Mars Odyssey PSG Mission Status Gaylon W. McSmith Robert A. Mase June 9, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solar System Division DVK, 10 Jul 2001 Rosetta Science Operations The planning concept - current status Detlef Koschny Space Science Department ESA/ESTEC.
Advertisements

Mars Telecommunications Relay CubeSat Constellation David Spencer Space System Design Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology November 20, 2014.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Decision making process, Communications and Planning.
1 Winter Launch Block Modeling and Results MMS Flight Dynamics Team MIWG 8 Feb. 20, 2014.
PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.
Questions from the European colleagues & Answers (only) from the Chinese engineers present for Y.-W. Zhang and S.-G. Yuan Chinese Academy of Space Technology.
Frank Stocklin Ron Vento Leslie Ambrose June 28,2001 SUPERNOVA/ACCELERATION PROBE (SNAP) Data Systems.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
1 April 2010 TX SET Timeline Project Conceptualization 11 weeks Market Requirements 12 weeks ERCOT Requirements 12 weeks Conceptual Design 6 weeks Detail.
CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Edward M. Mattison 29 June 2004.
EVM-2 Notice of Partnership Questions and Answers January 23, 2015.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
TEMPO Mission Project July 23, 2013 Project Manager: Alan Little.
Launching, Orbital Effects & Satellite Subsystems
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.
NOAA COMMAND AND DATA ACQUISITION STATION. WCDAS Numbers DCS Help Desk at or 7451 Contact Phil Whaley at (757) or Al McMath at.
Van Allen Probes Spacecraft Operations July 29, 2015 Kristin Fretz
Polar Topographic Knowledge Prior to LCROSS Impact David E. Smith 1, Maria T. Zuber 2 1 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
JPL AUTONOMOUS RENDEZVOUS OVERVIEW Rob Bailey Jet Propulsion Laboratory Inter-Agency AR&C Working Group Meeting May , 2002 Naval Research Laboratory.
MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.
Mars Exploration Rover MER Surface Lifetime Presented at Landing Site Selection Workshop #3 March 26-28, 2002 J. Matijevic 3/28/02.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
NOAA COMMAND AND DATA ACQUISITION STATION. WCDAS Numbers DCS Help Desk at or is with copies to
THEMIS peer Instrument CDR 1 CETP, Paris, April 8, 2004 THEMIS Mission Status at Peer UCB Instrument Critical Design Review UCB, April 19/20, 2004 Vassilis.
NASA Mars Exploration Mission Operations Concepts
Polar Gateways 2008THEMIS Constellation Operations − Jan 2008 THEMIS Constellation Operations Dr. Manfred Bester University of California at Berkeley.
1 JWST Functional Flow Diagrams and Schematic Block Diagrams.
1 Space Telescope Science Institute JWST S&OC JWST S&OC Contract Peter Stockman TIPS March 20, 2003.
Issue/Revision: 1.0 Reference: Status: For information Only ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use Solar Orbiter: Launch Options Favouring Data.
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO SWG March 27-28, 2007.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
GIST-24 Meeting December MSG PROGRAMME STATUS Presentation to the GIST-24 meeting.
Telemetry Constraints during Early Operations The STEREO telemetry rate is restricted during the phasing orbits due to S/C RF interference with each other,
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
THEMIS FDMO Review Propellant Budget Update − 1 October 5, 2004 PROPELLANT BUDGET UPDATE Vassilis Angelopoulos Covered in this presentation: Allocations.
SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 16, 2015 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument Quarterly Q Digital Fields Board (DFB) 1.
Van Allen Extended Mission Orbit Analysis 9/2014 SWG T. Sotirelis, F. Siddique JHU/APL.
Requirements to WSO Ground Segment Lavochkin Association & ROSCOSMOS 30/06/2006.
LuNet Integrated Network Architecture for Sustained Human and Robotic Exploration Gary Noreen Telecommunications Architect Communications Architecture.
1 EOS Aqua Mission Status at AMSR Science Team Meeting September 16, 2015 Huntsville, Alabama Bill Guit Aqua/Aura Mission Director - Code 584 phone
P. Mokashi IES Team Meeting, SwRI 29 May IES (SwRI) Develop sequences (flight and EQM test) Develop tables, macros and patches if necessary Test.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
Jan 2008 LMSSC - 1 SWEA Plume Impingements Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission.
GIST-21 Meeting 31 March-02 April MSG PROGRAMME STATUS Presentation to the GIST-21 meeting.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 Mission Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
 From SmallSat to CubeSat: Reducing Mass Size and Cost Jeremy Straub 1, Ronald Fevig 2, Todd Borzych 2, Chris Church 2, Curt Holmer 2, Martin Hynes 2,
Avatar Explore PROPOSAL NUMBERS Not available SCIENCE TEAM Erick Dupuis, Canadian Space Agency RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Demonstrate an operational and technical.
WEC meeting TED status and WEC timing.
Van Allen Probes VAP Spacecraft and Programmatic Status Ed Reynolds
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Astronomer Workshop Feb. 29, 2008 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California Mission Design & Observation.
Page No. 1 Overview Kelvin Nichols Payload Operations and Integration Center EO50 SSCN Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN)
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
Extended Reserve Technical Requirements Schedule (TRS) Presenters: Justin Blass, Project Manager Gillian Rodger, Power System Analysis Kevin Wronski, Compliance.
The road to the first E2E tests
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
ESA's Ground Station Network Prospects for operations of the Lagrange missions S. Kraft OPS-L , K.-J. Schulz OPS-GS 08/03/2017.
Technical Resource Allocations
Ulysses Nutation anomaly in
Failure of Process / Failure of Mission
Philae status 21st Rosetta Science Team meeting
Current SOC-Ground System Integration Schedule (Jan )
SmartMeterTM Steering Committee Update – September 2012
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
USGS Agency Status Landsat Operations Jenn Lacey 21 July 2016
LRO Mission Operations Concept
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
EagleSat 2 – Mission and Development Overview
Presentation transcript:

Mars Odyssey PSG Mission Status Gaylon W. McSmith Robert A. Mase June 9, 2003

Mars Odyssey Mission Status Spacecraft operations are nominal All Science payload suites are collecting data in a nominal fashion April 7, 2003 marked the 2-year anniversary of Odyssey launch On this date, we completed our 5000th mapping orbit Mission Statistics (May 2003): Day 443 of the 917-day science mission (48% complete) Day 338 since GRS Boom Deploy (49% of one Mars-year) Total # Mapping Orbits: 5380 (6196 since MOI) 761 days past Launch (61% of mission complete) Launch: April 7, 2001 End of Primary Mission: August 24, 2004 Science Data Return: Total Science Data Returned to Date: ~155 Gbytes Planned Data Volume for 917-day Science Mission: Gbytes DSN allocations better than planned, operations enhancements

Total Fuel in the Tanks (Feb 2002):46.2 kg ± 3 kg Unusable 2.4 kg Total Fuel Available for Mapping (Feb 19, 2002):43.8 kg ExpectedActual Usage Allocation*Usage to Date(1 May 2003) Contingency8.2 kg2.6 kg0.0 kg Safe Mode5.0 kg1.6 kg0.2 kg Momentum Mgmt11.5 kg3.7 kg2.0 kg Orbit Maintenance3.7 kg1.2 kg0.0 kg Extended Science1.9 kg-0.0 kg PQ Orbit Raise3.4 kg-0.0 kg Unallocated10.1 kg-0.0 kg Total43.8 kg9.1 kg2.2 kg Total Usable Propellant Remaining:41.6 kg ± 3 kg * Allocations for 1374-day mission Mars Odyssey Propellant Budget

Mars Odyssey Recent Spacecraft Activity Recent Spacecraft Activity Jan-Apr:Executed 14 NSP Demo Passes (18 Scheduled) Jan 7:Activated the MARIE auto-download/erase block Jan 15:Increased THEMIS APID30 packet buffer allocation Jan 24:Uplinked Safe-Mode emergency desat parameters Jan 27:Multi-Spacecraft  DOR demo pass (w/ MGS) Feb 4:Solar Array gimbal cycle and reposition Feb 4:110 kbps data rate at 70m stations Feb 13:Updated DPT for small-packet issue Feb 22:Multi-Spacecraft  DOR demo pass (w/ MGS) Apr 7:Completed 5000th Mapping Orbit Apr 10: Demonstration of 124 kbps data rate Apr 28:Solar Array gimbal cycle

Mars Odyssey Plans for Next Quarter Plans for the next 3 months Continue UHF relay capability development and testing UHF testing with MER test-set at LMA (May 5-9) Complete UHF Stanford test plans Execute tests in June - Sep 2003 Continue OTM planning for Sun-synchronous maneuver (Oct 2003) Plan for Demo tracks to prepare for Asset Contention Period (ACP) DEMOs with Parkes and New Norcia Arraying in an MSPA configuration 2-MSPA with uplink swaps Continue  DOR campaign to support MER (thru Nov 2003) Study phasing ODY orbit to support MER SOL-1 overflight

Mars Odyssey Schedule

Transition to NSP is complete All stations are now transitioned to NSP or down for NSP upgrade During Feb - April, up to 4 of 10 stations were down at once for upgrade ODY had less tracking, more MSPA than usual ODY impacted by stations not returning to service on schedule And by changing DEMO tracks Future Capability Upgrades that will impact Odyssey All will require ODY demonstration tracks in the fall to prepare for the Asset Contention Period (ACP) 2-MSPA with multiple uplink swaps Array capability with MSPA Alternate Assets - in case of spacecraft emergency during ACP Parkes and New Norcia, both in Australia Mars Odyssey Network Simplification Project (NSP)

Program desire to characterize ODY UHF system Discovered 6dB (forward) and 2dB (return) losses in cruise tests Can still meet MER requirements if system has not degraded further Avoid last-minute surprises, time to re-plan if negative result Major challenges have been addressed Instrument FOV constraints Test in three phases Power-on test - does not involve Stanford - early June (completed) Nadir-point test (no attitude change) - late June Earth-point test - mid-August Project continues to work implementation details Scope/goals of each test Test timeline and scheduling of Stanford antenna Identification of backup opportunities Mars Odyssey UHF System Test with Stanford

Likely Scenario for Earth-point test Test tentatively scheduled for ~ 25 Aug 2003 Would perform one activity to point UHF at Earth Accommodates all S/C and instrument FOV constraints throughout ~10 minute slew to Earth-point attitude Dwell at Earth-point for ~20 minutes ~15 minute dogleg-slew to return to nadir-point Dogleg to avoid Mars in GRS cooler FOV during slew Would dedicate an orbit to this activity May possibly be repeated a few days later Will identify backup opportunity to perform test again a few weeks later Only re-test if necessary Mars Odyssey UHF System Test with Stanford

Mars Odyssey OTM for Extended Mission Plan for the Extended Mission: Perform an inclination-change maneuver to change the LST drift Propellant Budget Allocation: 1.9 kg (~10 m/s of  V) Design Constraints: Sun-synch at the earliest LMST that would provide a solar beta angle < -52.5˚ with 1.5˚ margin Margin analysis performed by ACS (D. Shafter) Any change/perturbation in orbit drift can be trended and accommodated by an OTM in the future if necessary To maintain Solar Beta Angle OTM ~Sept 23, 2003 Implementation Flight team has gone through one iteration of OTM design Attitude very close to nadir-point attitude Issue: Telecom during the burn If required: attitude change would negatively impact GRS

Mars Odyssey 5 PM Sun-Synchronous Orbit All dates approximate

Mars Odyssey MER and Beagle2 UHF Relay Landing Dates Beagle2:Dec 25, 2003 MER-A:Jan 4, 2004 MER-B:Jan 25, 2004 Impacts to Odyssey MER requested ODY orbit phasing to cover post-EDL deployments Assessing ability to predict/control orbit phasing Would likely alter the ground track repeat cycle UHF relay data requires change to packet buffer allocations Possibly in 2 stages, prior to relay, just prior to MER-B DSN allocations actually improve Nearly continuous downlink Lots of MSPA, sharing of uplink within a pass

Backup Slides UHF Relay Packet Buffer Allocations

Original Proposal (April 2002) Change GRS allocation from 30 MB to 12.5 MB allowed for 15 hours of data collection on-board Odyssey (assuming 1500 b/s collection with 30% margin) Mars Odyssey Onboard Memory Allocations (Apr 2002) Old Onboard Configuration (April 2002)

Current On Board Configuration Proposed (New) Change GRS allocation from 30 MB to 8.5 MB allows for 12 hours of data collection on-board Odyssey (assuming 1500 b/s collection with 10% margin) Current average data rate of 990 bps equivalent to ~18 hours on board Mars Odyssey Onboard Memory Allocations (Current) Current Onboard Configuration

Mars Odyssey Packet Buffer Changes THEMIS Change from Original Baseline –Packet buffer allocation increased at the beginning of mapping due to 2 min. data latency issue –Current allocation of 1500 packets (3.3 Mbytes) supports 110 kbps or 124 kbps –Reduction to 1200 packets (2.6 Mbytes) supports 110 kbps MARIE Change from Baseline –MARIE Changed from 40 file equivalent (2000 packets, 4.4 Mbytes) to 80 file equivalent (4000 packets, 8.8 Mbytes) –Reduction in Frequency of MARIE Mode Changes Desired –Auto-Download Block Supports 80 file equivalent packet buffer –New 40 file Auto-Download Block Required MER/Beagle Packet Buffer Allocation (32.5 Mbytes Proposed) –15 MBytes per MER supports 120 Mbits per pass (6820 packets) –2.3 Mbytes for Beagle-2 supports 18.8 Mbits per pass (1050 packets)

Mars Odyssey 2005 Average Daily Tracking Pass