BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adobe 5 Collaborative Proposed Project Plan February 23, 2004.
Advertisements

Jason Thom MADCS – October Handy Reference – THE place to look it up Identify Safe Procedures Operation Records Past records can be invaluable Maintenance.
Flood Profile Modeling with Split Flows and Weirs
BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important.
Fort Bend Flood Management Association Flood Risk Reduction Symposium October 3rd, 2014 (Part-A) Brazos River at San Felipe - USGS Gage Fort Bend County.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Public Law 84-99, Rehabilitation and Inspection Program Mike deMasi Chief Emergency Management, PL Program.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Levee Safety Program Engineer Circular Development US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Michael Bart, P. E. Chief,
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
Sharif University of Technology Civil Engineering Department Tehran-Iran Dam Safety An Approach to Prevent Dam Incidents.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Methods for Determining Maximum Flood Elevations Landward of Failed Levees: An Example from the Great Missouri.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Background on Engineering Risk Assessments (ERA) for USACE Civil Works.
Council Bluffs Value Engineering Workshop
MINE WASTE DUMP The Overburden of waste and uneconomic mineralized rock is required to be removed to mine the useful mineral resource in a surface mining.
SUTTER BUTTE FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY Supplemental Presentation on Variances and Encroachments Feather River West Levee Project Project Area C May 24, 2013.
Example Presentation Something to Show. Basic Title & Content Point to be made Number One Point to be made Number Two Point to be made Number Three.
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
Acquisition of Flood Control Easements Triangle High-Ground Area City of West Sacramento, Yolo Co. Meeting of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Risk modeling.
ASFPM – May 24, 2012 CASE STUDY – 408 PERMITTING AND LEVEE ACCREDITATION FOR WATERLOO, NEBRASKA ASFPM MAY 24, 2012 Presented by Randy Behm, PE, CFM Lalit.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
Professional Engineering Services For Restoration Project John Mitnik, P.E. Engineering & Construction Bureau Chief Operations, Maintenance & Construction.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Prioritizing Investments within the USACE Levee Safety Program Process and Methodology Overview Jason Needham,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Greater New Orleans Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Armoring Brief Team New Orleans U.S.
Corps of Engineers Levee Safety Program Levee Safety Program Manager
Ventura County Levee Systems Levee Certification Compliance Efforts Presentation to the Ventura County Watershed Protection District Board of Supervisors.
An Unnatural Disaster Social, Legal, and Ethical Considerations for Engineering Managers MEM 604.
Hydraulic and Hydrologic Considerations in Planning Course FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT Chuck Shadie Mississippi Valley Division.
Levee Screening Tool - Cedar Right Bank
Responses to Levee Certification Requests 1.Closures 2.Maintenance Plans 3.U/S and D/S Levee Tie-ins.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Little Calumet River Marshalltown Levee System Routine Inspection Yuki Galisanao, PE, PG Team Lead, Geotechnical.
BUILDING STRONG SM Portland District Flood Damage Reduction Making Stormwater Management Systems Reduce Flood Damages D. Leslie Miller, P.E. Flood Preparedness.
DWR Maintenance Area Response to USACE Periodic Inspections Presented by: Noel Lerner, Chief, Flood Maintenance Office Mark List, Chief, Maintenance Support.
05C112011B Template Master – Update Tracking Number and Date Information Here Update tracking number and date on this slide Template Master – Update Tracking.
Steps in Foundation Engineering Understand project and site Develop design criteria Identify possible foundation alternatives Conduct soil investigation.
Planning for Non-Routine Activities
Basic Hydraulics: Bridges. Definition & terminology Abutments Flow contraction.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Yakima Flood Control Project – Left Bank Yakima, Washington Dennis Fischer, P.E. Levee Safety Program Manager.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mat Sinking Unit John W. Cross Commander, Vicksburg District March 2015 Exploring Redesign and Replacement.
What is PowerPoint? By Kettina L. Robinson. Unit Questions What do I want to accomplish? What do I want to accomplish? What content do I need to cover?
New Orleans Hurricane Protection System Overview by Mike Park HPS Program Manager Task Force Hope U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 19, 2008.
Presented to: Central Valley Flood Protection Board August 23, 2013 Sacramento Area Levee Accreditation Key Results from Encroachment Analysis.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 9A CVFPB MEETING – October 25, 2013.
Floodplain Management D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M8L5 Water Resources Systems Modeling.
TOPSAIL BEACH 30 Yr Beach Management Plan June 8, 2011.
BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Protection Structure Accreditation Task Force Jason Needham, USACE May 2013.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Emergency Response Policy Revision Update ( ER & EP ) Jeffrey Jensen CECW-HS USACE Flood Risk Management.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority February 26, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Subcommittee Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
Flood Inundation Mapping Program
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Levee Safety Program US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® December 2013 Update for the NAFSMA Annual Meeting.
2 American River Common Features General Re-evaluation Report Request for Board Approval of Letter Requesting Consideration of Locally Preferred Plan (LPP)
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Name of Levee Segment Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location Date of Presentation.
APPLICATION NO LEVEE DISTRICT No. 1 Of SUTTER COUNTY STAR BEND SETBACK LEVEE SUTTER COUNTY April 17, 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Jody Fischer P.E. Levee Safety Program Manager Los Angeles District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 14 December.
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 4: Operation and maintenance (O&M)
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 3 Functions, Forms and Failure of Levees.
Levee management guidelines Viktor Brenners, DEPI FMU.
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 6 – Emergency Management and Operations.
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 8 Physical processes and tools for levee assessment and design.
West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency November 10, 2011 Update on Current Levee Construction Projects and on the Southport Sacramento River Levee Early.
Preliminary Engineering Analysis and Design Foxcroft Colony and Mosby Woods Condominiums Prepared for: City Council Work Session November 3, 2015.
Tailings Dam Stability
OVERVIEW OF CLARA MODEL IMPROVEMENT TESTING Kenneth Kuhn – RAND Corporation Jordan Fischbach – RAND Corporation David Johnson – Purdue University.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® FIMS Annual Comprehensive Training Bridge File Content and Management May 2016.
Anthony Alvarado, PE, CFM National Hydraulic Engineering Conference
There are 2 Types of Bridge Inspectors – Class B and Class A.
GIS Applications in the Water Management Sector
Stream Crossing Replacement Policy
Civil Engineering Dept.
Presentation transcript:

BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important and should be provided in generally the same sequence and same format. But each presentation must be tailored for the specific segment being presented. Some slides can be eliminated and sometimes extra slides will be necessary to best convey the background and backup data needed to make the case for the LSAC Assignment. Pictures are generally a very good method for communicating information on a particular feature or defect being evaluated; captions for photos should be provided. Some of the additional summary type slides will eventually be produced directly from the LST but until then you will have to cut and paste the data / graph into the power point. Adjust font size, color, layout, tables, etc. as needed to improve the presentation. Do not overload your slides with too much information; It is better to add a slide. Don’t be surprised to see future revisions to the Power Point. The power point for the SOG will likely be a subset of this power point. 1 of 39

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Name of Levee Segment Presenter Name: Presenter Title: Duty Location: Date of Presentation: NLD System: NLD Segment:

BUILDING STRONG ® Levee Overview  USACE District  Name of Segment  Identify Segments relationship to Levee System (Does Segment = System, or is it only a part of a bigger system.)  Segment ID from NLD  Authorization / Project  Identity of Owner Operator  Dates of Construction (year)  Population at Risk Day: xxxx, Night: xxxx 3 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Vicinity/Segment Map 4 of 39 EXAMPLE

BUILDING STRONG ® Summary of Hydraulics Hydraulics Toe and Overtopping ACE Max Flood w/ Current Configuration Overtopped? Breached? Times Loaded (events) Levee Section Height, Crest Width, Slopes Embankment Materials Foundation Materials Population and Assets Total Population Total Assets 5 of 39 Remove example and replace with graphic of levee, water surface elevations, and house along with the legend from Levee Information tab for the subject screening here.

BUILDING STRONG ® Performance History 6 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Geomorphology / Foundation Geology  Present typical foundation / subsurface conditions in longitudinal profile and or cross sections to document section being assessed. 7 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Geologic Section Levee Embankment and Foundation 8 of 39 EXAMPLE

BUILDING STRONG ® Typical Flood Wall Section 9 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Typical Section with Culvert 10 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Culvert Section 11 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Example: Culverts/Closure 12 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Review of Assessment Ratings  Review/Compare ICW Rating with LST Rating in Table format  Highlight Primary Factors and other indicators needing attention / discussion.  Use table format similar to that shown on following slides. ADJUST TABLE COLUMN WIDTHS AS NEEDED 13 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® EMBANKMENT SEEPAGE SUPPORTING PHOTOS 14 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Embankment Seepage Assessment Ratings Performance ModeICW RatingLST RatingJustification Embankment and Foundation Seepage and Piping Unwanted Vegetation Growth Encroachment Settlement Cracking Animal Control Culverts/Discharge Pipes Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe/Drainage Systems Seepage 15 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® EMBANKMENT STABILITY SUPPORTING PHOTOS 16 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Embankment Stability Assessment Ratings Performance ModeICW RatingLST RatingJustification Embankment Stability Unwanted Vegetation Growth Encroachment Slope Stability Settlement Depressions/Rutting Cracking Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe/Drainage Systems 17 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® EMBANKMENT EROSION SUPPORTING PHOTOS 18 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Embankment Erosion Assessment Ratings Performance ModeICW RatingLST RatingJustification Embankment Erosion Sod Cover Erosion/Bank Caving Riprap Revetments & Bank Protection Revetments other than Riprap 19 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® FLOOD WALL STABILITY SUPPORTING PHOTOS 20 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Wall Stability Assessment Ratings 21 of 39 Performance ModeICW RatingLST RatingJustification Floodwall Stability Unwanted Vegetation Growth Encroachment Concrete Surfaces Tilting, Sliding or Settlement of Concrete Structures Foundation of Concrete Structures Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe/Drainage Systems

BUILDING STRONG ® FLOOD WALL SEEPAGE SUPPORTING PHOTOS 22 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Wall Seepage Assessment Ratings 23 of 39 Performance ModeICW RatingLST RatingJustification Floodwall Underseepage and Piping Culverts/Discharge Pipes Unwanted Vegetation Growth Encroachment Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe Drainage Systems Seepage

BUILDING STRONG ® CULVERTS AND CLOSURE SUPPORTING PHOTOS 24 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® CULVERTS AND CLOSURE ASSESSMENT RATINGS 25 of 39 Performance ModeLST RatingJustification Miscellaneous Issues

BUILDING STRONG ® Assessment Rating Summary Primary Factors Embankment & Foundation Seepage – U,M,A Embankment Stability – U,M,A Embankment Erosion – U,M,A Closure System - U,M,A Flood Wall Stability - U,M,A Flood Wall Under Seepage - U,M,A 26 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Population at Risk 27 of 39 EXAMPLE

BUILDING STRONG ® Evacuation Effectiveness Evacuation Planning: A,M,U [Comments] Community Awareness: A,M,U [Comments] Flood Warning Effectiveness: A,M,U [Comments] Computed Evacuation Effectiveness Factor Breach prior to overtopping = xx% Day ( xx% Night) Overtopping= xx% Day ( xx% Night) 28 of 39 IneffectiveEffective xx%

BUILDING STRONG ® Critical Infrastructure 29 of 39 Infrastructure Type# of Structures

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Data Summary  Weighted Fatality Rate: xxxx%  Threatened Population with Breach prior to Overtopping: Day- xxxx Night- xxxx  Threatened Population with Overtopping: Day- xxxx Night- xxxx  Estimated Loss of Life with Overtopping: xxxx  Estimated Loss of Life Breach Prior to Overtopping: xxxx  Number of Structures Inundated: xxxx  Property Damages (in 1000s): $xxxxxx 30 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Major Contributors to Overall Risk Rating Performance Type Performance Index Life Safety Index Economic Index Embankment and Foundation Seepage and Piping 97.74% Embankment Stability 0.22% Embankment Erosion 2.03% Closure Systems Floodwall Stability Floodwall Underseepage and Piping 31 of 39 EXAMPLE

BUILDING STRONG ® Major Contributors to Risk Prior to Capacity Exceedance 32 of 39 EXAMPLE

BUILDING STRONG ® Conditional Performance Index Whisker 33 of 39 EXAMPLE

BUILDING STRONG ® Annualized Risk Whisker 34 of 39 EXAMPLE

BUILDING STRONG ® Performance Index vs. Life Loss Prior to Overtopping 35 of 39 EXAMPLE

BUILDING STRONG ® Performance Index vs. Life Loss Overtopping 36 of 39 EXAMPLE

BUILDING STRONG ® Performance Index vs. Property Damage 37 of 39 EXAMPLE

BUILDING STRONG ® Recommendation [Recommendation] 38 of 39

BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important and should be provided in generally the same sequence and same format. But each presentation must be tailored for the specific segment being presented. Some slides can be eliminated and sometimes extra slides will be necessary to best convey the background and backup data needed to make the case for the LSAC Assignment. Pictures are generally a very good method for communicating information on a particular feature or defect being evaluated. Some of the additional summary type slides will eventually be produced directly from the LST but until then you will have to cut and paste the data / graph into the power point. Adjust font size, color, layout, tables, etc. as needed to improve the presentation. Do not overload your slides with too much information; It is better to add a slide. Don’t be surprised to see future revisions to the Power Point. The power point for the SOG will likely be a subset of this power point. 39 of 39