Andrew Thornton Chairman, HREC Royal Adelaide Hospital Ethics Forum – June 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Research Ethics Forum
Advertisements

School of Psychology Online Ethics Guide No. 2 Submitting an ethics update for review.
Open Library June 4, 2004 Informed Consent Process and Federal Regulations That Must Be Met to Waive Informed Consent Tracey Craddock Regulatory Compliance.
Specific Minor Revision Letters. SMR Letter-who does it come from? Either from Full or Expedited Committee. The letter from the Full Committee is generally.
TEACHER CERTIFICATION TUTORIAL TIMS = Teacher Information Management System BY: Dr. Cindy Ferraro and Ginger Daddona.
Andrew Thornton Chairman, HREC Royal Adelaide Hospital Ethics Forum – May 2012.
Proposal Submission 101. Proposal Timeline As soon as you have decided to submit, notify our SPPD contracts and grants coordinators, Nicole Burelli and.
How to…….  ICID review is moving from paper-based to electronic  Some elements of the review remain as they were, ie:  You will edit your document,
Submission to Approval What happens to my protocol once I submit it to the HIC office.
The Application for Renewal Accreditation: Electronic Submissions.
CRC Protocol Documents Protocol Submissions Amendments Publications Study Closure.
ESOS COMPLIANCE PROCESS 26 FEBRUARY REGULATORY APPROACH.
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager Radford University.
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) Research Studies UCSF HRPP Submission Process Overview Tuesday, December.
HOW TO CREATE AND SUBMIT AN IRB AMENDMENT 1 Institutional Review Board Health Sciences & Behavioral Sciences Nancy Adair Birk, Ph.D. IRB Education.
I T ’ S J UST A L ITTLE C HANGE ; O H AND I T ’ S T IME TO R ENEW ! H OW TO SUBMIT AMENDMENTS AND RENEWALS Human Investigation Committee Human Research.
Unlocking the Mystery of General Information Reporting Research Compliance Administration Training Presentation Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Presenter:Heather.
School of Psychology Online Ethics Guide No. 1 Submitting an application for ethical review. JRC/13/10/2014.
Mary Ann Laviolette, Ethics Coordinator Ottawa Hospital Research Ethics Board (OHREB) and University of Ottawa Research Ethics Board (HREB)
Working with Quorum Allina Health Megan Simpson, CIP Senior Study Manager Allina Account Manager.
The Ten Most Common Mistakes in IRB Submissions (How to avoid “3-tylenol-days”)
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
IRB AND HUMAN SUBJECTS REVIEW Kris Clarke, Ph.D..
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Andrew Thornton, Chairman, RAH HREC
The Online Submission Process: Guidelines and Training for Authors Marlowe H. Smaby, Michael R. Smith, Cleborne D. Maddux.
“Committee Progress Report” GRADING ENGL 3365 Copyright 2013 by Arthur Fricke.
IRB Board Education Session 6 How Consent Regulations are Implemented in INSPIR Mary Banks Director, Office of the IRB June -July 2005.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
IRB Electronic Submission. IRB Definition Committee formally designated to approve, monitor, and review biomedical and behavioral research involving human.
H I P A A T R A I N I N G Self Directed Module 7 Research Disclosures For Data Custodians START Click to begin…
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
HOW TO SUBMIT AN AMENDMENT TO A PROJECT THAT HAS ALREADY RECEIVED IRB APPROVAL Submitting an Amendment.
Welcome To INSPIR Training Please be sure Please be sure to sign- in to sign- in Please be sure you try to log – on to INSPIR before you leave Please be.
Andrew Thornton Chairman, HREC Royal Adelaide Hospital Low and Negligible Risk Research Update - Ethics.
CTN Study Submission & Review Process Update June 2 nd, 2015.
20 th Analysis and Computation Specialty Track Power Point How to Upload Abstracts and Sessions to the Paper Management System.
Welcome To INTERNSHIP CLINIC Thursday, April 29, Summer 2010 SEMESTER.
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Renewals A HOW-TO. Objectives 1.Why are renewals necessary? 2.What projects require a renewal? 3.How do I find the form? 4.How do I fill out the form?
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
Amendments A HOW-TO. Objectives 1.What is an amendment? 2.What projects are required to submit an amendment? 3.How do I find the form? 4.How do I fill.
Fully accredited since 2006 Tom Conquergood, CIP Working with Quorum October 13, 2015 Thomas Jefferson University.
1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.
THE SIMPLE GUIDE: COMPLETING AN INJURY/ACCIDENT REPORT For KPBSD Staff Members.
Lifespan 1 Submission Process to the IRB part 2 Revisions to Protocol.
Office of Human Research (OHR) Quality Improvement Program Patrick Herbison Heather Krupinski.
NAU New Project Submission Guidance for creating a new project.
1 SAE Centralized Report and Review Process April 2012.
Submitting a New IRB Protocol
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Investigator of Record – Definition
Amendments A how-to Prepared by: Christine Melton-Lopez, IRB Associate.
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/12/2016
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016
KC IRB Implementation – Phase IV
SUNY Pre Award and Compliance Systems Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Correcting Entries Training
Investigator of Record – Definition
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S STUDY FILE
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
Correcting Entries Training
Program Design Addendum Process
Welcome To INTERNSHIP CLINIC
Welcome To INTERNSHIP CLINIC
RVH Research Ethics Board SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
Patty Orndoff RN, MEd IRB Education Coordinator
Central IRB Components of ARCADIA
Presentation transcript:

Andrew Thornton Chairman, HREC Royal Adelaide Hospital Ethics Forum – June 2013

>Workloads >Additional requirements and processes due to on-line forms >Transitioning to electronic filing by electronic submissions of all documentation. >Additional requirements and processes due to SA Health Policies >Issues with linking research into governance, delegations of authority, credentialing, accreditation >National Approach (formerly HoMER). HREC Issues & Pressures

We need your help! >We are working towards making more use of electronic media and less hard copy. >We are trying to balance the needs of SA Health policy against the need to keep the committee functioning effectively and against the needs of researchers. >We need everyone’s help to keep the workloads manageable and to avoid mistakes happening.

For new submissions involving an investigational drug or device >NEAF (through on-line forms only) >Cover letter/Investigator’s Statement (1 electronic + 2 hard copies) >Protocol (1 electronic copy and 2 hard copies) >Informed Consent Documents (1 electronic copy and 2 hard copies) >Investigator’s Brochure/Product Info (1 electronic and 1 hard copy) >IDSC Form A (1 electronic copy) >IDSC Form B (1 electronic copy) >Pharmaceutical Checklist (1 electronic copy) >Questionnaires (1 electronic copy) >Advertising material (1 electronic copy) >Any other material (1 electronic copy) >CTN Form (1 hard copy) >Radiation Safety Report (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >EPA Notification Form (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >Invoicing Form (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >The submission must be complete with ALL documentation

Other new submissions which require full committee review >NEAF (through on-line forms only) >Cover letter (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >Protocol (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >Informed Consent (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >Advertising material (1 electronic copy) >Questionnaires (1 electronic copy) >Any other material (1 electronic copy) >Radiation Safety Report (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >EPA Notification Form (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >Invoicing Form (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >Any other material (1 electronic copy) >The submission must be complete with ALL documentation.

For LNR studies which are suitable for expedited review >Check with Heather whether the study is appropriate for expedited review. >Cover letter (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >Protocol (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >Informed Consent (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >Questionnaires (1 electronic copy) >Advertising material (1 electronic copy) >Any other material (1 electronic copy) >Radiation Safety Report (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >EPA Notification form (1 electronic copy and 1 hard copy) >There will be an on-line LNR form shortly. >There will be an on-line LNR SSA form shortly.

Amendments >Electronic Request For Review Of Updated Documentation Cover letter to give broad overview of reason for change and point to the detailed summary Summary of changes Amended documentation Detailed summary of changes including old text, new text and rationale (electronic). >Hard Copy Cover letter Amended Information Sheet

IBs (including Addendums) or Equivalent documentation >Electronic Request For Review Of Updated Documentation Cover letter Amended documentation >Hard copy – nil >Remember that somewhere there must be a statement from the PI to indicate whether the new information changes the risk/benefit of the study or creates any additional issues which the committee should be aware of.

Safety information (SUSARS, DSUR, etc, SAE, Protocol violations, DSMB reports, etc) >Electronic Request For Review Of Updated Documentation Cover letter Relevant documentation. >Hard copy – nil >Remember that somewhere there must be a statement from the PI to indicate whether the new information changes the risk/benefit of the study or creates any additional issues which the committee should be aware of.

For other notifications (Annual reports, Close-outs, etc) >Electronic Cover letter Relevant documentation >Hard copy - nil

General requirements…1 >Make sure that all of the appropriate documents are submitted. >Make sure the appropriate documents are listed in exactly the way you need them to be approved, either in a cover letter, , or in another form such as the new “Request For Review Of Updated Documentation” >Submit the document list in MS-Word format >Submit other documents as PDF’s which are searchable not as scanned documents. >Use “track changes” for all document changes. >If any submitted documents have a password, we must know what that password is.

General requirements…2 >Submit the cover letter or cover page with scanned signatures or preferably use an electronic signature for the PI – please check that there is some control on the use of the signature >Tell us how you are submitting, ie “electronic only” or “hard copy to follow” (in the , not the subject line). >Don’t send unnecessary hard copy – it will go in the bin. >Please don’t assume that we know what has gone on before – put the new submission in context. >CDs should be labelled with the RAH Study Number and the PI name and submitted in SOFT covers, not hard covers.

requirements >Subject Line – include REC # and short description of contents/documents submitted only >In the body (or in the “Request for Review…”) Full title of Protocol and REC Protocol No. Name and title (Mr., Ms., A/Prof, Dr) of PI Indication of what is to be reviewed/submitted List of documents submitted for review, and listed how they are to be approved. >In the or associated documentation, there must be contact name and return address location. Name: Dr Mary Smith, Dept: Dept of Ingrowing Toenails, Location: Level 1, Thornton Block. Phone:

Invoicing issues >If there is a change to the Invoicing Details please notify us promptly of: Contact person Name of Sponsor Address where the Invoices are to be sent >A new Invoice Form or the new “Request for Review of Updated Documentation” must be provided for every related study

News on the “National Approach” >July 2013? >Single ethical review >Multiple governance reviews >CPI responsibilities Submitting all documents* Coordinating with all sites Liaising with sponsor Preparing generic SSA >PI responsibilities Preparing specific SSA Dealing with local RGO * Note that we are happy with a generic Information Sheet – provided that the text is the same at all sites, it is not necessary to submit customised Information Sheets

Other issues >Committee recruitment >Committee feedback