StreamNet Project Overview for Data Management Category Review Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presented to: NPCC Independent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program
Advertisements

Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
October 20th 2006 Northwest Power and Conservation Council Stewart Toshach & Peter Paquet NED Project Coordinators Background - for the CBFWA Review of.
Comparative Survival Study Smolt Monitoring Program 2010 PIT Tag Mark Groups.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Funding Monitoring in 2006 – the Programs role in a West Coast Partnership November 16, 2005.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Data Management Projects Data Management Framework Subcommittee Update June 19, 2007.
Data Management in Support of the Fish & Wildlife Program Summary.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
1.A standardized format that identifies the types of information required or allowed in a particular document or exchange. 2.Data exchange templates contain.
Analysis of November 2006 Status of the Resource Summary Report Presentation to Northwest Power and Conservation Council September 11, 2007.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Frank Leonetti, Snohomish County
11 Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish-Wit Project #: Aja DeCoteau, CRITFC Watershed Department Manager.
CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.
Data Sharing Across Agencies: A guide to getting on the same page Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation to Oregon Chapter,
Fish and Wildlife Program’s Columbia River Basin High Level Indicators Tracking Progress in the Council Fish and Wildlife Program October 2009 Ketchum,
The Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System The First 20 Years Dave Marvin Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission A Presentation for the PSMFC PIT.
TRIBAL DATA NETWORK COLUMBIA RIVER INTER-TRIBAL FISH COMMISSION.
1 Software & Grid Middleware for Tier 2 Centers Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.
1 Columbia River Salmon Opportunities for Success Presentation to the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON AND STEELHEAD RETURNS FPAC and TMT – March 2013 Presented by: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) A Presentation for: Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Anadromous Fish Advisory Committee.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
NFHP Science and Data Committee Report Gary E. Whelan (MI DNR) and Andrea C. Ostroff (USGS) NFHP Science & Data Committee Co-Chairs June 2013.
Coordinated Assessments Project; Priorities and Expectations March 16, 2015 StreamNet Executive Committee.
A Guiding Framework For Regional Monitoring Participants –Alan Byrne (IDFG) –Alex Conley (Yakima Salmon Recovery Board) –Chris Drivdahl (WA State NPCC)
Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.
Coordinated Assessments Roadmap: Selecting & Prioritizing Indicators July 8, 2015.
Preliminary Results Progress Coordinated Assessments Reports from the Field.
Defining CBFWA’s FY09 Workplan Members January 15, 2009.
Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,
A New Partnership Working in Southeast Alaska 2013 Southeast Alaska Environmental Forum Deborah Hart, SEAKFHP Coordinator
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.
RMIS Overview & Infomap Service PSMFC Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) Overview of RMPC & CWT Database Since 1977 the RMPC has provided essential.
PNAMP Mission Statement PNAMP provides a forum to enhance the capacity of multiple entities to collaborate to produce an effective and comprehensive network.
Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting What Are Managers Required to Provide Their Constituents? March 9-11, 2004 Bob Leland.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
: Program Coordination and Facilitation Services January 17, 2012 Tom Iverson Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
Common PSMFC “data use agreement or policy” Overview of current data sharing in PTAGIS, RMIS, StreamNet.
Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.
1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) Presentation to PNAMP Steering Committee August 21, 2007.
StreamNet Library Project Overview for Data Management Categorical Review Lenora Oftedahl, Phil Roger, David Liberty & Gabe Sheoships Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
Coordinated Assessments April 3, 2014 Workshop Data Exchange Standard: Overview, Changes, Additions, and Direction Mike Banach PSMFC
Improved access to data to support high level indicators for salmon and steelhead.
Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Data Stewardship and Data Standards Practices Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Prepared for: USBR Tech Transfer Meeting Jennifer.
Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.
StreamNet Executive Committee Meeting
Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP)
PrepAration For The Streamnet Executive Committee Meeting
Articulation of Basin-wide Monitoring “Framework”
Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop
StreamNet Steering Committee Meeting
StreamNet Steering Committee
Presentation transcript:

StreamNet Project Overview for Data Management Category Review Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presented to: NPCC Independent Scientific Review Panel January 17, 2012

StreamNet Mission: Facilitate the distribution and use of scientifically collected information on fish and aquatic resources and their habitats… Why? Data have been stored and managed locally, hard to obtain

Base Functions: Disseminate data (locate, update, standardize, summarize, georeference, share)

CRITFC IDFG MFWP ODFW USFWS WDFW StreamNet Data Flow PSMFC Standardize Georeference SN Data- base PSMFC CRITFC Tabular Query Interactive Maps Web Services Data Store Online Catalog SN Library Source documents

Current Data Types Redd counts Spawner counts Population estimates Dam/weir counts Hatchery returns Age composition Anad. fish distribution Res. fish distribution Fish Barriers Hydrography Facilities Dams Hatcheries Protected Areas Subbasin planning Independent data (Data Store) Archive Metadata Reference documents StreamNet Library contract

Basic Functions: Disseminate Data Support data system development Assist regional data users Support regional collaboration PNAMP Steering Committee Metadata Work Group Data Management Leadership Team CBFWA Data to SOTR report Data Management Framework Subcommittee Coordinated Assessments Lead DET development, Supplement agency infrastructure Tools Shoulder data request workload

StreamNet Staffing Current Partner StaffFTE PSMFC IDFG MFWP ODFW USFWS WDFW CRITFC* Total New Request PartnerStaff FTE Colville Sho Ban Nez Perce* Yakama* Umatilla* Warm Springs* PSMFC Total & 5.5 * CRITFC and its member tribes are funded on other contracts Support from agency Non-StreamNet work

Regional Database Projects StreamNet* RMPC* PacFIN PTAGIS* FPC RecFIN AKFIN EFIN/AKFED DART SOTR SPS Fish related data, inland Coded wire tag data, W coast Marine harvest data, W coast PIT tag data, Columbia Basin Mainstem passage, smolt study Marine recreational harvest Marine commercial harvest, AK Commercial fish economic data Second tier data, some analysis Dissemination of status information ESA assessment data

Project Results - Website Use

Project Results: % Use of Website User typeWebsiteQueryMapperCombined ISP68.4%36.1%43.4%52.1% Federal10.4%24.0%32.9%21.8% State15.5%28.4%11.1%16.8% Consultant2.8%4.6%8.3%5.2% University2.8%5.6%2.5%3.3% County0% 1.4%0.5% School0% 0.4%0.1% Tribe0%0.4%0%0.1%

New Directions Expand data types Change Emphasis Increase tribal support New Data Query Response to Coordinated Assessments : Derived estimates (VSP Indicators): Natural Origin Spawner Abundance Adult to Adult Return Smolt to Adult Return Expand from there Toward distributed database technology StreamNet data as web services Provide temporary technical support for agencies Support data system develop in agencies Enable automated conversion to data standards Speed data assembly Requisite for distributed data dissemination Become members CA data assembly Data system development Tribal data to StreamNet

Implications for Fish Management Consistent access to hard-to-find data: Data for High Level Indicators, SOTR, regional reports, population assessments, etc. Interoperable data Better ability to do assessments across agencies Wider scale analysis A/T internal database systems: Increase speed of data location, assembly Automated (faster) conversion to standards Consistent data Result: Faster analysis Ability to host data as web services

Implications for Fish Management Bottom line: Access to current, consistent, transparent and reliable data to support wide scale fish management

Conclusions/Lessons Learned Embedding data specialists in agencies works We have successful data dissemination tools Tabular data query Interactive maps Data Store archive Data/metadata as web services Library of source documents “…thanks a lot! I hope you have a great New Year's and had a great Christmas. You have put together a very good web page and data system. I use it a lot and am grateful for it.” Received 12/27/2011

Conclusions/Lessons Learned Embedding data specialists in agencies works We have successful data dissemination tools Growing interest in sharing data Can’t get more people, so need better use of technology StreamNet’s role will have to continue to adjust Collaborative, regional guidance is needed Data priorities Regional strategy CA is providing useful guidance

Will Need in the Future: Continued dissemination of updated data sets And, new emphasis on: Add new types of data Regional data standards Define what will be shared Definitions Formats Data coordinators in the agencies Agency capacity to manage data internally and to host data as web services Central ‘Exchange Network’ interface & tools

Questions?