CME-GEOMETRY AND COSMIC-RAY ANISOTROPY OBSERVED BY A PROTOTYPE MUON DETECTOR NETWORK K. Munakata 1, T. Kuwabara 1, J. W. Bieber 2, P. Evenson 2, R. Pyle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of Pi2 pulsations observed from MAGDAS chain in Egypt E. Ghamry 1, 2, A. Mahrous 2, M.N. Yasin 3, A. Fathy 3 and K. Yumoto 4 1- National Research.
Advertisements

Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
4/18 6:08 UT 4/17 6:09 UT Average polar cap flux North cap South cap… South cap South enter (need to modify search so we are here) South exit SAA Kress,
North-West University, Potchefstroom November 18, 2011 Ground-Based Cosmic Ray Detectors for Space Weather Applications John W Bieber University of Delaware,
An Analysis of Heliospheric Magnetic Field Flux Based on Sunspot Number from 1750 to Today and Prediction for the Coming Solar Minimum Introduction The.
Petukhov I.S., Petukhov S.I. Yu.G. Shafer Institute for Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy SB RAS 21st European Cosmic Ray Symposium in Košice, Slovakia.
Storm-time total electron content and its response to penetration electric fields over South America P. M. de Siqueira, E. R. de Paula, M. T. A. H. Muella,
Precursor signatures of storm sudden commencement observed by a network of muon detectors C. R. BRAGA 1, A. DAL LAGO 1, M. ROCKENBACH 2, N. J. SCHUCH 3,
Cosmic Rays and Space Weather Erwin O. Flückiger Laurent Desorgher, Rolf Bütikofer, Benoît Pirard Physikalisches Institut University of Bern
Paul Evenson, Waraporn Nuntiyakul,
Towards a European Infrastructure for Lunar Observatories Bremen, Wednesday 23 rd March 2005 A 3D cosmic ray detector on the Moon X. Moussas University.
Ionospheric Electric Field Variations during Geomagnetic Storms Simulated using CMIT W. Wang 1, A. D. Richmond 1, J. Lei 1, A. G. Burns 1, M. Wiltberger.
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
1 Interactive DataBase of Cosmic Ray Anisotropy (DB A10) Asipenka A.S., Belov A.V., Eroshenko E.F., Klepach E.G., Oleneva V. A., Yanke, V.G. IZMIRAN, Pushkov.
SHINE 2008 June, 2008 Utah, USA Visit our Websites:
Efficacy of Muon Detection for Solar Flare Early Warning Canadian Muon Workshop St-Émile-de-Suffolk, Québec, Canada October 17-19, 2011 NRCan DND Carleton.
Variations of the high energy muon flux and space-time structure of the temperature profile in the atmosphere M.G. Kostyuk 1, V.B. Petkov 1, R.V. Novoseltseva.
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
North-south anisotropy of galactic cosmic rays observed with the Global Muon Detector Network 34 th ICRC (August 4, 2015, Den Hague) SH07 ID117 K. Munakata.
SHINE Meeting, July 31 – August 4, 2006 Neutron Monitor Observations of the January 20, 2005 Ground Level Enhancement John W. Bieber 1, John Clem 1, Paul.
Spring 2004 AGU Meeting, Montreal SH33A-02 UNUSUAL FEATURES OF THE OCTOBER 28, 2003 GROUND LEVEL ENHANCEMENT John W. Bieber 1, Paul Evenson 1, Roger Pyle.
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Effect of Geomagetic Activity on Cosmic Ray Muon Rate Mendon High School Regents Physics Honors Period 9 Class A group of Honors physics students plotted.
Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons: Recent Results from the Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation Measurements Aboard an ER-2 Airplane P. Goldhagen 1, J.M. Clem 2, J.W.
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
1 Atmospheric variations as observed by the BUST Barometric effect M.Berkova, V.Yanke, L.Dorman, V.Petkov, M.Kostyuk, R.Novoseltseva, Yu.Novoseltsev, P.
CME trajectory deduced from cosmic ray measurements K. Munakata, T. Kuwabara and J. W. Bieber.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
Initial Measurements of O-ion and He-ion Decay Rates Observed from the Van Allen Probes RBSPICE Instrument Andrew Gerrard, Louis Lanzerotti et al. Center.
By Dr. A. Mahrous Helwan University - EGYPT By Dr. A. Mahrous Helwan University - EGYPT.
Extreme Space Weather Project, Ottawa October 17-19, 2011 Ground-Based Cosmic Ray Detectors for Space Weather Applications John W Bieber University of.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SPACE RESEARCH – INPE/MCT SOUTHERN REGIONAL SPACE RESEARCH CENTER – CRS/CIE/INPE - MCT SOUTHERN SPACE OBSERVATORY– SSO/CRS/CIE/INPE.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
ROCKENBACH, M. 1; DAL LAGO, A. 2; MUNAKATA, K. 3; KATO, C
MuSTAnG – Muon Spaceweather Telescope for Anisotropies at Greifswald * Poster Content Space Weather Physics behind Cosmic Ray Muon Anisotropy MuSTAnG Consortium.
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
1 Yu. Bazhutov a, S. Bazhutova a, V. Kartyshov a, V. Nekrasov a, E. Pletnikov a,O. Vedeneev b, V. Yanke a (a) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
1 Seasonal variations of the m flux seen by the muon super telescope MuSTAnG Ganeva 1 M., Peglow 1 S., Hippler 1 R., Berkova.
Rainer HipplerMuSTAnG1 Muon Spaceweather Telescope for Anisotropies Greifswald - MuSTAnG -
Athens University – Faculty of Physics Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics Athens Neutron Monitor Station Study of the ground level enhancement of.
O N THE INFLUENCE OF THE CORONAL HOLE LATITUDE AND POLARITY ON THE GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY AND COSMIC RAY VARIATIONS Abunina Maria, IZMIRAN, Russia Abunin.
Fall 2004 AGU Meeting, San Francisco SH31B-07 GROUND-BASED COSMIC RAY DETECTORS FOR SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL RESEARCH AND SPACE WEATHER FORECASTING John W. Bieber.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
It is considered that until now in the 24th cycle of solar activity 2 ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays (GLEs) are registered: on May 17,
29 ICRC, Pune, India, 2005 Geomagnetic effects on cosmic rays during the very strong magnetic storms in November 2003 and November 2004 Belov (a), L. Baisultanova.
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
Extreme Event Symposium 2004 MAGNETOSPHERIC EFFECT in COSMIC RAYS DURING UNIQUE MAGNETIC STORM IN NOVEMBER Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Measurements of the Orientation of the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Neil Murphy Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
Effects of January 2010 stratospheric sudden warming in the low-latitude ionosphere L. Goncharenko, A. Coster, W. Rideout, MIT Haystack Observatory, USA.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
Impulsive Increase of Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux Observed by IceTop
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
Long-term variations of vector and tensor anisotropies of cosmic rays
Presenter: Paul Evenson
Early Alert of Solar Radiation Hazard
Development of a GLE Alarm System Based Upon Neutron Monitors
Investigations of CME in muon flux detected in hodoscopic mode
32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
Detection of Solar Neutrons and Protons by the ground level detectors
by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck
Presentation transcript:

CME-GEOMETRY AND COSMIC-RAY ANISOTROPY OBSERVED BY A PROTOTYPE MUON DETECTOR NETWORK K. Munakata 1, T. Kuwabara 1, J. W. Bieber 2, P. Evenson 2, R. Pyle 2, S. Yasue 1, C. Kato 1, Z. Fujii 3, M. L. Duldig 4, J. E. Humble 5, M. R. Silva 6, N. B. Trivedi 6, W. D. Gonzalez 6, and N. J. Shuch 6 1 Physics Department, Shinshu University, Nagano , JAPAN 2 Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA 3 Solar Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Aichi , JAPAN 4 Auatralian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania 7005, AUSTRALIA 5 University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, AUSTRALIA 6 Southern Regional Space Research Center, National Institute for Space Research, Santa Maria, RS, BRAZIL

ABSTRACT We analyze the cosmic-ray anisotropy observed by a prototype network of muon detectors during geomagnetic storms associated with CMEs. The network currently consists of multidirectional surface muon detectors at Nagoya (Japan) and Hobart (Australia), together with a prototype detector at São Martinho (Brazil) which has been in operation since March, In this report, we analyze the anisotropy recorded in both the muon detector and neutron monitor (the Spaceship Earth) networks and find significant enhancements of cosmic-ray anisotropy during geomagnetic storms. Following the analysis by Bieber and Evenson (1998) for the neutron monitor data at ~10 GeV, we also derive cosmic-ray density gradients from muon data at higher-energy (~50 GeV), possibly reflecting the larger-scale geometry of CMEs causing geomagnetic storms. We particularly find in some events the anisotropy enhancement clearly starting prior to the storm onset in both the muon and neutron data. This is the first result of the CME-geometry derived from simultaneous observations of the anisotropy with networks of multidirectional muon detectors and neutron monitors.

DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

Figure 1: The normalized count rates recorded in three vertical telescopes at Nagoya (black), Hobart (blue) and São Martinho (red) as functions of the day of year (DOY) on the horizontal axis over 4 days, including a large geomagnetic storm occurred in 11 (101 DOY) April 2001 (maximum Kp index is 8+). The onset of each SSC is indicated by the vertical line. The common decrease (~2 %) in these three directional channels is the manifestation of the Forbush decrease of the isotropic intensity. Clearly seen in this figure is the daily variation of counting rate superposed on the Forbush decrease and being enhanced following the SSC. It is also seen that the daily variations at Nagoya and São Martinho are almost out of phase to each other. This is a clear signature of the enhanced anisotropy of cosmic ray intensity.

Figure 2: The best-fit parameters derived from muon data (left) and Spaceship Earth NM data (right) for a period including a sample storm in Figure 1. Each panel from the top displays respectively the cosmic ray density, the north-south anisotropy, the component anisotropy in the ecliptic plane, the perpendicular gradients in the GSE x-y plane and y-z plane, as a function of the day of year in In the third panel, we plotted the anisotropy in a “ color-coded ” format. Each vertical stripe represents 1 hour of data, with lighter colors denoting a higher cosmic ray flux and darker colors denoting lower flux. Saturation occurs at +1.0 % (white) and – 1.0 % (black). Also shown by green circles in the second and third panels are respectively the GSE latitude and longitude of hourly mean IMF direction. Plotted in the bottom two panels is the effective gradient measured in units of the Larmor radius. Taking 50 GV as typical rigidity in the muon observation, the Larmor radius is 0.2 AU (5 nT field), and 1 % of in the panel corresponds to 5 %/AU.

Clearly seen in these figures is the cosmic ray anisotropy being enhanced after the onset of the SSC in both the muon and NM data. As in this example, we often observe the enhanced anisotropy corresponding to an increased flux of particles arriving from somewhere in the 0  -90  quadrant in GSE longitude. It is interesting to note that such enhancement can also be seen in the muon data between DOY, more than half a day prior to the SSC. The negative NS anisotropy corresponding to an excess flux from the south of the ecliptic plane is also enhanced around DOY in muon data (second panel of Figure 2a), while it is enhanced around DOY in NM data. During the second half of 101 DOY after the SSC, the gradients point anti- sunward, which indicate a cosmic ray depleted region approaching the earth. (Note that the negative of the gradient is displayed in the figure, so that the arroes point towards the region of depleted density.) The gradients then turn sunward at around DOY, again indicating the depleted region travels past the earth. The y-z component gradients in muon data also show a clear turning over from +z to -z direction at DOY, probably indicating that the depleted region traveled from the south to the north of the earth.

Figure 3: The best-fit parameters derived from a period including a storm in 27 (239 DOY) August, 2001 (maximum Kp index is 5-). Parameters are shown in the same manner as Figure 2. The strong enhancement is seen again in the anisotropy after the SSC. Most notable in this event is that the enhancement is also clearly seen about 5 hours prior to the SSC in the muon data (the second and third panels in Figure 3a). Though less prominent, close inspection of the third panel reveals that the precursor enhancement is also observed consistently in NM data. Another important feature of this event is that the y-z component gradients persistently point northward in both the muon and NM data, indicating a cosmic ray depleted region passed to the south of the earth.

SUMMARY We analyzed the cosmic ray anisotropy observed by both the prototype muon detector network and the Spaceship Earth neutron monitor network during periods including geomagnetic storms in Analyses of two sample periods including respectively large and minor storms reveal strong enhancements of the anisotropy during the storm. Of particular interest is that the enhancement is also seen up to half a day preceding the onset of the storm. The density gradients derived from the anisotropy illustrate interesting features of the cosmic ray depleted region in the CME approaching and traveling past the earth. This is the first result of the CME- geometry derived from simultaneous observations of the anisotropy with networks of multidirectional muon detectors and neutron monitors.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is supported in part by U.S. NSF grant ATM and in part by a Grant- in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan and by the joint research program of the Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University. The muon observations at Nagoya and Hobart have been carried out by Shinshu University and Nagoya University in Japan, the University of Tasmania and the Australian Antarctic Division in Australia, while the prototype muon detector at São Martinho has been operated under collaboration between Shinshu University and the Southern Regional Space Research Center of National Institute for Space Research in Brazil. Expansion of the São Martinho muon detector is being undertaken with support from the U.S. National Space Weather Program under grant ATM We thank N. F. Ness for providing ACE magnetic field data via the ACE Science Center.

REFERENCES Bieber, J. W., and P. Evenson, CME geometry in relation to cosmic ray anisotropy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, , Fujimoto, K., A. Inoue, K. Murakami et al., Coupling coefficients of cosmic ray daily variations for meson telescopes, Rep. 9, Cosmic Ray Res., Lab., Nagoya, Japan, Kawakami, S., K. Fujimoto, S. K. Gupta et al., The first outcome on the 3-D feature of forbush decrease events from large muon telescope of GRAPES III at Ooty, Proc. 27th Int. Cosmic-Ray Conf., 9, 3,473-3,476, Kawakami, S., private communication, Munakata, K., J. W. Bieber, S. Yasue et al., Precursors of geomagnetic storms observed by the muon detector network, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 27,457-27,468, Munakata, K., J. W. Bieber, T. Kuwabara et al., A prototype muon detector network covering a full range of cosmic ray pitch angles, Proc. 27th Int. Cosmic-Ray Conf., 9, 3,494- 3,497, Murakami, K., K. Nagashima, S. Sagisaka et al., Response functions for cosmic-ray muons at various depths underground, IL NUOVO CIMENTO, 2C, , address of J. W. Bieber

primary cosmic rays   e n p n p n n Upper atmosphere   Neutron Monitor Muon Detector

Estimation of count rates 1 次宇宙線 V N,S,E,W NE,NW,N2,S2 etc N3,S3 etc Response function Cut-off rigidity Zenith angle Azimuth angle Rigidity of primary cosmic rays Small telescope number (Murakami et al., 1979)

Spread of vertical telescope’s view

High latitude NM network

Loss-cone precursors Nagashima et al. [1992], Ruffolo [1999] Intensity deficit confined in a cone

Munakata et al. (JGR, 105, 27457, 2000)

Old network ( )

Lat.29 o, 26’S Lon.53 o, 48’W Alt.500m a.s.l. Sao Martinho muon observatory ( INPE/SSO, Brazil ) In operation since March 2001

New prototype network (2001~)

B× ∇ n streaming Center direction of CME (local geometry of CME ) Larmor radius IMF unit vector Cosmic ray density

3/193/223/27 Results

3/314/44/84/114/134/184/21

8/128/178/27