Forming a Team for Smooth Sailing. Phases of the Systemic Work Phase I: Understanding the System Phase II: Analyzing the System Phase III: Planning Action.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Mentoring New Educators
Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
Leadership for Improvement Plan Implementation Creating and Implementing Improvement Plans for Impact.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Win or Lose CONSENSUS Diana Peer Arkansas Leadership Academy - AASCD Conference 2011.
Working Systemically and Title I School Support The Big Picture.
Grantee Program Plan. Components of the Program Plan Goals  Objectives  Activities  Techniques & Tools  Outcomes/Change.
Learning designs Learning Designs. Learning designs Learners will be able to … Provide a rationale for using multiple learning designs. Draft a professional.
Evidence-Based Assessment Tool A Guide for Family Support Providers and Funders.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Context setting, assessment scenarios, and communications.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance Phase III: Design AEA 267 SINA Process Se.
ELearning Planning Overview. Goals of eLearning Planning Guide Reduce planning time and effort Increase eLearning effectiveness through targeted improvement.
Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective Gene Hall University of Nevada, Las Vegas 1Dr. Gene Hall.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Phase IV: Taking Action and Monitoring Implementation and Impact.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
“Request for Proposal” Presentation Project
Career Counseling PowerPoint produced by Melinda Haley, M.S., New Mexico State University. “This multimedia product and its contents are protected under.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Phase II: Analyzing the System Describe the Ideal State.
Collaboration Grants Design 101 Salem November 21 st, 2013.
Studying the Units of Study Teaching/Learning Cycle Standards Summit Day 2 April 30, 2012.
Keystone State Reading Association October 19, 2013 State College, PA.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
The Process  Greeting  Introductions  Agenda Review  Ground Rules  Decision Making Rules  Sticking to the Agenda  Complete the IEP  Closure 
Definition of Concern “The composite representation of the feelings, preoccupation, thought, and consideration given to a particular issue or task is called.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 3 Day 3 September 23-25, 2009 Denver, CO.
Welcome Back Review Day 1 Feedback on the Day Day 2 Goals Getting Organized for Learning: Seasonal Partners.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 3 Day 2 September 23-25, 2009 Denver, CO.
SUMMER INSTITUTEJULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK Maximizing Impact Using the Global Focus List to Review Interventions.
Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Formative Observation.
Page 1 JUSTIFY define and validate REQUIRE- MENTS define initial management DOCUMENTS define INFRA- STRUCTURE allocated maintenance changes management.
Challenges to successful quality improvement HAIVN 2012.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Long Beach Communities of Practice Institute. 2 2 The School Quality Improvement System Jot down words, phrases and images that speak to the “why” of.
Phase IV: Taking Action and Monitoring Implementation and Impact.
Innovation Configurations
Innovation Configuration Maps
Maine Department of Education Maine School RTI Readiness Checklist: A Planning Tool for Schools.
MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION – EDUCATIONAL SERVICES - MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION – EDUCATIONAL LCAP EVALUATION RUBRICS UPDATE.
Unit 8: Implementation, Part II Seminar Wednesday pm ET.
Strategies to Get the New Standards for Professional Learning Into Practice LF KS Annual Leadership Conference April 23, 2013 Sandee Crowther & Sheri Thomas.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Inspecting the Boat What Is the Source of School Support Teams (SSTs)? PUBLIC LAW , JAN. 8, STAT NCLB (Handout 1)
Project Life Presented by Chuck Ray, PMP ITS Project Manager.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Exploration and Readiness Work for a Collaborative Partnership: Session 3 Trainer Name January, 2013.
Module 8: Effective Innovation Review and Selection Process
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Sixth Edition
WIGOS Pre-operational Phase
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Training Presentation
FC 335 Safe and Supportive Schools Competitive Grant Webinar
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Implementation data will continue to be collected
District Leadership Plan
Project Name TEAM MEMBER 1 NAME TEAM MEMBER 2 NAME TEAM MEMBER 3 NAME
NIST TE Challenge Phase II
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

Forming a Team for Smooth Sailing

Phases of the Systemic Work Phase I: Understanding the System Phase II: Analyzing the System Phase III: Planning Action Phase IV:Taking Action and Monitoring Implementation Phase V: Assessing and Reflecting on Outcomes 2

How do we create an effective team(s) to support school improvement? Session Question: 3

Are the Right People Getting On Board? 4

What Makes a Good Crew/Team? With a partner, complete the district team membership sorting activity to answer the following questions: Who would be highly recommended members of a team? Who would be recommended members of the team? Who would add value to the team? 5

What roles should be considered when selecting members of a team? Silently review Handout 1. With a partner, discuss the roles to consider when identifying District Leadership Team Members. Why are these roles important? 6

What are some considerations for SST smooth sailing with district and campus leadership teams? 1.Establish the purpose of working together. 2.Identify norms for working together. 3.Agree on guidelines for team meetings. 4.Create a collaborative team. 7

Silently read the Plan for Work card (Handout 2) and be ready to discuss some considerations for planning the work. Why establish a purpose for the team? Why are norms important to consider? What guidelines should be established? Team Work 8

Collaboration How do we know whether we are working as a collaborative team? 9

A New Swing As proposed by the project sponsor 10

As specified in the project request 11 A New Swing

As designed by the senior analyst 12 A New Swing

As installed at the user’s site 13 A New Swing

What the user wanted 14 A New Swing

Innovation Configuration Matrix In most change efforts, different people have surprisingly different images of what full implementation looks like... One way to develop consensus is to develop an innovation configuration matrix, one of the tools of the Concerns Based Adoption Model. An innovation configuration matrix is composed of descriptions of different forms of an innovation or change to create a “word picture.” Hall, G. & Hord, S. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 15

Think about the new swing What are the essential components they have in common? What are the variations of those components? Which variations are usable? Which variation is the ideal? 16

Innovation Configuration Matrix for Collaboration For each of the components of collaboration, which of the variations do you feel would be acceptable? Ideal? Which of the variations have your observed during school team meetings? 17

Innovation Configuration Matrix for Collaboration How might this tool be helpful in reaching consensus on how the leadership team will work together? How might this tool be helpful in providing data on how well the team is working together? 18

Smooth Sailing Voyage for School Support Teams Thank You! 19