The on-line HFA Monitor and national level process 2 nd ISDR Asia Pacific Partnership Meeting 11- 13 August, 2010 Incheon, Republic of Korea.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Canadian Sport Policy Renewal April CSP Renewal Process To ensure orderly transition from the current Canadian Sport Policy to its successor.

Advertisements

Process and mechanics of HFA progress monitoring and Review Sujit Mohanty, UNISDR The Hyogo Framework for Action Progress Review and Reporting.

Consultation Process Towards the Post-2015 Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction Youcef Ait Chellouche UNISDR AFRICA.

Do we need a GN of NGOs? Yes! (as far as participation in the GN does not reduce/affect involvement in the GP/DRR) The GN should build on existing networks.

National level process HFA progress monitoring and Review Sujit Mohanty, UNISDR The Hyogo Framework for Action Progress Review and Reporting Framework.

Sujit Mohanty, UNISDR The on-line HFA Monitor Walkthrough The Hyogo Framework for Action Progress Review and Reporting Framework for the Arab States Region.

HFA Monitoring and Progress Reporting Results of First HFA Biennial Review of Progress Shefali Juneja UNISDR, Geneva.

TOWARDS A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ALLIANCE FOR DRR: FROM BARCELONA TO CHENGDU AND BEYOND Richard Davies, Leeds City Council.

A Framework to Guide and Monitor Disaster Reduction Online-Conference.

Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 2 – Prioritize and set outcomes.

THE REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER for Central and Eastern Europe Integrated Environmental Policies for Sustainable Development UNDP Workshop for NIS

Group 3 Financing EFA: Domestic resource mobilization and external support Facilitator: Robert Prouty, The World Bank.

Developing Guiding Principles for ICT in Education Policy

6 AMCDRR Technical session and Asia Pacific HFA2 input

Approach to 6AMCDRR Background Studies: Contribution of HFA1 learning and HFA2 consultations Madhavi Ariyabandu Programme Officer UNISDR Asia Pacific Meeting.

Comprehensive M&E Systems

Generic Employability Skills Centre for Developing and Evaluating Lifelong Learning (CDELL)

Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.

Learning Metrics Task Force Phase 2 Consultation Prototype Framework for Measuring Learning Outcomes December 2012 – January 2013.

ADB/ ECA/ PARIS21 – NSDS design seminar, Addis Ababa, 8-11 August 2005 National Strategies for the Development of Statistics: Making the Case, NSDS Essentials.

MASS Project Evaluation Annie Paton

1 “Adaptation to the consequences of Climate Change: Progress achieved and capacity building needed” Budapest, November 19-20, 2007 Strategic Environmental.

1 UNISDR Secretariat Asia and Pacific IAP meeting 25 March Learning from the HFA progress review.

NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW GREG HEESOM LEGAL COUNSEL ASIA PACIFIC FORUM OF NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS.

Monitoring and Evaluation of RA II Strategic Operating Plan (SOP) L.S. Lee, Hong Kong, China Chairman of the Task Team on RA II Strategic Planning.

1 UNISDR Secretariat Asia and Pacific, IAP meeting March The Hyogo Framework for Action - Biennial Progress Review.

Sam Tedcastle Stakeholder Engagement Officer - Scotland Twitter/celticseaspartnership Building.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNESCO Bangkok 1 Preparation of the Regional Strategy for the DESD in the Asia-Pacific.

REGIONAL ANALYSIS ON DISASTER RISK REDUCTION EDUCATION IN THE ASIA PACIFIC REGION IN THE CONTEXT OF HFA PRIORITY 3 IMPLEMENTATION Bangkok, March 2009 Prepared.

Views from the Frontline A local perspective of progress towards implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action

Structure of the HFA2 Input Paper. Outline Introduction and Rationale Process of consultation in the Asia Pacific region Synthesis of the AP experience.

HFA Progress Monitoring and 10 Year Review ISDR Asia Partnership (IAP) Meeting Bangkok, April 2014.

1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action.

THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL (LG-SAT)

Technical Session 3 Promoting Integration of DRR & CCA into Development for Green Growth Chair Agency: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the.

Global SNA Implementation Strategy GULAB SINGH United Nations Statistics Division Training Workshop on 2008 SNA for ECO Member States October 2012,

Supporting Industry Change Planning: Risk & Milestone Assessment Process & Tools 07/07/2014.

1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action.

IMPLEMENTING UNCT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR GENDER EQUALITY AND THE EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN (GENDER SCORECARDS) DESK REVIEW Prepared by the UNDG.

GEOSS Mid-Term Evaluation Detailed Framework. Issues with Plan Clear Direction on Scoping Data Issues- Made explicit so as not to raise expectations or.

HFA progress monitoring and Review Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership 29 – 31 March 2011 Jakarta.

Technical session (TS), High Level Round Table (HLRT) leads and Stakeholder groups in 6 AMCDRR Meeting of the Executive Committee and Development Support.

NSDS DESIGN PROCESS: ROAD MAPS & OTHER PRELIMINARIES Prof. Ben Kiregyera NSDS Workshop, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 9 August 2005.

UNEP’s Fifth Global Environment Outlook (GEO-5). GEO-5 Process to date March 2010: Global Intergovernmental and Multi- stakeholder Consultation April-September.

Process and mechanics of HFA progress monitoring and Review Sujit Mohanty, UNISDR Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership 24 – 26 March 2010 Bangkok.

Global Assessment Report and need for Regional Assessment Report Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership, September September 2011 Pattaya, Thailand.

Stakeholder Groups: 5 Key Questions and Some thoughts Abdul Shakoor Sindhu ISDR Asia Partnership (IAP), Bangkok, 2-4 December, 2014.

ISDR Asia Partnership (IAP) meeting, April 2014, Bangkok April 2014 Sujit Mohanty UNISDR ROAP Stakeholders’ engagement and ‘Voluntary Commitment.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

ISDR Asia Partnership (IAP) meeting, April 2014, Bangkok April 2014 Sujit Mohanty UNISDR ROAP Making of the for 6 AMCDRR Declaration and Voluntary.

NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR EARTHQUAKE TECHNOLOGY-NEPAL (NSET) ISDR Asia Partnership Meeting March 2011 Jakarta Indonesia Local Level Pilot HFA Workshop.

Fulfilling the commitments The 2 nd ISDR Asia Partnership Meeting 2014, December 2014, Bangkok, Thailand.

Flash Appeals NATF/ACAPS Training Revinge When is a Flash appeal issued? Part of the Consolidated Appeals Process, the FA is considered as the humanitarian.

Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments

Monitoring progress of AMCDRR outcomes CSO Task Force under IAP.

27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

Group One and Two Mid-term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Participants: UNISDR EMI Bhutan ADRC Incheon NEMA WFPUNOOSA WHO MARD Viet NamSamoa.

HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION This presentation contains a complete overview of all aspects of Response Monitoring Presenting.

Background The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which the UN Members States jointly committed to in September 2015, provide an ambitious and long-term.

Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction Building resilient communities and nations by putting the interests and concerns of.

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Process: What, when, by whom? Global Partnership monitoring workshop Copenhagen, June 2013.

Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metric (SEA-PLM) II CONSULTATIVE MEETING.

Title of presentation Copyright IDS and MeTA 2010

The most represented stakeholders within the NAPA process were governments, followed by research institutions, UN Agencies and local communities. Private.

Overview Of CREW Activities July 2013 – June 2014

Suggestion for next steps for PGA for REDD+ in Vietnam

Discussions support slides

E-Government: Benchmarking Electronic Service Delivery Moira Atkinson - Office of the e-Envoy September 2001.

Global SNA Implementation Strategy

Future Approach to Advancing Accountancy Education At the Global Level

Presentation transcript:

The on-line HFA Monitor and national level process 2 nd ISDR Asia Pacific Partnership Meeting August, 2010 Incheon, Republic of Korea

HFA Monitor A web based monitoring system Hosted at english/hyogo/hfa-monitoring/ Primary target user: National government

Outline Walkthrough of ‘HFA Monitor’ tool National level implementation process and time frame

HFA Monitor 3 strategic goals 22 core indicators in 5 priorities for action 5 drivers of progress 3 future outlook statements 5 levels of progress from minor progress to comprehensive achivement

: Regional organizations ( ) View interim report View report Access to authorized regional organizations View interim report

Accessibility of country reports

Demo user account User id: hfamonitordemo2010 Password: demo2010

National level arrangements Nominated HFA focal point facilitates inputs to online ‘HFA Monitor’ Broad, inclusive consultation across government and other stakeholders Draw on existing monitoring and review process (if available) Includes analysis of DRR progress reported in other frameworks (CCA, NAPA, MDG etc.) Supportive of national processes and feeds into national level DRR planning

Suggested steps Phase IBy 30 September 2010 Step 1:Identification of relevant stake holders Step 2:Grouping of stakeholders Step 3:Carry out multi stakeholder meetings/ workshops Step 4:Assemble all inputs from the working groups Step 5:Input all validated information in the web based HFA monitor system Step 6:Circulate the interim report to the working groups Step 7:Share the information as an ‘Interim’ report Phase II Step 8:Continue improving the information on the report Step 9:Finalize the report with the stakeholder group Step 10:Share the ‘Final Report’ through the HFA monitor

Multi stakeholder approach Examples of key stake holders

Identification of relevant stake holders Relevance, interest and availability Representation from a wide variety of stakeholders is essential Stakeholder mapping

Grouping of stakeholders Form working groups on specific areas For example: for each priority area of the HFA Multi stakeholder representation in each working group Identify facilitating organisation in each group

Multi stakeholder meetings Each working group meets to gather and analyze available information May use the offline report template Gather information through desk researches, field surveys and interviews

Assemble all inputs Through multi stakeholder participatory meetings Deliberate on the over all progress in all areas of HFA Coverage and authenticity is key

Input in HFA Monitor Feed information in the online tool After completion validate the report by the working groups Share it as an ‘Interim’ report By 30 September 2010

Finalize report Continue updating the information Finalize with the stake holder group Share as a ‘Final Report’ By May 2011

Discussion points Clarifications on the HFA Monitor tool Clarifications and/or suggestions on the national level processes