Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Native Trout Program Monitoring of Bull Trout Populations in the Columbia Plateau Province using the EMAP Protocol.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program

Advertisements

1 The Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 2003.

& dding ubtracting ractions.

Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.

STATISTICS HYPOTHESES TEST (I)

STATISTICS INTERVAL ESTIMATION Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.

Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.

Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.

Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =

Salmonid Natural Production Monitoring & Evaluation Project Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation BPA Project #

Use of microsatellite DNA markers to determine the reproductive success of hatchery and natural origin chinook salmon in a supplemented Idaho stream Brian.

Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and

Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Paul Kucera and Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management BPA Project

Implement the Grande Ronde Model Watershed Program Administration and Habitat Restoration Projects Project Lyle Kuchenbecker, Project Planner.

SELECT AREA FISHERY EVALUATION BPA Project # CEDC, ODFW, WDFW.

Project Contract 4101 ODFW Contract 4102 CTWSRO In FY02: Bull trout life history, genetics, habitat needs, and limiting factors in central.

Bull Trout Population and Habitat Surveys in the McKenzie and Middle Fork Willamette Presented by: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife February 22,

Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Project Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Mike Faler - USFWS, Ahsahka, ID Glen Mendel - WDFW, Dayton, WA Evaluate Bull Trout Movements in the Tucannon & Lower Snake Rivers.

Fluvial Bull Trout Migration and Life History Investigations, Upper Salmon River Subbasin New Project Proposal, No Sponsored by: Shoshone-Bannock.

Assessment of Bull Trout Populations in the Yakima River Watershed.

Monitor Natural Escapement and Productivity of John Day Basin Spring Chinook Project # Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife James Ruzycki Richard.

This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.

Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

1 Measuring Progress: Monitoring and Evaluation in WRIA 8 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 19, 2009 Scott Stolnack WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator.

Measurements and Their Uncertainty 3.1

Local Customization Chapter 2. Local Customization 2-2 Objectives Customization Considerations Types of Data Elements Location for Locally Defined Data.

Multiplication Facts Review. 6 x 4 = 24 5 x 5 = 25.

C1 Sequences and series. Write down the first 4 terms of the sequence u n+1 =u n +6, u 1 =6 6, 12, 18, 24.

Cyndi Baker & Jen Graham. Began in 1998 to document bull trout life history in WSR and SC and monitor population abundance Data from 1998.

Chapter 7 Sampling and Sampling Distributions

PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6

LOWER YUBA RIVER ACCORD Monitoring and Evaluation Program Redd Surveys Casey Campos PSMFC.

5-1 Chapter 5 Theory & Problems of Probability & Statistics Murray R. Spiegel Sampling Theory.

1 Slides revised The overwhelming majority of samples of n from a population of N can stand-in for the population.

Oil & Gas Final Sample Analysis April 27, Background Information TXU ED provided a list of ESI IDs with SIC codes indicating Oil & Gas (8,583)

Monitoring of Great Basin Redband Trout 6 Year Pilot Study ODFW Native Fish Investigations Project.

Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.

Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.

1 TV Viewing Trends Rivière-du-Loup EM - Diary Updated Spring 2014.

Adding Up In Chunks.

CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.

1 Intensively Monitored Watersheds Validation Monitoring for Salmon Habitat Restoration.

Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M

©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.

PSSA Preparation.

& dding ubtracting ractions.

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 11 Simple Linear Regression.

LESSONS LEARNED PILOT STUDY MAY 12, 2009 – SEPTEMBER 13, 2009 Leslie Alber.

1 Spatial and Spatio-temporal modeling of the abundance of spawning coho salmon on the Oregon coast R Ruben Smith Don L. Stevens Jr. September.

Erica Maltz, Fisheries Program Manager Drew Harper, Fish Biologist Burns Paiute Tribe 18 January 2012.

Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)

Strategy Rationale Oregon Recovery Plan Washington Recovery Plan NOAA Monitoring Guidance (includes RPAs) Integrated Status & Trends Monitoring (ISTM)

Chris Bare, Jim Latshaw, Ian Tattam, Jim Ruzycki, and Rich Carmichael Estimating Chinook escapement to the John Day River basin using a mark-recapture.

1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.

Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.

Monitoring Challenges for VSP Parameters in the Oregon Portion of the Lower Columbia River Jamie Anthony Monitoring Coordinator.

The concept of a Master Sample: Lower Columbia Example An Update Phil Larsen Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission c/o USEPA 200 SW 35 th St. Corvallis,

Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,

Oregon Steelhead Status, Recovery Planning and Monitoring Kevin Goodson Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting.

October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.

Lake Roosevelt Rainbow Trout Habitat/Passage Improvement Project No Jason McLellan Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation January.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop

Presentation transcript:

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Native Trout Program Monitoring of Bull Trout Populations in the Columbia Plateau Province using the EMAP Protocol Stephanie Gunckel, Bruce McIntosh, Al Hemmingsen, and Paul Sankovich

What is EMAP? EPAs Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program Estimate the current status and trends of ecological resources with known confidence

What is EMAP? Probabilistic Surveys Simple Random Sample EMAP Sample Random Spatially Balanced

Why EMAP? Status AND trends at multiple scales Large spatial scales with minimal effort Statistically rigorous Expertise developed with coho Integration of multiple aspects of monitoring

Why EMAP? Associations Is the number of juveniles related to the number of adults? Is the number of juveniles related to habitat condition? Coho Questions Status How many adult coho are in a region? What is the density of deep pools? Trends Is the number of adult coho changing over time? Is the number of juveniles changing?

Why EMAP? Average Relative Precision Geographic Unit Random 200 Sites Random 400 Sites EMAP 400 Sites ESU± 28%± 21%± 16% Monitoring Area ± 54%± 37%± 22% Major Basin± 63%± 52%± 35% Estimates of Precision for Coho

Bull Trout in the Columbia Plateau M. Esteve 2002 Target Precision - province ± 25% - subbasin ± 40% Estimate of Redds

Target Population All potential bull trout spawning reaches in Columbia Plateau Province

Target Population spawning distribution presence

Sample Frame All wadeable streams within the target population

Sample Sites 50 new sites each year

Response Design 1.6 km surveys Zero counts Late August – Early November repeat surveys Marked redds

Census vs. EMAP Surveyed sample frame Umatilla/ Walla Walla Subbasin

Census vs. EMAP Umatilla/ Walla Walla Subbasin Surveyed all sample sites

Census vs. EMAP Umatilla/ Walla Walla Subbasin CensusEMAP No. of Redds Km Surveyed 11559

Redd Estimate nRedds95%CI Province ± 15% John Day 42541± 33% Walla Walla 40716± 16% Deschutes ± 22% Columbia Plateau Province

Site Occupancy Redds/km

Site Occupancy John Day subbasin Redds/km Spawning domain less accurate Sympatric fall spawning salmonids

Considerations for Evaluation What is an acceptable level of precision for bull trout monitoring? Are redd surveys the best method to monitor reproductive adults? How do redd numbers relate to reproductive adults ?

Acknowledgements Design and Analysis – EPA – P. Larsen, T. Olsen; Implementation – ODFW Districts – T. Bailey, S. Marx, J. Neal, T. Unterwegner, T. Wise; USFS – L. Boe, P. Howell; CTWSRO – R. Dodson and crews; CTUIR – C. Contor, P. Kissner; WDFW – G. Mendel and crews; ODFW Field Crews – N. Davis, B. Goodman, A. Higgins, T. Johnston, A. Lauber, R. Ripley, K. Saylor, J. Severson, S. Starcevich, I. Tattam; Funding – Bonneville Power Administration