Myths, Facts, and Suttons Law

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer Review at the NIH Center for Scientific Review
Advertisements

NIH Grant Mechanisms and Funding Process
Demystifying the Federal Grant Review Process for NIH Career Development Awards The Ks.
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
NIH RESEARCH CONTRACTS Rosemary M. Hamill Procurement Analyst Division of Acquisition Policy and Evaluation Office of Acquisition Management and Policy.
NIH RESEARCH CONTRACTS
NIH RESEARCH CONTRACTS
Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) Grantees may access a list of progress reports that are due using the Status page in eRA Commons, and selecting.
Grants.gov Electronic Proposal Submission to the Federal Government Research Administration Round Table September 28, 2005 Dan Dwyer, Tammy Custer.
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center eRA: Electronic Research Administration Wednesday, May 10, 2006.
Making Grants.gov Work for You: U.S. Department of Education Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program CFDA #84.206A Find. Apply.
How a Study Section works
Fundamentals of NLM Grants National Library of Medicine Extramural Programs Updated Dec 2009.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
NIH TOP 10 MEGAN COLUMBUS. #1: Where’s the money? #2:How do I get some? #3:Do I call NIH before applying? #4:How long does it take to get funded? #5:What’s.
NIH TOP 10 MEGAN COLUMBUS. Finding the Right Fit.
Office of Sponsored Programs VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY The Office of Sponsored Programs has upgraded COEUS to accommodate the new Grants.gov C-Forms About.
XTrain Basics: Training Grants & Fellowships Margaret Gardner, Education Coordinator Research Development and Administration.
Dr. John E. Niederhuber Director, National Cancer Institute Board of Scientific Advisors June 22, 2009 NCI Director’s Update.
Laurie Tompkins, PhD Acting Director, Division of Genetics and Developmental Biology NIGMS, NIH Swarthmore College May 14, 2012 NIH 101.
California State University, Fresno – Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Basics of NIH – National Institutes of Health Nancy Myers Sims, Grants.
Center for Scientific Review National Institutes of Health Department of Health and Human Services Toni Scarpa NIH Peer Review: Continuity and Change NIDA.
Navigating the NIH Web Site for Funding and Getting Started with Grants Grants-For-Lunch December 6, 2005.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Weathering the Storm: How to Establish and Sustain an Independent Research Career in an Era of Limited Funds Lawrence J. Prograis, Jr., M.D Senior Scientist,
What You Need to Know about Application Receipt and Referral
Grants.gov How is BMC Preparing for Electronic Grants Submissions?
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute James P. Kiley, Ph.D. National Heart,
From Your Idea to Your First R01: Perspectives of a National Institutes of Health Extramural Scientist.
Enhancing Peer Review at NIH University of Central Florida Grant Day Workshop October 26, 2009 Anne K. Krey Division of Scientific Review.
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
The Office of Research Program Development. The Office of Research Program Development (RPD) was established in 1993 to facilitate and foster multidisciplinary.
1 The HRSA Electronic Handbooks (EHBs) Judy Ceresa HRSA - Division of Grants Policy Elisa Peet HRSA Call Center August 27, 2007.
Office of the Director National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute of Arthritis.
1 Process for a Research Grant National Institutes of Health IMPAC II Center for Scientific Review Study Section Institute Advisory Councils & Boards Assign.
Data Source: NIH Office of Budget NIH OFFICE OF EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH NIH Grants Process: The Big Picture Cynthia Dwyer Division of Communications and Outreach,
Got the Grant What’s next??????????? Joy R. Knipple Team Leader, National Institute of Mental Health July 26, 2006.
1. Proposal deadline 2. Timeline  A grant opportunity announcement will include a sponsor deadline for receipt of the proposal.  The instructions will.
Electronic Submissions of Grant Applications Muhsin Aboud Principal Investigator, IEARDA Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences.
WORKER EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM Business Officials Breakout Session Grantee Meeting, March 7, 2006 NIH Transition to the SF424 (R&R) Application.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
National Institutes of Health. Much of the biomedical research in the United States is supported by the Federal Government, primarily the National Institutes.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
Analysis of Overall Impact Scoring Trends within AHRQ Peer Review Study Sections Gabrielle Quiggle, MPH; Rebecca Trocki, MSHAI; Kishena Wadhwani, PhD,
MICHELLE BULLS DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF POLICY FOR EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION.
Indian Health Service Grants Management Grants 101- Fundamentals.
NIH eRA Commons What’s in it for me? Grants-for-Lunch November, 2005.
Introduction To Data Standards eRA SBIR Public Briefing March 4, 2002
1 Mission Impossible: Understanding the Pre-Award Grant Process Monique Foxx, MHSA Manager, Office of Sponsored Programs Stephanie Bair, MS Grants Management.
What University Administrators Need to Know About Getting from Submission to Review Cathleen Cooper, Ph.D. Director, CSR Division of Receipt and Referral.
The Role of a Program Director NCI Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop October 18-19, 2010 Jerry Li, MD, PhD Division of Cancer Biology NCI/NIH.
2 Who Are the Peer Reviewers? Senior Researchers Well-funded by NIH or Other Agencies Well-published, recognized in the field Associate Professor or higher.
Funding Opportunities for Investigator-initiated Grants with Foreign Components at the NIH Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH Program Director Epidemiology and Genetics.
Grantsmanship: The Art and Science of Getting Funded Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Molecular Endocrinology National Institute of Diabetes and.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.
MEGAN COLUMBUS NIH OFFICE OF EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH (OER) MAY 2016.
Grant Writing for Success
Preparing for NIH Peer Review
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Changing Response to AHRQ’s Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs)
NIH Research Funding Trends: FY
NIH Research Funding Trends: FY
The NIH Peer Review Process
NIH Research Funding Trends: FY
Presentation transcript:

Myths, Facts, and Suttons Law Francis D. Chesley, Jr., M.D. Director, Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations June 4, 2007 I am happy to be here in Alaska to talk with you about some of the challenges we all face healthcare that if we DO what we KNOW, it can make a real difference in people’s lives—and in your budgets.

AHRQ Grant Application Submission, Review, and Award Process Development, Receipt, and Assignment of Applications Study Section Review for Scientific Merit CSR sends computerized notice of assignment to applicant DSR Referral Officer assigns to appropriate AHRQ Program CSR assigns application to NIH Institute or AHRQ CSR sends computerized notice of review results to applicant CSR computes percentile ratings Applicant Investigator develops and submits grant application to NIH/CSR CSR Assignment Office IRG reviews and assigns priority scores or designates noncompetitive IRG members review and evaluate PO mails summary statements to investigators DSR informs program that summary statement is available AHRQ assigns application to Initial Review Group SRAs prepare Summary Statements Site visit made if necessary Site visit report NIH Councils (Duals) AHRQ Review for Program Relevance and Funding Determinations Public Affairs notified Award Negotiation and Issuance PO reviews and prepares/sends recommendation memo to DSR/GMS DSR schedules funding meeting Applications selected for funding Signed “paylists” received by GMO Final review and negotiations Award received by institution Congressional liaison notified Award issued Investigator begins work (30 days)

Facts #1 Research and program priorities matter Application process must be understood Electronic Grant Application has arrived! Concept papers are an important option Peer review is a step away from funding Avoid common pitfalls Mentorship!

Applicant Responsibilities Know PHS Form 398 and 424 R&R Know the Funding Agency and Staff Know Agency Research Priorities Know the Grant Mechanisms Know the Grant Process and Key Changes Understand Agency Research Budget

Top Myths AHRQ is not funding research AHRQ is not funding K award AHRQ does not fund investigator-initiated grants An “unscored” application is the kiss of death

Facts #2 FY07 new research grant budget: $45 million K award success rate: 30% $1 million for new grants $5.7 million total What is an investigator-initiated grant?

Fact #3: Sutton’s Law R01: $2 million R03: $1.7 million F31/F32: $0.5 million K02/K08: $1 million Budget for targeted initiatives is approx. $31 million

AHRQ E-grants Transition! Electronic Grant Application Receipt Use of the SF424 (R&R) Grant Application AHRQ will require electronic submission of all competing grant applications via Grants.gov using the SF 424 Research and Related (R&R) application. ________________________________________ Paper No More, Use 424 (R&R) Electronic submission is here to stay!

AHRQ Transitions to Electronic Grant Application Submission AHRQ transitioning to electronic grant submission through Grants.gov Grants.gov - Web portal that serves as the single access point for all Federal grant programs. Grants.gov provides the interface for 26 agencies to announce $350 billion in annual grant awards and for all grant applicants to find and submit applications to those funding announcements. www.grants.gov Transition complete for R01, R03, R13, R18, R36

Getting Started One time registrations for Grants.gov (http://grants.gov) and eRA Commons (era.nih.gov/commons) systems must be completed before application submission. For up to date general information on electronic submission, the SF 424 (R&R), and Grants.gov, visit the AHRQ Electronic Submission of Grant Applications Web Site: http://www.ahrq.gov/path/egrants.htm

“Opportunity is missed by most because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.” Thomas Edison

Contact Information AHRQ WEBSITE www.ahrq.gov Francis D. Chesley, Jr., M.D. (301) 427-1521 Francis.Chesley@ahrq.hhs.gov

Questions?