NOAA PIT Tag needs. NOAA needs to develop an internal PIT tag plan integrating research and monitoring objectives.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.

Advertisements

Tim Copeland and June Johnson Idaho Department of Fish & Game Idaho Natural Production Monitoring & Evaluation Project

Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.

Comparative Survival Study Smolt Monitoring Program 2010 PIT Tag Mark Groups.

Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.

UMATILLA RIVER FISH PASSAGE OPERATIONS

UW Offsite Habitat and Fish Survival Effectiveness Monitoring Objective: Assist in developing and applying central guidance and criteria for improving.

BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.

Rebecca A. Buchanan Columbia Basin Research School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, WA INVESTIGATING MIGRATORY PROCESSES.

Experiences Handling PTAGIS Data in Comparative Survival Study By Tom Berggren Fish Passage Center Portland OR.

Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.

The Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System The First 20 Years Dave Marvin Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission A Presentation for the PSMFC PIT.

C. A. Peery, M. L. Keefer, and S. R. Lee Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit U.S. Geological Survey and Northwest Fisheries Science Center.

Long-term planning for design, implementation and maintenance of in-stream detection systems Chris Jordan, NOAA-NWFSC – moderator & A panel of experts.

Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.

Al Giorgi – BioAnalysts, Inc. BioAnalysts, Inc.. BiOP RPA 52.6 = Monitoring Plan PIT data  Many RM&E RPAs Clarify needs, specifications (N, Populations,

Tucannon Endemic Steelhead – An Integrated Program picture.

A. Giorgi J. Geiselman J. Tenney N. Tancreto. Database system: Forecast Columbia Basin PIT tag use Anadromous salmonids Integrated with PTAGIS Time step.

Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.

Chris Bare, Jim Latshaw, Ian Tattam, Jim Ruzycki, and Rich Carmichael Estimating Chinook escapement to the John Day River basin using a mark-recapture.

IEAB Cost-effectiveness Evaluation Framework for Fish Tagging: Building a (MIP) Programming Model Bill Jaeger, IEAB & Oregon State University January 7,

Alternative Gear Implementation Project Pat Frazier WDFW Region 5 Fish Program Manager Photo by Wild Fish Conservancy.

Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 2009 Technical Management TeamDecember 11, 2009 Lessons Learned 2009 Bill.

1 Mainstem Passage Strategies In The Columbia River System: Transportation, Spill and Flow Augmentation Presented By: Albert Giorgi, Ph.D.

2014 Program Goal Statements for Salmon and Steelhead Overview Nancy Leonard, Laura Robinson and Patty O’Toole (NPCC)

1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.

1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.

Lewis River Fish Passage Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (draft)

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY Chapter 3: Annual SAR by study category and ratios of SARs Comparisons of SARs Transport to In-River By hatchery group Hatchery.

Annual SARs by Study Category, TIR and D: Patterns and Significance Presenter: Charlie Petrosky CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.

Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.

Differential Estimates of “Survival” for PIT Tagged Fish – Evidence and Causes Jason Vogel Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) Presentation to PNAMP Steering Committee August 21, 2007.

Status of Columbia River salmon and links to flow: What we do and do not know Presentation to Northwest Power Planning Council December 11, 2002

Al Giorgi – BioAnalysts Inc.. FCRPS BiOp RPA 52.6 = action plan status monitoring- Hydro Many RM&E RPAs require PIT data Coordinated and Effective FWP.

Howard Schaller PSMFC Annual Meeting September 24, 2013 Comparative Survival Study Outcomes – Experimental Spill Management 1.

CSS Oversight Committee ISAB November 15, 2013 Comparative Survival Study Outcomes – Experimental Spill Management 1.

The relationship of Snake River stream-type Chinook survival rates to in-river, ocean and climate conditions Howard Schaller, USFWS * Charlie Petrosky,

Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service.

October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.

2010 work planned, new operations, and wrap up Presenter: Robin Ehlke CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.

Survival and Behavior of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Lower Columbia River, Estuary, and Plume G. A. McMichael 1, R. L. McComas 2, J. A. Carter 1, G.

Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.

Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.

Tracey Yerxa Bonneville Power Administration Implementing the 2008 FCRPS BiOp Using Emerging Tools and Strategies

LSRCP Hatchery Steelhead Salmon River Brian Leth and Carl Stiefel LSRCP Steelhead Program Review July 20-21, 2012 Clarkston,WA.

Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.

November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.

Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.

US Army Corps of Engineers Draft 2009 Kelt Management Plan.

2016 Smolt Monitoring Program Juvenile Passage Data and

Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data

Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team

Bill Jaeger IEAB & Oregon State University March 19, 2013

Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting

Age at ocean entry of Snake River Basin fall Chinook and its significance to adult returns prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.

MPG Spring-Summer Chinook

Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary

The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.

Comparative Survival Study Project #

Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team

2017 TMT Year-end Review December 12, 2017 Brandon R. Chockley

Direct Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers: Update with 2007 Results Northwest Power and Conservation Council.

NOAA Mainstem PIT Tag Research

Articulation of Basin-wide Monitoring “Framework”

Presentation transcript:

NOAA PIT Tag needs

NOAA needs to develop an internal PIT tag plan integrating research and monitoring objectives

Primary Issues FCRPS BiOp Requirements Status monitoring Precision of estimates Adequate PIT Tag coverage of groups of interest (ESU,DPS, MPG, etc) Uncertainties associated with PIT tagging Detection sites Compass model

BiOp Requirements FCRPS Survival Transport vs. In-River SAR Adult Upstream Conversion Rates Evaluations of mitigation and enhancement measures PTAGIS maintenance and improvement

Status Monitoring Monitoring of intensively monitored watersheds Monitoring of populations of concern

Precision

Other Precision Concerns Increased surface passage = decreased detection MCN-BON survival. Precision of annual and within-season SARs and TIRs Reach survivals for other ESUs (e.g., upper Columbia wild-origin fish, Lower Columbia ESUs) are often imprecise or absent

Uncertainties Tag Effects

Detection Increased detector coverage-Upper Columbia, Tributaries, PIT tag trawl New technologies-spillway detection, flat plates, other innovations Improvements to PTAGIS