The Micro-CART project teaches students how to familiarize themselves with a project that they were not part of from conception to completion. Students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning with Purpose Control Design and Implementation of a Small-Scale Autonomous Hovercraft Ryan Mackay Joshua Bevan Nicholas Lutz Mario Stamatiou University.
Advertisements

Georgia Tech Aerial Robotics Dr. Daniel P Schrage Jeong Hur Fidencio Tapia Suresh K Kannan SUCCEED Poster Session 6 March 1997.
Waterloo Aerial Robotics Group WARG Mandate: The Waterloo Aerial Robotics Group is a team of University of Waterloo students who, with the support of our.
MicroCART Micro processor C ontrolled A erial R obotics T eam Abstract MicroCART is a group of EE/CprE students tasked with developing an autonomous helicopter.
Design Presentation Spring 2009 Andrew Erdman Chris Sande Taoran Li.
The Micro-CART project will develop a fully autonomous UAV for the 2007 International Aerial Robotics Competition. The industry-sponsored project is funded.
Vertical Launch UAV Project Plan. ∞ Construct an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a camera payload ∞ UAV must autonomously navigate with real-time video.
EDGE™ Project P09122: MAV Control System Erik Bellandi - ME Ben Wager - ME Garrett Argenna - ME Tahar Allag - EE Michael Pepen - EE Stephen Nichols - CE.
Automatic Control & Systems Engineering Autonomous Systems Research Mini-UAV for Urban Environments Autonomous Control of Multi-UAV Platforms Future uninhabited.
Field Navigational GPS Robot Final Presentation & Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
April 26, Team Information Designation Ongo-03 Members Advisors Dr. J. Lamont, Prof. R. Patterson, Dr. Rajagopalan, Dr. J. Basart ClientSpace Systems.
Micro-CART Microprocessor-Controlled Aerial Robotics Team May 1, 2002 Team - Ongo03.
Μ - CART Microprocessor – Controlled Aerial Robotics Team (Ongo03) An Ongoing Senior Design Project Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa.
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
IRP Presentation Spring 2009 Andrew Erdman Chris Sande Taoran Li.
Proposed Approach  Research available commercial satellite communications services  Explore viable battery technologies  Investigate GPS receiver functionality.
Development of Control for Multiple Autonomous Surface Vehicles (ASV) Co-Leaders: Forrest Walen, Justyn Sterritt Team Members: Andrea Dargie, Paul Willis,
EE 491 Project Presentation May07-04 – PDA Based UAS Remote Video Terminal Team Members: Devin Carney Jonathan Farmer Matt Henkes Rene Rios Faculty Advisor:
Fall 2006 AdvisorsClient Dr. John LamontIowa State University Professor Ralph Patterson IIIDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering Primary Vehicle.
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
Abstract Introduction Project Requirements Resources Proposed Approach and Consideration Closing Summary General Information Faculty Advisor Dr. Gerald.
Abstract The purpose of this project is to design a temperature controller to automate paint curing on automobiles using infrared lamps. These lamps will.
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
Ongo-03 Micro-CART Microprocessor-Controlled Aerial Robotics Team Advisors Dr. John Lamont Professor Ralph Patterson III Team Members 2 nd Semester1 st.
Abstract Proposed Approach Solution Development Project Requirements Estimated Resources Other Resources Financial Resources Project Schedule Computer.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos (ITA-Brazil)
Senior Design II Final Presentation Senior Design I April 12, 2006 Team Members: Julian Ross Felipe Prieto Arnoldo Perez Alexander Fontao.
Project OSCAR Octagonal Speech-Controlled Autonomous Robot ONGO-01.
Outline Previous Accomplishments o Last year's SURG o Mapkin Proposal Concept o Why is this useful? o The MikroKopter platform o Previous work Criteria.
AEM 5333 UAV Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking – Humans on foot – Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver.
MAE 435 Project Design and Management II 19 October,
Campus Locator – Cell Phone Interface (May06-05) Dr. John Lamont Prof. Ralph Patterson III Faculty Advisors Iowa State University Senior Design Client.
EE 491 Project Presentation May07-04 – PDA Based UAS Remote Video Terminal Team Members: Devin Carney Jonathan Farmer Matt Henkes Rene Rios Faculty Advisor:
COBXXXX EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE AND CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR UAVS Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos,
Design Team # 4 Design of low cost flight computer for unmanned aerial vehicles Status Report # 4 Ryan Morlino Chris Landeros Sylvester Meighan Stephen.
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
Problem Statement Expanding the capabilities of an auto repair paint drying system that uses newly developed ultraviolet (UV) light activated paint. This.
Abstract Traffic accidents often occur when a major athletic event or concert is held at Iowa State University. This is a result of drivers not being able.
Expert System Job Offer Evaluation Software May Abstract The project’s focus is to decide what criteria should be used to determine which job offer.
UK Aerial Robotics Team UK IDEA Laboratory Workforce Development: The UK Aerial Robotics Team and the PAX River Student UAV Competition Dale McClure (Matt.
A growing problem with university classrooms is the inability to effectively and efficiently record classroom attendance. The solution to this problem.
Preservation of human life is of the utmost importance. Whatever can be done to further this cause should be effectively implemented. It is the goal of.
Abstract Introduction End Product & Deliverables Resources Project Requirements Team Members: Faculty Advisors: Client: Team Members: Faculty Advisors:
Funding provided by: Clients Iowa Space Consortium Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisors Dr John Lamont, Professor E/Cpr E Dr Ralph.
 proposed approach the solution. Localization technologies: Off-board track 1 Dead reckoning Optical imaging Obstacle detection technologies: Ultrasonic.
Measurable Milestones END-PRODUCT DESCRIPTION The bed monitor system helps prevent injury by predicting when an individual is attempting to leave the bed.
OSCAR Octagonal Speech Controlled Autonomous Robot ME Seth Alberty Henry Venes EE Matt FrerichsHuy Nguyen Daniel HumkeDavid Staab Daniel MarquisFahad Wajid.
Mathematical Teaching Software System Ames Community Schools (ACS) has been concerned with their student’s performance in problem-solving on nationally.
1 Center for the Collaborative Control of Unmanned Vehicles (C3UV) UC Berkeley Karl Hedrick, Raja Sengupta.
Estimated Resources Closing Summary Other Resources Financial Resources Project Schedule Computer Engineers William Hoang Gavin Ripley David Hawley Justin.
Abstract Each July, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International holds an annual International Aerial Robotics Competition (IARC), with major.
Client Senior Design Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University Introduction Abstract Architectural plans are currently being developed.
OSCAR Octagonal Speech Controlled Autonomous Robot Team Ongo01 Motion Control & End Effector Frerichs, Matt – EE Moudin, Alex – ME Shedek, Tom – ME Wajid,
Problem Statement The goal of this project is to complete the basic automated functions of the Dream Green putting surface. The objective is to produce.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
P07122 – Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin (EE – Team Leader) Courtney Walsh (ME – Aero) Richard Nichols (EE) Glenn Kitchell (CE) Jeff Welch (ME) Dr.
Mathematical Teaching Software System Ames Community Schools (ACS) has been concerned with their student’s performance in problem-solving on nationally.
Micro-CART Micro-Controlled Aerial Robotics Team December 13, 2001.
Micro-CART SDongo3b Secondary Vehicle Team April 26, 2006
Micro-CART SDongo3b Secondary Vehicle Team
A Secure Wireless Interface between Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs)
Software Support Framework
PAX River Competition UK Aerial Robotics Team University of Kentucky.
Lockheed Martin Challenge
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter
Rudra Timsina Micah Lucas Marc Salas Advisor: Richard Messner
Octagonal Speech Controlled Autonomous Robot
The Rest of Project OSCAR
Presentation transcript:

The Micro-CART project teaches students how to familiarize themselves with a project that they were not part of from conception to completion. Students must quickly become familiar with Micro-CART at its current state and determine how they can actively contribute to the team. This experience is useful as many engineers may not experience projects in the workplace that they design, implement, test, and maintain. M ICRO -CART U N M A N N E D A E R I A L V E H I C L E Closing Summary O NGO Estimated Cost for Fall 2006 (total expenses $2,100) Abstract The Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) holds an International Aerial Robotics Competition (IARC) every July at Ft. Benning, Georgia. Collegiate teams from around the world enter unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) capable of autonomous flight into this competition where specific mission objectives must be met. The goal of the Microprocessor-Controlled Aerial Robotics Team (Micro-CART) is to enter a UAV into the entry level of IARC by developing a fully-autonomous helicopter. A secondary vehicle is also being developed for later stages in the competition. This will showcase the role of Iowa State in the field of unmanned aerial robotics and provide valuable design experience to Micro-CART team members. Continued support from Iowa State University and Lockheed Martin Sensor System Will Provide All Necessary Flight Software Inputs Current helicopter airframe limitations (lift, weight, speed, fuel) Power considerations for on-board hardware Robust autonomous flight system modifiable for various missions Documentation covering all aspects of research and accomplished tasks Design and build a primary and secondary aerial vehicle capable of autonomous flight Develop an integrated system of sensors to control the aerial vehicles Enter entry level IARC, summer 2007 Outside in fair weather conditions Maneuver within a 430-acre area Varied topography and a few man- made obstacles Micro-CART team members will use the vehicle to compete in the IARC Future uses in aerial surveillance, law enforcement reconnaissance Problem StatementOperating EnvironmentIntended Users and UsesAssumptionsLimitationsExpected End Product Client Funding Provided By Design Objectives Develop an aerial vehicle to compete in entry level IARC Develop a secondary vehicle for higher level IARC Functional Requirements Hover via autonomous flight-control Self-navigation to global positioning system (GPS) waypoints Communication between both vehicles Design Constraints Size and weight considerations Cost minimization Low power consumption Measurable Milestones Autonomous flight-control software testing Sensor implementation and testing Communications and ground station development Test flight(s): hover, translational test flights Proposed Approach X-Cell # gas helicopter as primary vehicle Quad-ducted fan platform as secondary vehicle On-board controller (PC/104) will provide sensor interfaces and processing resources for flight control software GPS unit and magnetic compass will provide data for navigation Inertial measurement unit (IMU) will provide helicopter dynamics Sonar arrays will provide data for object detection and avoidance Technologies Considered Software controlled basic stability Self-navigation to GPS waypoints Testing Considerations Individual hardware unit testing (GPS, IMU, Sonar) Integrated hardware unit test with flight-control Hover and translational flight tests Tethered flight testing with test stand M i c r o p r o c e s s o r – C o n t r o l l e d A e r I a l R o b o t I c s T e a m IntroductionApproach and ConsiderationsEstimated ResourcesProject ScheduleClosing SummaryProject Requirements Hardware Subteam Erica Moyer (EE)(Leader) Bill Hughes (EE) Hassan Javed (EE) Pankaj Makhija (EE) Cristina Olivas (EE)(Communication Coordinator) Software Subteam Andrew Larson ( CprE/EE)(Leader ) Brian Baumhover (CprE) Kito Berg –Taylor (AeroE) Bai Shen (CprE) Advisors Dr. John Lamont (EE/CprE) Prof. Ralph Patterson, III (EE/CprE) Scott Morgan (Lockheed Martin) Team Leaders Timothy Gruwell (CprE) Erica Moyer (EE) Ground Station Subteam Josh Robinson (CprE)(Leader) Gustav Brandstrom (ME) Secondary Vehicle Subteam Brett Pfeffer (ME)(Co-Leader) Jeffrey Pries (ME)(Co-Leader) Byung O Kang (EE) Patrick Turner (CprE) Estimated Personnel Hours/Category (2255 Total Hours) Primary Vehicle Secondary Vehicle