V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Targeted & Individual Systems of Support Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri – Columbia OSEP Center for Positive Behavior Interventions.
Advertisements

Sustained Implementation of School-wide PBIS for All Students George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
Aligning Resource for School Improvement: Getting Everyone on Same Page George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Working Your Way Up the Triangle: Systems, Data and Practices Mary Richter, Ph.D. Missouri SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Leadership Team Training
The PBS & RtI Connection The PBS & RtI Connection Using Student Data to Make School-wide Decisions.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of CT & OR
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Training/Coaching Meeting & Team Training Debriefing George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Building Tertiary Systems of Support Terry Bigby, Ed.D. Material adapted from Illinois PBIS & Tim Lewis, Ph.D., University of Missouri- Columbia.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
SWPBS Coaching: More than Reminders Donald H. Eichhorn Middle School Team & Coaches George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education &
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
VTPBiS Intensive Level June Tracy Harris Ken Kramberg.
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
Sustained Implementation of Tiered System of Behavior Support George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Checking in on Check In/Check Out DEBORA LINTNER MO SW-PBS TIER 2/3 CONSULTANT SUSAN LONG ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SIKESTON 5-6 GRADE CENTER.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Understanding & Planning for Non- Responsive Behavior (Secondary/Tertiary Tier) George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
Responsiveness-to-Intervention: What is It? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut October.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Discipline & Beyond George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Lou DeLoreto E.O. Smith High School George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
SRBI/PBIS Implementation: Considerations George Sugai & Jen Freeman Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Session B4: Expanding Your Tier 2 Behavior Intervention.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Tier 2/3 Advanced Behavior Supports: Session 2 KENTUCKY.
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
Kayla Locklear- Behavioral Specialist Leon Maynor – Behavioral Specialist SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: DISCIPLINE & BEYOND.
Function Based Thinking and Tier II
What is Positive Behavior Intervetions and Supports (PBIS)?
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Maryland State Coaches’ Meeting AM Session
Reaching All Students: RtI & SWPBS
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
MN SW Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Liberty Elementary staff training
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2

V Continuum of Support Tier III Individualized Intense Intervention Tier II Some Students Targeted Intervention Tier I All Students All Staff All Settings

V 2.1 ESTABLISHING A CONTINUUM of SWPBS SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound/PCP Special designed instruction PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach & encourage positive SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Effective instruction Parent engagement Audit 1.Identify existing practices by tier 2.Specify outcome for each effort 3.Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness 4.Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes 5.Establish decision rules (RtI) P 28-29

V 2.1 CORE FEATURES Targeted PBIS (Tier 2) CORE FEATURES Targeted PBIS (Tier 2) Team & data driven Behavior expertise Increased social skills instruction & practice Increased adult supervision Increased opportunity for positive reinforcement Continuous progress monitoring Increased precorrection

V 2.1 Criteria for Accessing and Exiting Tier 2 Support ❏ Academic performance (performing below grade level) ❏ ODR data (2-5 office discipline referrals) ❏ Observation of Internalizing Behaviors ❏ Attendance (frequently absent, tardy or truant) ❏ Setting events (life outside of school) ❏ Performing at grade level ❏ Office referrals are down ❏ Life outside of school has stabilized

V 2.1 Building the infrastructure to provide Tier 2 Support Team Evidence Based Interventions Training Intervention Staff DATA- Progress Monitoring Process

V 2.1 Team Team Roles ❏ Leader ❏ Behavioral Expertise ❏ Community Connections ❏ Tier 1 Connection ❏ Special Ed -Gen Ed Teacher who is accessing support for the student ❏ Meets weekly or bi-weekly ❏ Uses precision problem solving in order to make data-based decisions ❏ Progress Monitoring

V 2.1 Choose Interventions CHOOSE EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS ❏ Check In Check Out (CICO) ❏ Check & Connect ❏ Targeted Social Skills (SEL-Direct Instruction) ❏ Targeted Expectations (SEL-more practice!) ❏ Homework Club (targeted services) ❏ Organizational Skills (targeted services) ❏ Mentors (Big Brother, Big Sister)

V 2.1 Training-Professional Development ❏ Is everyone trained on the interventions you selected? ❏ Does everyone know their role in the intervention? ❏ Is there time built into the professional development calendar?

V 2.1 Intervention Staff ❏ Who will directly lead the intervention? ❏ Who will be involved indirectly? ❏ Will you use existing staff or hire new staff? ❏ If you use existing staff, how will you reduce or reshuffle their current duties so they have time to be an interventionist?

V 2.1 Progress Monitoring the Interventions and Student Progress ❏ Is there a standardized way to progress monitor the invention? ❏ Does everyone know how to progress monitoring the intervention? ❏ How often is progress reviewed? ❏ Is the criteria that indicated a need for intervention changing?

V 2.1 Assess your current infrastructure for Tier 2 ❑ Tier l is in place -We know this based on our fidelity and outcome data ❑ What infrastructure do you currently have in place to support Tier ll implementation? ❑ Team ❑ Evidence Based Interventions ❑ Intervention Staff ❑ DATA-Progress Monitoring Process ❑ PD-Training ❑ Criteria for accessing and exiting Tier ll Support