Agenda 1. ISEF Award Winners 2. Improving Science Fair Projects 3. Follow-up Study of the ISEF Finalists.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

The Presenting Sponsor of Science Buddies is Seagate Technology.
FUTURE ENGINEERING FACULTY & PROFESSIONALS BE A COMPETITIVE CANDIDATE: ENGINEERING PROFESSORSHIP AT AN INSTITUTION FOCUSED ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION AND.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
Stacy A. Rudnicki, M.D. Brendan C. Stack, Jr., M.D., FACS, FACE.
Intel ISEF Educator Academy Intel ® Education Programs 2013 Intel ISEF Educator Academy Phoenix, Arizona Amanda Alonzo Science Teacher and STEM Research.
Powder Changes of Theoretical and Experimental Pharmacology Teaching in Xi’an Zang Wei-jin Department of Pharmacology School of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong.
Sue Couling The Department of Chemistry. The University awards Departmental key targets Implementation and Benefits The Department of Chemistry.
Education in the United States
Judging Orientation 58 th Annual DRSEF. Agenda 1) Organization 2) Scoring 3) Conduct.
Addressing the Challenges of Graduate and Post-graduate Training in the Geosciences Margaret Leinen Assistant Director for Geosciences National Science.
Applying to Ph.D. programs CBS Proseminar Topic Fall 2005.
Education and Culture LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FORMER GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION José Gutierrez Erasmus+ : Higher.
Who We Are Founded in 1919, the Institute of International Education (IIE) is a private nonprofit leader in the international exchange of people and ideas.
Student Activities Centralized Training Session 4 Post High.
Three Steps to Systemic Improvement in Science Education & Increased School Participation in Science Fairs Shop Talk May 13, 2009.
Feinberg School of Medicine Faculty Promotion and Tenure Program June 2015.
International Collaboration on Graduate Education: Experience and Best Practices Dr. Liu Jinghui Secretary-General CHINA SCHOLARSHIP COUNCIL Chengdu, August.
1. Youth Aspirations and Sense of Place in a Changing Rural Economy: The Coos Youth Study Presented by: Nena Stracuzzi, Ph.D. Carsey Institute University.
National Science Centre An Important Component of Research Funding in Poland RECFA visit to Poland, Krakow 2012 Andrzej Jajszczyk.
Action Plan Template Educator Academy May 2011 PERU.
Preparing a Successful Graduate Student Award Application Karen Beattie, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dept. of Medicine McMaster University
Undergraduate Research Experiences in Microbiology and Developmental Entomology Patricia Baynham and Lisa Goering-Ortiz, Department of Biological Sciences.
Mentored Clinical Research Training Program (MCRTP) Frederick J. Meyers, MD – PI Gregg Servis – Program Manager Glynis Butler-Stone - Program Rep.
Outline  Case study  Significance of study  Need of career guidance in under-developed countries  Process  Overview of Career Guidance Model  Innovative.
Women in science: the role of gender equality machinery Indrė Mackevičiūtė Office of the Equal Opportunities Ombudsperson.
ISCB-SC - Saraswathi.S Saraswathi S PhD Student Iowa State University Ames, Iowa, USA Chairperson: ISCB-SC-RSG.
Teaching Scientific Research Skills in an Elective Curriculum: Obstacles, Opportunities and Outcome Ingrid Bahner PhD Co-Leader of the Biomedical Research.
Goals and objectives Goal: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Bolashak program. Main objectives: 1. Analytical review of the scholarship’s legal base.
HIGHER EDUCATION OF WOMEN IN ISLAMIC COUNTRIES: EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN IN THE NEW ERA OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY T. Mahrouzadeh Consultant, Ministry of Science,
Thinking as a Scientist Thinks from “BSCS Biology: A Human Approach”, 2 nd ed July 2013 Sherry Herron.
RESEARCH EDUCATION OUTCOME AND CAPABILITIES Results of groupwork, point 5 on the agenda.
Action Plan Intel ISEF 2008 Educator Academy May 2008 Sri Lanka.
Staff Development Approaches at The University of Georgia: Philosophy, Models, and Financial Support University of Georgia Institute of Higher Education.
TRACY VARGO-GOGOLA, PH.D. DEPARTMENT OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE-SOUTH BEND DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES.
Navigating A College Fair How to Make the Most of the College Fair.
Intel Confidential 11 Action Plan Intel ISEF Educator Academy May 2014 Kenya.
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
4/6/20061 Are Sociologists Different? Findings from Social Science PhDs- 5+ Year Out: A National Study of PhDs in Six Social Science Fields Panel: Satisfaction.
Case Study IBEC conference, India 2009 Elsa-Sofia Morote, Ed.D. and Juana Roman Dowling College.
Presentation Istanbul – The Turkish Mathematical Society (TMD) was founded in It was the only professional institution representing and.
Action Plan Guidelines
Asia Science Educator Academy (ASEA) 2010 ACTION PLAN Vietnam.
Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy 1 Intel Confidential 11 Action Plan Intel ISEF 2013 Educator Academy May 2013 Lebanon.
ACTION PLAN EGYPT ISEF 2010 Updated 27-Oct OVERVIEW Science Fairs Local Science fairs Local SFNational SFUpdates 102Old Plan 123 Agreed with MOE.
LYNBROOK HIGH SCHOOL Creating a Culture of Research Amanda Alonzo, Teacher and STEM Research Coordinator.
Action Plan Template Intel ISEF 2011 Educator Academy May 2011 Palestine.
NSF STEM Scholarship Program. Outline NSF-STEM program information – One submission per year – Mission – Regulations What we learned last time – Strengths.
Intel ISEF Educator Academy 2009 Taiwan. 2 Taiwan Area:36,000,000 km 2 Population:23,000,000.
Applying to Ph.D. programs CBS Proseminar Topic Fall 2011.
Intel ISEF Educator Academy 2009 Taiwan. 2 Taiwan Area:36,000,000 km 2 Population:23,000,000.
Dr Alicja Adamczak President of the Patent Office of the Republic of Poland 13 October 2015 Women and IP Fostering Women’s Innovativeness and Entrepreneurship.
Research Funding Opportunity & Scientific Capacity Building in Developing Countries By Dina R. Andersson 1.
ACTION PLAN EGYPT ISEF OVERVIEW Science Fairs Local Science fairs.
Action Plan 2011 Educator Academy INDONESIA. Intel ISEF 2011 – Educator Academy 2 Intel Confidential 22 Action Plan 2011 Intel ISEF - Educator Academy.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
What do I do NOW?. How do I decide what I am going to do?  Education:  How much do I want? How much do I need?  Interests:  What kinds of careers.
The Robot Competition: A Project-Based Learning Approach for Enhancing STEM Education Yi-Ching (Sophia) Chen Doctoral candidate Department of Technology.
What are sponsors looking for in research fellows? Melissa Bateson Professor of Ethology, Institute of Neuroscience Junior Fellowships.
INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FAIR Ho Chin Minh City, Vietnam, March 6, 2008.
Physics Faculty, Kabul University
Policy Guidelines on Awards and Recognition for the K to 12 Basic Education Program DepEd Order No. 36 , s
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
Academic Promotion of HE Teaching Personnel : China
Feinberg School of Medicine Faculty Promotion and Tenure Program
The research student journey – PRES 2015
Department of Medicine Michael Farkouh, Vice-Chair Research michael
How to Be Ready for a Successful STEM Career
Zonta International Women in Technology Scholarship
Standard 10 Research(**) البحث العلمي )**(.
Presentation transcript:

Agenda 1. ISEF Award Winners 2. Improving Science Fair Projects 3. Follow-up Study of the ISEF Finalists

Taiwan’s Experience ISEF Award Winners

ISEF Award Winners of Taiwan (1) YearFinalistsWinners Intel Young Scientists Best of Category Awards Grand Awards Special Awards Total SARS, NO PARTICIPATION T= Since 1997, every year 3 top finalists are selected from more than 1500 finalists to receive the Intel Young Scientists Award. In 2008, Yi-Han Su from Taiwan received the Young Scientist Award (only 6 overseas finalists had been awarded since 1997)

ISEF Winners of Taiwan 1982 – 2008 (2) 51% (81/160) projects from Taiwan won Grand Awards at ISEF Statistics showed that 25%~30% projects won Grand Awards at ISEF

Taiwan’s Experience mproving Improving Science Fair Projects

Support Systems : Universities & Research Institutions Provide laboratory equipments & resources Young Scientists Experimental & Mentorship Program to educate high school students doing science research

Support Systems: Government Initiatives National Taiwan Science Education Center Promote Science Education I. National Primary & High School Science Fair II. Taiwan International Science Fair III. Select finalists to ISEF IV. High School Science Research Program V. Science Project Workshops for students & teachers VI. Build Mentors & Finalists Alumni database

I. National Primary & High School Science Fair (NPHSSF) Established in 1960 School fairs →Regional fairs→NPHSSF Judging divided into 4 groups: Grade 4-6 (Elementary schools) Grade 7-9 (Junior high schools) Grade (Senior high schools) Grade (Vocational schools) Grand awards and special awards given to winners

II. Taiwan International Science Fair Established in 2002 Encourage science research, promote academic & cultural exchange Grade 9-12 students 10 to 18 participating countries Experienced Judges Committee: select outstanding Taiwan projects for international science fairs, e.g. Intel ISEF, CWSF, ESI, HKJSSE, NZ etc.

III. High School Science Research Program Initiated in 1995 Grade 10 & 11 students 40 projects are selected each year Arrange students to work with mentors & subsidize research funding Upon completion, students must submit research projects to Taiwan International Science Fair

IV. Science Research Workshops For students & teachers Educate students about science research Lectures on how to prepare projects for science fairs Share science fair experience

Support Systems: Government Policy The Ministry of Education implement University Admission & Scholarship Policy Guaranteed university admissions for ISEF Grand award winners & Recommended university admissions for non-winners Scholarships for ISEF First grand award winners to attend prestige overseas universities

Support Systems: Foundations & Corporations Intel KT Lee Foundation for Science & Technology TDK Taiwan Corporation GFC Corporation “We hope to inspire more foundations and corporations to sponsor for science fair” -Prime Minister Liu-

Prior to ISEF Training workshop - Experienced mentors & former finalists instruct students to present science fair projects as well as talk with judges - Practice makes Perfect

Taiwan’s Experience Talented Young Scientists: A Follow-up Study of the International Science & Engineering Fair Finalists from Taiwan Fung, K.C. (2006). Proceedings of the 9th Asia-Pacific Conference on Giftedness,

Research Questions To what extent does the ISEF identify young scientists of Taiwan? Are there any discernible patterns, such as family background, educational experience, and career path among Taiwan ISEF winners and non-winners? What impacts have the ISEF experience had on these Taiwan ISEF finalists?

Methods Questionnaire surveys (40-item) ● 91 Taiwan-ISEF finalists from ● 79 finalists were tracked down ● 77 finalists: 54 winners (100%) and 23 non- winners (92%) returned the completed questionnaire Interviews 12 winners and 6 non-winners selected from different gender, age, academic & career groups, were interviewed

Female Summary of Research Findings

Parents Winners vs. Non-winners StatusWinners (N=54) Non-winners (N=23) Father: University graduates 68%65% Mother: University graduates 55%52% Father: Teacher28%4% Mother: Teacher37%22% Educated parents & high percentage of parents are teachers

Employment & Educational Status Winners vs. Non-winners Status Winners (N=54) Non-winners (N=23) Employed26%22% Graduate School: Research Track 11%13% Graduate School: Applied Fields 9%13% Undergraduate43%35% Senior High School4% Military Duty7%13% Total100% 100% W vs. 86% NW choose science, engineering & medicine as major field of study

Educational Attainments Winners vs. Non-winners Status Winners (N=54) Non-winners (N=23) Total PhD30%13%19 MS13%26%13 BS37%26%26 MD17%22%14 JC0%9%2 Senior high School4% 3 Total100% 77 79% W vs. 71% NW attended graduate school 55% W vs. 29% NW completed or completing doctoral degree

Career Winners vs. Non-winners Status Winners (N=14) Non-winners (N=5) Assistant Professor20 Research Scientist10 Postdoctoral Fellow30 Engineers/Technician43 Medical Doctor21 Research Assistant10 Other1(math teacher)1(salesman) 7 out of 14 W selected careers in academia, none for NW

Publications Winners vs. Non-winners Age GroupWinnersNon-winners ; N=2 (2.5/person) ; N=7 (1.4/person) 5; N=3 (1.7/person) ; N=11 (10.8/person) 0 Total134; N=20 (6.7/person) 5; N=3 (1.7/person)

Scholastic Honors & Achievement 2 winners (1 assistant professor & 1 postdoctoral research fellow) were named SLOAN Research Fellows 3 winners & 1 non-winner have registered patents

Motivations for conducting research Winners vs. Non-winners MotivationsWinners (N=54) Non-winners (N=23) Interest 80%52% Curiosity 63%39% Encouragement of teachers 35%52% Prestige 22%48% Parental support 20%22%

Positive Impact Winners vs. Non-winners (1) Positive ImpactWinners (N=54) Non-winners (N=23) Realization of potential and confirmation of abilities 74%65% Learned scientific methods 72%52% Increased ability to conduct research 63%39%

Positive Impact Winners vs. Non-winners (2) Positive ImpactWinners (N=54) Non-winners (N=23) Widened horizons & met bright peers 57%65% Developed experimental skills 46%39% Pursued science career 44%17% Facilitated university admissions 24%17%

Negative Impact Winners vs. Non-winners Negative ImpactWinners (N=54) Non-winners (N=23) Unable to catch up with schoolwork 59%52% Burned-out 35%43% Too much pressure 33%35% Losing friends 15%17%

Results All former winners have remained in science, engineering, and medical disciplines, either working as research scientists, physicians, engineers, or PhD/MS/BS candidates with science majors. Winners out-numbered the percentage of non- winners in attending graduate programs, pursuing doctoral degrees, selecting careers in academia, and publishing research papers. Taiwan ISEF finalists portray certain personality traits, such as passion for science, curiosity and persistence in tackling challenging problems. (Refer to original paper for results of Interviews)

Conclusion (1) 1. Taiwan ISEF winners are remarkable than non-winners in terms of Educational attainments Career path Scholastic honors 2. ISEF identify young scientists of Taiwan successfully 3. Winning at ISEF helps build up more confidence in abilities, especially in pursuing science as careers

Conclusion (2) 4. No loser in science fair competition Managed time for research & developed discipline Presented research studies to distinguished scientists and experts Met bright peers, shared ideas & widened horizons Learned from setbacks and obstacles Research skills acquired could be applied in future studies or later in careers

Discussion 1. Does the ISEF process simply identify outstanding students who will be successful when engaged in science study, or 2. Is there something about the ISEF process that develops their potential and makes it possible for them to succeed in science? My tentative answer (based on a limited pool): Winning at ISEF DID provide winners with much more confidence in their abilities. It also assisted them to evaluate their potential and to set higher goals.

THANK YOU! Your feedback is highly appreciated ! Marianna K.C. Fung