The Civil Engineering Project. Practicum, Project, Thesis/Dissertation. PRACTICUM. Exposes the student to an actual job; Interpreted as “on-the-job training”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Poster & Project Presentations The Robert Gordon University
Dr Linda Allin Division of Sport Sciences The value of real life evaluation research for student learning and employability in Sports Development.
{ Weighting: 15% IA – Internal Assessment "Students are required to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of texts studied in parts 1 and 2 and the implications.
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
Writing Objectives: Instructional Targets to Aim For! Anitra E. Butler Associate Professor Dept. of Teacher Education.
What makes a good project?.  A testing ground for concepts presented in the taught programme  An opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge.
Interviewing Techniques and Writing Strategies. Middle School.
© Cambridge International Examinations 2013 Component/Paper 1.
The Literature Review as an integral part of PhD Research
Group Project: Film Analysis of Sunset Blvd. Preparation for 2 nd semester IB presentations.
The Personal Statement: Strategies for Supporting Students
Consistency of Assessment
S17: Field work. Session Objectives  To explain the manner in which field audit is carried out.  To explain the nature of evidence and the different.
Your Project Proposal.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Research Proposal and Dissertation Daing Nasir Ibrahim.
Project Workshops Initial Preparation. 2 Final Year Projects A significant piece of individual and academic work A double module -- 20% of final mark;
Research Methods for Business Students
1 Dissertation & Comprehensive Exam Process Dissertation Process Comprehensive Exam.
Approaching the Literature Review. ‘A researcher cannot perform significant research without first understanding the literature in the field’ (Boote and.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
Grant Writing/Comprehensive Workshop Paul R. Albert, Ph. D
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Sharif University of Technology Session # 4.  Contents  Systems Analysis and Design Sharif University of Technology MIS (Management Information System),
Research Methods Nanda Ganesan, Ph.D. Professor of Information Systems California State University, Los Angeles.
Advanced Research Methodology
Formulating objectives, general and specific
CS 347: Operating Systems  In this course, we reason about effective performance of a computer system  The emphasis of this course is on –Concepts –Techniques.
FINAL PROJECT (CE3216) PLANNING & TIME MANAGEMENT Dr DEEPAK T.J. SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING.
DR. AHMAD SHAHRUL NIZAM ISHA
26 TH ACADEMIC COUNCIL ST APRIL 2015 Breakout session Group C “EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING”
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Research Project at Cabra
The role of the Secretary at Academic Approval and Periodic Review events Quality Assurance Services February 2015.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Literature Review. What is a literature review? A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes information.
Academic Essays & Report Writing
From the Initial Idea to the Finished Product. How to Produce an Effective Essay.
Learning Learning Outcomes, Qualification Frameworks, Goals, Cycles, Levels, Credit, Workload, Profiles Andy Gibbs Bishkek 2011.
1 November 7, 2002 ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT November 7, 2002 EE CURRICULAR REVISION.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
Dillon School District Two Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy.
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
What makes a good project?.  A testing ground for concepts presented in the taught programme  An opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge.
Learning with Cases §Topic 1 - Background - Why are cases used? §Topic 2 - The Three Stage Learning Process §Topic 3 - Individual Preparation for Cases.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Educational Research CECS 5610 Dr. Gerald Knezek University of North Texas Clicking on the Speaker or Quicktime icon will play the audio associated with.
Process-Genre Model for Teaching Writing. Why Process-Genre Model? Allowing students to study the relationship between purpose and form for a particular.
The Research Process Chapter 4. The Process Explore Propose Prepare Execute Analyse Publish.
ECE791 Senior Design Experience Project Requirements and Timeline.
Project 1 (CGNB 413) Briefing
In Search of a Valid Research Topic and its Development.
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
Now what? 1.  I have short-listed projects I am interested in  I know the types of projects I would like to pursue  I have an idea of the resources.
Thinking Skills Creating a thinking school Rosalind Stark.
© Pearson Education Canada, 2005 Business Communication Essentials, Canadian Edition Chapter Understanding and Planning Business Reports and Proposals.
Planning Instruction A Review of the Cognitive Domain and Performance Objectives.
Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, CDIO conference 2009 Lessons learned from developing and operating a large-scale project course.
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Laura Sharp: Senior Lecturer in Law The Law School
PhD Program Requirements
Your Research Proposal
Educational Research CECS 5610
Understanding and Planning Business Reports and Proposals
Effective Graduate Writing
An overview of course assessment
Presentation transcript:

The Civil Engineering Project

Practicum, Project, Thesis/Dissertation. PRACTICUM. Exposes the student to an actual job; Interpreted as “on-the-job training” or “exposure”; In general, it does link together the advanced courses taken by the student to applications.

Practicum, Project, Thesis/Dissertation. THESIS/DISSERTATION. Become thoroughly familiar with a well- defined professional area; Awareness of the state-of-the-art as well as the contributions of other scholars in this particular field of study (comprehensiveness); Significant contribution (originality) to the field study.

Practicum, Project, Thesis/Dissertation. PROJECT. The main objective is to enable the undergraduate student to perform an undertaking which will have a meaningful relationship to his/her future professional activities as an engineer.

Practicum, Project, Thesis/Dissertation. PROJECT. A practical design work; A short experimental or analytical study aimed at solving an actual engineering problem, or; A minor research investigation.

The Civil Engineering Project. What is expected of the CE Project: Feasibility in terms of scope, time constraints and relevance. Under-graduate-level work and focus on the development of higher level of thinking skills of the student.

Under-Graduate-Level Work. Educational Objectives. Knowledge. Comprehension. Analysis. Application. Synthesis. Evaluation.

Thinking Skills. 1. Knowledge. Involves the recall of specifics and universals, the recall of methods and processes, or the recall of a pattern, structure or setting. 2. Comprehension. Refers to the type of understanding, or apprehension such that the individual knows what is being communicated and can make use of the material being communicated without necessarily relating it to other material or seeing its fullest implications.

Thinking Skills. 3. Analysis. The breakdown into its constituent elements or parts such that the relative hierarchy of ideas is made clear and/or the relations between the ideas expressed are made explicit. 4. Application. The use of abstractions in particular and concrete situations.

Thinking Skills. 5. Synthesis. The putting together of elements and parts so as to form a whole; this involves the process of working with pieces, parts, elements, etc., and combining them in such a way as to constitute a pattern or structure not clearly there before. 6. Evaluation. Qualitative or quantitative judgements about the value of material and methods for given purposes or criteria.

Stages in the Eng’g. Project. PROJECT 1: Proposal Stage. Searching for a Topic. Proposal Writing. Proposal Approval by a Committee. Implementation of the Project. PROJECT 2: Documentation/Final Stage. Final Draft Writing. Comprehensive Examination. Results of the Committee.

The Project Adviser’s Function. Guide the student in identifying a perspective projective. Guide the student in defining the problem, setting the objectives and scope of the project. Discuss with the student the details of the approach of the project and the responsibilities of the student in the pursuit of the objectives. Orient the student on the frequency by which he/she will report to the Adviser to account for the accomplishments and/or problems encountered.

The Project Adviser’s Function. Advise the student on background readings relevant to the study. Guide the student on project documentation and preparation of the final report. Monitor the performance of the student against given landmarks. Assist the student in the preparation of the comprehensive examination.

The Time Frame Requirement. Minimum of one semester and a maximum of one academic year to complete the project. Failure to complete within the maximum period would mean compulsory re- evaluation, probable change or discarding of project and going through the proposal stage again.

The Written Proposal. Must be organized, neat & readable. Well-written, brief & concise. Problem & Objectives must be stated clearly and concisely. Show clear project design and planning.

The Proposal Hearing. The Committee. Is composed of 3 members, headed by the Chair. Grades the written & oral presentation of the student. Suggests revisions, evaluates the relevance, and approves or disapproves the proposal.

The Proposal Hearing. Time Frame: Presentation (15 minutes) Defense (20 minutes) Panel Deliberation (10-15 minutes)

FAQ

What is the outline of the research proposal?

Will we be guided in the writing process?

How should we start? Where do we begin?

Is there anyone who would monitor our work?

Is there a possibility that we will fail?

Where can we get the references and books?

Is a project study costly?

How far should we go in the analysis?

Are the advisers strict on grammar and sentence structures of our report?

Will the members of a group be graded the same?

Is it possible that one fails in the group while the other two members pass?

Will the committee members matter during the defense or final deliberation?

Why is it that the proposal presentation is made earlier this year?

Can we start writing our report while still gathering data?

What are the essential elements to be presented during the proposal defense?

What must be the first step to do after this lecture?

Can we ask other people to do the data gathering for us?

What is the bottleneck in a project?

What if circumstances prevent us from finishing our project?

Will we be able to catch up in case there is a change of topic?

What would happen to our results or final reports?

Is there a way we can see a sample proposal?

END