UIC Report to the GEO-VI Plenary: Accomplishments, Activities, and Recommendations 17-18 November, 2009 The UIC Co-Chairs Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Carsten.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 GEO/CEOS-SIT Call to Action Ken McDonald WGISS Vice-Chair.
Advertisements

CBC 7 Report to June C4. Discussions in Meeting Next CBC Meeting Coordination with Committees GCI Work Plan Progress Development of 2009 – 2011 Work Plan.
Overview of Capacity Building Committee Activities GEO Capacity Building Committee Meeting Brussels – 14 September 2006 Errol Levy DG Research – European.
AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.
User Interface Mechanism GEO GEO-I Meeting Ad Hoc User Interface Workgroup May 2005 Geneva.
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Days 2 DS-05 Highlights.
GEO Call for Proposals on Earth Observations in Decision Support Projects.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Day 3 DS-11 Global Forest Observation.
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
UIC Draft Report to C4: Issues and Recommendations 25 September, 2008 The UIC Co-Chairs Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli,
GEO-5 in Ottawa 1 29 November 2004 Draft GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan and Status Report on Reference Document Ivan B. DeLoatch, Toshio Koike, Robert.
Standards and Interoperability Forum: Status, Issues & Plans GEO Architecture and Data Committee Kyoto, Japan 9 February 2009 Siri-Jodha Singh Khalsa.
Call for Proposals: Earth Observations in Decision Support Joint Effort of GEO Capacity Building Committee and User Interface Committee March 2009.
27 September, 2004 GEO Special Session on Governance Analysis of Comments on Governance of GEOSS International Cooperation Subgroup Co-Chairs Patricio.
ID-04 Building Communities and Increasing Awareness & ID-06 (proposed) Building a user-driven GEOSS.
Report from the 7th GEO S&T Committee Meeting Gilles OLLIER – Policy Officer « Earth Observation » EUROPEAN COMMISSION Research Directorate General - Environment.
IN-05 Gap Analysis Definition Identify and address critical gaps in observational networks that reflect, in particular, the needs of developing countries,
1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
IGOS-P 15 and GEO Achievements planning meeting in May 2008 at UNESCO, Paris Report to 4 th C4, 17&
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Francesco Pignatelli,
GEO Forest Observation Community of Practice: Identifying Critical Earth Observations Michael Brady, Canadian Forest Service/GOFC-GOLD GEO User Interface.
GEONETCast Initiative of GEO presented at the EC GEONETCast workshop 5 March 2006 GEO Secretariat.
The GEO Work Plan * 2010 Update (GEO-VI) * New Online Management System Alexia Massacand (Work Plan Coordinator) Rik Baeyens (IT Manager)
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
Alan Edwards European Commission 5 th GEO Project Workshop London, UK 8-9 February 2011 * The views expressed in these slides may not in any circumstances.
EGIDA Stakeholder Network and Advisory Board and Their Relevance for EGIDA and GEO Stefano Nativi 1 st Joint Workshop of the EGIDA Stakeholder Network.
© GEO Secretariat Capacity Building Committee experience of resource mobilisation Alan EDWARDS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Research Directorate General Environment.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
The IGWCO Transition into GEO August 2007 IGWCO Secretariat 7bis, avenue de la paix CH-1211 Geneva 2.
Integrated Earth Observations - Building the Bridges - IGOL Theme Team Meeting Sept 2004 Jeff Tschirley Chief, SDRN.
© GEO Secretariat 2.4 Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Craig Larlee / John Adamec Co-Chairs, M&E Working Group GEO 2015 Work Plan Symposium 5—7 May.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-5 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
GEO Cold Regions: from Regional to Global effort --- As the interface between SAON and GEOSS Yubao Qiu Vancouver, Canada 29 March 2013.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing By John Lyon and Co-Chairs, UIC Introduction to the UIC: A User Requirements Approach Gary J. Foley,
Report of the Science and Technology Committee GEO Plenary VIII Istanbul, Turkey 16 November 2011.
© GEO Secretariat 5.2 Monitoring and Evaluation John Adamec Co-Chair, M&E Working Group GEO-XI Plenary November 2014 Geneva, Switzerland.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
Energy Expert Meeting Aug 06 Contents Who is GEO? What is GEOSS? What is GEO Added-Value? GEO & Energy Management.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-03: Science and Technology in GEOSS ID-03-C1: Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation.
The Use of the Targets by the Institutions & Development Implementation Board in Monitoring the Work Plan Implementation 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Francesco Pignotelli,
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-01 Advancing the GEOSS Data Sharing Principles.
Call for Proposals: Earth Observations in Decision Support Joint Effort of GEO Capacity Building Committee and User Interface Committee.
© GEO Secretariat 10 th UIC Outcomes User Interface Committee Sofia Antipolis, February 2009 UIC co-leads / GEO Secretariat Geneva, Switzerland.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
GEO ADC Co-Chair meeting, Tokyo, Japan, 13 May 2007 Slide # 1 Cross-GEO Coordination Report of C4 Meeting and follow-up discussion Ivan Petiteville, CEOS.
CEOS Priorities for 2013 Agenda 3 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS Executive Officer CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.
Preparation of the 2010 GEO Ministerial Summit GEO Science and Technology Committee Preparation of the 2010 GEO Ministerial Summit Gilles OLLIER Head of.
Task NumberHarmonise, develop & implement capacity building Performance Indicators CB-07-01c Harmonise efforts by Tasks, in particular those related with.
Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-4 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
© GEO Secretariat Collaboration with Partner Organizations – GEO/GEOSS ICG-WIGOS Geneva, Switzerland 18 March 2013 Barbara J. Ryan Director, GEO Secretariat.
UIC Work Plan Analysis Discussion 15 November, 2009 Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE, Univ. Waterloo Kathy Fontaine, NASA Lawrence Friedl, NASA.
The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli,
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
Earth Observations in the Americas Opportunities and Challenges Brigadier General John J. Kelly, Jr., (USAF, Ret.) Deputy Under Secretary for Oceans and.
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
1 BUILDING A USER-DRIVEN GEOSS: Continuing User Engagement as a Priority of GEO Presented by Lerato Senoko, South Africa On behalf of the UIC Co-Chairs:
Report of the Capacity Building Committee to the ADC-6 meeting.
Report from GEO Post-2015 WG and GEO Ministerial WG D. Brent Smith, NOAA CEOS Representative CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.
Towards a New Phase of GEOSS Implementation : The GEO Work Plan Alexia C. Massacand GEO Work Plan Coordinator
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
CEOS Response to GEOSS Water Strategy
The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits
GEO WP 1. INFRASTRUCTURE (Architecture and Data Management)
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
IGWCO CoP Overview Richard Lawford
Summative Evaluation for GEOSS Implementation
Presentation transcript:

UIC Report to the GEO-VI Plenary: Accomplishments, Activities, and Recommendations November, 2009 The UIC Co-Chairs Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Carsten Dettmann, Germany Gary J. Foley, USA Jai Parihar, India Francesco Pignatelli, EC Thierry Ranchin, France

UIC Objectives 1.Enable GEO to address the needs and concerns of a broad range of user communities in developing and developed countries, across issues and trans- disciplinary needs, with a particular focus on fostering new or less organized communities. 2.Enable GEO to engage a continuum of users, from producers to the final beneficiaries of the data and information. 3.Facilitate linkages and partnerships between established communities of practice and new groups or organizations interested in collaborating.

UIC Objectives (continued) To oversee and manage the following Tasks and Sub-Tasks –US-09-01: User Engagement US-09-01a: Identifying Synergies between Societal Benefit Areas US-09-01b: Communities of Practice and Partnership Development –US-09-02: Socio-Economic Indicators US-09-02a: Socio-Economic Benefits of GEO and GEOSS US-09-02b: Socio-economic and Demographic Global Data US-09-02c: Global Road and Human Settlements Mapping on GEO Grid –US-09-03: Cross-Cutting Products and Services US-09-03a: Development of Global Map for GEOSS Societal Benefit Areas US-09-03c: Global Soil Data

Highlights User engagement needs improvement within the GEO tasks – UIC has conducted an analysis of the role of the UIC in GEO tasks and has developed a proactive strategy to improve the User engagement role; The UIC has been working to acquire and provide feedback on collaboration, user engagement, Work Plan content, and communication throughout all aspects of GEO. The UIC embraces significant activity; indeed with more activity than it has volunteers at present.

Highlights (continued) The UIC has developed an organized, structured approach to address the significant user engangement opportunities and expectations within GEO. Our focus remains on user engagement and increasing participation in targeted regions

Major Accomplishments for 2009 Communities of Practice Societal Benefit Analysis Project GCI Usability Testing in collaboration with ADC Call for Proposals in collaboration with CBC Work Plan Analysis UIC Activity Plan

Communities of Practice Process being formalized for introduction of new Communities of Practice –Enabling vs prescriptive process New Communities of Practice: Carbon Community of Practice Global Agricultural Monitoring System Community of Practice Health and Environment Community of Practice Integrated Global Water Cycle (IGWCO) Community of Practice

Communities of Practice We request that the Plenary continue to support the Communities of Practice and IGOS Theme Teams by volunteering new participants to these groups and identifying in-kind contributions to their work plans

Societal Benefit Analysis Project The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the IEEE, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) are leading the GEO effort on identifying critical Earth observations priorities common to many Societal Benefit Areas. Analysts and Advisory Group members originate from various GEO Members and Participating Organizations: –Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Costa Rica, Denmark, Germany, Finland, France, India, Iran, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Norway, Paraguay, Russia, United States, Senegal, South Africa, Thailand, Tunisia, CEOS, DIVERSITAS, ECMWF, ESA, FAO, GCOS, IEEE, UNESCO, WMO.

Societal Benefit Analysis Project (i) Identifying existing publicly-available documents, published by GEO Members and Participating Organizations from present, that specify observation needs, (ii) Performing a meta- analysis across the documents, (iii) Preparing interim and final reports.

Societal Benefit Analysis Project Analysts have completed Final reports for five SBAs: Climate, Disasters Ecosystems, Energy, and Weather. Analysts have completed Preliminary reports for four SBAs: Agriculture, Biodiversity, Health, Water. The Task Team established a website ( to support the management of this task and report results.

Societal Benefit Analysis Project We request that the Plenary support the new UIC efforts to develop and populate the databases on user types, user applications and user requirements, as well as the Best Practices Wiki, in each of the SBA areas by designating points-of-contact that can bring their user experiences into this work

GCI Usability Testing Gary, we need some help here. Do you have anything that will work? Process Statistics Recommendations Next steps

Call for Proposals In Collaboration with the CBC Earth Observations for Decision Support Schedule –Call for Proposals in February 2009 –Provide Feedback in fall of 2009 –Full proposals due in January 2010 –Final selections announced in 2010 Statistics –130 concept proposals received in June 2009 UIC and CBC have involved the relevant Communities of Practice in the review Consistent with sub-task Resource Mobilization (CB-09-01), the GEO Committees will broker connections between project teams and resource providing organizations These projects clearly represent activities that will occur because of GEO.

Work Plan Analysis The GEO User Interface Committee conducted an analysis of user engagement in the GEO Work Plan task sheets and delivered an 18-page report in August The UIC performed this analysis to assess user-engagement activities in all 114 task sheets and to identify opportunities for UIC support to task teams. –51% of the task sheets had strong or fairly-substantive statements about user engagement; –49% had insufficient statements (dozens left the User Engagement section of the task sheet blank). The analysis found a general need to improve the user- engagement activities in many tasks. The analysis identified 20 tasks of strong interest to the UIC in which the UIC is not currently involved.

UIC Activity Plan Formulated in early 2009; adopted in mid 2009 Spans 2009 – Support of GEO Work Plan, Targets, and Events 2. Communities of Practice 3. User Needs and Requirements 4. GEOSS Applications and Societal Benefits 5. Key Cross-Committee Actions 6. Engagement Strategies 7. UIC Internal Management 35 Activities; 6 complete; 16 underway; remainder to start in early 2010.

Actions for Plenary SBA: We request that the Plenary support the new UIC efforts to develop and populate the databases on user types, user applications and user requirements, as well as the Best Practices Wiki, in each of the SBA areas by designating points-of-contact that can bring their user experiences into this work CoP: We request that the Plenary continue to support the Communities of Practice and IGOS Theme Teams by volunteering new participants to these groups and identifying in-kind contributions to their work plans

Actions for Plenary UIC recommends that there be representation of Committees on Ministerial Task Force working on the GEO Work Plan Workshop. UIC recommends that its Co-Chairs work with the appropriate ExCom and/or C4 representatives to determine the best method for discussing Committee topics that might require some level of response from the ExCom.