Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 1  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extraction of G E n at Q 2 =1 (GeV/c) 2 by Measurements of May 1, 2011 Ge Jin University of Virginia.
Advertisements

PR : Precision Measurements and Studies of a Possible Nuclear Dependence of R = L / T Simona Malace - contact (JLab) Eric Christy (Hampton U.),
Experimental Status of Deuteron F L Structure Function and Extractions of the Deuteron and Non-Singlet Moments Ibrahim H. Albayrak Hampton University.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuterium and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li November 3, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
Quark-Hadron Duality Cynthia Keppel Hampton University / Jefferson Lab.
NUFACT06, Irvine, CA August 25, 2006 S. Manly, University of Rochester1 Recent Electron Scattering Results from Jefferson Laboratory S. Manly University.
BONUS (Barely Off-Shell Nucleon Structure) Experiment Update Thia Keppel CTEQ Meeting November 2007.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hall C Users Meeting January 23, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Experiment Setup  HMS Detectors  Calibrations.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Experimental Approach to Nuclear Quark Distributions (Rolf Ent – EIC /15/04) One of two tag-team presentations to show why an EIC is optimal to access.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 10 th, 2012.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
Motivation. Why study ground state hyperon electroproduction? CLAS detector and analysis. Analysis results. Current status and future work. M. Gabrielyan.
The inсlusive produсtion of the meson resonanсes ρ 0 (770), K * (892), f 0 (980), f 2 (1270) in neutrino- nuсleon interaсtions Polyarush A. Yu. INR RAC.
Exclusive π 0 electroproduction in the resonance region. Nikolay Markov, Maurizio Ungaro, Kyungseon Joo University of Connecticut Hadron spectroscopy meeting.
Precision Measurement of R L and R T of Quasi-Elastic Electron Scattering In the Momentum Transfer Range 0.55GeV/c≤|q|≤1.0GeV/c* Yan Xinhu Department of.
Duality: Recent and Future Results Ioana Niculescu James Madison University Hall C “Summer” Workshop.
Measurements of R and the Longitudinal and Transverse Structure Functions in the Nucleon Resonance Region and Quark-Hadron Duality Rolf Ent, DIS2004 -Formalism:
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
G E p -2γ experiment and the new JLab Hall-C Focal Plane Polarimeter Mehdi Meziane The College of William & Mary - APS Meeting April 14, On behalf.
Jump to first page Quark-Hadron Duality Science Driving the 12 GeV Upgrade Cynthia Keppel for Jefferson Lab PAC 23.
A Measurement of Two-Photon Exchange in Unpolarized Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering John Arrington and James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne.
Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.
Total photoabsorption on quasi free nucleons at 600 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, A.Ignatov, A.Lapik, A.Mushkarenkov, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL collaboratiion.
Beijing, Sept 2nd 2004 Rachele Di Salvo Beam asymmetry in meson photoproduction on deuteron targets at GRAAL MENU2004 Meson-Nucleon Physics and the Structure.
The BoNuS Experiment at Jefferson Lab’s CLAS. Svyatoslav Tkachenko University of South Carolina for the CLAS collaboration.
The inсlusive produсtion of the meson resonanсes ρ 0 (770), K * (892), f 0 (980), f 2 (1270) in neutrino- nuсleon сharged сurrent (CC) interaсtions Polyarush.
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
Model independent extraction of neutron structure functions from deuterium data. Svyatoslav Tkachenko University of South Carolina.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Search for the  + in photoproduction experiments at CLAS APS spring meeting (Dallas) April 22, 2006 Ken Hicks (Ohio University) for the CLAS Collaboration.
Measurement of Flavor Separated Quark Polarizations at HERMES Polina Kravchenko (DESY) for the collaboration  Motivation of this work  HERMES experiment.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
Nilanga Liyanage University of Virginia For Jefferson Lab Hall A, CLAS and RSS Collaborations.
L/T separation in the 3 He(e,e’p) reaction at parallel kinematics Freija Descamps Supervisors: Ron Gilman Eric Voutier Co-supervisor: Jean Mougey.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jan 29, JLab.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Spin Structure of the neutron (3He) in the resonance region Patricia Solvignon Temple University, Philadelphia For the JLAB Hall A and E Collaborations.
Ibrahim H. Albayrak, Hampton University Group Meeting Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 13 th, 2013 E97-110:
Simultaneous photo-production measurement of the  and  mesons on the nucleons at the range 680 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation 
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Vahe Mamyan, Hall-C collaboration meeting, January Data Analysis of F2 and R in Deuterium and Nuclei  Physics  Experiment Setup  HMS Detectors.
BONuS experiment. Svyatoslav Tkachenko University of Virginia for the CLAS collaboration.
Hall A Collaboration Meeting Slide 0 Measurements of Target Single-Spin Asymmetries in QE 3 He ↑ (e, e’) Update of QE A y (E05-015) experiment.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
Probing Quark – Gluon correlations in the neutron Precision measurements of d2n and g2n Brad Sawatzky for the E Collaboration.
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
Photoproduction of vector mesons off nuclei with the GlueX detector
PHENIX measurement on direct photon production
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Duality in Pion Electroproduction (E00-108) …
Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011
The np -> d p0 reaction measured with g11 data
Proposal for an Experiment: Photoproduction of Neutral Kaons on Deuterium Spokespersons: D. M. Manley (Kent State University) W. J. Briscoe (The George.
GEp-2γ experiment (E04-019) UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 1  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation  L/T Separations Ibrahim H. Albayrak Hampton University

2  ROSEN07 (E06-009) is the second phase of the experiment JAN05(E04-001) with higher Q 2 data.  ROSEN07 is combination of two experiments:  Measurement ofR =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.(I.Albayrak)  Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.(I.Albayrak)  Measurement ofR =  L /  T on Nuclear targets in the Nucleon Resonance Region.(Vahe Mamyan)  Measurement of R =  L /  T on Nuclear targets in the Nucleon Resonance Region.(Vahe Mamyan)  JAN05 is combination of two experiments:  Measurement ofR =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.(Ya Li)  Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.(Ya Li)  Measurement ofR =  L /  T on Nuclear targets in the Nucleon Resonance Region.(Ya Li)  Measurement of R =  L /  T on Nuclear targets in the Nucleon Resonance Region.(Ya Li) ROSEN07 and JAN05 experiments

F L, F 1, F 2 and R fundamental Structure Function Measurements on Deuterium. - These structure functions provide us important information about internal structure of nucleon, i. e. distribution of quarks and gluons inside the nucleus. Since these are fundamental measurements, they allow a variety of physics issues to be addressed, such as: – Structure Function Moments Lattice QCD comparisons Singlet and non-singlet distribution functions – Quark-hadron duality studies – Neutron form factors. – Support Broad Range of Deuteron Physics Spin structure functions BONUS (BOund NUcleon Structure) neutron structure functions - Hall B experiment for NEUTRON cross sections via spectator tagging. 3 Physics Physics Motivation

Structure functions (F1 and F2) which have the Information of the nucleon’s internal structure. Physics of Interest (Nucleon Structure) Calculable in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) { Physics Structure Functions: F1, F2, FL 4

Where:  = flux of transversely polarized virtual photons  = relative longitudinal flux Rosenbluth Separation Technique: Physics 5 longitudinalTransverse

The non-singlet moments can only be determined from differences of proton and neutron moments. The non-singlet moments can only be determined from differences of proton and neutron moments. Assuming a charge-symmetric sea, n-p isolates the non-singlet Assuming a charge-symmetric sea, n-p isolates the non-singlet WhereWhere Need to pin down non-singlet (n-p) to extract singlet. Need to pin down non-singlet (n-p) to extract singlet. M d – 2M p = ∫ x n-2 (F d ∙ f – 2F p )dx yields non-singlet distribution 6 Physics Moments of the Structure Functions Moments Calculated on the lattice at Q 2 = 4 GeV 2 M n (Q 2 ) = ∫dx x n-2 F(x,Q 2 )

JAN05 ROSEN07 New data with higher Q 2 And new epsilon points for LT separation Physics ROSEN07 experiment is the second phase of this experiment, the first phase was JAN05 experiment… Purely New data with high Q 2 above 3 GeV 7

Current Status and Update  Detector Calibrations  Kinematic Corrections  Dead Times  Efficiencies  Background Estimation and Subtraction:  Target Density Correction  Acceptance Corrections  Bin-centering corrections  Radiative corrections  Iteration Procedure  Systematic Uncertainties  Extracting Differential Cross Sections  Doing Rosenbluth L/T Separation  Moment extraction  N-p analysis 8 Experiment & Data analysis

Data to Monte Carlo simulation comparisons… Experiment & Data analysis 9

Drift Chamber Positions Offsets Checked optics elements, magnets fields, matrix elements and no difference found from previous data. Significantly different from previous data!!! Could it be because of DC offsets? 10

Drift Chamber Positions Offsets X direction Experiment & Data analysis Without X pos offset Peak gets wider with any x offset Must be Straight. Gets tilted with any x offset No DC offset in X (vertical) direction! For drift chamber position offset study I studied the width of the Elastic peak and Xptar. The narrowest the peak the best the position. XpTar plots should not be correlated with DC positioning. With X pos offset 11

Drift Chamber Positions Offsets Y Direction Experiment & Data analysis Ytar plot for Carbon target should be narrowest with correct positions Peak gets narrower Slope of the valley gives the best Y offset! With Y pos offset 12 Without Y pos offset There is about 0.45 mm relative offset (distance) between the DCs

Offsets for Drift Chamber Positions Experiment & Data analysis Before After After correction y pos gets narrow, which indicates that we are doing the right thing. After putting the relative offset 0.45 mm for Y position we get better comparison! 13

Target Position Study (Again) Experiment & Data analysis After getting correct position information for Drift Chambers, Target position study needed to be redone. C D Al Fe Cu Del X (cm) Del Z (cm) 14

Experiment & Data analysis Two simulation runs compared with and without radiative corrections to get the radiative effect on peak position. Elastic Study (Kinematic Corrections) And correct elastic peak position calculated after subtracting the radiative effect. 15

Experiment & Data analysis There is not enough data to do a precise kinematic offset study! Elastic Study (Kinematic Corrections) Two Photon experiment has enough number of elastic H data. They could provide more precise results. 16 A possible 0.3 mrad Theta offset. On average it gives better results. All this data is consistent with very small (> ) E and E’ offsets

Experiment & Data analysis Monte Carlo ratio method is used to extract data cross sections: We can simulate Monte Carlo data using a cross section model to obtain Y MC (E',q) = L*  mod *(  E  W)*A MC (E',q) Taking ratio to data and assuming that A MC = A, yields  d  /dWdE' =  mod * (Y(E',q)/Y MC (E',q)) (MC ratio method) Cross Sections Extraction Method 17 Peter Bosted’s model used as input model. And this data has helped in the development of this model.

Experiment & Data analysis Cross Sections (preliminary) 18

And L/T Separations… 19 Experiment & Data analysis Here is some almost final rosenbluth separation plots for 2 different W2,Q2 pairs Advantage of this method: Systematic errors cancel.

And L/T Separations… Plots of R,first one have Q2 range second one Q2 range for Carbon. 20 Experiment & Data analysis

Summary Calibrations are done. Charge symmetric background subtraction, radiative corrections and other corrections are mostly done. Some L/T separations have already been done (Vahe). Continue data analysis L/T separations Moment extractions n-p analysis 21 Experiment & Data analysis