RCR Requirements for NSF & NIH Michele Chin-Purcell, Director, RIOP Carol Foth, Manager, RCR/RIOP 02.18.2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Responsible Conduct of Research Rod Kelln Dean, Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research University of Regina.
Advertisements

Federal Demonstration Partnership Meeting August 2010 Washington, DC.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) at WSU. What is RCR? It is appropriate and ethical practice of research, scholarship or creative activity OR- don’t.
University of Florida Academic Activities Reporting (Formerly IWF)
Responsible Conduct of Research & Research Compliance Adam J. Rubenstein, Ph.D. Director of Research Compliance Old Dominion University Office of Research.
Local Approval of Stand-Alone Credit Courses Training Session provided by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and System Advisory Committee.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) at WSU. What is RCR? It is appropriate and ethical practice of research, scholarship or creative activity OR- don’t.
Shea McGovern Assistant Director, Pre-Award Office of Sponsored Projects.
The Responsible Conduct of Research at UTAS Office of Research Services.
Recent Changes to HDR Policy and Procedures Felicity Roddick Associate Dean Research and Innovation.
Office of Research Administration Update Jim Becker OVPRA CATS Session January 21, 2009.
A “Can Do” Approach to RCR Compliance Lessons Learned and Strategies Going Forward Marty Welsch, HR/RCR Coordinator Diane Rees, IT Professional, Research.
Research Integrity at the NIH
Glenda McAlister Kimberly Long
Mission-Based Management November 2007 Electronic CV System Users Group.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Responsible Conduct in Research
Office of Research Integrity Office of Research Integrity Orientation Session November 8, 2012 ECSS
Integrated Online Research Compliance System (iORC)
Grants.gov – What to Expect Presented by the Office for Research Cindy Hope, Director Office for Sponsored Programs.
Submitting a Proposal: Best Practices By: Anu Singh Science Assistant
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs January 5, 2010 Topic: Responsible Conduct of Research Training.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
Research Administrators Forum December 2008 Cindy Kiel, JD, CRA Assistant Vice Chancellor and Executive Director, Research Office
NSF CAREER Program & CAREER Proposals Claudia Rankins Program Director, Directorate of Education and Human Resources NSF CAREER Program.
O FFICE OF S CIENCE & R ESEARCH OSR O FFICE OF S CIENCE & R ESEARCH OSR Welcome to Click Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) Learning Module.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
Brown Bag Breakfast Briefing: Responsible Persons with/using Suitable Means of Verification for Effort Certification.
6/10/2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 5 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES In-House Research Resources.
Workshop for all NSF-funded PIs regarding new NSF policies and requirements. America COMPETES Act contains a number of new requirements for all those funded.
+ Meeting of Assistant Professors June 29, Faculty and Academic Affairs Leadership Steven Abramson, M.D., Vice Dean for Education, Faculty and.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
FEDERAL UPDATE Jeff Warner Senior Contract and Grant Officer Alisia Ford Contract and Grant Officer Spring QRAM - Tuesday, March 12, 2013.
1 FEDERAL UPDATES NIH OSP Roundtable March 24, 2011 DHMC.
A Medical Student Guide to Preparing Your Curriculum Vitae Office of Admissions & Student Affairs.
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
NSF policies and requirements for Implementation of the America COMPETES Act. America COMPETES Act contains a number of new requirements for all those.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
LSA Responsible Conduct of Research and Scholarship (RCRS)
NIH Considerations for CBI Trainees Leslie Kinsland November 12, 2015.
OSP REPORT MRAM January 14, ARRA Update Total to Date $188,423, Awards from 70 sponsors (include UW as sub) Top $$: Sponsor# Awards$ Total.
Overview of Proposal and Award Process at UCLA A short “ How-to-Do ”
Parallel Paths: Distance Education Basics Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Stephanie Low, Chancellor’s Office Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College ASCCC Curriculum.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
Research as defined by DHHS A systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable.
Office of Sponsored Projects Federal Updates/Reminders ROUNDTABLE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 CAMPUS.
CIRTL Network Administrative Meeting Wednesday, December 4, :00-1:00 ET/ 11:00-12:00 CT/ 10:00-9:00 MT / 9:00-8:00 PT.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)
Research Administrator Meeting December 1, 2010 UI Implementation of Responsible Conduct of Research Requirements Twila Fisher Reighley Assistant Vice.
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
Office of Sponsored Projects
Faculty Early Career Development program CAREER part 1
What Reviewers look for NIH F30-33(FELLOWSHIP) GRANTS
Progress Report Preparation and Submission
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
The CITI Program Mission Statement Training on regulations with CITI
Conversations in Research Integrity and Scholarship
New NIH Human Subjects & Clinical Trials Information
NIH Requirements for Training in Responsible Conduct of Research
Curriculum and Distance Education
The CITI Program Mission Statement Training on regulations with CITI
Presentation transcript:

RCR Requirements for NSF & NIH Michele Chin-Purcell, Director, RIOP Carol Foth, Manager, RCR/RIOP

 The National Science Foundation (NSF) now requires institutions applying for funding to certify that they have a plan to provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research to undergraduates, graduate students and postdoctoral researchers who will be supported by NSF to conduct research.  NSF grant applications that include funding to support postdoctoral researchers must include a description of mentoring activities.  The National Institutes for Health (NIH) has issued an update to their requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research for recipients of all NIH training grants and awards.

 What are the changes in the requirements?  When do they take effect?  What do the changes mean for PIs and grant administrators?  How will these new requirements be managed? By whom?  How you can help?

 August 2007 – NSF funding included in America COMPETES Act; included requirement to provide RCR training for all students supported by funding  February 2009 – NSF asks for comments on new requirement  July 2009 – UM ad hoc committee begins meeting to develop plan to meet requirement  August 2009 – NSF publishes implementation plan for requirement:

“Effective January 4, 2010, NSF will require that, at the time of proposal submission to NSF, a proposing institution's Authorized Organizational Representative certify that the institution has a plan to provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research to undergraduates, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers who will be supported by NSF to conduct research.”

 Ad hoc committee comprised of representatives from academic units with histories of receiving NSF funding  Overall goal: develop a training plan that is beneficial, feasible and ensures compliance  Framework for development: ◦ New information for some; review for others ◦ PIs vary in their understanding of issues ◦ Need for consistent, available options using existing resources ◦ Tracking of completion should be electronic ◦ Best format will combine online with interactive ◦ Does not replace other required training (e.g., research subjects protection, lab safety)  Identified list of approved online courses

 Postdoctoral researchers complete RCR 1 & 2  Graduate and undergraduate students complete course, activity or online tutorial  Minimum topics to address in training: ◦ Authorship & Plagiarism ◦ Data/Research Integrity ◦ Reporting Misconduct  Format – in-person course preferred; online tutorial should include interaction and/or assessment of knowledge  Length – sufficient to address topics in substantive way  Complete requirement – within 90 days of the start of funding 

 Research Associate Deans serve as local clearinghouse on courses/activities that satisfy requirement ◦ UM courses/activities meeting minimum topics, format and length recommendations ◦ Review new or revised courses/activities  Students submit completion certificate to RCR/RIOP for online courses  Instructor submits sign-in sheets for in-person courses or seminars  Record-keeping done by RCR/RIOP

 EdPA 5080/8095: Surviving in the Research World  APSC 8123: Research Ethics in the Plant and Environmental Science  WRS 8581: Research and Professional Ethics in Water Resources and Environmental Science  BioC 8401: Ethics, Public Policy and Careers in Molecular and Cellular Biology  DHA 8181: Ethics and Research  CITI RCR online curriculum  List of approved courses:

 OVPR-generated report will identify students who need to complete requirement based on payroll records  Automated from OVPR will be sent to student, PI and/or collegiate contact outlining requirement and options to complete it  Reminders will be sent  Consequences for non-compliance will be monitored and managed by OVPR

 All students supported by NSF funding to do research must complete requirement  Need to be aware of University plan – do not need to describe it in proposal; do need to ensure student compliance  Most record-keeping being handled centrally  PIs leading activities to meet requirement must have participants sign in & submit forms for recording

 Be aware of new requirements and available information concerning the University plan:  Support importance of student compliance and need to complete training according to guidelines  Ensure student hire documents reflect the correct classification and are accurately entered into the payroll system  Become familiar with tool to verify completion of requirement:

 Proposals for NSF funding to support postdoctoral researchers must include 1-page description of mentoring activities to be provided  Beginning April 2010, FastLane will check for inclusion of this section; will not accept proposal if it is missing  NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide includes details and list of suggested activities:

 Need to develop and describe mentoring plan for postdoctoral researchers  Ensure postdoctoral researchers supported by grant/award complete training as described on application  Use UMN resources to help – Postdoctoral Affairs, departmental resources  Must keep track of activities for reporting

 PI is responsible for information on applications and reporting requirements  Be aware of PI roles and responsibilities with respect to these requirements  Be aware of resources for PIs – RCR program, Postdoctoral Affairs, departmental resources

 November 24, NIH Update on Requirement for Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research issued: files/NOT-OD html files/NOT-OD html  Policy applies to all new and renewal applications submitted on or after January 25, 2010, and for all continuation (Type 5) applications with deadlines on or after January 1, 2011

“NIH requires that all trainees, fellows, participants, and scholars receiving support through any NIH training, career development award (individual or institutional), research education grant, and dissertation research grant must receive instruction in responsible conduct of research.”

 Incorporates best practices principles into philosophy, format and content of instruction  Emphasizes need for ongoing instruction relevant to career stage  Prescriptive about content, format, duration and frequency  Provides specific guidance for preparing and reviewing plans  Requires monitoring of attendance and reports on activities completed

 Revised existing description of RCR program to reflect new guidelines for inclusion in NIH proposals and continuations:  Published announcements in Research News Online  Included new guidelines in RCR continuing education Information Update online materials  Identified and notified via PIs with current applicable awards  Working with departments to identify and communicate current courses and activities

 Work with departments to clarify their programs and provide language to describe them  Work with Graduate School to clarify their role in implementing and supporting these guidelines  Identify other sources of programs to help applicants and awardees meet requirement (e.g., Postdoctoral Affairs, AHC, etc)  Continue to communicate about new guidelines  Clarify guidelines about “monitoring” and incorporate into existing tracking systems

 Be aware that NIH has more specific requirements for applications and reporting  Read RFP for individual grant program details  Must complete RCR parts 1 & 2 to serve as PI  Must also participate in other discipline-specific formal & informal activities  Ensure others supported by grant/award complete training as described on application  Must tie activities to career stage  Must keep track of these other activities for reporting

 PI is responsible for information on applications and reporting requirements  Be aware of PI roles and responsibilities with respect to these requirements  Be aware of resources for PIs – RCR program, Postdoctoral Affairs, departmental resources

 Be aware of University record-keeping systems & how to verify completion of RCR  Be aware that institutional grant programs have updated reporting requirements – check grant program for details

Questions & Comments

Carol Foth Manager, RCR/RIOP Michele Chin- Purcell Director, RIOP