DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 1 The Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (IDQTF) April 2004 Presented By: James.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEO-5 in Ottawa 1 29 November 2004 Draft GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan and Status Report on Reference Document Ivan B. DeLoatch, Toshio Koike, Robert.
Advertisements

Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
Legal Work Group Developing a Uniform EHR/HIE Patient Consent Form.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Member.
EPA Requirements for Quality Management Plans And Quality Assurance Project Plans Ray Terhune, QAS.
DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 1 The Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans.
ANSI/ASQ E Overview Gary L. Johnson U.S. EPA
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP The Uniform Federal Policy for Implementing Environmental Quality Systems (UFP-QS) Emile I. Boulos.
Global Business Blueprint Summary Presenters: Laurie Dempsey, CBP Lois McCluskey, eCP January 28, 2004.
RESOLVE, Inc. National Geothermal Collaborative An Overview January 20, 2004.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel PGIN Representative.
The National Declassification Center Releasing All We Can, Protecting What We Must Public Interest Declassification Board NDC Project Update April 22,
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
AMTAC April 12 th, 2011 Meredith Kurpius EPA R9 1.
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
Office of the Auditor General of Canada The State of Program Evaluation in the Canadian Federal Government Glenn Wheeler Director, Results Measurement.
Part II Objectives F Describe how policies and procedures are used F Identify different types of P & P F Describe the purpose and components of a Policy.
Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual: MARLAP Presentation to the Radiation Advisory Committee/Science Advisory Board April.
Welcome ISO9001:2000 Foundation Workshop.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
1 of 39 DQO Implementation Process: Flow Chart and Wall Charts 30 minutes DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 8 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
Implementation of DOE Order 450.1: Self-Declaration and Report Letters Steven R. Woodbury US Department of Energy March 9, 2005.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
©2008 Office of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley Community Benefits Guidelines Office of Attorney General Martha Coakley February 23, 2009.
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
2011 ITRC Spring Membership Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota April 6, 2011.
Briefing on a Draft Green Streets Policy for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell COG/TPB Staff Transportation Planning Board January 15, 2014 Item.
Region V ERP Auto Body Training Introduction to Data Quality Training Chicago, IL November 18, 2009.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Activities of the National Water Quality Monitoring Council Gail Mallard, USGS NWQMC Meeting Phoenix, AZ, December 10, 2002.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Deemed Exports Overview and the Inspector General’s Report Presentation for : Alex Lopes Director, Deemed Exports and Electronics Division Office of National.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
1 Update on the STIP-II Project & Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Meeting Portland, OR April 3, 2003.
1 Lifecycle Management Work Group A briefing on Work Group progress by Wendy Blake-Coleman US EPA.
DoD Environmental Data Quality Workgroup Update Presented to: Joint Services Environmental Management Conference April 2005 Edward Hartzog Director, NAVSEA.
USEPA REGION 4 Quality Management Plan ( For training purposes only)
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
DOE Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Conference Knoxville, TN August 24-27, 2009 Colette Broussard, DOE-HQ Office of Quality Assurance Policy.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
Using the FRP to Enhance Georgia’s Leadership Program May 9, 2006 Stephanie Busch P 2 AD.
1 Developed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) January 2014 Setting up a Sustainable National GHG Inventory Management System.
Presentation at HSPD-12 Workshop Ms. Jeanette Thornton May 4, 2005.
Update on the STIP-II Project: Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Air Manager’s Committee Santa Fe, NM March.
ECOS Information Session Draft EPA Quality Documents February 13, 2013 Presented by EPA Quality Staff, Office of Environmental Information For meeting.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
OMB Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance (Endorsed) Ivan DeLoatch, Staff Director Lew Sanford Jr. & Wendy Blake-Coleman NGAC Meeting, February 4, 2009.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update January 14, NSDI Strategic Plan High-level Timeline 2 Timeframe Activity Dec - Feb Project Start-up – COMPLETED Feb -
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA EMS Building Blocks to Success Michael DeWit, QEP EMS Lead ICF Consulting Inc. Fairfax, VA Michael J. Green, PE.
Quality Management Plans (QMPs) and Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) Danny France and Greg Noah EPA Region 4, SESD December 6, 2006.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Office of Science Statement on Digital Data Management Laura Biven, PhD Senior Science and Technology Advisor Office of the Deputy Director for Science.
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
NATO Policy on Civil Standards Benefits of Going Civil Greg Saunders Director Defense Standardization Program Office.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
EMS Organizational Implementation Model Presented by James Chitty Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service June 2008.
DS477 Draft Safety Guide: The Management System for the Predisposal and Disposal of Radioactive Waste CS to develop the draft IAEA Safety Guide on the.
Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
Development of determination and verification manual (DVM)
Part II Objectives Describe how policies and procedures are used
Central New York HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COALITION
Presentation transcript:

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 1 The Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (IDQTF) April 2004 Presented By: James Woolford, Director, Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office, U.S. EPA

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 2 Purpose Explain background of IDQTF and its products Provide overview of IDQTF products Describe IDQTF product implementation plans Explain background of IDQTF and its products Provide overview of IDQTF products Describe IDQTF product implementation plans

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 3 Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (IDQTF) (est. 1997) IDQTF Subgroups An interagency partnership with a shared mission and goals Background EPA Waste Programs - Headquarters And Regions Other Federal Agencies (Observers) Department of Energy Department of Defense Components What Is the IDQTF?

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 4 IDQTF Mission and Goals Mission –To document an intergovernmental quality system, beginning with the hazardous waste programs (CERCLA and RCRA) Goals –To document an intergovernmental quality system based on ANSI/ASQC E-4 –To identify the roles and responsibilities of EPA and other Federal agencies regarding QA/QC oversight –To develop guidance for implementing Federal Government-wide requirements and procedures regarding data quality Mission –To document an intergovernmental quality system, beginning with the hazardous waste programs (CERCLA and RCRA) Goals –To document an intergovernmental quality system based on ANSI/ASQC E-4 –To identify the roles and responsibilities of EPA and other Federal agencies regarding QA/QC oversight –To develop guidance for implementing Federal Government-wide requirements and procedures regarding data quality Background

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 5 A Two-Part Quality System Program level – Based on Part A of ANSI/ASQC E-4 –Uniform Federal Policy for Implementing Environmental Quality Systems (UFP-QS) –Roles and Responsibilities Guidance (appendix) Project level – Implementation guidance for Part B of ANSI/ASQC E-4 –Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans (UFP-QAPP) Part 1, Manual Part 2, Supplementary Materials Program level – Based on Part A of ANSI/ASQC E-4 –Uniform Federal Policy for Implementing Environmental Quality Systems (UFP-QS) –Roles and Responsibilities Guidance (appendix) Project level – Implementation guidance for Part B of ANSI/ASQC E-4 –Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans (UFP-QAPP) Part 1, Manual Part 2, Supplementary Materials Background

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 6 Uniform Federal Policy for Implementing Environmental Quality Systems Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans (UFP-QAPP), Manual and Workbook QA/QC Compendium: Minimum QA/QC Activities Roles and Responsibilities Guidance, Appendix to UFP-QS Final, signed by all three agencies, January 2003 Review draft, Fall 2003 Review draft, Spring 2004 Status of IDQTF Products Background

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 7 Commitment to IDQTF Product Each agency will decide how best to implement products. Each agency will be responsible for its own oversight. IDQTF will have a continuing role to address issues and ensure improvement. Each agency will decide how best to implement products. Each agency will be responsible for its own oversight. IDQTF will have a continuing role to address issues and ensure improvement. Background

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 8 Potential Impact of IDQTF Products Focus on team-based, front-end planning requires: –More time spent at the beginning of the process –Changes in how people think about the way the process is managed –A long view of outcomes Focus on team-based, front-end planning requires: –More time spent at the beginning of the process –Changes in how people think about the way the process is managed –A long view of outcomes Background

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 9 IDQTF Products

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 10 UFP-QS The Uniform Federal Policy for Implementing Environmental Quality Systems A guide for documenting and implementing a quality system Consistent with ANSI/ASQC E-4 and EPA Order A2 A guide for documenting and implementing a quality system Consistent with ANSI/ASQC E-4 and EPA Order A2

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 11 UFP-QS The Benefits of the UFP-QS Improved effectiveness of Federal environmental programs Clarification of roles and responsibilities Confidence in quality systems to reduce duplication of oversight efforts Enhanced accountability and confidence in environmental decisions Improved effectiveness of Federal environmental programs Clarification of roles and responsibilities Confidence in quality systems to reduce duplication of oversight efforts Enhanced accountability and confidence in environmental decisions

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 12 UFP-QS How Does the UFP-QS Differ from Existing EPA Guidance Documents? Expands quality requirements to other agencies Provides more detailed implementation policies and examples Reflects needs and practices of participating Federal agencies Represents consensus policy based on input from participating Federal agencies. Expands quality requirements to other agencies Provides more detailed implementation policies and examples Reflects needs and practices of participating Federal agencies Represents consensus policy based on input from participating Federal agencies.

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 13 UFP-QS Applicability Applies to signatory agencies –DoD –DOE –EPA Initially applicable to hazardous waste programs Applies to signatory agencies –DoD –DOE –EPA Initially applicable to hazardous waste programs

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 14 UFP-QS Implementation A multistep process that may take a number of years: –Step 1 – Review existing quality system requirements and document them –Step 2 – Identify gaps between what is and what is required –Step 3 – Begin to address these gaps, with revisions to quality management plans (QMPs) over time A multistep process that may take a number of years: –Step 1 – Review existing quality system requirements and document them –Step 2 – Identify gaps between what is and what is required –Step 3 – Begin to address these gaps, with revisions to quality management plans (QMPs) over time

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 15 UFP-QS Agency-Specific Implementation Steps EPA OSWER Quality Management Plan DoD Quality Assurance/Quality Control Instruction DOE O 450.1, Environmental Protection Program EPA OSWER Quality Management Plan DoD Quality Assurance/Quality Control Instruction DOE O 450.1, Environmental Protection Program

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 16 UFP-QS Roles and Responsibilities Guidance, Appendix to UFP-QS Establishes general principles for the roles and responsibilities relating to environmental data collection and use at Federal facilities Outlines how problems between two agencies can be resolved Clarifies the relationships between headquarters and subordinate organizations for quality systems oversight Establishes general principles for the roles and responsibilities relating to environmental data collection and use at Federal facilities Outlines how problems between two agencies can be resolved Clarifies the relationships between headquarters and subordinate organizations for quality systems oversight

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 17 UFP-QAPP Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans (UFP-QAPP) Provides implementation guidance for project-specific portion of ANSI/ASQC E-4 (Part B) Provides a structured, standardized approach to planning for and conducting environmental data collection operations Uses common format that promotes easier review Covers all essential elements of the systematic planning process (SPP) Is consistent with EPA guidance Provides implementation guidance for project-specific portion of ANSI/ASQC E-4 (Part B) Provides a structured, standardized approach to planning for and conducting environmental data collection operations Uses common format that promotes easier review Covers all essential elements of the systematic planning process (SPP) Is consistent with EPA guidance

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 18 UFP-QAPP The UFP-QAPP Approach Walks the user through each stage of the SPP Provides optional fill-in-the-blank tables for each QAPP element Walks the user through each stage of the SPP Provides optional fill-in-the-blank tables for each QAPP element

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 19 UFP-QAPP UFP-QAPP Organization Part 1, Manual – Provides instructions for preparing QAPPs. Part 2, supplementary materials – Part 2A, Workbook – Part 2B, QA/QC Compendium – Part 2C, Example QAPP Part 1, Manual – Provides instructions for preparing QAPPs. Part 2, supplementary materials – Part 2A, Workbook – Part 2B, QA/QC Compendium – Part 2C, Example QAPP

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 20 UFP-QAPP How Will the UFP-QAPP Be Implemented? Voluntary adoption of the UFP- QAPP by programs and agencies Applicable to future QAPPs only Systematic training Potentially useful for all environmental programs Current status: Review draft out; comments due January 2004 Voluntary adoption of the UFP- QAPP by programs and agencies Applicable to future QAPPs only Systematic training Potentially useful for all environmental programs Current status: Review draft out; comments due January 2004

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 21 UFP-QAPP What Is the QA/QC Compendium? Identifies minimum QA/QC activities for Superfund Will reduce conflicts by standardizing QA/QC practices Preserves the data quality objectives process by recognizing the role of site- specific decisions Is based on analysis of current practices and best value Will be implemented as Part 2B of the UFP-QAPP Identifies minimum QA/QC activities for Superfund Will reduce conflicts by standardizing QA/QC practices Preserves the data quality objectives process by recognizing the role of site- specific decisions Is based on analysis of current practices and best value Will be implemented as Part 2B of the UFP-QAPP

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 22 UFP-QAPP What is the content of the QA/QC Compendium? List of carefully defined minimum QA/QC activities for each phase of Superfund Text addressing: –Use of screening and definitive data –Definitions of QA/QC measures –Added value of commonly used QC samples –Scope and steps of data review List of carefully defined minimum QA/QC activities for each phase of Superfund Text addressing: –Use of screening and definitive data –Definitions of QA/QC measures –Added value of commonly used QC samples –Scope and steps of data review

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 23 ConclusionConclusion

24 Conclusion Status of Products UFP-QS  IDQTF consensus final document, implementation efforts underway UFP-QAPP  Interagency review and approval process underway Roles and Responsibilities Guidance, appendix to UFP-QS  Due to be released for review spring 2004 UFP-QS  IDQTF consensus final document, implementation efforts underway UFP-QAPP  Interagency review and approval process underway Roles and Responsibilities Guidance, appendix to UFP-QS  Due to be released for review spring 2004

DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 25 Conclusion Implementation Challenges Introduce products throughout agencies Provide consistent training Involve other stakeholders Introduce products throughout agencies Provide consistent training Involve other stakeholders