Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Project 199106100 SWANSON LAKES WILDLIFE AREA (SLWA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Walla Walla Basin Fish Habitat Enhancement Project CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION.
Advertisements

Lolo Creek Watershed Project #
Pend Oreille Wetland Mitigation Project # Albeni Falls Dam Mitigation Project #
Sharp-tailed Grouse Program. Project Overview Our goal is to preserve and enhance viable Sharp-tailed grouse populations on suitable habitat within their.
DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.
Project Introduction Consists of 9,040 acres of deeded land and 52,000+ acres of state and federal lands. Encompasses 16.6 miles of the South Fork and.
Wildlife Inventory and Habitat Evaluation of Duck Valley Indian Reservation Project #32008 Shoshone-Paiute Tribes.
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Perform Range Forage Inventory for Large Ungulates Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Dept. and Range Dept. Project.
PINE HOLLOW WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Sherman County Soil & Water Conservation District.
Acquire South Fork Asotin Creek Property A proposal from the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.
A ccomplishments for W ildlife Project IDProject Title Lake Creek Land Acquisition and Enhancement Protect and Enhance the Wanaket Wildlife.
Restore McComas Meadows /Meadow Creek Watershed Project # Restore McComas Meadows/ Meadow Creek Watershed Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries.
CTUIR Grande Ronde Subbasin Restoration Project Project Confederated Tribes Umatilla Indian Reservation Presented by: Carl Scheeler, CTUIR Wildlife.
M I N I S T R Y O F A G R I C U L T U R E, F O O D A N D C O N S U M E R A F F A I R S Focusing on objectives – simplifying delivery Rural Development,
Research, Citizen Involvement, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Jack Sullivan Science Services Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources.
MANAGING FARMLANDS FOR WILDLIFE Richard E. Warner, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Jeffery W. Walk, Illinois Chapter of The Nature Conservancy.
Managing Rangelands rangeland: landscape of grasses and/or scattered trees - uncultivated & provides forage for large animals - gradient in precipitation,
Working Lands for Wildlife WLFW. Focal Areas by Species.
Daren Carlson – MN DNR 14 April Overview Prairie monitoring – Change analysis – Status/trend monitoring – Grassland adaptive management collaborative.
by Larry Stine Estherville Lincoln Central High School
Livestock & Wildlife Interaction. Interactions NegativePositive It Depends on….?
History and Benefits of Wildlife Management
Minnesota Prairie Plan Working Group June 14, 2011
Gunnison Sage-grouse Ecology, San Juan County Utah Sarah G. Lupis, Sharon Ward, and Terry A. Messmer Utah State University Extension, Jack H. Berryman.
1 In the early years....  Wildlife provided the bulk of food available  Supplies seemed exhaustible  Humans destroyed wildlife habitat.
Statewide Resource and Species Plans Guide for Restoring, Protecting, and Enhancing Wetlands, Prairies, Forests, and Game, Fish and Wildlife Habitat -
Module 3: Environmental Objectives, Programme of Measures, Economic Analysis, Exemptions PoM implementation: wetland restoration Alexei Iarochevitch Afyon,
Grazing and Grazing Management. Positive Impacts Proper management – Reduced erosion – Improved water quality – Food for wildlife – Habitat and cover.
WLCI Update July 23, 2010 Conserving World-class Wildlife Resources Facilitating Responsible Development.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Livestock & Wildlife Interaction. Interactions NegativePositive It Depends on….?
Agroforestry Assistance §History §Technical §Financial.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Grazing – Our Most Commonly Used Conservation Practices.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Matt Shollenberger. African elephants are the largest land animals on Earth. They eat roots, grasses, fruit, and bark. An adult can consume 300 pounds.
Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan Development on Navy Installations in Southern California Coralie Cobb Natural Resources Specialist Southwest.
Louisiana Coastal Roots High. Read and Discuss "The swamps and marshes of coastal Louisiana are among the Nation's most fragile and valuable wetlands,
S e s s i o n 5 Managing riparian land for terrestrial wildlife.
Updating the District’s Wildlife Action Plan in 2015 Fisheries & Wildlife Division Department of Energy & Environment Government of the District of Columbia.
History of Wildlife Conservation. First practiced in England during the Middle Ages Ignored by European settlers to the United States due to the abundance.
Montana Forest Stewardship “Empowerment of Forest Owners through Personal Involvement”
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
APPLYING CONSERVATION TO THE TEXAS LANDSCAPE Norman Bade, NRCS State Resource Conservationist Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill (Farm Security.
I-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project Tanya Lamb Urban Geography, GEOG 481 Description 15-mile stretch Hyak (MP 55.1) to Easton (MP 70.3) 2010 scheduled to.
Homes on the Range An Introduction to California Rangelands Photo Credit: Bureau of Land Management.
100 Legislation Wildlife Management Tools Conservation Techniques Mixed
Wildlife Management Practices and Techniques. What is Wildlife Management It is an important part of wildlife conservation. It is the ability to manipulate.
Wildlife Program Amendments CBFWA Members Meeting – Sept
Beneficial Management Practices for Saskatchewan Species at Risk: Greater Sage-grouse Endangered.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
Photo by Mike Danzenbaker.  Proposed rules to add Gunnison sage-grouse to the list of threatened and endangered species and designate critical habitat.
LIVESTOCK & WILDLIFE INTERACTION. Interactions NegativePositive It Depends on….?
National Forest System Grazing Objectives 1.Manage range vegetation to protect basic soil and water resources, provide for ecological diversity, improve.
Everglades Snail Kite Path to Extinction. Description of Snail Kites Photo courtesy of Dr. Wiley Kitchens  45 inch wingspan  inches long  Weighs.
Land Management and Conservation /08. Keeping rural lands free from urbanization and in good shape is important because of the environmental services.
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Role in Timber Harvest Review.
Agriculture has an important role Well-managed livestock grazing and other traditional ranching practices are not considered major threats to sage-grouse.
Observations and Ideas for Payment for Ecosystem Services in Central Asia.
Habitat: Livestock & Wildlife. Habitat “The place or environment where an organism or community of organisms live and grow."
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
The Fish and Game Commission has designated the states portion of the South Bay Salt Ponds an Ecological Reserve. Planning for the management of Ecological.
13.1 Ecologists Study Relationships Notes Q KEY CONCEPT 1. Ecology is the study of the relationships among organisms and their environment. 2. Every ecosystem.
An Introduction to California Rangelands
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
Research and Conservation on the Lower Brule Indian Reservation
Wildlife Terms and Concepts
Government Conservation Programs
Presentation transcript:

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

Project SWANSON LAKES WILDLIFE AREA (SLWA)

Project Acquire Sharp-tailed Grouse Habitat at the SLWA

PROJECT LAND OWNERSHIP

SLWA Cover Types Cover TypeAcres Shrub-steppe14,676 Ephemeral pond98 Lacustrine132 Wetland83 Wet meadow1,754 Riparian Shrub35 Conifer1 Cliff/Talus485 Agriculture275 Conservation Reserve (CRP)2,396 Farmstead65 TOTAL20,000

Shrubsteppe

More Shrubsteppe

Yep, Looks Like Grass to Me!

A little more to the left Ive got hay fever!

Wet Meadow/Vernal Pool

Riparian Shrub - Deciduous Forest If you think Im going in there..

Wetlands

Lacustrine

In Contrast……….

Sharp-tailed Grouse Acquisition Cover Types

…and other shrubsteppe obligate species

MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 18,000 shrubs/trees planted

MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 243 ha of agricultural land converted to native-like grassland

Grass/Shrub Plantings

MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 16 ha Food Plots

MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 93 km of Fence

MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS MONITORING & EVALUATION HEP/VEGETATION BASELINE TRANSECTS CONDUCTED WILDLIFE SURVEYS

MONITORING & EVALUATION Replicated HEP transects-2000 Established vegetation transects using M&E protocols Monitored sharp-tailed grouse leks and neo-tropical birds etc. Grassland fertilizer trials

M&E RESULTS – VOR Null hypothesis (H o ): VOR measurements observed in 1992 and 2000 are equal Alternative hypothesis 1 (H A1 ): VOR measurements observed in 1992 are greater than VOR measurements recorded in 2000; Alternate hypothesis 2 (H A2 ): VOR measurements observed in 1992 are less than VOR measurements recorded in 2000.

Grassland VOR Results Example No Disturbance Disturbed

VOR

TSSTSS SHRUBLAND VOR RESULTS vn1vn1 VN1-TSS (not disturbed) NE1-TSS (disturbed ) TR1-TSS ( not disturbed ) S71-USS High Power Low Power

RANGE FERTILIZER TRIALS

WILDLIFE MONITORING Shrubsteppe Bird Surveys Hunter Harvest Surveys Waterfowl Surveys Deer Surveys Sage Grouse Surveys

REGIONAL & SUB-BASIN GOALS

FUTURE OBJECTIVES AND TASKS 1. INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SHARP- TAILED GROUSE TO 400 BY Augment existing population Monitor and control recreational use of project lands.

FUTURE OBJECTIVES AND TASKS 2. Implement the SLWA Management Plan. Control introduced vegetation Maintain shrub and tree enhancements Maintain boundary fence Construct new fence as needed Maintain equipment/infrastructure etc. Maintain sharp-tailed and sage grouse nesting habitat.

FUTURE OBJECTIVES AND TASKS -Monitor leks -Search for new leks -Conduct sharp-tailed grouse nesting and brood rearing surveys 3. Conduct sharp-tailed grouse research….in conjunction with WDFW statewide efforts.

FUTURE OBJECTIVES AND TASKS 4. Monitor wildlife and habitat response to protection, enhancement, and maintenance measures annually. Conduct HEP and vegetation transects and establish photo points. Monitor big game, sage grouse, waterfowl, and neo-tropical birds populations/hunter harvest.

SUB-BASIN NEEDS AND LIMITING FACTORS The Swanson Lakes Wildlife Area and the Sharp-tailed Grouse Habitat Acquisition proposals address the following major sub-basin needs and limiting factors: 1. Declining shrubsteppe habitat quality and quantity and subsequent impacts on obligate species. 2. Shrubsteppe habitat fragmentation 3. Loss of deep soils plant communities. 4. Alteration of the plant community due to weeds, grazing, and wildfire.

IN CLOSING………. SWANSON LAKES WILDLIFE AREA Project Acquire Sharp-tailed Grouse Habitat at the SLWA Project 25001

REQUESTED FUNDING Swanson Lakes WA 2002: $296, : $290, : $265,137 SHGR Acquisition 2002: $237, : $32, : $5,000

THANK YOU