Function-Based Support: Selected Topics Rob Horner & George Sugai Universities of Oregon & Connecticut Center on PBIS www.PBIS.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functional Behavioral Assessment and Behavioral Intervention Plan
Advertisements

Behavior.
Conducting a Functional Behavioral Assessment
Positive Behavior Support
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports & Students with Autism Jointly developed by the above organizations with funding from the U.S.
Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support George Sugai US Dept. of Educ.Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education.
Using Data to Determine Intervention: Removing the Guesswork.
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Introduction to Behavior Function and FBA Adapted from - Kevin J. Filter, Ph.D. Minnesota State University George Sugai, Ph.D. - PBIS Center.
Behavioral Observation Data for Individual Intervention Decision Making George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
MU Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri Behavior Intervention Plans: Developing a Competing Pathway.
Building Function-based Behavior Support Plans
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Positive Behavior Support
Functional Behavior Assessment
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-Based Support George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Leading a Team from a Functional Behavioral Assessment to a Behavior Support Plan Rob Horner, Cindy Anderson and Anne Todd University of Oregon TA-Center.
Behavior Support Planning January 31, 2013 Karen O’Brien.
Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Building Tertiary Systems of Support Terry Bigby, Ed.D. Material adapted from Illinois PBIS & Tim Lewis, Ph.D., University of Missouri- Columbia.
Functional Assessment & Positive Behavior Support Plans
Introduction and Practice in Functional Behavior Assessment and Behavior Intervention Planning (FBA/BIP) From FBA to BIP Part 2.0.
George Sugai University of Connecticut
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Year One RI PBIS Team & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
Function-Based Behavior Support
Function-Based Behavior Support: Big Ideas George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on PBIS
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner, Ph.D. University of Oregon Families Educators Medical Professionals.
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports, 2008 December, 2008.
Functional Assessment SPED 3380 Chandler, L.K. & Dahlquist, C.M. (2002). Functional Assessment: Strategies to Prevent and Remediate Challenging Behavior.
Efficient and Effective Process for Completing FBA within a 3-tiered Continuum Teri Lewis-Palmer July 11, 2008.
BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University.
Bridging Primary & Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems: Responding to Unresponsive Behavior Brandi Simonsen & George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Leading a Team from a Functional Behavioral Assessment to a Behavior Support Plan Rob Horner and Anne Todd University of Oregon TA-Center on Positive Behavior.
Leading a Team from a Functional Behavioral Assessment to a Behavior Support Plan Rob Horner and Anne Todd University of Oregon TA-Center on Positive Behavior.
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS) “Introduction and Practice in Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA)” From FBA to BIP Two Day Series.
Understanding & Planning for Non- Responsive Behavior (Secondary/Tertiary Tier) George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Primer on Function-based Support: From Function to Plan George Sugai November Center on PBIS University of CT.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Follow-up Jon Dyson, Lavonne Nkomo, George Sugai Center on Disabilities University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral.
Developing Feasible and Effective Interventions based on Functional Behavioral Assessment Cindy Anderson and Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support George Sugai US Dept. of Educ.Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Summary of Function Based Behavioural Assessment Leading Behaviour Change Providing Behaviour Support to All Students.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice Gene Thompson, Martha Wally, Brandi Simonsen, George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Diverse Strategies for Diverse Needs: Classroom Management When One Size Does Not Fit All Students Flint Simonsen, Ph.D. Whitworth University.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Leading a Team from a Functional Behavioral Assessment to a Practical and Effective Behavior Support Plan Rob Horner University of Oregon TA-Center on.
Principles of Behavior Basic Overview for Tier 1 Monthly Coaches’ Meeting Module P DC Name and Date Here.
Identifying Function-Based Interventions
District Implementation of Effective Practices: Using an RTI model to Implement Functional Behavioral Assessment Rob Horner University of Oregon
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Multi-tiered Systems of Support & Bullying Behavior Phi Delta Kappan - UConn George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
Part 4: Function-Based Behavior Support Planning Sheldon Loman 1 Practical FBA.
Working with a Few Students at Tier III: Supporting the Individual Needs of Students with Chronic and Severe Behaviors within a SWPBS Framework Tim Lewis,
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features
Rob Horner, George Sugai and Celeste Dickey
Behavior Support Planning
George Sugai University of Connecticut
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
MN SW Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Overview of Individual Student Systems
Presentation transcript:

Function-Based Support: Selected Topics Rob Horner & George Sugai Universities of Oregon & Connecticut Center on PBIS

pbis.org

Quiz How many muscles in cat’s ear? –32 What is a “prompt that keeps things going?” –Behavioral momentum New Big Idea – Function matters

~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM of SWPBS Tertiary Prevention Wraparound School-based MH Function-based support Secondary Prevention Check in/out First Steps Targeted SS Group Primary Prevention SWPBS General social skills Character education Audit 1.Identify existing efforts by tier 2.Specify outcome for each effort 3.Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness 4.Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes 5.Establish decision rules (RtI)

Outcomes Function based support Function Levels of function based support Response class & routines Function & behavior intervention & support plans

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making 4 PBS Elements

Function Based Support? PROCESS emphasizing…. Behavioral theory, applied behavior analysis, & positive behavior support Environmental context Function of behavior Teaching effective, efficient, & relevant behaviors Behavior of implementers

Function-based Support Problem Behavior Functional Assessment Intervention & Support Plan Fidelity of Implementation Impact on Behavior & Lifestyle *Response class *Routine analysis *Hypothesis statement *Alternative behaviors *Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit *Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes *Evidence-based interventions *Implementation support *Data plan *Continuous improvement *Sustainability plan Team-based Behavior competence

Functional approach logic Behaviors are maintained by consequence events (function) –Positive or negative reinforcement Behaviors are occasioned by antecedent events –Relate antecedent to emission of behavior & likelihood of consequence event Changing behaviors requires consideration of maintaining consequences

What is FBA? A systematic process for developing statements about factors that –contribute to occurrence & maintenance of problem behavior, & –more importantly, serve as basis for developing proactive & comprehensive behavior support plans.

Only 2 Basic Functions Pos Reinf Neg Reinf Existing aversive condition identified

Ingram, Lewis-Palmer, & Sugai, 2005

FBA LEVELS 1.Informal  Archival Review  Problem Solving Meeting 2. Indirect  Checklist  FA Interview  Routine Analysis 3. Direct Observation  A-B-C  Structured, Planned Observation 4. Planned Manipulation  Experimental or Functional Analysis INFORMAL EASIER SIMPLE RESPONSIVE INDIRECT DIRECT NOT RESPONSIVE COMPLICATED HARDER FORMAL

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior & Response Class Testable Hypothesis “Basic Unit” “Best guess” about behavior & conditions under which it is observed Represents basic working unit of FBA Directly guides development of BIP

Consider response class Set of topographically different behaviors with similar or related purpose or function –Hit, spit, runaway, yell… Escape difficult task request –Cry, hit, whine, raise hand, spit….. Obtain adult attention

Functional Assessment Checklist for Teachers “FACTS” STEP 1: Student/ Grade: _____Clarence/5th grade_____Date: ____January 11___________ Interviewer: ___________Sugai________Respondent(s): ____Thomas_____ STEP 2: Student Profile: Please identify at least three strengths or contributions the student brings to school. C. has leadership potential. Peers listened to him, and he can be very convincing and sincere. He’s academically competent and seems to be moving smoothly and successfully through the school curriculum. STEP 3: Problem Behavior(s): Identify problem behaviors ___Tardy_X Fight/physical Aggression ___ Disruptive___ Theft___ UnresponsiveX Inappropriate Language_X__ Insubordination___ Vandalism___ Withdrawn_X__ Verbal Harassment____Work not done___ Other __________ ____X _ Verbally Inappropriate___ Self-injury Describe problem behavior:C. may have one of the shortest fuses I’ve seen. One little tease by a peer, and he quickly and predictably escalates through a behavioral sequence that begins with passive in subordination (non response), moves to a mild protest, shifts to harassment and name calling, increases to property damage and even to physical aggression. Its interesting that he seems to “enjoy” the reactions he gets from peers that he aggresses toward, and from peers who look up to him for his aggressiveness.

STEP 4: Routine Analysis Schedule (Times) ActivityLikelihood of Problem BehaviorSpecific Problem Behavior 8:00Waiting to enter building Low High See escalation described above 8:15Advisory & Planning Mostly teasing and touching property of others. Doesn’t escalate much further 9:15Language Arts Occasional name calling/teasing 10:15Recess See escalation described above 11:30Math Occasional teasing 12:00Lunch See escalation described above 12:35Earth Science Minor verbal harassment 1:15Art or Phy Ed See escalation described above 2:00Reading Rarely a problem 2:50Waiting for bus See escalation described above

Fundamental Rule! “You should not propose to reduce a problem behavior without also identifying alternative, desired behaviors person should perform instead of problem behavior” (O’Neill et al., 1997, p. 71).

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior Desired Alternative Acceptable Alternative Typical Consequence Summary Statement

Neutralize/ eliminate setting events Add relevant & remove irrelevant triggers Teach alternative that is more efficient Add effective & & remove ineffective reinforcers

When has FBA been done? 1.Clear & measurable definition of problem behaviors. 2.Complete testable hypothesis or summary statement is provided. Statement of function (purpose) of behavior 3.Data (direct observation) to confirm testable hypothesis. 4.Behavior intervention plan based on testable hypothesis Contextually appropriate supports for accurate implementation

FBA Elements Contextually Appropriate Support Testable Hypothesis Function Statement Competing Path Analysis Supporting Data Behavior Intervention Plan Definition of Problem Behavior or Class

On Mondays and/or when up all of the night before. Daily nongraded quiz on previous night’s homework Verbal protests, slump in chair, walks out of room. Avoids doing quiz & homework discussion. Do quiz without complaints. Discussion about answers & homework. Turn in with name & sit quietly w/o interrupting. + Give time to review homework. + Give quiet time before starting. + Give easy “warm- up” task before doing quiz. + Precorrect behavior options & consequences. + With first sign of problem behaviors, remove task, or request completion of task next period. + Remove task based on step in task analysis (STO). + Provide effective verbal praise & other reinforcers. Teach options to problem behavior: 1. Turn in blank 2. Turn in w/ name 3. Turn in w/ name & first item done. 4. Turn in w/ name & 50% of items done.

6 FBA Misrules 1.Only one way to conduct FBA…. –FA process & elements basically same –Vary by Intensity Agreement Responsiveness NO

2.Must do everything every time…. Base FBA activity on Understood Confirmed (data) Responsiveness NO

3.Everyone has to know how to do a full FBA…. Small number people must have high fluency All people must know process & what to expect Some individuals must work on systems sustainability NO

4.FBA is it….. One component of comprehensive plan of behavior support Academic, family, medical, vocational, mental health, etc. NO

5.FBA is only for students with disabilities… Process for undersanding behavior of all individuals across multiple settings NO

6. “Power,” “authority,” “control,” etc. are functions…. 2 research validated functions Positive & Negative Reinforcement NO

Behavior Support Elements Problem Behavior Functional Assessment Intervention & Support Plan Fidelity of Implementation Impact on Behavior & Lifestyle *Response class *Routine analysis *Hypothesis statement *Alternative behaviors *Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit *Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes *Evidence-based interventions *Implementation support *Data plan *Continuous improvement *Sustainability plan Team-based Behavior competence