College of Engineering & Architecture Honor System Honesty Self- Governance Integrity Ethics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AQUINAS INSTITUTE Student/Parent Handbook.
Advertisements

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES August 20, 2014 Material developed by Tim Korb, Peter Hirst, and Jeff Stefancic.
NDSU's New and Improved Code of Academic Responsibility and Conduct Pedagogical Luncheon, March 22, 2011 Presenters: Jim Council, Professor of Psychology,
Cheating on College Campuses 83% of students cheat in some form 60% cheat on homework and see nothing wrong with it 19% cheat on exams Most likely to cheat:
MUSC Honor Code Lindsay Avery MUSC COP Honor Council President August 19, 2014.
Academic Integrity: A Guide for Instructors Presenters: Christy D. Moran, Ph.D. Assistant Dean of Students Tine Reimers, Director CETaL.
Academic Integrity “Just do what’s right.” GTA Presentation Dan Schwab, Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards Shannon Quihuiz, Title IX Investigator.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY University of Arkansas at Little Rock Presented by: Darryl K. McGee, M.S. Office of the Dean of Students.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY. COMMUNITY EXPECTATIONS All members of the campus community will:  make a commitment to create a community of learners who trust one.
Student Integrity and Misconduct Training and support for decision makers and Academic Integrity Officers.
Academic Responsibility
Academic Integrity Policy (AIP) Academic and Student Affairs Fall 2008.
Honor Code Expectations and Proposed Revisions Faculty Senate, December 3, 2014.
RCR Needs Assessment Survey 02/04/2011. Core areas of RCR Data Management Mentor / Trainee Relationships Publication Practices & Responsible Authorship.
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Undergraduate Honor System.
Honor Code Constitution. I will neither give nor receive unauthorized aid on any test, quiz, research paper, lab or any other student-generated work as.
Living in an Honorable Society The Honor System. What is the Honor System? The Honor System is a student-led system that helps to ensure academic honesty.
The Case of the Keystroke Logger Presented by Michael Votava, Director of Student Conduct & Ethical Development February 21, 2014.
Plagiarism and Cheating
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Honor System.
Honesty Policy. 1. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES 1.1. The Department enforces the general university policies on academic honesty, as described in the University's.
Ohlone College Policy on Academic Dishonesty
New Student Orientation Module 4: Academic Honesty and Plagiarism
Academic Integrity. Academic Integrity LaGuardia Academic Integrity Policy: Website (
What is it? How can you avoid it?. What is plagiarism?  Plagiarism comes from the Latin word plagiarius which means “kidnapper.”  Plagiarism is literary.
Academic Integrity. What is integrity? What do you think “academic integrity” means?
Academic Dishonesty: Fundamentals of Prevention Susan Pocotte, Ph.D. Associate Dean for Academic Affairs College of Graduate Studies.
Academic Honesty in the UT Arlington College of Engineering.
Academic Integrity ASU 101. Academic Integrity Objectives  Differentiate between instances of academic honesty and dishonesty  List potential consequences.
AS&E Academic Honesty Policy Summary of key changes Most relevant points for Pre-major advisers.
Material developed by Tim Korb, Peter Hirst, and Jeff Stefancic
FYC Orientation The Honor Code & Honor Council
Academic Integrity at IU Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct.
CLASSROOM BEHAVIOR ETHICS AND CONSEQUENCES. NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers - Preamble Engineering is an important and learned profession. As members.
Academic Integrity at Brandeis Erika Lamarre Director of Academic Integrity The policies Education and Prevention Reporting an incident.
Status of the Recommendations of the Spring 2002 Academic Misconduct Review Committee and Office of Student Integrity (OSI) Update Executive Board Meeting.
TRUELL HYDE VICE PROVOST FOR RESEARCH SINDA VANDERPOOL ASSISTANT VICE PROVOST FOR ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT LINDA CATES DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF ACADEMIC.
1 Academic Ethics An analysis of what constitutes CHEATING AND PLAGIARISM and the related consequences.
Academic Integrity Mike Scott Lecturer, CS Dept.
 Part IV of the ECU Faculty Manual  To get to the Faculty Manual 1. Go to ECU Home and click on “Faculty & Staff.” 2. Scroll down to the “Policies”
Review of University Policies and Procedures Academic Regulations.
Academic Washington State University Adam Jussel Director Office of Student Standards & Accountability.
Confronting and Reporting a Violation Assistance for this presentation was provided by: Camilla J. Roberts, Associate Director, Provost Office.
Instructor: Basma Alabdullatif Office: Preparatory Year instructors office, 1st floor Office hours: sat(11-1), sun(11-1)
Academic Integrity: Processes & Expectations at the College Level Andrea Goodwin Associate Director, Office of Student Conduct University of Maryland Diane.
Academic Dishonesty Definition Examples Penalty. Definition of Academic Dishonesty l Academic dishonesty is the use of unauthorized materials and devices,
Level 1: Chapter 8.  Read and gain an understanding of the Tutor Code of Ethics  Read and gain an understanding of OSU/COTC Academic Ethics Policy 
Academic Integrity: Processes & Expectations at the College Level Dr. Andrea Goodwin Associate Director, Office of Student Conduct University of Maryland.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY VIOLATIONS OFFENSES, PENALTIES, AND PROCEDURES.
Ron Smelser Professor and Associate Dean Dean’s Office.
Honor Pledge for Exams Write out the pledge and sign your name. “I affirm that I will not give or receive any unauthorized help on this exam, and that.
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System Jennifer N. Buchanan, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
1 ACADEMIC SENATE POLICY ON ACADEMIC DISHONESTY History: Approved by the Academic Senate, 2/16/88 Approved.
IMPORTANT SMU POLICIES (and some general resources)
Sources for definitions and explanations of the term plagiarism and the consequences of plagiarism: I.Class Syllabus, p. 3 “Academic Dishonesty” II. Student.
Academic Misonduct 1. Definition: Any act that compromises the academic integrity of the University or the educational process. 2.
IB defines academic honesty as a set of values and skills that promote personal integrity and good practice in teaching, learning and assessment. Academic.
Academic Integrity at IU Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct.
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System
IE102 A Process Outlook for Industrial Engineering
ACADEMIC HONESTY Role of Teachers 14th March, 2016 Zakir Hossain.
COAM Annual Report Summary Data
Academic Policy Highlights
Syllabus Guidelines and Other Instructor/Student Policies
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
College of Engineering
Academic Integrity Mike Scott Lecturer, CS Dept.
Academic Integrity.
Rowan University Academic Integrity Skills Workshop
Presentation transcript:

College of Engineering & Architecture Honor System Honesty Self- Governance Integrity Ethics

“On my honor I will not give nor receive unauthorized assistance in completing assignments and work submitted for review or assessment. Furthermore, I understand the requirements in the College of Engineering and Architecture Honor System and accept the responsibility I have to complete all my work with complete integrity.” CEA Honor Pledge

A system based on self governance. Pertains to all courses taught in the college. Function is to support the principles of integrity and honor as cornerstones of academic success. Acts to curtail academic dishonesty through peer evaluation and to penalize those who are dishonest. CEA Honor System

NDSU Honor System proposed by student government in CEA Honor Code implemented in Fall 2009 by the EA Council. In April 2011, the CEA faculty passed a resolution supporting the CEA Honor System. Honor System is reviewed yearly to incorporate suggestions for improvement with a “vote of continuance” held each spring by the EA Council. History

Academic misconduct (intentional or otherwise) includes but is not limited to: Plagiarism. Receiving, possessing, distributing or using any material or assistance not authorized by instructor. Unauthorized collaborating on individual assignments. Having others take exams or complete assignments. Stealing or improperly obtaining copies of exam or assignments. Altering or correcting an assignment or exam without permission. Misrepresenting one’s attendance to class. Fabricating or falsifying information in research, papers, or reports. Aiding or abetting academic misconduct. Unauthorized copying of another student’s work. Tampering with or destroying materials. Utilizing false or misleading information. Source: NDSU Policy 335 Academic Dishonesty Defined

The administration and faculty are responsible for creating an atmosphere where honesty is expected in all relationships. Each instructor shall include a description of the Honor System on their syllabi and have open and honest discussions of ethical behavior and expectations. NOTE: If academic dishonesty is detected by the instructor, he or she may take independent action as directed by NDSU Policy 335. Administration and Faculty Responsibility

All students in the CEA are responsible for knowing and complying with the Honor System and pledge to take actions that will contribute to the elimination of academic dishonesty. Students who are suspected of academic dishonesty but who do not have a signed Honor Pledge in their advising file will not have the opportunity to have their case heard before the Honor Commission. Students are encouraged to suggest modifications to improve the Honor System. Student Responsibility

Student Signature Form Each student is responsible for making sure that a signed copy of the Honor Pledge is in their advising file.

Violations should be reported as soon as possible. Witnesses of academic dishonesty can report to: Instructor Chair of the department A member of the Honor Commission Reporting Violations

Is comprised of: One undergraduate student from each of the academic departments in the college. Two graduate students from the college. One faculty member (plus one alternate faculty member should the primary member not be able to fulfill his or her role). Honor Commission

When a case of academic dishonesty is reported, the Honor Commission will meet to review the pertinent evidence as soon as is reasonably possible. Students who are suspected of academic dishonesty may not withdraw from the course in which dishonesty is suspected while the case is under review by the Honor Commission. Honor Commission Hearing

Penalties may be varied with the gravity of the offense and the circumstances of the particular case. Disciplinary action may include but is not limited to: Failure or grade reduction on the exam, quiz, paper, assignment, or project in question. Failure or grade reduction in the course. Suspension or expulsion from the CEA or university. Possible Outcomes

For cases that are heard by the EA Honor Commission, the appeals process must be made through the Dean’s Office within two weeks of the Honor Commission’s recommendation. A committee will be appointed by the Dean to review the process and findings. All actions and outcomes of the Honor Commission are confidential. Sources: CEA Honor System University Policy 335: Code of Academic Responsibility and Conduct Appeals Process