12/25/2009 Pleasure Craft Proposal Draft Pleasure Craft Evaporative Emissions Regulation and Standards

2/25/20092 Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/20093 Objectives 1.Seek public participation in process 2.Share information on control technology testing 3.Seek input on draft proposal

2/25/20094 Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/20095 Purpose of ARB Regulation 1.Seek additional emission reductions from category 2.Reduce emissions for ozone attainment 3.Meet existing SIP commitment

2/25/20096 Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/20097 Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Breakdown of emissions from a 33 gallon 2006 MY Crestliner ARB is reducing emissions by improving technology to all four sources

2/25/20098 Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions, cont. Total Projected HC emissions and reductions based on current model

2/25/20099 Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/ Control Technology Test Results Using Proven Automotive Control Technologies Low Permeation Fuel Tank (Moeller Marine, <1.0 g/m2/day, roto-molded two layer) Carbon Canister (Delphi Marine, 0.84 g/liter) Low Permeation Fuel Hose (Arrow Hose and Tubing, <5 g/m2/day) Fuel Injection (Honda FI, 90HP)

2/25/ Controlled Technology Test Results, cont. One MY 2006 Crestliner was used for all control technology testing

2/25/ Emissions reductions were calculated against an uncontrolled 2006 Crestliner with E6 Averaged over seven 24-hour California summertime diurnal profiles Fuel TypeAverage Emissions Reductions E680% E1077% Controlled Technology Test Results, cont.

2/25/ Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/ Refueling Emissions Current inventory does not account for refueling emissions Estimated refueling emissions could be as much as 3 TPD Based on: –Population of 1.2 million –Daily fuel consumption

2/25/ Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/ Draft Proposal – Key Elements Options for Certification Proposed Pleasure Craft regulation has two methods of certification: 1.Design-Based Standard – Requires specific components – fuel injection – low permeation fuel hoses – low permeation fuel tank – passively purged carbon canister 2.Performance Alternative – One standard for the complete system Based on a 72-Hour test (California Summer Profile) ORVR required for both options The standard will be based on E10 –90% California Phase 3 Reformulated Gasoline with 10% by volume ethanol

2/25/ Draft Proposal – Key Elements Standards Design Requirements Section (a) Effective Date Model Year Fuel Hose Permeation Grams/m 2 /day ROG Fuel Tank Permeation Grams/m 2 /day ROG Carbon Canister Butane Working Capacity Grams/Liter 1 Fuel Injection Production Compliance Phase-In 2012 and subsequent Required*All Pleasure Craft 1.Design Based Standards *Fuel Injection will be required for: Greater than 200HP - MY2012 Greater than 50HP – MY2013 All Pleasure Craft – MY2014

2/25/ Draft Proposal – Key Elements Standards 2.Performance Alternative Standard Performance Requirements Section (b) Effective Date Model Year PLEASURE CRAFT TypeDiurnal Standard Grams HC/day 2012All PLEASURE CRAFT Types * Tank Volume (liters)

2/25/ Draft Proposal – Key Elements Concept for Certification 1.Evaporative System Builders (boat builders, manufacturers, dealers, etc.) must apply for an Executive Order of Certification 1.Build evaporative system with ARB EO approved components 2.Reference EO number in application form 3.Submit application to MSOD 4.EO is automatic upon submittal 2.Boat Manufacturer will submit test data for the whole system, ARB will issue an EO

2/25/ Concept for Certification- Example Dealer Certification 1.Dealer builds evaporative system with EO certified components 2.References EO numbers in registration form 3.Submits registration form to MSOD 4.Boat is allowed for sale immediately upon submittal 5.Dealer will receive EO of Certification within 45 days of submittal

2/25/ Draft Proposal – Key Elements Requirements for ORVR Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery (ORVR) is required for all Pleasure Craft in 2012 –Fill necks must be compatible with gasoline dispensers –Must control displaced refueling vapor from escaping into the atmosphere

2/25/ Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/ Request for Manufacturing Cost ARB is seeking cost information from manufacturers to refine cost estimates for: –Fuel Tanks –Fuel Hoses –Carbon Canisters –Fuel Injection –ORVR Compatibility

2/25/ Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/ Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness ARB will: Use cost estimates provided by the boat and component manufacturers Assume two levels of profit in calculating increased retail cost Use estimated fuel savings in overall cost effectiveness calculation

2/25/ Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/ Pleasure Craft Survey Institute for Social Research, CSUS is currently performing a California Pleasure Craft usage and activity survey –Preliminary data will be available in March –Final report will be available in July The survey data will be used to update activity and usage in the Off-Road Model

2/25/ Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/ Status of Inventory Testing Inventory testing is on-going and will be completed in 2011 PTSD will update the Off-Road model when inventory testing is finished Because of the urgent need for reductions the Pleasure Craft regulation will move forward with existing estimates

2/25/ Presentation Outline Objectives Purpose of ARB Regulation Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions Control Technology Test Results Refueling Emissions Key Elements of Draft Proposal Request for Manufacturing Cost Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness Pleasure Craft Survey Status of Inventory Testing Comments and Contact Information

2/25/ Comments? We are specifically seeking comment on: 1.Time needed for technology implementation 2.Concepts for certification 3.Manufacturing costs 4.Definitions in draft regulation

2/25/ Contacts Monitoring and Laboratory Division (For Questions Concerning the Rule Development) Scott Monday –Project Co-Lead, Evaporative Control, Engineering, and Regulatory Development Section (916) Jim Watson –Manager, Evaporative Control, Engineering, and Regulatory Development Section (916) Planning and Technical Support Division (For Questions Concerning the Emissions Inventory) Satya Sardar –Staff, Off-Road Modeling and Assessment Section (626)