The Stanford Prison Experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The people Look for some people. Write it down. By the water
Advertisements

Here’s an interesting conversation. It’s a little lengthy
A.
What You Do TO Others Will Be Done To You A NICE STORY !!! Music:To Take… To Hold…
Social psychology Concerned with how others influence the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of the individual Social thinking When something unexpected.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Prisoner-Guard Experiment Stanford University Summer “What happens when you put good people in an evil place?
Attentiveness vs. Distraction
Identifying point of view. Identify the narrative point of view in a story.
When writing, it is important to be consistent in verb tense usage. There are three basic forms of verb tenses: past, present, and future. Simple and.
The Stanford Prison Experiment A study into the effects of prison life.
The Stanford Prison Experiment Max Rowe. The Purpose The Stanford prison experiment was a study of the psychological effect of becoming a prisoner or.
Stanford Prison Experiment And you thought what happened to Little Albert was bad…
To Kill A Mockingbird Chapters
Why me? By: Daniela Julca.
Chapter 1 Jim Hawkins’ Story I
Stanford Prison Experiment Wyatt G., Connor A., Liz T., Brianna H. Mrs. Menzen English Honors 9 April, 2015.
Second Grade English High Frequency Words
Conducted by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo and Stanford students.
Assignment 2 Original By Cheris Beaty Concordia University Chicago When you see this picture, click on it.
Helen Harton, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology University of Northern Iowa.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment
By: Chris Bentley and Tanya Landau The war began with two parts. The Tories and the Rebels. The Tories were loyal to the queen and king, while the rebels.
Alice and her family had just moved from London to Manchester. She had already visited her new school but on her first day, she was feeling quite scared.
Deindividuation – Module 54 General Psych 2 March 4, 2004 Class # 12.
Stanford Prison Experiment
Created by Verna C. Rentsch and Joyce Cooling Nelson School
By: Robert Start the story. One day you lived as a boy in a city far, far, away called Sherlinkton. Your name was Himilton. You had a wealthy dad’ a wealthy.
 The girl who was suppose to die was running into a accident but didn’t realize it.
I am ready to test!________ I am ready to test!________
Sight Words.
Social Psychology Contents What is Social Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Social Psychology: Milgram. (1963) and Zimbardo.
Sight Words List 1 Mr. Matthews Grade One can.
Sight words.
Philip Zimbardo By: Steph Cataline. Who is Philip Zimbardo? The “voice and face of contemporary American psychology”. Presently, an Emeritus professor.
Through the eyes of a child The Children’s Center Salt Lake City, Utah.
The Princess and the Frog.
What is a better explanation of what happens to people (prisoners and guards) who are incarcerated --- a “situational” model or the role of individual.
Love You Forever by Robert Munsch. A mother held her new baby and very slowly rocked him back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. And while she.
The Prodigal Son Year 5 Here I Am Lesson 4. The Prodigal Son Introduction Jesus told many stories to his friends to help them understand difficult things.
District 200 High frequency words
Stanford Prison Experiment. Background Landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity. Conducted in 1971 Led by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford.
Stanford Prison Experiment - Zimbardo by Peace Park.
Zambardo Induction and Result. Purpose of the Study Study aimed to answer the question: – “Are the state of prisons due to the dispositional or internal.
Sight Words.
High Frequency Words.
Stanford Prison Experiment Haney, Banks and Zimbardo Social Psychology.
The Stanford Prison Experiment 1 Video Clip. Background 1971 – Stanford University Experiment overseen by Dr. Philip Zimbardo –PH. D. in Psychology from.
The Stanford Prison Experiment: ZIMBARDO OBJECTIVE: To be able to describe a study into identification.
Social Psychology Social psychology studies the beliefs and behaviors of the individual (the self) within a group (others). Humans are social animals:
PHILIP ZIMBARDO & THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT AJ Malisheski.
MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE. What was the Experiment? The Milgram Experiment was a social psychology experiment conducted by Yale University.
A mother held her new baby and very slowly rocked him back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. And while she held him, she sang: I'll love you.
课标人教实验版 高二 Module 6 Unit 3. Listening on workbook.
Phillip Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment. Volunteers More than 70 applicants answered ad & were given interviews & personality tests to eliminate candidates.
ESSENTIAL WORDS.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Welcome to the Fuller Adolescent Detention Center
Groups and Obedience The Stanford Prison Experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment
High Frequency Words. High Frequency Words a about.
Obedience to Authority & the Psychology of Evil
The Stanford Prison Experiment
How would you answer this question??
Stanford Prison Experiment
Social Psychology The scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another.
Presentation transcript:

The Stanford Prison Experiment An Experiment in Social Psychology AP Psychology Wadlington

The Arrest On a quiet Sunday morning in August, a police car swept through the town picking up college students as part of a mass arrest for armed robbery and burglary. The suspects were picked up at their home, charged, spread- eagled against the police car, searched, and handcuffed.

Booking and Holding Cells The car arrived at the police station, the suspects were brought inside, formally booked, read their Miranda Rights, finger printed, and a complete identification was made. The suspects were then taken to a holding cell where they were left blindfolded for as long as two hours.

Volunteering for the Experiment College students answered a newspaper ad asking for volunteers in a study of the psychological effects of prison life, in an experiment designed by Philip Zimbardo, a Stanford psychology professor. More than 70 applicants answered the ad and were given diagnostic interviews and personality tests to eliminate candidates with psychological problems, medical disabilities, or a history of crime. 24 college students from the U.S. and Canada who happened to be in the Stanford area were selected and set to earn $15/day.

Constructing the Experiment The prison was constructed by boarding up each end of a corridor in the basement of Stanford's Psychology Department building. That corridor was "The Yard" and was the only place where prisoners were allowed to walk around, eat, or exercise. Cells were made from laboratory rooms with specially made doors with steel bars and cell numbers.

Humiliation Each prisoner was systematically searched and stripped naked. He was then deloused with a spray, to convey the belief that they may have germs or lice.

Humiliation The prisoner was then issued a uniform. The main part of this uniform was a dress, or smock, which each prisoner wore at all times with no underclothes. On the smock, in front and in back, was his prison ID number. On each prisoner's right ankle was a heavy chain, bolted on and worn at all times.

Becoming a Prisoner The chain on their foot was used in order to remind prisoners of the oppressiveness of their environment. When a prisoner turned over, the chain would hit his leg, waking him up and reminding him that he was still in prison. The process of having one's head shaved is designed in part to minimize each person's individuality. It is also a way of getting people to begin complying with the arbitrary, coercive rules of the institution.

Enforcing the Law The guards were free, within limits, to do whatever they thought was necessary to maintain law and order in the prison. The guards made their own set of rules. All guards were dressed in identical uniforms of khaki, and wore a whistle around their neck and a Billy club borrowed from the police. Guards also wore mirror sunglasses which prevented anyone from seeing their eyes or reading their emotions.

In the Cells The experiment began with nine guards and nine prisoners in the jail. Three guards worked each of three eight-hour shifts, while three prisoners occupied each of the three barren cells around the clock. The cells were so small that there was room for only three cots on which the prisoners slept or sat, with room for little else.

Asserting Authority At 2:30 A.M. prisoners were awakened from sleep by blasting whistles for the first of many "counts." The counts served as a way to familiarizing the prisoners with their numbers. More importantly, they provided a regular occasion for the guards to exercise control over the prisoners.

Physical Punishment Push-ups were a common form of physical punishment imposed by the guards, for infractions of the rules or displays of improper attitudes toward the guards or institution. One of the guards stepped on the prisoners' backs while they did push-ups, or made other prisoners sit on the backs of fellow prisoners doing their push-ups.

Asserting Independence Because the first day passed without incident, the guards were surprised and totally unprepared for the rebellion which broke out on the morning of the second day. Prisoners removed their stocking caps, ripped off their numbers, and barricaded themselves inside the cells by putting their beds against the door The guards were angered and frustrated because the prisoners began to taunt and curse them. When the morning shift of guards came on, they became upset at the night shift who, they felt, must have been too lenient.

Putting Down the Rebellion The guards called in reinforcements. The three guards who were waiting on stand-by duty came in and the night shift of guards voluntarily remained on duty. The guards broke into each cell, stripped the prisoners naked, took the beds out, forced the ringleaders of the prisoner rebellion into solitary confinement.

Special Privileges One of the three cells was designated as a "privilege cell." The three prisoners least involved in the rebellion were given special privileges. Given back their uniforms and beds and were allowed to wash and brush their teeth. Privileged prisoners also got to eat special food in the presence of the other prisoners who had temporarily lost the privilege of eating. The effect was to break the solidarity among prisoners.

Consequences of Rebellion The prisoners' rebellion played an important role in producing greater solidarity among the guards. It was no longer just an experiment, Now guards saw the prisoners as troublemakers who were out to get them, who might really cause them some harm. In response to this threat, the guards began increasing their control, surveillance, and aggression.

Prisoner #8612 Less than 36 hours into the experiment, Prisoner #8612 began suffering from acute emotional disturbance, disorganized thinking, uncontrollable crying and rage. After a meeting with the guards where they told him he was weak, but offered him “informant” status, #8612 returned to the other prisoners and said “You can't leave. You can't quit.” Soon #8612 “began to act ‘crazy,’ to scream, to curse, to go into a rage that seemed out of control.” It wasn’t until this point that the psychologists realized they had to let him out.

A Visit from Parents The next day, they held a visiting hour for parents and friends. They were worried that when the parents saw the state of they jail, they might insist on taking their sons home. Guards washed the prisoners, had them clean and polish their cells, fed them a big dinner and played music on the intercom.

Stepping Things Up After the visit, rumor spread of a mass escape plan. Afraid that they would lose the prisoners, the guards and experimenters tried to enlist the help and facilities of the Palo Alto police department. The guards again escalated the level of harassment, forcing them to do menial, repetitive work such as cleaning toilets with their bare hands.

An Informant in the Prison The guards had become so immersed in the simulation they started getting paranoid. In an attempt to stop further “plots,” the guards planted an informant within the prison.

Falling Further From Reality Zimbardo invited a Catholic priest who had been a prison chaplain to evaluate how realistic our prison situation was. The chaplain interviewed each prisoner individually. The priest told them the only way they would get out was with the help if a lawyer. Half the prisoners introduced themselves by number rather than name.

Prisoner #819 The only prisoner who did not want to speak to the priest was Prisoner #819, who was feeling sick, had refused to eat, and wanted to see a doctor rather than a priest. Eventually while talking to the priest, #819 broke down and began to cry hysterically, just as had the other two boys released earlier. The psychologists removed the chain off his foot, the cap off his head, and told him to go and rest in a room that was adjacent to the prison yard. They told him they would get him some food and then take him to see a doctor.

Prisoner #819 While this was going on, one of the guards lined up the other prisoners and had them chant aloud: "Prisoner #819 is a bad prisoner. Because of what Prisoner #819 did, my cell is a mess, Mr. Correctional Officer." The psychologists realized #819 could hear the chanting and went back into the room where they found him sobbing uncontrollably. The psychologists tried to get him to agree to leave the experiment, but he said he could not leave because the others had labeled him a bad prisoner.

Back to Reality At that point, Zimbardo said, "Listen, you are not #819. You are [his name], and my name is Dr. Zimbardo. I am a psychologist, not a prison superintendent, and this is not a real prison. This is just an experiment, and those are students, not prisoners, just like you. Let's go." He stopped crying suddenly, looked up and replied, "Okay, let's go,“ as if nothing had been wrong.

An End to the Experiment Christina Maslach, a recent Stanford Ph.D. brought in to conduct interviews with the guards and prisoners, strongly objected when she saw our prisoners being treated so poorly. Out of 50 or more outsiders who had seen our prison, she was the only one who ever questioned its morality. Once she countered the power of the situation, however, it became clear that the study should be ended. Maslach was dating Zimbardo at the time. They are still married to this day.

In the End “By the end of the study, the prisoners were disintegrated, both as a group and as individuals. There was no longer any group unity; just a bunch of isolated individuals hanging on, much like prisoners of war or hospitalized mental patients. The guards had won total control of the prison, and they commanded the blind obedience of each prisoner.” -Philip Zimbardo

The End of the Experiment After only six days, the planned two-week prison simulation was called off. Do we see similarities to present day?

Discussion Questions If you were a guard, what type of guard would you have become? How sure are you? If you were a prisoner, would you have been able to endure the experience? What would you have done differently than those subjects did? What factors would lead prisoners to attribute guard brutality to the guards' disposition or character, rather than to the situation?

Discussion Questions What are the effects of living in an environment with no clocks, no view of the outside world, and minimal sensory stimulation? Consider the psychological consequences of stripping, delousing, and shaving the heads of prisoners or members of the military. What transformations take place when people go through an experience like this? After the study, how do you think the prisoners and guards felt? If you were the experimenter in charge, would you have done this study? Would you have terminated it earlier? Would you have conducted a follow-up study?