Evaluating commercial selective fishing. C.E. Ashbrook J.F. Dixon A.Hoffmann K. E. Ryding E. A. Schwartz J.R. Skalski R. Townsend G.E. Vander Haegen K.W.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.

AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory

EuroCondens SGB E.

UMATILLA HATCHERY MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROJECT Richard Carmichael, Wes Stonecypher, Gerold Grant, and Will Cameron Project # Oregon Department.

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.

: An Acoustic Tracking Array for Studying Ocean Survival and Movements of Columbia River Salmon (POST) David Welch.

A Study to Evaluate Delayed (Extra) Mortality Associated with Passage of Yearling Chinook Salmon Smolts through Snake River Dams Project No

Grande Ronde Supplementation Lostine River: Operation and Maintenance and Monitoring and Evaluation Sponsor: Nez Perce Tribe Project Number:

E STABLISH R ELATIONSHIP B ETWEEN F ISH P ASSAGE S URVIVAL AND T URBINE O PERATING E FFICIENCY NORMANDEAU ASSOCIATES HTI, Inc. and J. R. Skalski (Proposal.

Evaluate recreational and commercial mark-selective fisheries. (35018) Geraldine Vander Haegen, WDFW Charmane Ashbrook, WDFW Chris Peery, U. Idaho Annette.

Workshop: Monitoring and Evaluation of Harvest on Columbia River Salmonids July 31- August 1, 2007.

Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and

Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.

The Coded-Wire Tag Program: Regional Overview

SELECT AREA FISHERY EVALUATION BPA Project # CEDC, ODFW, WDFW.

Investigate Re-establishing Anadromous Fish Populations Above Man-made Barriers Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Willamette Basin.

Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

The 5S numbers game..

The basics for simulations

Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run

When you see… Find the zeros You think….

CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.

2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.

Before Between After.

2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.

2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.

Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture

Rebecca A. Buchanan Columbia Basin Research School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, WA INVESTIGATING MIGRATORY PROCESSES.

Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.

& dding ubtracting ractions.

Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.

Rebecca Buchanan and John Skalski, University of Washington Gregory Mackey, Douglas County PUD Charles Snow, Washington DFW TRIBPIT: ESTIMATING SALMONID.

Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.

  Multiple years of sampling to mark and recapture individuals completed between 2006 and 2008   Despite significant effort, population estimates were.

Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.

Adult Steelhead Monitoring Challenges in Cedar Creek, WA Josua Holowatz & Dan Rawding.

C. A. Peery, M. L. Keefer, and S. R. Lee Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit U.S. Geological Survey and Northwest Fisheries Science Center.

Assessing the use of PIT Tags as a Tool to Monitor Adult Chinook Salmon Returns to Idaho John Cassinelli Regional Fisheries Biologist Idaho Department.

Investigation of Avian Predation Upon Salmonid Smolts With the Use of an Active Acoustic / PIT Tag Combination Curt Dotson – Grant PUD Suzie Rizor – Blue.

Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.

COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON AND STEELHEAD RETURNS FPAC and TMT – March 2013 Presented by: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Chris Bare, Jim Latshaw, Ian Tattam, Jim Ruzycki, and Rich Carmichael Estimating Chinook escapement to the John Day River basin using a mark-recapture.

Alternative Gear Implementation Project Pat Frazier WDFW Region 5 Fish Program Manager Photo by Wild Fish Conservancy.

Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 2009 Technical Management TeamDecember 11, 2009 Lessons Learned 2009 Bill.

May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries and Beyond Oregon and Washington Staff Options for Initial Analysis.

Is there evidence for stock segregation in Chinook salmon during ocean residence? Indicators of survival: reconstruction of juvenile size-at-emigration.

Effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing and release practices at Winthrop NFH William Gale and Matt Cooper -USFWS, Mid-Columbia River Fishery.

Using PIT tags to evaluate the post- release survival of spring chinook salmon following their release from commercial nets C. E. Ashbrook, J. R. Skalski,

Downstream Survival of Juvenile Stream Type Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Through the Snake/Columbia River Hydropower System and Adult Return Rates AFEP.

Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.

Performance of a New Steelhead Line Derived from Hatchery Parents Collected in Autumn in the Grande Ronde River Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,

Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.

Commercial Fisheries Bycatch Monitoring on Utah Lake David Tinsley and Jackie Watson Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.

Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data

Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team

Bill Jaeger IEAB & Oregon State University March 19, 2013

MPG Spring-Summer Chinook

Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary

The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.

Adult Returns and Juvenile Outmigration Data

Steelhead status in Idaho – 2012 Update

Adult PIT-tag Interrogation System Wells Hydroelectric Project (System Design, Installation and Evaluation) Shane Bickford* Public Utility District.

Hatchery Production Wells Hatchery Steelhead: 450,000 fish annually

Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman

Presentation transcript:

Evaluating commercial selective fishing

C.E. Ashbrook J.F. Dixon A.Hoffmann K. E. Ryding E. A. Schwartz J.R. Skalski R. Townsend G.E. Vander Haegen K.W. Yi Researchers and Technical Support

Why selective fisheries? Harvest commingled populations and species at different rates. Extract hatchery fish that are produced for harvest (as mitigation for the dams). For the same impact on natural fish, the harvest of hatchery fish can be significantly increased.

Visual markadipose fin clip

Evaluate the concept of live capture, selective harvest in a commercial fishery. Historic large return of spring chinook salmon made this possible. Compare conventional and experimental gear. Will the tangle net more benignly capture fish compared to the conventional gill net? Revise techniques; Use a revival box, shorter net, shorter soak time, and careful handling. Evaluate four metrics: immediate survival, catch efficiency, bycatch and long-term survival. Objectives

Gillnet and tangle net

Control and test fishing areas Upriver Toward Pacific Ocean Fish Trap Beacon Rock Washington State Oregon State

Evaluate condition and length

Revival box

Jaw tag on adult chinook salmon

Chinook salmon with gill and wedge marks

Chinook salmon with tangle marks

Immediate survival Tangle (3.5&4.5) Gill (8) Net Tangle (4.5) Tangle (4.25&4.5) 2003 N Immediate survival % Net Type (inches) Study year

Catch efficiency for paired nets inch gill net captured 2-10 times more fish than 3.5 inch tangle net. No significant difference between 8 inch gill net and 4.5 inch tangle net inch gill net captured 1.5 times more fish than 4.5 inch tangle net inch gill net captured 1.3 times more fish than 4.25 inch tangle net.

Bycatch Mostly in tangle nets. Mainly shad, juvenile sturgeon, and suckers. Less in 2002 and 2003 through avoiding concentration areas and times.

Long term survival

new control tangle control gill tangle control gill tangle control 95% confidence interval Estimated total survival (%) Jaw tag recovery rate (%) Group

2003PIT tagged all adult spring chinook salmon

Jaw and PIT tag survival estimates 2003 only 13.4% 16.6% 19.2% Jaw tag recovery probability Control below Bonneville Dam Tangle net Control at Bonneville Dam 81.5% ( ) 79.8% ( ) PIT tag survival estimate 79.1% ( ) 68.2% ( ) Jaw tag survival estimate Group 79.5% 95.6% 97.6% PIT tag detection probability

PIT tag data by dam DamTangleControl at Bonneville Detection probability Bonneville % McNary % Three Mile010% Lower Granite % Ice Harbor % Priest Rapids % Rock Island % Wells %

Survival beginning at Bonneville Dam GroupNDetection probability Ratio of probabilities Unique treatment detections above Bonneville Dam % 1.04 Treatment detections at Bonneville Dam 855 Unique control detections above Bonneville Dam % Control detections at Bonneville Dam 1062 Indicates that survival differences occur before fish reach Bonneville Dam

Short soaks and careful handling techniques are not enough to improve long-term survival of 8 gill net or 5.5 net captured chinook. Combined with the tangle net, they can improve long-term survival. Long-term survival measured by releasing fish to swim freely is very different than immediate survival or net pen holding survival. Fish in better condition at capture are more likely to survive long-term. PIT tag post-release survival estimates are similar to jaw tag post-release survival estimates, provide tighter confidence intervals, and indicate the post-release survival differences occur before fish reach Bonneville Dam. Conclusions

Whats Next? Evaluate 2003 passage timing using PIT tags. Request funds to: 1.Evaluate steelhead (bycatch) survival. 2.Additional year of spring chinook study using PIT tags. 3.Evaluate spawning success.

Bonneville Power Association Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife University of Idaho Cooperative Unit Acknowledgements

2003 recapture Of fish that were either recaptured or swam back into the net after being released, 8.5% were eventually recovered, compared to 14.1% recovery of fish that were not recaptured and did not swim back into the net.