END-OF-LIFE BASIC CONCEPTS “THOU OWEST GOD A DEATH”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Death and the Law. Suicide  the act of intentionally ending one’s own life  became illegal in the 13th century - it was a crime to commit suicide, and.
Advertisements

Autonomy and Beneficence.  Right to make one’s own choices  Respect for persons- not to interfere with choice of another, though persuasion permitted.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2004 Development Through the Lifespan Chapter 19 Death, Dying, and Bereavement This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
PAIN.  New concept  Generally agreed upon that it exists  Definition variable.
To a Christian, death is not the end of life, but rather a dramatic transition to a new state of being. -Archbishop Gomez, A Will to Life: Clear Answers.
Euthanasia Passive Euthanasia: refusing to continue medical treatment, leading to death Voluntary Active Euthanasia: Killing someone with their consent.
Introduction to basic principles
Controversy 7 Should People Have the Choice to End Their Lives?
Euthanasia Euthanasia II II.
Done By: Christopher Chew Mak Wei Zheng Dai Tianxing Zhang Zhenglin.
Termination of Life-Sustaining Treatment Philip J. Boyle, Ph.D. Vice President, Mission & Ethics.
Euthanasia on the verge of becoming legal in Lithuania? Milda Gegužytė Eglė Mazėtytė.
Applied Ethics Ethical Issues Section 2 Computer Science.
Death and Dying Christian Perspectives on the End of Life.
General Principles: God is the Lord of our lives, the Lord over our birth and our death. Man is steward over his life, but this does not include the right.
Euthanasia The central problem of medical ethics.
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Odyssey: UNIV 300I Fall 2006 California State University, Long Beach.
What Would You Do? A Case Study in Ethics
To the End of Our Days Nurturing Life in the Face of Death Steven Bozza, MA, Director Respect Life Office Archdiocese of Philadelphia Phone: (215)
1 HOW OLD IS TOO OLD? How old is too old? How sick is too sick? (How young is too young?)
Revision of Facts on Euthanasia
Mental Health Nursing I NURS 1300 Unit VIII Spirituality, Death, and Grief.
Dr. Jacquelyn A.K. Kegley California State University U.S.A.
Ethics and End-of-Life Care Part 2: Autonomy and Futility Michael Wassenaar, PhD February 9, 2012.
Using or forgoing life-sustaining treatments (LST)
1 PALLIATIVE CARE AND EUTHANASIA – ARE THEY MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE? Aleksandrova-Yankulovska Silviya University of Medicine - Pleven Faculty of Public health.
Questions and Guidelines
Euthanasia Part I Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. Euthanasia Directly or indirectly bringing about the death of another person for the person’s sake Examples.
Natural law Principles guiding R.C. morality
1 Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Michael Wassenaar, PhD February 16, 2012.
Are There Limits to Patient Autonomy? Elizabeth Heitman, PhD Vanderbilt University Medical Center Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society Challenges in.
MEDICAL ETHICS and The End of Life. PRIMA FACIE DUTIES AUTONOMY BENEFICENCE NON - MALEFICENCE JUSTICE UTILITY.
TERMINAL SEDATION TERMINAL SEDATION- Ethical implications in different situations James Hallenbeck, MD, Medical Director, VA Hospice Care Center, Stanford.
Module 4: Ethical/Legal Issues in Pediatric Palliative Care End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium Pediatric Palliative Care C C E E N N L L E E C C.
Chapter Five: Euthanasia Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
1 VALUES IN DECISIONS ABOUT FUTILITY DETERMING MEANING IN LIFE AND DEATH.
Amaro, Alejandra Amolenda, Patricia Anacta, Klarizza Andal, Charlotte Ann Antonio, Abigaille Ann Arcilla, Juan Martin MEDICAL ETHICS III: CASE 2.
Termination of Life-Sustaining Treatment Philip J. Boyle, Ph.D. Vice President, Mission & Ethics.
Developing an Argument: Assisted Suicide.  Euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged.
Social problems in our actual world THE BEGINNING AND THE END OF HUMAN LIFE. Euthanasia THE BEGINNING AND THE END OF HUMAN LIFE. Euthanasia.
MEDICAL ETHICS and The End of Life. ETHICAL THEORIES DEONTOLOGY CONSEQUENTIALISM VIRTUE ETHICS.
Amaro, Alejandra Amolenda, Patricia Anacta, Klarizza Andal, Charlotte Ann Antonio, Abigaille Ann Arcilla, Juan Martin MEDICAL ETHICS III: CASE 2.
Withholding and refusing optional treatment. Cases Withholding treatment Karen Ann Quinlan -Right to die controversy in US -Valium and alcohol  unconscious.
Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide
Creating Context Palliative Care for Front-Line Workers in First Nations Communities.
1 ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS IN DETERMINING FUTILE CARE HOW MUCH CAN WE AFFORD?
Chapter Five: Euthanasia
Conscientious Objection MONICA BRANIGAN. Hastened death: multiple ways of participating Administer a lethal injection Provide a lethal prescription Attend.
Euthanasia. Learning Intentions:  To be able to identify key terms and definitions.
Sarah E. Shannon, PhD, RN. Slide 2 Ethics: Forgoing Medical Therapy TNEEL-NE One exception is the state of Oregon where in 1999, about 1/3 of expected.
1 DETERMINING FUTILE TREATMENTS SEEKING THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE PATIENT.
Euthanasia Easy death without suffering See handout See textbook pg.191.
A resource for academic staff in Higher Education STUDENT MENTAL HEALTH 1.
Chapter 7: Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide
Physician assisted suicide, euthanasia, “law of double effect’, Palliative Sedation, Withholding or Withdrawing Medical Interventions.
Issues in Palliative Sedation Bruce A. Ferrell, MD Professor of Clinical Medicine UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine Director of Palliative Care.
Ethical dimension of nursing and health care
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Definition of Euthanasia
Lesson Outcomes: know what the sanctity of life means
Death and Dying Issues.
BENEFICENCE SEEKING THE GOOD FOR OTHERS AND AVOIDING HARM TO THEM.
BMA on end of life decisions
Finding Loving Care At The End of Life
DIFFICULT DECISIONS.
Lecture 10: A Brief Summary
FROM ORDINARY TO EXTRAORDINARY…
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Concepts and Issues
Natural Laws applied to voluntary euthanasia
Presentation transcript:

END-OF-LIFE BASIC CONCEPTS “THOU OWEST GOD A DEATH”

QUALITY OF LIFE A FORMULA [SHAW, 1986/1994] QL = NE X (H + S) NE --- NATURAL (PERSONAL) ENDOWMENT H --- CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE HOME S --- CONTRIBUTIONS OF SOCIETY

QUALITY OF LIFE ESSENTIAL FEATURES [SPITZER ET AL., 1981] ACTIVITY (WORK, PLAY, STUDY) --- INVOLVEMENT IN OCCUPATION TASKS OF DAILY LIVING --- ORDINARY LIFE ACTIVITIES HEALTH (FEELING OF WELL-BEING) --- PERCEPTION OF ONE’S OWN HEALTH SUPPORT FROM FAMILY AND FRIENDS PSYCHOLOGICAL, SPIRITUAL OUTLOOK ON LIFE

QUALITY OF LIFE WAYS OF TALKING THE SUBJECTIVE SATISFACTION EXPRESSED OR EXPERIENCED BY AN INDIVIDUAL IN HIS/HER PHYSICAL, MENTAL, AND SOCIAL SITUATION THE SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION BY AN ONLOOKER OF ANOTHER’S SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCES OF PERSONAL LIFE THE ACHIEVEMENT OF CERTAIN ATTRIBUTES HIGHLY VALUED IN OUR SOCIETY, AS REFLECTED IN A SOCIAL AND CULTURAL BIAS ABOUT THOSE FACTORS WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO A LIFE WORTH LIVING A LEVEL OF CAPABILITY AND ACTIVITY WHICH CONTRIBUTES TO THE INDIVIDUAL’S ABILITY TO FLOURISH –FLOURISHING --- THE FULFILLMENT OF THE POTENTIAL AN INDIVIDUAL MAY POSSESS FOR MEANINGFUL EXISTENCE [BEYOND MERE SURVIVAL]

MEANS FOR EXTENDING LIFE ORDINARY (PROPORTIONATE) –ALL MEDICINES, TREATMENTS, AND OPERATIONS, WHICH OFFER A REASONABLE HOPE OF BENEFIT FOR THE PATIENT AND WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED AND USED WITHOUT EXCESSIVE EXPENSE, PAIN, AND OTHER INCONVENIENCES EXTRAORDINARY (DISPROPORTIONATE) –ALL MEDICINES TREATMENTS, AND OPERATIONS, WHICH CANNOT BE OBTAINED WITHOUT EXCESSIVE EXPENSE, PAIN, OR OTHER INCONVENIENCE, OR WHICH, IF USED, WOULD NOT OFFER A REASONABLE HOPE OF BENEFIT. “ONE CANNOT IMPOSE ON ANYONE THE OBLIGATION TO HAVE RECOURSE TO A TECHNIQUE WHICH IS ALREADY IN USE BUT WHICH CARRIES A RISK OR IS BURDENSOME. SUCH A REFUSAL IS NOT THE EQUIVALENT OF SUICIDE [OR HOMOCIDE]; ON THE CONTRARY IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS AN ACCEPTANCE OF THE HUMAN CONDITION.”

BENEFITS THE POSITIVE RESULT FOR A FUNCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT IN THE QUALITY OF LIFE OR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF A PARTICULARLY DESIREABLE GOAL WHICH AN INDIVIDUAL WILL EXPERIENCE AS THE RESULT OF A HEALTHCARE INTERVENTION COMPLETE RECOVERY REMISSION OF DISEASE PROCESS IMPROVED QUALITY OF LIFE –COMFORT –RESTORATION OF CONSCIOUSNESS –IMPROVED PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY RETURN TO A PREVIOUS LEVEL OF FUNCTIONING MAINTENANCE OF A MINIMALLY DECENT QUALTIY OF LIFE FIGHTING A DISEASE EXPERIENCING A LESS DISTRESSING DYING COST/RESOURCE SAVINGS [CONTINUED BIOLOGICAL EXISTENCE]

BURDENS THE SUFFERING ONE MUST ENDURE AS THE RESULT OF AN INTERVENTION; IT MAY TAKE A PHYSICAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, SPIRITUAL, OR MORAL FORM TOO PAINFUL TOO DAMAGING TO BODILY SELF AND FUNCTIONING TOO PSYCHOLOGICALLY REPUGNANT TO THE PATIENT TOO RESTRICTIVE OF PATIENT’S LIBERTY AND PREFERRED ACTIVITIES TOO SUPPRESSIVE OF PATIENT’S MENTAL LIFE TOO EXPENSIVE

WEIGHING BENEFITS AND BURDENS WHAT IS THE GOAL OF THE INTERVENTION? –WILL THE GOAL BE ACCOMPLISHED? –RELATION OF GOAL TO PATIENT’S LIFE-STYLE CHOICES THE BENEFITS OF THE INTERVENTION? –RELATION OF BENEFITS TO LIFE-STYLE CHOICES –ARE BENEFITS WORTH THE BURDENS? THE BURDENS OF THE INTERVENTION? –RELATION OF BURDENS TO LIFE-STYLE CHOICES –ARE BURDENS TOLERABLE? –DO BURDENS MINIMIZE BENEFITS? WHO MOST DIRECTLY BEARS THE BURDENS? WILL THE PATIENT HAVE TO BEAR THE BURDENS ALONE?

ACTIVE - PASSIVE EUTHANASIA OLD STYLE ACTIVE –DOING SOMETHING/TAKING THE INITIATIVE DIRECT CAUSE IN PRODUCING THE EFFECT OF DEATH –E.G. GIVING A LETHAL INJECTION PASSIVE –NOT DOING A SPECIFIC THING/ALLOWING SOMETHING TO HAPPEN INDIRECT CAUSE IN PRODUCING THE EFFECT OF DEATH –E.G. WITHHOLDING OR WITHDRAWING AN INTERVENTION –ALLOWING THE NATURAL COURSE OF EVENTS TO FOLLOW

ACTIVE - PASSIVE EUTHANASIA NEW STYLE ACTIVE –DOING “x” = DOING SOMETHING PASSIVE –DOING “NON-X” = DOING SOMETHING BOTH INVOLVE TAKING AN INITIATIVE AND PRODUCING THE SAME END –UTILIZE DIFFERENT MEANS BOTH INVOLVE A DOING --- MINIMALLY A MENTAL ACTION MORAL EQUIVALENTS BUT MAY HAVE DIFFERENT PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS ACTIVE MAY BE MORE HUMANE THAN PASSIVE SINCE SUFFERING IS TERMINATED SOONER

PRINCIPLE OF DOUBLE EFFECT ACTIONS WITH TWO EFFECTS; ONE GOOD, ONE BAD ONE MAY NOT WILL EVIL DIRECTLY ONE MUST INTEND THE GOOD EFFECT BUT MAY PERMIT OR TOLERATE THE EVIL EFFECT –E.G. REMOVAL OF VENTILATOR TO PRODUCE COMFORT –E.G. THERAPEUTIC LEVELS OF PAIN MEDICATION GOOD EFFECT MUST NOT COME ABOUT AS A CAUSAL RESULT OF AN EVIL ACTION –E.G. KILLING THE PATIENT TO ACHIEVE PAIN RELIEF THERE MUST BE A PROPORTIONATE REASON FOR THE PROCEDURE

VOLUNTARY AND INVOLUNTARY INVOLUNTARY –ACTIVE --- CONSTANT MEDICAL PROHIBITION –PASSIVE --- ACCEPTED AS W/W IN “HOPELESS” CASES (BENEFICENCE) VOLUNTARY –ACTIVE --- EQUIVALENT OF SUICIDE: STRONG MORAL PROHIBITION NO CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION REFUSAL OF TREATMENT, NOT SUICIDE –PASSIVE --- ACCEPTED AS TREATMENT REFUSALS (AUTONOMY)

WHY ACTIVE EUTHANASIA NOW? ASSISTED SUICIDE AND ALTERNATIVES TO AVOID PAIN –PAIN MANAGEMENT –WITHHOLDING/WITHDRAWING TREATMENTS T0 AVOID A PROTRACTED DYING PROCESS –SUPPORT PATIENT IN TREATMENT REFUSALS –EXPLORE POSITIVE AVENUES OF PERSONAL GROWTH TO AVOID INSTITUTIONS WHERE PATIENT “WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DIE” –CREATE ENVIRONMENTS TOLERANT OF A VARIETY OF DEATH-STYLES –UTILIZE WIDE RANGE OF ACCEPTABLE MEDICAL PRACTICES –ASSESS BENEFITS REALISTICALLY –RESPECT PATIENT AUTONOMY TO AVOID EXCESSIVE EXPENSES –RESPECT TREATMENT REFUSALS –ASSESS BENEFITS REALISTICALLY –UTILIZE LOW TECHNOLOGY INTERVENTIONS TO AVOID HUMILIATION AND INDIGNITY IN DYING –EXPLORE WAYS OF PROMOTING DIGNITY –EXPLORE AVENUES OF HOPE IN A LIMITED CONTEXT

TERMINAL [PALLIATIVE] SEDATION A FORM OF OR ALTERNATIVE TO EUTHANASIA? RIGHT TO CONSENT TO OR REFUSE TREATMENTS [PSDA] GOAL OF MEDICINE: RELIEF OF PAIN AND SUFFERING CAUSED BY MALADIES TREATMENT TO PROVIDE BENEFITS OR REDUCE BURDENS –PAIN –SUFFERING ADEQUATE PAIN CONTROL –HASTEN DEATH –PROLONG LIFE

TERMINAL SEDATION AND DOUBLE EFFECT TWO EFFECTS --- ONE GOOD, ONE UNDESIRABLE CANNOT ACHIEVE GOOD BY IMPROPER MEANS INTEND THE GOOD EFFECT; CANNOT WILL EVIL DIRECTLY MUST BE PROPORTIONATE REASON –RELIeVE INTRACTABLE PAIN –PRODUCE UNCONSCIOUSNESS BEFORE TERMINAL WEANING –RELIEVE EXISTENTENTIAL SUFFERING INTENTION [DIVIDING INTENTIONS] –RELIEVE PAIN [AND SUFFERING]/NOT CAUSE DEATH –SEDATION = RELIEVE PAIN WITHHOLD/WITHDRAW NUTRITION AND HYDRATION = NONBENEFICIAL