MPACT64 Transportation Infrastructure for Colorado Matt Appelbaum 36 Commuting Solutions Membership Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance Act 374 of 2009.
Advertisements

County Transportation Systems Association of MN Counties, MN County Engineers Association, MN Inter-County Association Presentation to MN Senate Transportation.
October 10, 2013 Federal Transportation Revenue Options Discussion.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
MPACT64 Transportation Infrastructure for Colorado We Can’t Afford to Wait.
Act 44 Transportation Funding John Dockendorf Pennsylvania Department of Transportation November 2007.
American Trucking Associations National Association of Steel Pipe Distributors March 2007 Ray Kuntz Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Watkins and.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Iowa State Association of Counties 2013 Fall School of Instruction November 14, 2013 Stu Anderson Iowa Department of Transportation.
Local Highway Technical Assistance Council Joint Senate and House Transportation Committees January
Current as of: Feb.06, New Economic Recovery Package: Not the Cure Federal government is working on a one-time economic recovery package Package.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
MPACT64 Transportation Infrastructure for Colorado We Can’t Afford to Wait.
PROPOSITION 1 AND SELECTED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS IN TARRANT COUNTY SOUTHEAST TARRANT TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP OCTOBER 8, 2014.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
COLORADO PERSPECTIVE Cathy Shull Board of Directors Ports-to-Plains Alliance.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.
SB 360 and Multi-Modal Impact Fees & Efficiently Managing a Street Lightning System.
International Partnership Meeting Thursday, January 17, 2013 Washington D.C. 1.
Reforming Transportation Finance: Needs, Opportunities, Constraints Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies UC-Berkeley.
Funding the Future of Our Transportation Infrastructure Juva Barber Executive Director.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AN ALDOT PERSPECTIVE December 3, 2014.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
HEALTHY CITIES HEALTHY OKLAHOMA We’re all in this together.
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE How Do We Adequately Finance Our System?
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Street Maintenance. The Town of Bayfield maintains centerline miles of road.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
The Road to New Hampshire's Future. Transportation Funding Overview/summary Operational deficit Preservation and Maintenance Capital needs.
Texas Transportation Funding State Senator Robert Nichols.
Finance and Infrastructure Subcommittee Financing Recommendations.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
1 Colorado Department of Transportation Presentation to the Joint Budget Committee November 16th 2009.
Grant Levi, NDDOT Director 1. SB Early funding passed in February  Western North Dakota  State Highways $450 million  Counties $240 million 
MEC’S BLUEPRINT MISSISSIPPI LONG-TERM TRANSPORTATION/ INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN.
A A S H T O S P R I N G M E E T I N G 1 7 M A Y B E D F O R D S P R I N G S, P A 1 Surface Transportation Authorization: Review of Mid-Course.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Regional Transportation & Land Use IREM / BOMA Real Estate Forecast Breakfast 2009 Rich Macias, Director Regional & Comprehensive Planning Southern California.
Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB)
Division of Budgets January 25, 2012 Budget and Allocation Capacity Update Presented to the California Transportation Commission Tab 13.
California State Association of Counties January 2010 Governor’s Proposed Budget Unrealistic Assumptions, Significant Risks, and Cost Shifts.
Resolving Regional Challenges SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION GOVERNMENTS of Resolving Regional Challenges.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis Transportation Funding Updated March 10, 2014.
House Transportation Policy and Finance April 13, 2016 Tracy Hatch Deputy Commissioner Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
In Numbers Strength COLORADO TRANSPORTATION FUNDING.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
Minnesota’s Municipal Transportation System
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Transportation Funding
MnDOT Revenue Outlook Duane Leurquin Office of Finance
Transportation Finance Legislation and Ballot Measures
This is a side to visualize how we got into this transportation funding problem (most folks have probably seen this and know the numbers) We only spend.
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan
Comprehensive and Dependable Transportation Plan
Presentation transcript:

MPACT64 Transportation Infrastructure for Colorado Matt Appelbaum 36 Commuting Solutions Membership Meeting

Colorado’s Transportation System

Transportation is the Foundation Transportation and Mobility Education Trade Governme nt Arts & Culture Safety Tourism Recreation Communit y Economic Health Health Care Quality of Life

Growth Since 1990 Colorado Actual and Projected Growth: 1990–2035 Actual Projecte d

How We Pay for Transportation

What is the Fuel Tax Worth? Price per gallon Tax per gallon Tax per gallon inflation adjusted

Colorado vs. Other States? Gasoline Motor Fuel Taxes as of January 1, 2012

Funding Source — MillionsFY  Motor Fuel Excise Taxes — (last raised in 1991)  Motor Vehicle Registrations —  Motor Vehicle Penalty Assessments — 48.0  SB Road Safety Surcharges —  SB Daily Vehicle Rental Fees — 25.0  SB Late Vehicle Registration Fees — 22.4  SB Oversize/Overweight Surcharges —1.4 Total —————————————————— Total Colorado HUTF for (in Millions $)

Fiscal YearFY12-13 % Total  Off-the-Top Appropriations % ( State Patrol, Department of Revenue/Ports of Entry)  CDOT %  Counties %  Municipalities %  Other distributions % TOTAL ————————————————927.2 Where Does HUTF Go?

Where Does CDOT Money Go? FY2012 (in millions) $1,104,588,163* $684.3 [63%] MAINTAIN What We Have $167 [15%] Debt Service $158.9 [14%] Pass-Through Funds Multi-Modal Grants $57.8 [5%] DELIVERY of Programs & Administration $34.6 [3%] MAXIMIZE What We Have $2.5 [<1%] EXPAND Capacity 15% 63% 14% 3% <1% 5% *Safety investments are included in every category CDOT Expenditures

How Much Do Streets & Highways Cost? $275,000 2” Asphalt Paving Per Lane Mile $60 million Annual Snow Removal $25 million Interchange A Lot and Growing Every Day

 Diminishing motor fuel tax revenues  22 years since last increase (1991)  Growing statewide needs  2007 CTFIP identifies $1.5B annual shortfall  FASTER (SB09-108) raises $173M/YR  Under/unfunded local & regional needs Growing Transportation Dilemma

Pavement Conditions CDOT Goal is 60% good or fair Actual is 47% good or fair

CDOT Minimum Needs

Will Federal Funding Fill the Gap? MAP21 for Colorado, in all funded programs, will generate around $530M annually if fully obligated. Per CBO, absent a significant tax increase Congress must cut HUTF obligation authority from $51B to $4B in 2015

MPACT64 Seeks Solutions

 2003 MPAC (Metro Mayors Caucus, Progressive 15, Action 22, Club 20) came together to create and promote water development principles for Colorado  2005 MPAC expanded discussion to Transportation  2011 metro area discussion of a joint highway and transit funding proposal led to MPAC members reengaging to ensure regional action would not preclude statewide funding for transportation  2012 MPACT64 meetings and discussion began MPACT64 Begins the Transportation Discussion

 Throughout 2012 MPACT64 added new groups to the discussion  By 2013, 16 organizations joined the discussion  Early discussions contemplated dual funding proposals  Statewide transportation funding based on motor fuel tax  Subsequent regional transportation funding based on sales tax  November polling changed everything  Majority opposed to motor fuel tax increase  If statewide sales tax, then must fund regional and transit needs  If statewide fails, move ahead with regional solutions MPACT64 Discussion Expands

 Funding Priorities  Multimodal improvements  System preservation & annual maintenance  Safety  New capacity – tolling  Revenue Strategies  Statewide funding first  Then address regional needs  Or — both at once MPACT64 Priorities

 Motor Fuel Tax  Unpopular with voters nationwide  User fees — seen as necessary and appropriate by many  Paid by trucking industry and tourist traffic  Declining revenue source with fuel efficiency & alternate fuel vehicles  Extending State sales tax base to fuels  Sales Tax  Popular with voters  Relied on by local governments as a general revenue source  Temporary source at best  Other user fees — bicycle registration? Revenue Strategies Under Discussion

 Statewide Sales Tax Increase  Dedicated to transportation  No access for “off the top” diversions (State Patrol, Ports of Entry, etc.) .7% sales tax  Distribution between HUTF and Transit at 67% and 33%  Transit distribution to transit agencies and interregional transit projects  HUTF distribution 60% to State, 22% to counties, 18% to municipalities  Distribution to municipalities optional by region of the state:  Rural by HUTF formulas?  Metro/urban by population?  Discussion of alternate strategies is ongoing MPACT64 Potential Funding Strategy Currently Under Consideration/Discussion

Possible Distribution Scenario Distribution Categories Total67% HUTF33% Transit60%HUTF to State 22% HUTF to Counties 18% HUTF to Municipalities.7% Sales Tax Annual Statewide (10 Year Average) $605,000,000$405,350,000$199,650,000$243,210,000$89,177,000$72,963,000 Distribution assuming.7% sales tax dedicated to transportation — with 33% for transit and 67% to the HUTF Typical HUTF split — 60% to the State — 22% to the Counties — 18% to the municipalities

 It is never a good time for a tax increase  If not now, when?  Last motor fuel tax increase 1991  FASTER 2009  Term limits forces us to start from scratch  If not us, who?  State legislature?  Congress? Why Now— Why Us?

What Comes After Fuel Tax Is No Longer Viable and Any Interim Solution Sunsets? Ideas?  Do we want a user tax/fee  How do we ensure everyone contributes  Electric cars/natural gas/other alternates  Trucking industry  Tourism  Can our revenue source fund transit & bike/ped needs Temporary Solutions On the Table

 Should we pursue a statewide ballot issue on transportation finance, or should we seek transportation finance solutions region by region?  What funding source(s) can we live with even on a temporary basis?  Sales tax  Motor fuel tax  VMT pilot program  Registration fees  Other general revenue sources  Do we have consensus:  Within our organizations?  As MPACT64? Questions Ahead for MPACT64 and Participating Organizations

MPACT64 Participants as of 5/1/13

MPACT64 Transportation Infrastructure for Colorado We Can’t Afford to Wait