1 [insert briefing type here] [insert program name here] for [insert name and organization of person(s) to be briefed here] [insert “month day, year” of brief here] Briefed by: [insert briefer’s name here] [insert briefer’s organization code here] [insert briefer’s phone number here] [Insert briefer’s address here] Insert program logo in this area Distribution Statement

Program logo here 2 Key Stakeholders NameOrganization APM MDA DT Coordinator COMOPTEVFOR (OTD) COMOPTEVFOR (OTC) CNO (N912) CNO (N-sponsor) JITC DOT&E (if required) Others (as required) -PMW, SYSCOMS, Service

Program logo here 3 Purpose of Briefing

Program logo here 4 Briefing Outline

Program logo here 5 Program Overview ACAT Program Phase Milestone or Decision that this phase of test will support Mission Inventory Objective (quantities)

Program logo here 6 ADM Exit Criteria and Action Item Status R Required at this time, but not completed G Completed YIn progress & on schedule

Program logo here 7 Concept/Requirement

Program logo here 8 System Overview Component/System Description

Program logo here 9 System Overview Capability Enabler

Program logo here 10 Deployed/ Mobile Units BASE IMA FISC Pier Connections CLINIC TRNG CEN HQ TELEPORT/STEP Long Haul (DISN & Commercial ) TRAINING CENTER USN/USMC LOGISTIC BASE NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE NOC BASE MC AIR STATION End-to-End Connectivity NMCI at the Pier Development Strategy End-to-End Capability

Program logo here 11 Program Overview Accomplishments/History

Program logo here 12 Program Overview Previous Guidance (if Required)

Program logo here 13 Acquisition Coordination Team (ACT) The following (Program Name) ACT members have been briefed on the program status and concur with the fielding of (Program Name).

Program logo here 14 Program Information and Documentation Status R Required at this time, but does not exist B Requires development or updating w/in 12 months O Required at this time and under development/update G Current, with all required approvals Y In approval cycle. Expected Date in Comments NR Not required. Rationale in Comments

Program logo here 15 [insert program name] Program Overview Chart DATE OF REPORT: MM/DD/YYYY PM / SponsorCostSchedulePerformance Programmatic Compliance Logistics Contract Execution Contact Info here Description: Program Start Date: MM / YY [Insert program description here] Joint or International: [Insert joint or International details] Key Performance Parameters KPPObjectiveThresholdDemo OP Avail S/W Reliability 200 hrs 200 hrs 1000 hrs S/W Mean 5 sec 5 sec 3.2 sec xxxx x x x Acquisition Objectives Quantity650 IOC12 / 99 Target Price (unit)$Various $M (FY XX)$ Contractor Data ContractorLitton DSD Value / Type$NA / GSA Start / CompleteAPR97 / APR03 ContractorXXX Value / Type$XX / XXX Start / CompleteXXX / XXX Cost Data ($ in M)* CostObjectiveThresholdCurrent Est. R&D Proc O&S xxxx x x x * Values from last approved APB (IT) ACAT Level: MDA: Budget Source: Overall Volatility Contract Execution Ratings: G= CPI/SPI.95 or > Y= CPI/SPI R = CPI/SPI <.85 OSD T&E Oversight: Y/N

Program logo here 16 Affordability by Increment Notes 1. FY05 includes 11 LRIP systems and 27 Increment II Upgrade Kits which are on CODE B hold pending FRP 2. Target Inventory Objective of 110 systems * Current procurement and install schedule includes 96 ships and 4 shore sites * Remaining 10 systems planned for FY09 not shown in table, Program direction expects INC III installation to begin and INC II to end in FY09

Program logo here 17 SPAWAR 01-6 Cost Risk * Confidence Index based on weighted averages

Program logo here 18 Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV)

Program logo here 19 Analysis of Alternatives KPPALT 1ALT 2ALT 3ALT 4 KPP 1 KPP 2 KPP 3 KPP 4 LCC ($TYM) Then Year Millions $$$$

Program logo here 20 Source Documents: –Typical source documents that effect strategy are ICD/CDD/CPD, AoA, etc. Approach: Single Step or Evolutionary –Each increment requires a MS C and if development a MS B. These could be supported by one CDD containing all capabilities and multiple CPDs supporting each increment of useable capability. Each increment could use the same CDD (revalidated each time) for the MS B and would have a separate CPD for the MS C. This method supports Evolutionary acquisition, the preferred approach. See CJCSI 3170 for other Evolutionary approached Acquisition Strategy (Requirements and Approach)

Program logo here 21 Acquisition Strategy (Program Structure) Concept Decision Milestone A RFP Development Milestone B Contract Award Development Test/OA Milestone C/LRIP Decision Operational Test IOC FRP Decision FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08FY09FY10

Program logo here 22 Acquisition Strategy (Business Approach) Current Contracts New Procurement Actions Proposed [name of effort] Contract –Competitive or Sole Source (if sole source provide justification –Contract Type: –Estimated contract value: –Period of Performance: –Acquisition Objectives: –Estimated Contract Award: –Status of Acquisition Plan:

Program logo here 23 Contractor Name, Contract Number, Contract Type, Short Contract Title Contract EV Metrics and Performance Projections Y Solvency (Provide comments in notes page) PEO and Program Manager/PMS-XXX, Program Acronym, ACAT XX, Date Reported CPI: SPI:

Program logo here 24 CPARS/IPARS/Award Fee Matrix Contractor PM Name/Gov’t PM Name Date of Review: ddmmmyy

Program logo here 25 LOGISTICS SUPPORT (Compliance with DoD/SECNAV 5000 series and policy documents) Logistics RequirementCompliance Exception Notes Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) GREEN/YELLOW/RED Rating? When completed? Navy Training System Plan (NTSP) NTSP completed? Sustainment Training in Place? YES/NO Diminishing Manufacturing Sources & Matl. Shortages (DMSMS) DMSMS Process/Tool used to ID Obsolescence challenges? YES/NO Unique Identification (UID) Policy implementation DFARS Clause in contract/contract mods? YES/NO Digital Product and Technical Data Manuals, Drawings, Illustrations available in approved digital formats? YES/NO Human Systems Integration (HSI) HSI factors addressed in AS, SEP, and NTSP? YES/NO Performance Based Logistics (PBL) implementation PBL strategy considered and decision documented in BCA? YES/NO

Program logo here 26 Program Assessment Installation Readiness Place the assessment rating icon here. Delete the remaining.

Program logo here 27 NESI SUMMARY Technical Evaluation Summary CountScoring No Evaluation No Compliance (0) Low Compliance (1) Some Compliance (2) Complete Compliance (4) Waived Waived (Registered) 131Total Tests Evaluation Count Total Score 2.26Mean Score Best Possible Total Score Percent of Best Possible Score Acquisition Evaluation Summary CountScoring No Evaluation No Compliance (0) Low Compliance (1) Some Compliance (2) Complete Compliance (4) Waived Waived (Registered) 35Total Tests Evaluation Count Total Score 3.31Mean Score Best Possible Total Score Percent of Best Possible Score

Program logo here 28 NESI Status Acquisition Technical No Compliance Complete Compliance Some Compliance Low Compliance The “Mean Score” from each summary chart automatically creates the Maturity level.

Program logo here 29 Interoperability (Net Ready)

Program logo here 30 PEO C4I Review Checklist

Program logo here 31 PEO C4I Review Checklist

Program logo here 32 PEO C4I Review Checklist

Program logo here 33 PEO C4I Review Checklist

Program logo here 34 e LIKELIHOOD e d c b a CONSEQUENCE dc b a HighMedium LowMedium Risk Advisory Board: [Mr. X, PMA xxx] [Ms. Y, XYZ Corp] [Ms. Z, DASN YY] A brief description of Issue # 4 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 4 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 3 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 3 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 2 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 2 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 1 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 1 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 5 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 5 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 6 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation A brief description of Issue # 6 and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation Acronyms: [IMA= Intermediate Maintenance Activity] Program Risk Assessment

Program logo here 35 Key Issues No further action required Significant interest outside Program Cannot be solved within the Program Legend IssueDue DateResponseStatus

Program logo here 36 Other Decision Factors and Challenges [List as appropriate] Example: Acquisition Coordination Team, Chaired by [insert name] concurred that [insert program name] is ready for OT&E on [date] Example: Acquisition Coordination Team, Chaired by [insert name] concurred that [insert program name] is ready to enter SDD Phase

Program logo here 37 PM Assessment

Program logo here 38 Recommendations