The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Insights from interviews* Iowa OCLC Users Group Conference May 27, 2005 Lynn Silipigni Connaway,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building the Foundation of an Information Literacy Program
Advertisements

Exploring the Information Needs of Life Sciences Researchers Brenda Graves-Blevins 1 ; Katherine M. Anderson 2 ; MaryEllen Sievert 2 1 Ellis Library; 2.
What Ohio Librarians Want to Know About College and University Faculty and Student Users Chandra Prabha, OCLC Lynn Silipigni Connaway, OCLC Brenda Dervin,
An Overview of the IMLS Project: Sense-making the information confluence: The whys and hows of college and university user satisficing of information needs.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center What Can Be Learned From Usage Data Lynn Silipigni Connaway Research Scientist Mark Bendig Systems Analyst ASIST 2003.
Why Not Libraries? Users Identify Their Information Preferences Presented by Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Consulting Research Scientist OCLC Research.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC Research: Collection Assessment and Use Studies Lynn Silipigni Connaway Ed ONeill Chandra Prabha Mark Bendig Anya.
Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Transcripts Presented by Marie L. Radford and Lynn Silipigni Connaway 2006 ALISE Conference San Antonio,
Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Transcripts Presented by Lynn Silipigni Connaway OCLC Members Council February 14, 2006.
Google is user friendly… the library catalog is not. Information-seekers Preferences Presented by Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Consulting Research Scientist.
Relational Communication in Chat Reference Marie L. Radford and Lynn Silipigni Connaway New Jersey Communication Association Montclair State University,
Meeting the Information Needs of College and University Users: Preliminary Results of a Two-Year, Multidisciplinary User Investigation NFAIS 47 th Annual.
Reflections of Reference Practice: Analyzing Virtual Reference Transcripts Presented by Marie L. Radford and Lynn Silipigni Connaway 2007 ALISE Conference.
Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Transcripts Presented by Lynn Silipigni Connaway and Marie L. Radford QuestionPoint Users Group Meeting.
Focusing on Change: Connecting to Both Millennials and Baby Boomers Presented by: Lynn Silipigni Connaway information: interactions & impact Conference.
PLA National Conference Minneapolis, MN March 25-29, 2008 Exceeding Expectations: E-Reference Excellence in Collaborative VR Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center The Library is a good source if you have several months. Making the Library More Accessible Presented by Lynn Silipigni.
LRS-V October 8,2010 Lynn Silipigni Connaway Senior Research Scientist Timothy J. Dickey Post-Doctoral Researcher I Dont Have to Know, I Go to One Spot:
The world’s libraries. Connected. User-centered Decision Making: A New Model for Developing Academic Library Services & Systems Helsinki, Finland 12 August.
Methods to weigh the outcome of the use of electronic resources Highlights of two studies among Doctoral Candidates and PhDs worldwide Mr. Boe Horton Senior.
OCLC Research Webinar November 15, 2011 Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist OCLC Research Marie L. Radford, Ph.D. Associate Professor.
Shared Expectations: Getting Comfortable, and Providing Quality Service in Cooperative Virtual Reference Lynn Silipigni Connaway Marie L. Radford Best.
11 Collaboration and Crowdsourcing: Synergistic Solutions for Sustainable Virtual Reference, an Analysis of Critical Incidents Marie L. Radford, Ph.D.,
Marie L. Radford, PhD, Rutgers University & Lynn Silipigni Connaway, PhD, OCLC Presented at the Fifth Annual iConference University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Marie L. Radford, Ph.D. Associate Professor Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist OCLC Reference.
EuroCRIS Best Practices & Solutions Members Helping Members Move Forward.
Mixed Emotions: The Affective Experience of Librarians During Virtual Reference Instructional Work Susan Wengler Ph.D. Student Rutgers, The State University.
Leading to excellence Comprehensive Equity at Ohio State: What have we learned? Joan M. Herbers Principal Investigator ceos.osu.edu 1.
Planning brainstorming collaboration training faculty work practice study the question our methods project plan retrospective interviews “what don’t we.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program: Summary Report.
Examples of Successful Collaborative Campus Critical Thinking Examples of Successful Collaborative Campus Projects in Critical Thinking n “Seeing Women.
The world’s libraries. Connected. Convergence & Synergy: Social Q&A Meets Virtual Reference Services ASIS&T, 75 TH Annual Meeting 30 October 2012
Choosing Your Primary Research Method What do you need to find out that your literature did not provide?
Mountains, Valleys, and Pathways: Serials Users’ Needs NASIG 2006 Annual Conference May 4-7, 2006 Presented by: Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. OCLC Online.
Center for Information and Communication Studies The Link Among Faculty Purposes of Reading, Information Seeking Patterns, Aspects of Use, Value and the.
Image-seeking preferences & behavior of undergraduates: a study to understand what they want, how they do it, & how we can help Laurie Bridges Tiah Edmunson-Morton.
Value of Scholarly Reading to Graduate Work: An Academic Survey of 3 U.S. Universities Rachel Volentine, Liz Whitson; University of Tennessee; College.
Project EIFL Direct in Lithuania By Ausra Vaskeviciene Martynas Mazvydas National Library of Lithuania, Lithuanian Research Library Consortium.
Time. Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. Blackboard Collaborate Communication Tools 3.
Thomas F. Holgate Library Bennett College HBCU Library Alliance –Mentorship Program Bennett College Site Visit December 12, 2005 Joan Williams, Director.
Proposition: Digital Collections Are Easier to Find and Use through DLF Aquifer’s American Social History Online Katherine Kott, Aquifer Director Library.
Seeking Sustainability & Singularity: Evaluating Virtual Reference From User, Non-user, & Librarian Perspectives Presented by Marie L. Radford and Lynn.
Understanding Virtual Users: Connecting Research to Practice Lynn Silipigni Connaway Consulting Research Scientist Clifton Snyder Software Engineer October.
Education and Outreach Goals Increase Audience Awareness Facilitate Audience Engagement Along a User-Contributor Continuum Support Audience Needs.
The world’s libraries. Connected. Social Q&A Meets Virtual Reference Services Convergence and Synergy: ASIS&T, 75 TH Annual Meeting 30 October 2012
A Model for Computational Science Investigations Supercomputing Challenge
“Make it as easy as a Google Book Search.” Learning how to make the catalog usable Presented by Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist.
Building relationships and bridging social capital: An inclusive approach to immigrant civic engagement within libraries A PROCESS AND OUTCOME EVALUATION,
Click, Call, or Come on In! Connecting to Millennials in FtF & VR Encounters R U Communicating? Speaking the Language of Millennials ACRL, University Library.
#vandr Chicago October 22, 2015 Visitors and Residents: A Mapping Exercise Lynn Silipigni Connaway, PhD Senior Research Scientist William Harvey, PhD Consulting.
ASK?AWAY USERS GROUP October 19, 2006 AGENDA Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, and Librarian Perspectives.
Michal Fedeles, PhD Director, Continuing Health Education, Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences Simon Fraser University Céline Cressman, MSc Collaborator,
Stephanie Gerding Brenda Hough Beyond the Survey: a practical approach to INTERVIEWS and FOCUS GROUPS November 17, 2015.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J HOW RESEARCHERS FIND INFORMATION IN THE NEW DIGITAL AGE Gaynor Austen Director, Library Services.
Printed by Making the Connection: Assessing the Information Literacy Skills of First-Year Students Enrolled in a Doctor of Dental.
E-Valuating Virtual Viewpoints: User, Non-User, and Librarians Perspectives on Live Chat-Based Reference Marie L. Radford, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Rutgers,
Georgia Tech NSF ADVANCE Research Program Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator NSF ADVANCE Site Visit June 2004.
ALISE Philadelphia 9 January 2008 Users and Librarians Engaging in Virtual Spaces: Using Critical Incidents to Inform Practice and Education in Chat Reference.
Curriculum Mapping: Academic Faculty & Subject Librarians Working Together By Barbara Tierney, Head Research & Info Services, UCF Libraries With some content.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center “The Library is a good source if you have several months.” Making the Library More Accessible Presented by Lynn Silipigni.
Project SAILS: An Information Literacy Research Project Carolyn Radcliff Kent State University.
From Program Theory to Systems Theory: Using Logic Analysis to Re- conceptualize an Evaluation Lori L. Bakken, PhD; Jonathan M. Ross, MD; Curtis A. Olson,
Connect. Collaborate. Contribute: A Model for Designing and Building a Research Commons Alison Armstrong Associate Director for Research and Education.
LSSU Assessment Timeline Phase I (Completed by December 2009) –Create Institutional Assessment Structure –Create Department Assessment Teams –Write College.
The Essentia Institute of Rural Health (EIRH) is
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
Rebecca L. Mugridge University of Pittsburgh
PAIRS - Resources for Broadening Participation in Computing Project
Supporting Research for Major Institutional Grants
Presentation transcript:

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Insights from interviews* Iowa OCLC Users Group Conference May 27, 2005 Lynn Silipigni Connaway, OCLC Chandra Prabha, OCLC Brenda Dervin, OSU *IMLS Grant

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Project funded by: –Institute of Museum and Library Services $480,543 grant to Ohio State University –Ohio State University (OSU) $209,340 in kind contribution –Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) $319,412 in kind contribution

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Project Phases Project duration Calendar years, 2004 and 2005 Four phases: I.Literature reviews and dialogue II.Sense-making surveys: online & phone III.Focus group interviews IV.Structured observations

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Study Populations 44 colleges and universities 100 mile radius from Columbus 400 informants – 100 each Faculty Graduate students Undergraduate students netLibrary users Samples, stratified by Carnegie Institutional Class Codes

Input from users

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Focus Group Interviews –Think of a time when you had a situation where you needed answers or solutions and you did a quick search and made do with it. You knew there were other sources but you decided not to use them. Please include sources such as friends, family, professors, colleagues, etc.

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Focus Group Interviews –Have there been times when you did not use a library (university/college, public, etc.) and used other sources instead?

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Focus Group Interviews –Think of an academic situation where you needed answers or solutions and you did a thorough search (you did not take the first answer that you found). Describe the situation.

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Focus Group Interviews –If you had a magic wand, what would your ideal information systems and services provide? How would you go about using the information systems and services? When? Where? How?

Input from librarians

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Project Dialogues and Librarian Surveys –Local Advisory Committee –National Advisory Committee –OCLC Members Council –OCLC Board of Trustees

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Project Dialogues Library director or representative from each of the 44 academic institutions Library director or representative from geographically contingent public libraries 79 were invited 31 participated

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Online Survey OCLC Members Council and Board of Trustees –126 online surveys distributed –34 responses = 27% response rate

Common Threads in Librarian Responses

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Information needed for development of user- centered services and collections – Who are the users? – Where are they getting their information? – Why dont users think of the library first?

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Biggest challenges of the advance of electronic information systems –Too much information, too many choices –Not knowing users expectations and needs –Off-site users

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Biggest challenges (continued) –Non-standard search interfaces –User training –Designing systems for users – not librarians –Competing with Google, Amazon, Ask Jeeves…

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Differences between how practitioners and researchers look at users –Researchers ask why questions –Practitioners are interested in how questions –Researchers see users in abstract –Practitioners see users in real-time –Pursue collaborative research Make practitioners an integral part of research

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Differences (continued) –Overwhelming affirmative response Theory vs. practice Ivory tower vs. real world Researchers general approach vs. practitioners individualized approach Researchers – unreality paint

The Whys & Hows of Students & Faculty Finding What They Want Continue to analyze data Write and submit for publication –Literature Reviews –Reports of findings

END NOTES This presentation is one of the outcomes from the project Sense-Making the Information Confluence: The Whys and Hows of College and University User Satisficing of Information Needs." Funded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services, Ohio State University, and OCLC, Online Computer Library Center, the project is being implemented by Brenda Dervin (Professor of Communication and Joan N. Huber Fellow of Social & Behavioral Science, Ohio State University) as Principal Investigator; and Lynn Silipigni Connaway (OCLC Consulting Research Scientist III) and Chandra Prabha (OCLC Senior Research Scientist), as Co-Investigators. More information can be obtained at: