UW Offsite Habitat and Fish Survival Effectiveness Monitoring Objective: Assist in developing and applying central guidance and criteria for improving.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program
Advertisements

Monitoring Watershed Restoration Effectiveness Nez Perce Tribe DFRM-Watershed Division Rebecca A. Lloyd, Project Leader.
Interior Columbia Basin TRT Draft Viability Criteria June, 2005 ESU & Population Levels.
NOAA PIT Tag needs. NOAA needs to develop an internal PIT tag plan integrating research and monitoring objectives.
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Washington Department
Management Implications of ISAB Tagging Report # Council Meeting June 9, 2009 Whitefish, Montana.
Okanogan Sub-basin Water Strategy and Pilot Projects (Proposal No ) Sponsored by: The Colville Confederated Tribes Presented by: Bob Anderson Golder.
Data Management in Support of the Fish & Wildlife Program Summary.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.
CHARACTERIZE AND ASSESS WILDLIFE-HABITAT TYPES AND STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS FOR SUB-BASINS WITHIN THE COLUMBIA PLATEAU ECOPROVINCE Project:
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Columbia Cascades Water Rights Acquisition Program.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America Step 7 Identify Population Objectives Population Objective is set here.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative James Broska Science Coordinator
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
Fish and Wildlife Program’s Columbia River Basin High Level Indicators Tracking Progress in the Council Fish and Wildlife Program October 2009 Ketchum,
km Landsat TM and ETM from the Minthorn Springs node on the Umatilla River, Oregon. Assessing scales of thermal influence in alluvial floodplains.
Scientific motivation of the CHaMP project: How CHaMP data can be used to answer fish and habitat management questions Chris Jordan – NOAA-Fisheries Brice.
Recent Events in Water Law and Policy in the United States Portion of the Columbia Basin The Federal Columbia River Power System: Pacific Salmon and the.
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
Incorporating Spatial Heterogeneity in Temperature into Climate Vulnerability Assessments for Coastal Pacific Streams NOAA, UW, USGS This project will.
Vegetative versus Wildlife Habitat Classifications How stuff works.
Climate Change: SEAFWA Thoughts? Ken Haddad, Executive Director Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission September 2007.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
A Guiding Framework For Regional Monitoring Participants –Alan Byrne (IDFG) –Alex Conley (Yakima Salmon Recovery Board) –Chris Drivdahl (WA State NPCC)
Klamath Coho Integrated Modeling Framework (IMF)
2014 Program Goal Statements for Salmon and Steelhead Overview Nancy Leonard, Laura Robinson and Patty O’Toole (NPCC)
2012 Instream Flow Study Agency Meeting on 2012 Draft Study Descriptions January 24,
Hancock Springs A natural lab for studying the roles of physical habitat, nutrient availability, and non-native species to inform river restoration John.
1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
1 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Usha Varanasi, Ph.D. Science Director Philip Roni, Ph.D. Research Fishery Biologist Northwest Fisheries.
1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Habitat Status and Trend in the Upper Columbia ESU Chapter 3 John Arterburn.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
: Program Coordination and Facilitation Services January 17, 2012 Tom Iverson Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange - Thursday Sessions - Sponsored by Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.
Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange Habitat Issues.
Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Hydropeaking and minimum flow : the French approach. P. Baran CIS ECOSTAT - HYDROMORPHOLGY WORKSHOP 12th and 13th June Brussels Pôle Ecohydraulique.
Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
Tracey Yerxa Bonneville Power Administration Implementing the 2008 FCRPS BiOp Using Emerging Tools and Strategies
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
ISEMP Data Management System. Support entire workflow Based on required functions Based on understanding of the data ISEMP Data Management System.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
RTT Analysis Workshop Synthesis: Data Gaps and Research Needs (Chapter 5) Presented by Keely Murdoch MaDMC Chair Yakama Nation.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
An Overview of the Flathead Subbasin Planning Process
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.
ISAB and ISRP 101 Eric J. Loudenslager, ISRP Chair
Summarize Strategy The strategy is comprehensive. Covers:
Science Policy Exchange - Thursday pm Session -
Collaboration on Comprehensive Columbia River Basin Hatchery RM&E How do we get to a comprehensive list of Hatchery RM&E for the Basin??
Articulation of Basin-wide Monitoring “Framework”
Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop
Presentation transcript:

UW Offsite Habitat and Fish Survival Effectiveness Monitoring Objective: Assist in developing and applying central guidance and criteria for improving the effectiveness of: Basin-wide monitoring (RPA 180) Independent research projects (RPA 183)

RPA 180 and 183 RPAs designated as high priority by the Fish and Wildlife Programs (FWP) and Biological Opinions (BiOp) RPAs apply to All provinces/geographical areas

RPA 180 and 183 RPAs designated as high priority by the Fish and Wildlife Programs (FWP) and Biological Opinions (BiOp) RPAs apply to All provinces/geographical areas All salmon life stages, ESUs, and fish species

RPA 180 and 183 RPAs designated as high priority by the Fish and Wildlife Programs (FWP) and Biological Opinions (BiOp) RPAs apply to All provinces/geographical areas All salmon life stages, ESUs, and fish species Tributary-offsite mitigation habitat measures identified in the RM&E Gap Analysis

RPA 180 Objective Facilitate a basin-wide hierarchical monitoring program

RPA 180 Tasks Organize a Regional Monitoring Team (RMT) to consult on development of monitoring guidance and criteria Facilitate the development of a Monitoring Information Website in cooperation with BPA, CBR (UW) and the RMT Use information from RPA 183 effectiveness studies to facilitate development of the monitoring program Use the basin-wide monitoring program to improve RPA 183 data collection and analyses

RPA 183 Objective Improve effectiveness of tributary habitat research Management Action Fish Survival / ConditionPhysical / Environmental

RPA 183 Tasks Evaluate use of information in the RPA 183 guidance document in habitat and salmon research Review studies of management effects on tributary habitat and salmonid conditions

RPA 183 Tasks Evaluate use of information in the RPA 183 guidance document in habitat and salmon research Common management actions Common factors and data sources Differences in methods Applicable response models Review studies of management effects on tributary habitat and salmonid conditions

RPA 183 Tasks Evaluate use of information in the RPA 183 guidance document in habitat and salmon research Common management actions Common factors and data sources Differences in methods Applicable response models Review studies of management effects on tributary habitat and salmonid conditions Distribution of habitat research by province and ESU Stratification variables and spatial scales for tributaries Habitat indicators Salmonid life stage survival/condition indicators and methods of sampling and detection

Land use/ vegetation PhysiographyClimate Landscape controls Sediment Regime Hydrologic Regime Wood Regime Gross reach morphology Habitat Forming Processes Habitat complexes, e.g. pools, riffles, meanders Species assemblages Stream Morphology Biodiversity

Proposed research combines RPA 180 and 183 to address sub-basin needs and limiting factors Columbia River Basin Monitoring Program (RPA 180) Tributary-based Effectiveness Research (RPA 183) Criteria improves data collection and analyses Proposal and project review information Review and evaluate proposals and projects

Joint RPA 180 and 183 Tasks Evaluate what statistical methods could facilitate the design of studies that: - Optimize sampling efficiency - Improve data analysis - Reduce costs

Joint RPA 180 and 183 Tasks Evaluate what statistical methods could facilitate the design of studies that: Identify uncertainties in monitoring and effectiveness research related to distinguishing between the effects of: - Management actions and natural events - Different management activities

Joint RPA 180 and 183 Tasks Evaluate what statistical methods could facilitate the design of studies that: Identify uncertainties in monitoring and effectiveness research related to distinguishing between the effects of: Identify possible adaptive management approaches. - Passive adaptive management - Active (experimental) adaptive management

Expected Results Improve monitoring criteria and guidance for tributary projects

Expected Results Improve monitoring criteria and guidance for tributary projects Improve criteria for review of the effectiveness of research proposals and projects

Expected Results Improve monitoring criteria and guidance for tributary projects Improve criteria for review of the effectiveness of research proposals and projects Facilitate coordination of current and future projects to ensure data quality control

Expected Results Improve monitoring criteria and guidance for tributary projects Improve criteria for review of the effectiveness of research proposals and projects Facilitate coordination of current and future projects to ensure data quality control Improve balance of salmon and habitat projects

Expected Results Improve monitoring criteria and guidance for tributary projects Improve criteria for review of the effectiveness of research proposals and projects Facilitate coordination of current and future projects to ensure data quality control Improve balance of salmon and habitat projects Facilitate the development and transfer of a Monitoring Information Website to BPA for basin-wide communication and information sharing