Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Monitoring Watershed Restoration Effectiveness Nez Perce Tribe DFRM-Watershed Division Rebecca A. Lloyd, Project Leader.

Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.

Data Management Projects Data Management Framework Subcommittee Update June 19, 2007.

Data Management in Support of the Fish & Wildlife Program Summary.

1.A standardized format that identifies the types of information required or allowed in a particular document or exchange. 2.Data exchange templates contain.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.

Northwest Habitat Institute Interactive Habitat and Biodiversity Information System (IBIS) for the Columbia River Basin.

Integrated Justice Information Sharing Illinois Integrated Justice Information System Implementation Board Meeting August 14, 2003.

Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services

Data Sharing Across Agencies: A guide to getting on the same page Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation to Oregon Chapter,

Bi-National Review: Gulf of Maine Monitoring & indicators to address management issues NWQMC – July 26, 2005.

Metadata Tool Proposals PNAMP Meeting Wednesday, December 15 th 2010.

Centro Internacional para Estudios del Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo Sostenible CIEMADeS Centro Internacional para Estudios del Medioambiente y el Desarrollo.

New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.

Basic guidelines for the creation of a DW Create corporate sponsors and plan thoroughly Determine a scalable architectural framework for the DW Identify.

Lesson-10 Information System Building Blocks(2)

PNAMP Aquatic Monitoring Activity Survey and Inventory Pilot Project Review By PNAMP Inventory Subcommittee Russell Scranton & Jen Bayer.

Quality Manual for Interoperability Testing Morten Bruun-Rasmussen Presented by Jos Devlies, Eurorec.

National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.

NGAC Interagency Data Sharing and Collaboration Spotlight Session: Best Practices and Lessons Learned Robert F. Austin, PhD, GISP Washington, DC March.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Agenda item 3.3 INIS IT developments 13th INIS/ETDE Joint Technical Committee Meeting October 2011, Vienna,

Recent Events in Water Law and Policy in the United States Portion of the Columbia Basin The Federal Columbia River Power System: Pacific Salmon and the.

Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) A Presentation for: Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Anadromous Fish Advisory Committee.

8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Trade Software Developer Technical Seminar Document Imaging System March 7, 2012.

California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Data Management Systems Cassandra Lamerdin SWAMP Data Management Team Marine Pollution Studies Laboratory.

StreamNet Project Overview for Data Management Category Review Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presented to: NPCC Independent.

Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members in Alaska’s Commercial Fisheries Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members.

1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Dr. David Mowat June 22, 2005 Federal, Provincial & Local Roles Surveillance of Risk Factors and Determinants of Chronic Diseases.

PNAMP Mission Statement PNAMP provides a forum to enhance the capacity of multiple entities to collaborate to produce an effective and comprehensive network.

Lesley Rickards MEDIN Core Team European initiatives and how MEDIN and the data in the framework relates to them.

REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.

Microsoft Operations Framework Morten Lauridsen Engagement Manager Microsoft Consulting Services Morten Lauridsen Engagement Manager.

Common PSMFC “data use agreement or policy” Overview of current data sharing in PTAGIS, RMIS, StreamNet.

FEA DRM Management Strategy Presented by : Mary McCaffery, US EPA.

Implementing air quality e-Reporting Data deliverables in 2013 and 2014 and the process of reporting Tony Bush ETC/ACM AQ e-Reporting task leader 18th.

EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.

National Monitoring Network Report Methods and Data Comparability Chapter 5 Outline National Monitoring Council Meeting April 12-14, 2005.

Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,

Development of Fish and Wildlife Program Amendments.

Pilot Census in Poland Some Quality Aspects Geneva, 7-9 July 2010 Janusz Dygaszewicz Central Statistical Office POLAND.

Columbia River Basin Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Reporting (MERR) Plan DRAFT Nancy Leonard Fish, Wildlife, Ecosystem Monitoring and Evaluation.

BPA F&W Program Data Management Needs for Monitoring Support and Coordination Coordinated Assessments Workshop, 2011.

New England Vocational Rehabilitation Quality Assurance System

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Technology Exchange Meetings Steve Rentmeester, Environmental Data Services Sean Quigely, Pacific.

Fourth IABIN Council Meeting Support to Building the Inter-American Biodiversity Information Network.

Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.

What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.

Main tasks of system analysis ? 1-study exit=sting information system 2-identify problem 3-spelify system requirement 4-asalysis decision ========= How.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

RTT Analysis Workshop Synthesis: Data Gaps and Research Needs (Chapter 5) Presented by Keely Murdoch MaDMC Chair Yakama Nation.

SUSTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL (SEC) INITIATIVE Providing resources for applying ecosystem services in public land & water management.

Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.

Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Data Stewardship and Data Standards Practices Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Prepared for: USBR Tech Transfer Meeting Jennifer.

Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

© 2016 Chapter 6 Data Management Health Information Management Technology: An Applied Approach.

BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.

Part 1: Practical steps for NiD integration into WISE

Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Concept and state-of-play

Generic Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM)

Cynthia Curry, Director National AEM Center

Presentation transcript:

Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation to Northwest Power and Conservation Council July14, 2009 White Paper:

There’s been talk of a regional data delivery system… 2000 BiOp RPA Council Contract with SAIC CBCIS / NED 2008 BiOp RPA Col. Basin Data Center Fish and Wildlife Program So why isn’t there one? NOAA Guidance

Need for Shared Data Legal: Remand, US v OR, PST, etc. ESA Recovery Planning Coordinated Monitoring, PNAMP Population Assessments (VSP) Inter-jurisdictional Management Co- management High Level Indicators, SOTR Many Programs Cross Jurisdictions BiOp Compliance, Listing Decisions

Current data delivery status: Existing database projects – Focused StreamNet Pacific Northwest Water Quality Data Exchange Fish Passage Center PTAGIS, RMIS, PACFIN, RECFIN IBIS (wildlife data) Proposals – Comprehensive, but not built SAIC / CBCIS 2000 BiOp RPA 198 Columbia Basin Data Center Efforts started – Not complete NED / PNAMP (NED Portal, ISTM) Columbia Basin Center of Knowledge (Canadian & US data)

Existing database projects Data sources: Agencies / Tribes / Projects db SOTRPopulation models Population AssessmentsSubbasin planning PlanningHLIs ManagementPublic, etc. db ???? Output Tool Regional Data Access DB Project

Data sources: field offices, research projects, etc. Database Project Agency Database Smooth, organized v. current inefficient approach

Most efficient – start with existing projects: Fish db … Multiple types of data from multiple sources db Hab. db db Output Tool Regional Data Access Water dd Pacific Northwest Water Quality Data Exchange

Improve from there: db … Multiple types of data from multiple sources, standardized by data type WaterHabitatFish db Habitat db Output Tool Regional Data Access dd db

The essential driver of a comprehensive data delivery system: db … Multiple types of data from multiple sources, standardized by data type WaterHabitatFish db Habitat db Output Tool Regional Data Access dd db Data flow can be automated

Automation is the key! Efficiency, Speed Accuracy Automatic data updates Canned products Translation to regional format Essential for any database technology

Continue to evolve: … Multiple types of data from multiple sources, standardized by data type WaterHabitatFish db Output Tool Regional Data Access standardsStandards

The ultimate endpoint?? … Multiple types of data from multiple sources, standardized by data type WaterHabitatFish db

How does the Data Sharing Guide help? Organize discussions Consider ALL components Provide a blueprint Identify needed support Assure that when a system is built, the data are there to deliver!

The Data Sharing Guide addresses data flow from field to highest reporting need Non prescriptive Any data type Any agency Non-technical Primary focus is on infrastructure and processes to assure data accessibility

Previous Proposals Vendors pitched their output tool… but not getting data to the tool

What’s needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output

Data Flow Field data creation (local office/project) Regional data application Post data on the Web Describe full data set(metadata) Regional standards Agency data QA / QC Agency database system Local use of data Describe the data (metadata) Quality Assurance / Quality Control Input to electronic form GOAL Steps in data flow Post metadata on the Web Data interoperability

Data Flow Field data creation (local office/project) Regional data application Post data on the Web Describe full data set(metadata) Regional standards Agency data QA / QC Agency database system Local use of data Describe the data (metadata) Quality Assurance / Quality Control Input to electronic form GOAL Steps in data flow Post metadata on the Web Data interoperability

Data Flow Field data creation (local office/project) Regional data application Post data on the Web Describe full data set(metadata) Regional standards Agency data QA / QC Agency database system Local use of data Describe the data (metadata) Quality Assurance / Quality Control Input to electronic form GOAL Steps in data flow Post metadata on the Web Data interoperability Any missed step can prevent data flow! Significant effort to bridge the gaps!

What’s needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output 2. Data validated by agency

What’s needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output 2. Data validated by agency 3. Descriptive information (metadata) X. Y

What’s needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output 2. Data validated by agency 3. Descriptive information (metadata) 4. Data and metadata on the Internet

What’s needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output 2. Data validated by agency 3. Descriptive information (metadata) 4. Data and metadata on the Internet XML SQL Database Spreadsheet ASCII Word Processing PDF

What’s needed? 1. Uninterrupted data flow, source to output 2. Data validated by agency 3. Descriptive information (metadata) 4. Data and metadata on the Internet 5. Data able to roll together Ideal: standard data collection, definition, codes Minimum: Data translate to a standard

All of this is needed for seamless data delivery to ANY regional tool We can implement these steps before deciding on a data sharing tool

Sampling Crews Sampling Agencies Funding Entities Regional Data Users Database Projects Policy Makers Roles Create the data Data Entry QA Describe the data Maintain the data Establish procedures Set standards, codes Agency data systems Post data / metadata Biological & data mgt. responsibilities Negotiate key issues Metrics Methods Data disposition Contract language Support data automation Set priorities Policies to remove obstacles to data sharing Agency support Technical assistance System development Data tasks for agencies Post data & metadata Feed regional data tools

So, why don’t we have a regional data delivery system? Infrastructure to automate data flow is not in place Focus was on the data delivery tool Didn’t address all roles

We think the Data Sharing Guide will help to: inform development of a regional data system avoid skipping essential components Get us started

Questions? Funded by:Through: Fish and Wildlife Program Administered by: