BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program

Advertisements

EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.

Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Interior Columbia Basin TRT Draft Viability Criteria June, 2005 ESU & Population Levels.

NOAA PIT Tag needs. NOAA needs to develop an internal PIT tag plan integrating research and monitoring objectives.

Comparative Survival Study Smolt Monitoring Program 2010 PIT Tag Mark Groups.

Selective Fish Collection & Harvesting Gear P roposal #29042 Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.

Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.

Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

Management Implications of ISAB Tagging Report # Council Meeting June 9, 2009 Whitefish, Montana.

Data Management Projects Data Management Framework Subcommittee Update June 19, 2007.

Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.

Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.

Spatial scales of homing and the efficacy of hatchery supplementation of wild populations Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries.

Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Summary of Recommendations: Peer Review of FY 13 Science Workplan Trinity River Restoration Program Preliminary Fiscal Year 2013 Science Workplan.

Preliminary Results of Management Question Survey Jim Geiselman & Jen Bayer March 16, 2006 Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP)

1 Bonneville 2 nd Powerhouse Corner Collector PIT Tag Detection System Project Bonneville Power Administration and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Portland.

Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.

FCRPS BIOPHatchery BIOP Program HGMP’s ESA coverage New Hatchery Reform Actions Program Description & Assessment Selection of Projects for New HSRG/HRT/HGMP.

Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.

Al Giorgi – BioAnalysts, Inc. BioAnalysts, Inc.. BiOP RPA 52.6 = Monitoring Plan PIT data  Many RM&E RPAs Clarify needs, specifications (N, Populations,

Where are we going? Regional monitoring and evaluation of hatchery/supplementation programs.

* Population ageing, few young fish (juveniles) * Endangered as per the Species at Risk Act (SARA) * Now fully protected, it is against the law to have.

Tucannon Endemic Steelhead – An Integrated Program picture.

Saskatchewan River Sturgeon Management Board (SRSMB) What is the SRSMB? It is a group of stakeholders working together with communities to prevent further.

A. Giorgi J. Geiselman J. Tenney N. Tancreto. Database system: Forecast Columbia Basin PIT tag use Anadromous salmonids Integrated with PTAGIS Time step.

Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)

Strategy Rationale Oregon Recovery Plan Washington Recovery Plan NOAA Monitoring Guidance (includes RPAs) Integrated Status & Trends Monitoring (ISTM)

A Guiding Framework For Regional Monitoring Participants –Alan Byrne (IDFG) –Alex Conley (Yakima Salmon Recovery Board) –Chris Drivdahl (WA State NPCC)

Alternative Gear Implementation Project Pat Frazier WDFW Region 5 Fish Program Manager Photo by Wild Fish Conservancy.

2014 Program Goal Statements for Salmon and Steelhead Overview Nancy Leonard, Laura Robinson and Patty O’Toole (NPCC)

1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.

Following is a list of locations that project sponsors indicated their data would be published to for the BPA categorical review process.

Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.

PNAMP Mission Statement PNAMP provides a forum to enhance the capacity of multiple entities to collaborate to produce an effective and comprehensive network.

REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.

FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.

Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.

1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) Presentation to PNAMP Steering Committee August 21, 2007.

Al Giorgi – BioAnalysts Inc.. FCRPS BiOp RPA 52.6 = action plan status monitoring- Hydro Many RM&E RPAs require PIT data Coordinated and Effective FWP.

Adult steelhead evaluations in Imnaha River tributaries William Young, Jocelyn Hatch Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,

Integrated Status and Trends Monitoring Demonstration Project Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership Bernadette Graham Hudson, Lower Columbia.

2010 work planned, new operations, and wrap up Presenter: Robin Ehlke CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.

Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.

Yakima Steelhead VSP Project: Resident/Anadromous Interactions Gabriel M. Temple 1913 “Landlocked Steelhead”

Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.

What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.

November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

RTT Analysis Workshop Synthesis: Data Gaps and Research Needs (Chapter 5) Presented by Keely Murdoch MaDMC Chair Yakama Nation.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data

Bill Jaeger IEAB & Oregon State University March 19, 2013

Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting

MPG Spring-Summer Chinook

BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.

Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary

Summarize Strategy The strategy is comprehensive. Covers:

Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop

Science Policy Exchange

Collaboration on Comprehensive Columbia River Basin Hatchery RM&E How do we get to a comprehensive list of Hatchery RM&E for the Basin??

Articulation of Basin-wide Monitoring “Framework”

Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop

Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman

Presentation transcript:

BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Develop a PIT tagging plan, as an element of a more comprehensive regional tagging& marking plan for RME Ensure adequate estimates or indices are being obtained. Improve efficiency by coordinating tagging among user groups or H-categories. BioAnalysts, Inc.

Mainstem/Hydro: Clarify Management Needs for mainstem/hydro RME, which require PIT tag based data. Specify required estimates and quantitative characteristics thereof, e.g. precision. Assess Population Coverage. Integrate with other Hs PIT tagging needs and effort. BioAnalysts, Inc.

1. Work through the Mainstem/Hydro Steps and r ecord decisions. Inventory planned PIT tag effort for Align the effort with management needs. Identify gaps 2. Discuss components and structure of a regional PIT tag plan. 3. Discuss who, how and when the plan will be produced (Multi-H effort). BioAnalysts, Inc.

1. RME Workgroups formed (H-specific) 2. Assessed BiOp coverage for RME activities. 3. Catalog projects that currently use PIT, or plan to in the near term AFEP FWP BioAnalysts, Inc.

Hydro – Monitor survival both Juvenile and Adults (BiOp) SMP monitoring (FWP) Action effectiveness/ Life history research studies. Estuary RME Population – VSP - Status and Trends Hatchery evaluations Habitat action evaluations Harvest impacts BioAnalysts, Inc.

Hatchery and habitat projects release tagged lots from specific populations to evaluate actions. Hydro survival monitoring uses those tagged fish from tribs. and hatcheries. SMP monitoring also uses those tags. Population status and trend monitoring relies on those tags as well. Hydro and estuary research projects use additional tags, some of which can augment hydro performance standard monitoring. BioAnalysts, Inc.

Does the AMIP alter Hydro RME needs or shift emphasis relative to tagging needs? In the future, what populations should tagged, and in what numbers? How can we efficiently coordinate and integrate tagging efforts among Hatchery Habitat and hydro studies? BioAnalysts, Inc.

hat cssvsp hab css vsp hab

BioAnalysts, Inc. McNLGR AFEP Research NOAA dam tagging Snake VSP HAB HAT CSS UC &MC- VSP,HAB,HAT,CSS BON

Questionnaire to NOAA, Corps and BPA. Initial Responses Catalogued projects that will rely on PIT tag information for AFEP, BiOp and FWP RME. BioAnalysts, Inc.