Presentation: Fallacies - Presumption vs. Relevance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

Asking the Right Questions: Chapter 1
Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
Presentation: Fallacies - Relevance vs. Weak Induction
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Deductive Validity Truth preserving: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is logically impossible for the premises to be true and the.
Critical Thinking: Chapter 10
Fallacies - Weak Induction. Homework Review: Fallacies » pp , §4.1 “Fallacies in General” » pp , §4.3 “Fallacies of Weak Induction” Inductive.
The Second Amendment The Right to Bear Arms. The Second Amendment A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right.
Constitution Questions. 2 nd Amendment Your important questions answered…
The 2 nd and 3 rd Amendments. Which of these should private citizens not be allowed to own, if any? Handguns Automatic Shotguns Grenades F-16 Fighter.
Constitutional Law Part 4: The Federal Judicial Power Lecture 1: Interpretive Limits.
Flawed Arguments COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES.  Flaws in an argument  Often subtle  Learning to recognize these will:  Strengthen your own arguments 
Homework: 4 th amendment “research questions” for Monday FrontPage: Turn in your FP sheet to the back box.
Presentation: Fallacies – Ambiguity. Homework Recommended Exercises (do the starred problems) – 4.4.III: 1-50 Remember How does each specific argument.
The Second Amendment The Right to Bear Arms. The Second Amendment ORIGINAL Wording A well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, being.
Tutorial 4: Critical Reading 26 August, Inductive Argument Ernest Hemingway who is a prolific writer committed suicide. F. Scott Fitzgerald who.
Welcome to Unit Three Introduction to Constitutional Law
Second Amendment Facts  Proposed on Sept. 25, 1789  Ratified on Dec. 15, 1791  Actual words in the 2 nd Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being.
Homework: #5 due tomorrow FrontPage: Can anything be done to avoid tragedies like Newtown, the shooting in Colorado, or other incidents of gun violence?
Circulus in Demonstrando (circular argument) and Petitio Principii (begging the question).. By: Ashley Lewis.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
Let’s see some more examples!
Unit 2 Day 6 TLW: Develop an understanding of federalism, judicial review, and the amendment process.
Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance
Article III – US Constitution The Supreme Court. The “Supremes” Great group – but NO – we aren’t talking about them. Great group – but NO – we aren’t.
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
Handguns “Sawed-off” shotguns Tanks “Automatic” or “assault” rifles Grenades F-16 Fighter Jets Hi-Capacity magazines (hold up to 50 bullets in one “clip”)
Other Bill of Rights Protections Ch. 4, Les. 2. Rights of the Accused  The First Amendment protects five basic freedoms  Equally important is the right.
Gun Control Leading Debates in Gun Control Policy.
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall.
Informal Fallacies “A Short Catalog of Informal Fallacies”
Some common informal fallacies. Fallacies of: 1. Presumption2. Ambiguity3. Grammatical Analogy.
Mr. Calella Introduction to Law.  “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Common Logical Fallacies FLAWED ARGUMENTS SUBTLE ERRORS IN JUDGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION.
The Constitution contains 3 parts: the Preamble, the Articles, and the Amendments The Constitution contains 3 parts: the Preamble, the Articles, and.
Chapter 6 Due Process and Other Protected Rights Section 2 Controversial Rights.
Presumption, Ambiguity, & Illicit Transference 2/17/2016 C.G. Parker | PHIL
Chapter 12 Genuineness of Assent. Introduction Voluntary assent by the parties is necessary to create an enforceable contract. Assent is determined by.
A Journey into the Mind Logic and Debate Unit. Week 2: May 23 through May 26 The Fallacies SWBAT: Identify the common fallacies in logic in order to be.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
The Right to Bear Arms. Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution  A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right.
Second Amendment: Words & Rights
2017 Federal Courts and Constitutional Controversies
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Arguments an argument can be defined as a:
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Common Logical Fallacies
Right to Keep and Bear Arms
District of Columbia v. Heller
Common Logical Fallacies
Gun Control Should the U.S. government ban the possession of handguns for normal citizens?
CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT PARAGRAPH
Lecture 28 Chapter 9 The Right to Bear Arms.
GUNS Team trivia challenge.
Militia and Right to Bear Arms
UNIT NINE| LAW AND ORDER
Thursday, September 8, 2016 Objective: We will go over the perspectives on the Second Amendment and evaluate the effectiveness of gun safety laws and.
Content Focus: D.C. v. Heller
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CIVIL LIBERTIES AND CIVIL RIGHTS?
Common Logical Fallacies
Content Focus: D.C. v. Heller
McDonald v City of Chicago
The Second Amendment The Right to Bear Arms.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
3.1 Fallacies in General Fallacies: Making Bad Arguments Appear Good.
Avoiding Ungrounded Assumptions
Basic Errors in Logic Featured in “Love is a Fallacy” By Max Shulman
Presentation transcript:

Presentation: Fallacies - Presumption vs. Relevance

Homework Reading: pp Recommended Exercises (do at least the starred problems) – 4.3.III(of relevance & weak induction) – 4.4.I (of presumption & ambiguity) – 4.4.III: 1-50 Remember How does each specific argument commit a fallacy of that type? Where precisely is the offending element in the argument? The Study Guide is available online online Model exercise for the exam

Kinds of Informal Fallacies Fallacies of: 1.Relevance 2.Weak Induction 3.Presumption 4.Ambiguity or Whole/Part a.Ambiguity b.Whole/Part Where premises do support the conclusion – Insufficient evidence to warrant conclusion Conclusion unlikely Fallacies of induction

Kinds of Informal Fallacies Fallacies of: 1.Relevance 2.Weak Induction 3.Presumption 4.Ambiguity or Whole/Part a.Ambiguity b.Whole/Part Premises are logically immaterial to conclusion Attention drawn away from supporting evidence – appeal to some irrelevant concern – often intentionally deceptive Premises appear relevant

Kinds of Informal Fallacies Fallacies of: 1.Relevance 2.Weak Induction 3.Presumption 4.Ambiguity or Whole/Part a.Ambiguity b.Whole/Part Premises reiterate or presuppose conclusion – Simple or deceptive – May also presume what needs proving

Fallacies of Presumption 1.Begging the Question 2.Complex Question 3.Either … or … (false dichotomy) 4.Suppressed Evidence Formally, identical to valid arguments

Fallacies of Presumption Begging the Question 1.Conclusion is restatement of some premise Simple: In same words Complex: In different words of same meaning Deceptive: Key premise missing but asserted as premise 2.Circular argument Premises presuppose conclusion which, itself, presupposes premises

Fallacies of Presumption P ⊢ P 1 (1) P A

Fallacies of Presumption BQ (restatement) – We have a brain in our skulls but no mind. The mind is a myth, since the mind is just a fairy tale we tell ourselves to believe in life after death. A myth and a fairy tale are one and the same thing A myth and a fairy tale are one and the same thing Shaky premise

Fallacies of Presumption Circular Reasoning To cast abortion as a solely private moral question…is to lose touch with common sense: How human beings treat one another is practically the definition of a public moral matter. Of course, there are many private aspects of human relations, but the question whether one human being should be allowed fatally to harm another is not one of them. Abortion is an inescapably public matter. Source: Helen M. Alvaré, The Abortion Controversy, Greenhaven, 1995, p. 23. (

Fallacies of Presumption Circular Reasoning To cast abortion as a solely private moral question…is to lose touch with common sense: How human beings treat one another is practically the definition of a public moral matter. Of course, there are many private aspects of human relations, but the question whether one human being should be allowed fatally to harm another is not one of them. Abortion is an inescapably public matter. Source: Helen M. Alvaré, The Abortion Controversy, Greenhaven, 1995, p. 23. (

Fallacies of Presumption Circular Reasoning To cast abortion as a solely private moral question…is to lose touch with common sense: How human beings treat one another is practically the definition of a public moral matter. Of course, there are many private aspects of human relations, but the question whether one human being should be allowed fatally to harm another is not one of them. Abortion is an inescapably public matter. Source: Helen M. Alvaré, The Abortion Controversy, Greenhaven, 1995, p. 23. (

Fallacies of Presumption Circular Reasoning To cast abortion as a solely private moral question…is to lose touch with common sense: How human beings treat one another is practically the definition of a public moral matter. Of course, there are many private aspects of human relations, but the question whether one human being should be allowed fatally to harm another is not one of them. Abortion is an inescapably public matter. Source: Helen M. Alvaré, The Abortion Controversy, Greenhaven, 1995, p. 23. ( Abortion is a public matter. Why? Abortion is a not a private matter.

Fallacies of Presumption “Either … or …” fallacy – You should just drop out of school. Either take a full course load or drop out. And with everything going on right now you can’t take a full course load. Standard Features: 1.Express disjunction 2.Reasonable alternatives ignored or suppressed PvQ, ~P ⊢ Q 1 (1) P v Q A 2 (2) ~P A 1,2 (3) Q 1,2 vE

Fallacies of Presumption Complex Question – After J. Gordon Liddy served time in prison for his role in the Watergate scandal that brought down President Nixon, he made an appearance on the Dick Cavett show. On the show, Cavett mentioned the high rate of homosexual activity in US prisons. Cavett: “Did you have any trouble adjusting to homosexuality in prison?” Liddy: “No.” Cavett: “There you have it folks. Mr. Liddy had no trouble adjusting to homosexuality in prison.” The two questions in one: 1.Did you adjust to a homosexual lifestyle in prison? 2.Was it difficult?

Fallacies of Presumption Suppressed Evidence – Cough syrup is an effective remedy for adults suffering from common respiratory distress. Kids will benefit as equally. Recognition of suppressed evidence can be challenging? 1.Obvious instances are, of course, simple to identify 2.More difficult cases: background knowledge often necessary

Fallacies of Presumption "The Second Amendment to the Constitution states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But a law controlling handguns would infringe the right to keep and bear arms. Therefore, a law controlling handguns would be unconstitutional. "In fact, the Second Amendment reads, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." In other words, the amendment states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed when the arms are necessary for the preservation of a well- regulated militia. Because a law controlling handguns (pistols) would have little effect on the preservation of a well-regulated militia, it is unlikely that such a law would be unconstitutional. (p. 146 of our text)

Fallacies of Presumption "The Second Amendment to the Constitution states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But a law controlling handguns would infringe the right to keep and bear arms. Therefore, a law controlling handguns would be unconstitutional. "In fact, the Second Amendment reads, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." In other words, the amendment states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed when the arms are necessary for the preservation of a well- regulated militia. Because a law controlling handguns (pistols) would have little effect on the preservation of a well-regulated militia, it is unlikely that such a law would be unconstitutional. (p. 144 of our text)

Fallacies of Presumption "The Second Amendment to the Constitution states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But a law controlling handguns would infringe the right to keep and bear arms. Therefore, a law controlling handguns would be unconstitutional. "In fact, the Second Amendment reads, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." In other words, the amendment states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed when the arms are necessary for the preservation of a well- regulated militia. Because a law controlling handguns (pistols) would have little effect on the preservation of a well-regulated militia, it is unlikely that such a law would be unconstitutional. (p. 144 of our text) "The Supreme Court, splitting along ideological lines, on June 26 declared the District of Columbia's ban on handgun ownership unconstitutional." (Washington Post)

Homework Reading: pp Recommended Exercises (do at least the starred problems) – 4.3.III(of relevance & weak induction) – 4.4.I (of presumption & ambiguity) – 4.4.III: 1-50 The Study Guide is available online online Model exercise for the exam Remember How does each specific argument commit a fallacy of that type? Where precisely is the offending element in the argument?