IT Accessibility Committee NYS Standards and The Forum Validation Tool.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
>> Web Accessibility at WIPO Victoria Menezes Miller Web Systems Officer Internet Services Section February 2, 2010.
Advertisements

W3C WAI update Dr Scott Hollier OZeWAI INTRODUCTION Overview of the W3C Australian W3C presence Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Working group.
1 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level AODA Website Accessibility Compliance at York: Open Discussion.
Copyright © 2012 W3C (MIT, ERCIM, Keio) Web Accessibility Now Shadi Abou-Zahra W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Copyright © 2009 W3C (MIT, ERCIM, Keio) Government for All: Including People with Disabilities Shadi Abou-Zahra W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
PESO Meeting | June 11, TAC 213 Electronic and Information Resources Rule Review Jeff Kline Statewide Accessibility Coordinator Lon Berquist Technology.
Enterprise Content Management Pre-Proposal Conference for RFP No. ISD2006ECM-SS December 6, 2006 California Administrative Office of the Courts Information.
Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR™) The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR™) was developed by the Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC),
2/23/ Enterprise Web Accessibility Standards Version 2.0 WebMASSters Presentation 2/23/2005.
Terrill Thompson Technology Accessibility Specialist University of Washington Web and IT Accessibility Policy in Higher Education.
Dean Brusnighan David Schwarte.  Getting Captioning Started  Web Accessibility Policy.
UW Web Council Thursday, January 9 Topics in Web Accessibility.
Executive Sponsor Session October 31, 2006 ATI Technical Assistance Workshop.
Relentless in the Pursuit of Excellence Highland Technology Services Inc. 1 Section 508 Business Practices.
Web Accessibility John Rochford UMMS Shriver Center Director, INDEX Program Rich Caloggero WGBH National Center for Accessible Media MIT Adaptive Technology.
Empowering All Learners with Accessible Technology-based Instructional Products Maryland Regulations Sponsored by: The Maryland State Department of Education.
Australian policy & practice in ICT accessibility Gunela Astbrink, Internet Society of Australia ASEAN-ITU Seminar, August 2014.
Debi Orton, Co-Chair NYS Forum IT Accessibility Committee.
Electronic and Information Resources (EIR) Accessibility in Cooperative Contracts Procurement June 2013.
1 Agenda  8:00–9:00 Attendee Arrival, Sign-In, Networking  9:00–9:15 Welcome and Introductions- Natesa Robinson SEWP V Contracting Officer  9:15–10:00.
Required Terms Regarding Accessibility for Information Technology Contracts February 17, 2009.
Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) Support Services Pre-Proposal Conference/ Site Visit Kari M. Alvarado Contract Specialist NASA-DFRC November 8, 2006 Dryden.
Terrill Thompson Access Technology Services, UW-IT Recent Developments in Web/IT Accessibility Law.
Betsy L. Sirk Section 508 Coordinator NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
1 EIR Accessibility Web Scanning Program Jeff Kline, Statewide Accessibility Coordinator Texas Department of Information Resources October, 2012.
Deakin Richard Tan Head, Information Technology Services Division DEAKIN UNIVERSITY 14 th October 2003.
Webmasters’ Guild and IT Accessibility Workgroups Friday, Feb 5, 2010 Welcome These presentation slides are available on the NYS Forum Web site at
Office Document Accessibility for the Australian Government Andrew Arch A/g Director, Web Advice and Policy Australian Government Information Management.
Cambridge Journals Online (CJO). CJO – E Publishing Service Content Delivery Site Administration Online Production Online Marketing and Promotion Customer.
Is Your Site Accessible? Web Site Testing for Accessibility Presented by: The NYS Forum IT Accessibility Committee The NYS Forum Webmasters Guild Northeast.
The OSH Act, Standards, & Liabilities
How to evaluate technology for accessibility Terrill Thompson Technology Accessibility Specialist University of
European Ministerial Conference on Knowledge and Information Society Citizens with Special Needs Francisco Godinho Ministry of Science and Technology Francisco.
Strengthening Science Supporting Fishery Management  Standards for Best Available Science  Implementation of OMB’s Peer Review Bulletin  Separation.
Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration Management Services Center Industry Day Upcoming Changes Affecting the MAS Program Mark.
Australian university website accessibility revisited Dey Alexander Scott Rippon WANAU Forums Canberra.
1 Geospatial Line of Business Update FGDC Coordination Group April 14, 2009.
Quentis Scott IT Specialist - Section 508 Coordinator General Services Administration Office of the Chief Information Officer Washington, D.C. Developing.
Advancing Science: OSTI’s Current and Future Search Strategies Jeff Given IT Operations Manager Computer Protection Program Manager Office of Scientific.
SAE, DOD & Industry SDO Benchmarking Overview. Benchmarking Plan  Team determined four areas to benchmark  IP (copyrights, patents, trademarks  Revision.
MSU David Holstius May 9, 2001 “Standards in Web Accessibility” Presented by The Resource Center for Persons with Disabilities at Michigan State.
A human right mandate for the UN  A General Assembly mandate since 2004  Established as a human right by article 9 of the.
Expert Group Meeting on the Revision of the Handbook on the Management of Population and Housing Censuses New York, 14 – 17 December 2015 Overview of the.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Section 24 Pipeline Safety Standards Incorporated Into the Federal.
Kansas Partnership for Accessible Technology January 12, 2016 Meeting.
Providing access to your data: Determining your audience Robert R. Downs, PhD NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
 A content management system ( CMS ) is a system providing a collection of procedures used to manage work flow in a collaborative environment. These.
U.S. Department of Education Assistive Technology Program.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise IHE Conformance: Connectathons, Integration Statements & RFPs Kevin.
Improving Campus IT Accessibility Dr. Jonathan Lazar Dept. of Computer and Information Sciences Towson University Copyright Jonathan Lazar This work.
1 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level AODA Website Accessibility Compliance at York Open Discussions June.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Program.
OGS Procurement Services Group 2007 State Purchasing Forum IT Procurement.
From ADRC to MAP Naming, Branding, and Marketing the Maryland Aging and Disability Resource Center Project Posted 6/21/06.
Accessible Information and Communication Technology Policy Draft Digital Environment Committee PCC Accessibility Council.
Web Accessibility National Transition Strategy: working toward WCAG 2.0 An accessibility update with Gruden & Sitecore 6 April 2011 Jacqui van Teulingen.
IT Trends: Website Accessibility Presenter: Cindy Leonard Technology Services Manager The Bayer Center for Nonprofit Management at Robert Morris University.
YOUR TITLE HERE Courtney Matthews, Digital Repository Librarian Web Advisory Committee April 20, 2016 uwspace.uwaterloo.ca Library Scholarly Communications.
Web Content Accessibility for the People with Disabilities, Standards and Guidelines By Lucy Wang.
Zero-Textbook-Cost Degree Grant Program (Z Degrees)
UH + Website Accessibility
AODA Website Accessibility at York
Our Goal Consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act, insure RTD’s website content is accessible to people with disabilities using a variety of.
Enterprise Web Accessibility Standards
MODULE A - ADMINISTRATIVE
Website Accessibility
Income Eligible Re-Procurement
From compliance to usability
Put your agency information here
WebAIM Screen Reader Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

IT Accessibility Committee NYS Standards and The Forum Validation Tool

Why Accessibility is Important ● According to the 2000 Census:  49.7 million people in U. S. age 5 and older have disability – nearly one in five residents (19%)  5.2 million between ages of 5 and 20 (8% of people in age group)  30.6 million between 21 and 64 – 57% were employed  14.0 million 65 and older – 42% of this group had disabilities

What the statistics mean “Disability … contributes to lessened participation.” -Don Lollar, Centers for Disease Control “Technology can increase access to education, community and employment for people with disabilities.” - University of Washington Center for Technology and Disability Studies Inaccessible web sites lose up to 19% of potential audience

Background on NYS Standard Two de facto web accessibility standards: Two de facto web accessibility standards: W3C's WCAG W3C's WCAG U. S. Section 508 U. S. Section 508 First NYS Web Accessibility policy adopted in 1999 – aligned with the WCAG 1.0 First NYS Web Accessibility policy adopted in 1999 – aligned with the WCAG 1.0 Policy and hybrid (current) standard adopted in 2004 with biannual reviews Policy and hybrid (current) standard adopted in 2004 with biannual reviews

Policy Requirements All new content must conform to standard Timeframe to bring existing “high/medium traffic” content into conformance Procurement language Requirement to validate content before posting

Standard Requirements 14 individual standards, 81 checkpoints in all Hybrid of Federal Section 508 and W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Thorough compliance testing required up to 5 different tests on each page Full compliance requires “human judgment” (e.g., appropriateness of text included in alt attribute)

Compliance Number of products testing to NYS standard as of December 2007: 0 Cited by NYS web developers as significant obstacle to producing accessible web sites

Solution NYS Forum IT Accessibility Committee and Webmasters’ Guild identified requirements and drafted RFP for development of NYS-Specific tool Contract awarded to HiSoftware in October 2007 for desktop and online version of tool Testing of proposed products began in November 2007 Products accepted January 4, 2008

Why two versions? Desktop tool includes limited auto-repair capabilities, can be used behind firewall and to test intranets Online tool tests published content, no repair capabilities, cannot test unpublished content Desktop tool is customized version of off-the-shelf product Online tool developed specifically for NYS

Distribution NYS Forum has underwritten development and use of tools for first year: Each state agency gets 2 desktop license subscriptions free for one year Each state agency’s web developers and contractors that work with agency can access online tool free for one year

Implementation Online training for agency administrators and users of online tool Limited hands-on training for desktop users (max. one per agency) FAQ Will be developing other training and support resources as needs identified Many requests for presentations already

Demonstration of Tools

Questions??