Definition –Kid-Teacher-Administrator interaction –Underestimation of actual behavior Improving usefulness & value –Clear, mutually exclusive, exhaustive definitions –Distinction between office v. classroom managed –Continuum of behavior support –Positive school-wide foundations –W/in school comparisons

# Ref by Problem

# Ref by Location

# Ref by Time of Day

# Ref by Students How long would it take to answer big 5 SW discipline questions in your school? 1.How many? 2.What? 3.Where? 4.When? 5.Who?

Examples

Emphasizing & Teaching Positive Expectations

Teaching Matrix SETTING All Settings HallwaysPlaygroundsCafeteria Library/ Compute r Lab AssemblyBus Respect Ourselves Be on task. Give your best effort. Be prepared. Walk.Have a plan. Eat all your food. Select healthy foods. Study, read, compute. Sit in one spot. Watch for your stop. Respect Others Be kind. Hands/feet to self. Help/share with others. Use normal voice volume. Walk to right. Play safe. Include others. Share equipment. Practice good table manners Whisper. Return books. Listen/watch. Use appropriate applause. Use a quiet voice. Stay in your seat. Respect Property Recycle. Clean up after self. Pick up litter. Maintain physical space. Use equipment properly. Put litter in garbage can. Replace trays & utensils. Clean up eating area. Push in chairs. Treat books carefully. Pick up. Treat chairs appropriately. Wipe your feet. Sit appropriately. Expectations 1. SOCIAL SKILL 2. NATURAL CONTEXT 3. BEHAVIOR EXAMPLES

Acknowledge & Recognize

Data & Outcomes

4 Main Data Concerns

Measurable & justifiable outcomes On-going data-based decision making Evidence-based practices Systems ensuring durable, high fidelity of implementation PBIS Messages

Effective Social & Academic School Culture Common Vision/Values Common Language Common Experience RtI/ SWPBS

YEAR 1 OUTCOME OBJECTIVES Establish leadership team Establish staff agreements Build working knowledge & foundations of SW-PBS practices & systems Develop & begin implementation of individualized action plan for SW- PBS