FAST: A Faceted Application of Subject Terminology Classification Crosswalks Workshop Joint Conference on Digital Libraries June 28, 2001 Presented by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CIDOC 2000 Using GEM Metadata to Access Education Resources Nancy Virgil Morgan Coordinator
Advertisements

Nancy Morgan GEM Project Coordinator
Implementing Effective Metadata Brian Lavoie Office of Research OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Intranets 99, San Francisco April 27, 1999.
FAST: Faceted Application of Subject Terminology Edward T. O'Neill, OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Subject Metadata from the Other Side ASIST.
Looking Deeper into Using FAST: Report on three projects using the FAST Authority File. Reported by Shannon L. Hoffman, Subject Authorities Librarian,
FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology): A Vocabulary to Facilitate Faceted Browsing Eric Childress Consulting Project Manager OCLC Programs.
OCLC Research OCLC Online Computer Library Center Dewey Translators Meeting 23 August 2006 World Library and Information Congress: 72nd IFLA General Conference.
The HILT Pilot Terminologies Server Dennis Nicholson: Centre for Digital Library Research, Strathclyde University.
1 Subject Authority Control and Cooperative Cataloging May 18, 2005.
The world’s libraries. Connected. Using Authorities to Improve Subject Searches Beyond Libraries – Subject Metadata in the Digital Environment and Semantic.
F aceted A pplication of S ubject T erminology A Joint Research and Development Project by OCLC and the Library of Congress Development of a Simplified.
Module 5a: Authority Control and Encoding Schemes IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2007 Michael Crandall.
The Case for Faceting Ed O’Neill OCLC Research November 5, 2013 ASIS&T Montreal Maximizing the Usage of Value Vocabularies in the Linked Data Ecosystem:
Application of Subdivisions June 22, 2003 ALA Annual Conference, Toronto.
An Introduction to MODS: The Metadata Object Description Schema Tech Talk By Daniel Gelaw Alemneh October 17, 2007 October 17, 2007.
Corey A Harper DC2006 October 4, 2006 Authority Control for the Semantic Web Encoding Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) in SKOS.
Eric Childress Ed O’Neill ALA Annual June 2013 FAST Report 1 Faceted Subject Access Interest Group.
1 Adaptive Management Portal April
Introduction to Library Research Gabriela Scherrer Reference Librarian for English Languages and Literatures, University Library of Bern.
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 metadata considerations for digital libraries.
Using Metadata in CONTENTdm Diana Brooking and Allen Maberry Metadata Implementation Group, Univ. of Washington Crossing Organizational Boundaries Oct.
Mess ‘o MeSH …Or, What are all those funny terms anyway? MU Cataloging Workshop 24 April 2008 Amanda Sprochi.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
The Library Cataloging Tradition
Session 7 Selection of Online Resources and Options for Providing Access.
Edward T. O'Neill Prepared with the assistance of the FAST Team Australian Committee on Cataloguing Seminar Sydney, Australia, January 31, 2005 FAST A.
To Browse or To Keyword? … that’s the question! Colorado Horizon Users Group April 21, 2006 Presented by Donna Spearman Cataloger Westminster Public Library.
8/28/97Organization of Information in Collections Introduction to Description: Dublin Core and History University of California, Berkeley School of Information.
Cornell Metadata Interest Group, October 31 st, 2014 Sarah Ross Steven Folsom, FAST.
1 Catalog Displays, Retrieval, and FAST May 31, 2005.
1 On the Record Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control Diane Boehr Head of Cataloging, NLM
The Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) NISO Metadata Workshop May 20, 2004 Rebecca Guenther Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Kathy Kie December 2007 OCLC Cataloging & Metadata Services an introduction.
FAST and simple: faceted subject headings Jorge A. González P. July 13, 2015 Technical Services Standing Committee meeting.
Organizing Internet Resources OCLC’s Internet Cataloging Project -- funded by the Department of Education -- from October 1, 1994 to March 31, 1996.
The Library Cataloging Tradition Marty Kurth CS 431 February 9, 2005 [slides stolen from Diane Hillmann]
Are LCSH still effective? Why not use keyword searching instead? Presented by Carol Bradsher October 29, 2004.
7. Approaches to Models of Metadata Creation, Storage and Retrieval Metadata Standards and Applications.
Meta Tagging / Metadata Lindsay Berard Assisted by: Li Li.
An Alternative Approach to Interoperability Testing The Use of Special Diagnostic Records in the Context of Z39.50 and Online Library Catalogs William.
Research library of the National Aerospace University Kharkiv Aviation Institute.
Evolving MARC 21 for the future Rebecca Guenther CCS Forum, ALA Annual July 10, 2009.
Qiang Jin Cataloging Working Group Meeting September 23 rd, 2014 FAST: brief overview.
A Quick Introduction to Metadata Michael Day UKOLN: The UK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath
Introduction to Metadata Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program.
A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk DCMI Affiliates: Implications for Institutions Rosemary Russell UKOLN University.
The RDF meta model Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations of XML compared.
Resource Description and Access (RDA) information session Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee.
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
CNI Spring 2016 Membership Meeting San Antonio TX Linked Data Implementations— Who, What and Why? Karen Smith-Yoshimura OCLC Research.
1 Shelflisting and Filing Rules and Subject Authority Control May 11, 2005.
PREPARING FOR LINKED DATA IN DIGITAL REPOSITORIES Sai Deng, University of Central Florida Libraries ACRL Technical Services Interest Group ALA.
Online Information and Education Conference 2004, Bangkok Dr. Britta Woldering, German National Library Metadata development in The European Library.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
1 Metadata: an overview Alan Hopkinson ILRS Middlesex University.
Pre-coordinate vs Post-coordinate Subject Access: Pros and Cons and a Real Life Experience… Peter Fletcher, University of California, Los Angeles Diane.
LC Update to the Authority Control Interest Group
The Use of EAD in Archival Based Repositories
Authority Control for the Semantic Web
Subject analysis in the 21st century
Introduction to Metadata
Form/Genre Headings --DRAFT--
Cataloging Tips and Tricks
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
MARC: Beyond the Basics 11/24/2018 (C) 2006, Tom Kaun.
Some Options for Non-MARC Descriptive Metadata
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
Using FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Headings) in CONTENTdm
Presentation transcript:

FAST: A Faceted Application of Subject Terminology Classification Crosswalks Workshop Joint Conference on Digital Libraries June 28, 2001 Presented by Ed ONeill

Background Enormous volume and rapid growth of resources available on the World Wide Web. Emergence of numerous metadata schemes have spurred a re-examination of the way subject data is to be provided for web resources efficiently and effectively.

Metadata Simplicity Simplicity refers to the usability by non- catalogers to allow the creation of metadata records by persons not necessarily trained in sophisticated methods of bibliographic control. Semantic interoperability Semantic interoperability enables users to search across discipline boundaries and, desirably, also across information retrieval and storage systems.

ALCTS/SAC/Subcommittee: Requirements Be simple and easy to apply and to comprehend, Be intuitive so that sophisticated training in subject indexing and classification, while highly desirable, is not required in order to implement, Be logical so that it requires the least effort to understand and implement, Be scalable for implementation from the simplest to the most sophisticated.

Options for Metadata We are limited to three basic choices in selecting an indexing/subject heading schema for metadata: The use an existing schema(s), Adapt or modify an existing schema. Develop new schema(s),

Objective of FAST Project Develop a new subject heading schema based on LCSH suitable for metadata which is easier to use, understand, and maintain. Minimized the need to construct headings, Simplify the syntax, Retain the richness of the vocabulary.

Simplify the Complex Syntax and Rules

FAST Team Ed ONeill, OCLC Diane Vizine-Goetz, OCLC Kerre Kammerer, OCLC Eric Childress, OCLC Rebecca Dean, OCLC Lois Mai Chan, University of Kentucky Lynn El-Hoshy, Library of Congress

Synergy ALCTS/SAC OCLC Library of Congress

Advantages of LCSH Rich vocabulary covering all subject areas, It has the strong institutional support of the Library of Congress, Synonym and homograph control, Has been extensively used by libraries, contained in millions of bibliographic records, Has a long and well-documented history.

Card Format Originally created for card catalogsa 3x5 card environment, Pre-coordinated vocabulary, Design limits number of entries.

Coverage of LCSH Topical Authority File

Coverage of Geographic Authority File

Patterns Subdivisions Pattern subdivisions, like free-floats, are subdivisions which have general application. However, the scope of patterns is limited to particular types (patterns) of headings. Patients is one of several hundred subdivisions that can be used with headings for individual or types of diseases and other medical conditions …

Combining Pattern Subdivisions is an established heading, is covered by the disease pattern, is authorized under the pattern for diseases becomes a class of persons, is authorized under the pattern for classes of persons.

FAST Requirements Usable by people with minimal training and experience, Enables a broad range of users to assign subject terminology to web resources: –Bibliographers –Faculty –Reference staff Amenable to automated authority control, Compatibility with use as embedded metadata, Focus on making use of LCSH as a post-coordinate system in an online environment.

Facets Topical Personal Names Corporate Names Conference/Meetings Uniform Titles Geographic Form Period

FACET: Topical LCSH main headings from topical headings (650), All associated general ($x) subdivisions from any type of LCSH heading, Period subdivisions containing topical aspects from any type of LCSH heading, All topical headings will be established in an authority file.

FAST: Topical Headings Industrial project managementData processing. Colombian poetry BlacksmithingHistory. Epic literatureHistory and criticism. Pets and travel Quartets (Pianos (2), percussion) Natural gas pipelinesEconomic aspects School psychologists Blood banks LoudspeakersDesign and construction

Geographic name will be established and applied in indirect order, [OhioColumbus not Columbus (Ohio)], First level geographic names will be limited to names from the Geographic Area Codes table (e.g., Ohio, France, Great Lakes, etc.) Other names will be entered as subdivisions under the smallest first level name in which it is fully contained (North AmericaMaya Forest) Qualifiers are only be used to identify the type of geographic name (Kingdom, Satellite, Duchy, Princely State, etc.). All geographic headings will be established in an authority file. FACET: Geographic

Charlevoix Search Example

Charlevoix (LCSH headings) Charlevoix (Mich.) Charlevoix (Quebec) Charlevoix County (Mich.) Charlevoix County (Quebec) Charlevoix Harbor (Mich.) Charlevoix Region (Mich.) Charlevoix Region (Quebec) Charlevoix Site (Mich.) Charlevoix, Lake (Mich.) Charlevoix-Est (Quebec : Regional County Municipality) Charlevoix-Est (Quebec) Charlevoix-Est County (Que.) Charlevoix-Est County (Quebec) Charlevoix-Ouest (Quebec) Charlevoix-Ouest County (Que.) Charlevoix-Ouest County (Quebec) Clermont (Charlevoix-Est, Quebec) Deer Creek Watershed (Charlevoix County, Mich.) Holy Island (Charlevoix County, Mich.) Horton Creek (Charlevoix County, Mich.) Horton Creek Marsh, Charlevoix County, (Mich.) Lake Charlevoix (Mich.) Lake Charlevoix (Michigan) Marion (Charlevoix County, Mich.) MichiganBeaver Island (Charlevoix County) MichiganCharlevoix MichiganCharlevoix County MichiganCharlevoix Region MichiganCharlevoix, Lake MichiganDeer Creek Watershed (Charlevoix County) MichiganHorton Creek (Charlevoix County) MichiganLake Charlevoix MichiganMarion (Charlevoix County) MichiganPeaine Township (Charlevoix County) MichiganSt. James Township (Charlevoix County) O'Neill Site, Charlevoix County, (Mich.) Quebec (Province)Charlevoix Quebec (Province)Charlevoix Co. Quebec (Province)Charlevoix East Quebec (Province)Charlevoix Region Quebec (Province)Charlevoix West Quebec (Province)Charlevoix-Est (Regional County Municipality) Quebec (Province)Charlevoix-Ouest QuebecCharlevoix Region QuebecCharlevoix-Est QuebecCharlevoix-Ouest

Charlevoix (FAST headings) Michigan--Charlevoix Michigan--Charlevoix County Michigan--Charlevoix County--Deer Creek Watershed Michigan--Charlevoix County--Holy Island Michigan--Charlevoix County--Horton Creek Michigan--Charlevoix County--Beaver Island Michigan--Charlevoix County--Marion Michigan--Charlevoix County--O'Neill Site Michigan--Charlevoix County--Peaine Township Michigan--Charlevoix Harbor Michigan--Charlevoix Region Michigan--Lake Charlevoix Quebec ………………………….

FACET: Forms Uses table developed based on LC documentation (e.g., SCM, FFS:AAI), and independent correspondence, LCSH tagged headings not containing $v will be processed for correction prior to validation, All form headings will be established in an authority file.

Example of Forms Translations into French Rules DictionariesSwedish Controversial literatureEarly works to 1800 Translations into Russian StatisticsDatabases Textbooks for foreign speakersEnglishJuvenile literature Slides Directories CorrespondenceJuvenile literature Records

FACET: Period Chronological headings will reflect the actual time period of coverage for the resource, Chronological headings will be expressed as a numeric date or date range. Authority records will be created for period subdivision except when necessary for notes or cross-references.

Example of Faceting (DC view) 650 0Slavery $z United States $v Fiction. SubjectSlavery Coverage.spatialUnited States TypeFiction

Interoperability between LCSH and FAST Separating syntax from semantics, the syntax can be simplified while retaining the richness of vocabulary in LCSH is retained, FAST and LCSH can co-exist.

For more information: Chan, Lois Mai et. al. A Faceted Approach to Subject Data in the Dublin Core Metadata Record. Journal of Internet Cataloging. Volume 4, no. 1-2, 2001, p ONeill, Edward T. et. Al. Form Subdivisions: Their Identification and Use in LCSH. Accepted for publication in Library Resources & Technical Services. For a copy of this presentation: