© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 15 Death: The Ultimate Sanction 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Punishment and Sentencing
Advertisements

Appeal and Postconviction Relief
The Death Penalty and the Eighth Amendment. Admin Opportunity to participate, be on the news! 2:00, Thursday, Room 117 Wooten – First 60 students – Line.
Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 330 Race, Ethnicity and Criminal Justice Dr. Abu-Lughod, Reem Ali Color of.
Capital Punishment in The United States. Capital Punishment (the death penalty) is a legal option for sentencing in 32 states. The federal government.
The Death Penalty. Capital punishment in the UK at common law -early Norman times – felonies (castration or blinding) -by the 13th century – all felonies.
D EATH P ENALTY BUSINESS AND PERSONAL LAW October 15, 2013.
Criminal Justice System Unit 4: Judicial Branch Criminal Justice System Three Parts:Three Parts: Police Courts Correction s
8 th Amendment No excessive bail or fines No cruel and unusual punishment.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
1 Sentencing the Guilty Chapter Eighth Amendment Excessive bail shall not be required, not excessive fines imposed, not cruel and unusual punishments.
FrontPage: Do you support capital punishment? Why or why not?
The Death Penalty Tyler Fletcher Fall 2006 Political Science Capstone.
Sentencing, Appeals, and
The Death Penalty 8 th Amendment – Cruel and Unusual Punishment?
Criminal Law RESOLUTIONS BETWEEN PEOPLE AND SOCIETY.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 20 The Death Penalty.
Chapter 11 Punishment and Sentencing
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER FIFTEENFIFTEEN.
THE DEATH PENALTY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. 37 Separate Death Penalty Systems in the United States Each of 35 states has a death penalty system The federal.
Sarah Bibbey September 28,  There are 34 states that have the Death Penalty.  Also the U.S. Gov’t, and U.S. Military have the Death Penalty. 
Vanessa Ott Period 2 Honors American History.  Death Penalty  Planned taking of a human life  Government’s Response to a crime committed.
8 th Amendment.  Punishment must fit the crime  Punishments should not violate decency standards “Excessive bail shall not be required nor excessive.
The Death Penalty 8 th Amendment – Cruel and Unusual Punishment?
Death Penalty Debate: Resolved… The use of the death penalty, if fairly applied, does not violate the Constitution and is a just method of punishing perpetrators.
Chapter 14 Capital Punishment & the Death Row Inmate 1.
THE 8 TH AMENDMENT CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT. FACTS: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IS LEGAL IN 32 U.S. STATES. AS OF JANUARY 2014 THERE WERE 3,070 INMATES IN.
Vanessa Ott Period 2 Honors American History.  Death Penalty  Planned taking of a human life  Government’s Response to a crime committed.
Correctional Facilities What happens if you are found guilty of a crime? YOU GO TO JAIL!!
The Death Penalty in Delaware: An Empirical Study John Blume, Ted Eisenberg, Valerie Hans & Sheri Johnson Cornell Death Penalty Project, Cornell Law School.
1. Explain retribution to deter crime At one time the primary reason for punishing a criminal was RETRIBUTION. This is the idea behind the saying “an.
Purpose of Punishment Corrections. Retribution – An eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth. – Society, through the criminal justice system, taking on the.
Introduction to Criminal Justice
Rights of the Accused Under the Criminal Due Process System Rights when 1 st Apprehended: 1.Free from “bills of attainder” – to put someone in jail without.
The Constitution explicitly permits capital punishment – if you may not be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law,” then you.
Introduction to Criminal Justice Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty Chapter Nine Bohm and Haley.
The Death Penalty 8 th Amendment – Cruel and Unusual Punishment?
American Government Chapter 20 Section 4.
Punishment & Sentencing The Criminal Justice system aims to solve three basic questions: What conduct is criminal? What determines guilt? What should be.
Chapter 15. Sentencing Options  Can be one or combination of the following depending in the state  Suspended sentence – sentence is given but does not.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101: Chapter 10 Sentencing, Appellate Review, and the Penalty of Death.
PUNISHMENT Chapter 20, Section 4 8 th Amendment. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments.
Capital Cases: Roles of Forensic Psychology. Roles of forensic psychologist in a capital case Capital cases –Capital means “head” in Latin Punishment.
Capital Punishment Ch. 9 in Moral Choices by Scott B. Rae.
  excessive bail shall not be required,  nor excessive fines imposed,  nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. The Text:
Chapter 15 The Death Penalty the entrance to death row San Quentin, California.
Eliseo Lugo III.  Prohibits cruel & unusual punishment.  Text of the Amendment: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor.
Punishment and Sentencing
Do you support the death penalty?
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE USA
8th Amendment – Cruel and Unusual Punishment?
Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty
Chapter 3 Sentencing: To Punish or to Reform?
Imposing the ‘Sentence’
How do the fifth, sixth and eighth amendments protect rights within the judicial system? LESSON 32.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
Capital Punishment.
By: Lindsey Haney and Jessica Cunningham
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
CHAPTER 5 THE DEATH PENALTY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL, IN THE MILITARY, AND GLOBALLY Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
Capital Punishment.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
Chapter Twenty The Death Penalty
SENTENCING IN NEW YORK STATE
Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:
Capital Punishment.
The 8th Amendment And the death penalty.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS
Presentation transcript:

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 15 Death: The Ultimate Sanction 1

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill A Brief History of Capital Punishment  Throughout history, capital punishment has commonly been used as a penalty for criminal behavior.  Until the Age of Enlightenment in the18th century, death was meted out for crimes as minor as forgery or the theft of a chicken.  The Enlightenment led to new theories on crime and punishment. One put forth the notion that punishment ought to fit the particular crime for which it is applied. 2

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill A Brief History of Capital Punishment – Continued  Some states banned or limited capital punishment in the early 20th century.  U.S. v. Jackson (1968) – held that the provision of the federal kidnapping statute that required the death penalty to be imposed only upon the recommendation by a jury was unconstitutional.  Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968) – a potential juror’s mere reservations about the death penalty were insufficient to prevent that person from serving on the jury in a death penalty case. 3

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill A Brief History of Capital Punishment – Continued  Furman v. Georgia (1972) – declared the death penalty, as it was applied, was unconstitutional.  As a result the court voided 40 death penalty statutes.  Gregg v. Georgia (1976) – upheld the guided discretionary capital statutes.  Created a bifurcated trial process. 4

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Capital Punishment Worldwide  In 2005, there were at least 2,148 executions in 22 countries.  China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the U.S. were responsible for 94% of these known executions.  As of March 2007, the death penalty had been abolished in law or practice in 123 countries.  It is still used in 73 countries, including the United States. 5

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Capital Punishment in the U.S.  Today, 38 states, the military, and the federal government allow capital punishment.  Twelve states do not allow capital punishment.  The first person to be executed in the U.S. after the moratorium ended on the death penalty was Gary Gilmore by a Utah firing squad on January 17,

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Federal Death Penalty  The U.S. Constitution does not mention the death penalty, but it does permit depriving citizens of life after giving due process.  The first federal execution was of Thomas Bird on June 25, 1790 when he was hanged in Maine for the crime of murder.  Since 1790, the federal government has executed 336 men and 4 women.  39% were white; 35% were black; 19% were Native American; and 7% were Hispanic or other. 7

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Federal Death Penalty Act and the Right to Counsel  A minimum of two lawyers should be appointed to represent federal capital defendants.  At least one of the two lawyers must have experience in capital work.  The federal court must consider the Federal Public Defender’s recommendation regarding which counsel are qualified for appointment in capital cases. 8

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Federal Death Row  United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana.  Special Confinement Unit (SCU)  On June 15, 2007, 53 people were on federal death row. 9

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Executions  As of June 15, 2007, 1,079 people have been executed in the U.S. since Gary Gilmore’s execution in  37% of all executions have taken place in Texas.  The South leads the U.S. in executions. 10

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Characteristics of Death Row Inmates  On January 1, 2007, 3,350 persons were under a sentence of death in the U.S.  43% of the nation’s death row population is in California (660), and Florida (397), and Texas (393).  Inmates executed in 2005 had been on death row an average of 12 years and 3 months.  Between 1973 and 2005, 327 people on death row died, 2,702 had their convictions or sentences overturned, and 341 were granted clemency. 11

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Methods of Execution  Lethal injection  Predominant method in U.S.  Used in 37 states.  Charles Brooks was first to be executed by lethal injection.  Electrocution  Nebraska is only state that uses the electric chair as its sole method of execution.  Lethal gas  Hanging  Firing squad  Repealed in Utah on March 15,

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Death Row  A prison area housing inmates who have been sentenced to death  A prison within a prison.  All but two death penalty states (Missouri and Tennessee) segregate death row inmates from the general prison population.  Most death row inmates spend 22 to 23 hours per day locked down in a five-by-eight- or six- by-nine-foot cell. 13

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Public Opinion and Death  69% of the public still favors capital punishment, up from 64% in  Support for the death penalty drops when other punishment options, such as life without the possibility of parole are given.  People with higher incomes are more likely to support capital punishment than people with lower incomes. 14

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Politics and Death  In January 2003, Illinois Governor George Ryan commuted 164 death sentences to life in prison, commuted three other death row inmates’ sentences to 40 years in prison, and pardoned four other death row inmates because of mounting evidence that the death penalty was not being applied fairly in Illinois. 15

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Courts and the Death Penalty Furman v. Georgia (1972)  The death penalty, as imposed and carried out under the laws of Georgia, was cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.  Voided all death penalty statutes because they allowed arbitrary and discriminatory imposition of the death sentence.  The states responded by rewriting the statutes. Some devised mandatory death penalties for certain crimes, while others opted for guided discretion that set standards to guide judges and juries. 16

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Courts and the Death Penalty Mandatory Death Penalty  A death sentence that the legislature has required to be imposed upon people convicted of certain offenses.  Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana (1976) rejected mandatory death penalty statutes. 17

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Courts and the Death Penalty Gregg v. Georgia (1976)  Approved guided discretion statutes.  Mandated a bifurcated trial process.  The first part is the guilt phase, in which the jury decides the issue of guilt  The second part is the penalty phase, in which the prosecution presents aggravating factors and the defense present mitigating factors and a jury decides which punishment to impose.  Approved automatic appellate review. 18

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Key Terminology  Guided discretion: decision making bounded by general guidelines, rules, or laws.  Bifurcated trial: two separated hearings for different issues in a trial, one for guilt and the other for punishment.  Mitigating circumstances: factors that, although not justifying or excusing an action, may reduce the culpability of the offender.  Aggravating circumstances: factors that may increase the culpability of the offender. 19

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Appealing Death  The average time between imposition of a death sentence and execution of the offender is 11 years.  Serious error – error that substantially undermines the reliability of the guilt finding or death sentence imposed at trial.  Nationally, for every 100 death sentences imposed, 41 were turned back at the trial and direct review phase because of serious error. 20

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Appealing Death – Continued  Death penalty cases may pass through as many as ten courts, across three stages:  trial and direct review;  state post-conviction appeals; and  federal habeas corpus appeals.  Second stage reviews (state post-conviction appeals) detect serious error in 10 percent of the capital cases reviewed.  Despite extensive state-level appellate review, federal courts still find serious error in 40 percent of the capital cases they review. 21

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill The Liebman Study  The overall rate of prejudicial error in the U.S. capital punishment system is 68%.  Serious flaws existed in more than two out of three capital cases reviewed by the courts.  The error rate in some states exceeded 75%.  Almost 1,000 retried cases ended in sentences less than death.  Retrials in 87 cases ended in verdicts of not guilty. 22

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Juveniles and the Death Penalty  The first juvenile executed was Thomas Graunger in 1642 when he was hanged in Massachusetts for buggery. He was sixteen.  The U.S. has put to death 365 people for offenses they committed as children.  From 1976 to March 2, 2005, 22 people were executed for crimes they committed as juveniles.  In Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988), the Court held that it is unconstitutional to execute a 15-year-old.  In Roper v. Simmons (2005) the Court held that it is unconstitutional to execute anyone for a crime they committed before turning age

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill The Mentally Retarded and Death  Atkins v. Virginia (2002) held the execution of the mentally retarded to be a violation of the Eighth Amendment ban against cruel and unusual punishment.  The Court cited the development of a national consensus against such executions.  Atkins also left it to the states to define mental retardation. 24