Some outcomes of the CRM/FRBR harmonization: the definition of manifestation and a review of attributes Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented to the ALCTS FRBR Interest Group, ALA Annual, 24 June 2011
Advertisements

Interoperability and semantics in RDF representations of FRBR, FRAD and FRSAD Gordon Dunsire Presented at the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and.
Transitions, transformations, and shifting sands: the landscape beyond MARC; the ground beneath the record Gordon Dunsire Presented to the RDA Programs.
A short history of the evolution of the library catalogue record Gordon Dunsire 2009.
FRBR : A Review Joy Kim University of Southern California.
Identifying textual works ISTC: controversy and potential Patrick Le Bœuf FRBR in 21st century catalogues: an invitational workshop Dublin, Ohio, May 2-4,
Modeling Continuing Resources in FRBR [and More] Judith A. Kuhagen CPSO, Library of Congress FRBR Workshop - OCLC May 2, 2005.
Relational Models for Aggregates Ed ONeill IFLA FRBR Workshop Dublin, Ohio, May 2, 2005 OCLC Research.
SOME GENERAL FEATURES OF RDA Atoma T. Batoma
FRBR Overview and Application Authorities: Part 1 June 2012.
Bibliographic Relationships and Bibliographic Families.
Microform/Reproduction Charlene Chou at the CEAL RDA Workshop March 19 th,
FRBR Functional requirements for bibliographic records (IFLA, 1998) Don Thornbury, RBSC Technical Services April 5, 2005.
FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records it is the Final Report of the IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic.
RDA and libraries Gordon Dunsire Presented at a College Development Network webinar, 13 June 2013.
RDA Terminology: A Summary Atoma Batoma. RDA Terminology RDA Vocabularies: Controlled Vocabularies -Closed – Open –
Navigating Through Voyager: Should FRBR be in our Future? Jennifer Bowen University of Rochester October 2002.
Descriptive Cataloging of Monographs 1. Introduction DRAFT.
UNIMARC, RDA and the Semantic Web Gordon Dunsire Presented at Les Journées ABES May 2010, Montpellier, France (Originally presented at WLIC 2009,
RDA, FRBR & MARC RDA Cataloguing Seminars September 2012.
The European Manuscript & Hand Press Book Heritage The role of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) Manuscript Collection in the National.
Harmonising without Harm: towards an object-oriented formulation of FRBR aligned on the CIDOC CRM ontology Maja Žumer (University of Ljubljana) & Patrick.
Cornell CS Bibliographic Concepts CS 502 – Carl Lagoze – Cornell University Acks to H. Van de Sompel.
RDA Training FRBR: a brief introduction British Library 2015 (2015 April RDA update)
Conceptual models: museums & libraries towards an object-oriented formulation of FRBR aligned on the CIDOC CRM ontology The title of the present ELAG.
Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program New Developments in Cataloging.
10/14/20151 Bibliographic Ontologies. Bibliontology Providing ontology to model bibliographic information for the libraries.
The book, the bug and the bangle: a parallel and a paradox Washington, International CRM Symposium “Sharing the knowledge” March 26-27, 2003 Patrick Le.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: FRBR and Millennium
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
Module 2: FRBR refresher Adapted from: Teaching RDA: Train-the-trainer course RDA: Resource description and access presented by the National Library of.
Module 2: FRBR refresher This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License
Moving from a locally-developed data model to a standard conceptual model Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian Indiana University Digital Library Program.
1 herbert van de sompel CS 502 Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Cornell University – Computer Science Herbert Van de Sompel
What users want & how FRBR can help Diane Vizine-Goetz Research Scientist OCLC Research.
FRSAD Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data in its finalizing stages : a very brief report Päivi Pekkarinen Helsinki University Library Meilahti.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
ICS-FORTH March 14, Modelling Intellectual Processes: The object-orient FRBR Model Martin Doerr Paris, France March 14, 2006 Corrections made 9.
APPLYING FRBR TO LIBRARY CATALOGUES A REVIEW OF EXISTING FRBRIZATION PROJECTS Martha M. Yee September 9, 2006 draft.
The Semantic Web and expert metadata: pull apart then bring together Presented at 12.seminar Arhivi, Knjižnice, Muzeji Nov 2008, Pore č, Croatia.
What Does FRBR Mean To You? Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program
Relevance of the consolidated edition ISBD for national bibliographies Professor Mirna Willer, PhD University of Zadar Department of Information Sciences.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
Building blocks for RDA Theory behind RDA ALLUNY Annual Meeting September 28-30, 2012.
FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005 Modeling augmentations Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana.
Intellectual Works and their Manifestations Representation of Information Objects IR Systems & Information objects Spring January, 2006 Bharat.
FRBR: Cataloging’s New Frontier Emily Dust Nimsakont Nebraska Library Commission NCompass Live December 15, 2010 Photo credit:
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
1 Mental models and the bibliographic universe Jan Pisanski Maja Žumer LIDA 2007.
From FRBR to FRBR OO through CIDOC CRM… A Common Ontology for Cultural Heritage Information Patrick Le Bœuf, National Library of France International Symposium.
LIS512 lecture 2: FRBR reading International Federation of Library Association “Fundamental Requirements for Bibliographic Records”, revised.
Defining Entities for Description The Bibliographic Universe.
Helsinki, November FRBR: the bright new future? Part 1 Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana Slovenia.
1 SWE Introduction to Software Engineering Lecture 14 – System Modeling.
RDA in NACO Module 1.b Background : FRBR/FRAD. 2 FRBR Foundation of RDA If you want a more detailed background, watch this webcast by Barbara Tillett:
1 CLA June 2, 2010 IFLA’s Conceptual Models and RDA presented by Pat Riva.
Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Introduction to FRBR Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records GACOMO Oct. 16, 2008.
Paul Frank George Prager (You describe the relationships)
From FRBR to FRBROO through CIDOC CRM…
FRBRoo and performing arts
Defining Entities for Description
A model to link them all IFLA-LRM as a driver for harmonization of cataloguing standards related to serials and other continuing resources Gordon Dunsire.
Prepared by Elena Escolano
The new RDA: resource description in libraries and beyond
Modelling Intellectual Processes: The object-orient FRBR Model
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
IFLA LRM adopted! Top congress news!
Modelling Intellectual Processes: The object-orient FRBR Model
Presentation transcript:

Some outcomes of the CRM/FRBR harmonization: the definition of manifestation and a review of attributes Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 FRBR/CRM harmonization Will be discussed in detail by Patrick Le Boeuf on Wednesday A working group discussing (possible) convergence of FRBR (E-R model of the library community) and CIDOC CRM (O-O model of the museum community)

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 Expressing FRBR as O-O Re-examination of entities Re-examination of entities Review of attributes Review of attributes

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 In this presentation manifestation manifestation attributes attributes

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 Manifestation in FRBR The physical embodiment of an expression of a work When a work is realized, the resulting expression of the work may be physically embodied on or in a medium such as paper, audio tape, video tape, canvas, plaster, etc.

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 What makes a new manifestation Changes in physical form Changes in physical form –Display characteristics (typeface, layout) –Changes in physical medium (paper to microfilm) –Changes in the container (casette to cartridge) Changes in production process Changes in production process –Publication, marketing (change in publisher, repackaging) But: Changes that affect the intellectual or artictic content result in a new manifestation embodying a new expression of the work

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 Dual nature of manifestation A single physical exemplar A single physical exemplar Multiple copies for public dissemination or distribution Multiple copies for public dissemination or distribution –Formal production process –Limited number of copies for private study or preservation

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 Single exemplar In some cases there may be only a single physical exemplar produced of that manifestation of the work (an authors manuscript, a tape recorded for an oral history archive, an original oil painting, etc.) In some cases there may be only a single physical exemplar produced of that manifestation of the work (an authors manuscript, a tape recorded for an oral history archive, an original oil painting, etc.) Physical object

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 Multiple copies Whether the scope of production is broad or limited, the SET of copies produced in each case constitutes a manifestation. A set is an abstract notion

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 Proposal Both types of manifestation are not equal, so we need two distinct entities: Single exemplar (manifestation sigleton) Single exemplar (manifestation sigleton) A set of exemplars (manifestation product type) A set of exemplars (manifestation product type) They are different by nature and have different attributes, different relationships

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 Attributes in FRBR Derived from analysis of data typically reflected in bibliographic records The principal sources: ISBDs ISBDs Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries (GARE) Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries (GARE) Guidelines for Subject Authority and Reference Entries (GSARE) Guidelines for Subject Authority and Reference Entries (GSARE) UNIMARC Manual UNIMARC Manual

FRBR workshop May 2, Comprehensive but not exhaustive Attributes defined at logical level (as viewed by a user, rather than specific data elements defined by catalogers): Individual data elements Individual data elements Aggregate of discrete data elements (e.g. title of manifastation) Aggregate of discrete data elements (e.g. title of manifastation)

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 Issue no. 1 Attributes were defined from existing practice and mapped to user functions later. Are some attributes missing? Shouldnt attributes be defined from the analysis of functions and entities? Are electronic resources appropriately dealt with?

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 FRBR/CRM analysis There are (too) many attributes for each entity There are (too) many attributes for each entity –Create a superclass –Split into more classes Some attributes are not assigned to appropriate entities Some attributes are not assigned to appropriate entities

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 Examples original language of the work original language of the work medium of performance (musical work) medium of performance (musical work) revisability of expression revisability of expression extensibility of expression extensibility of expression

FRBR workshop May 2, 2005 Proposal A review of attributes Based on user functions and specific needs within functions Based on user functions and specific needs within functions Include electronic resources Include electronic resources