1. Suspicion of Disability = Obligation to seek informed parental consent to evaluate 2. Consideration of performance domains assures a “full and individual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education as an Alternative to Academic Failure.
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
CRITICAL THINKING The Discipline The Skill The Art.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
Fall 2011 Child Find and Eligibility Determination for AEA Special Education Support Staff Day 1.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
SPECIAL EDUCATION OVERVIEW
Secondary Goals and Transition Strategies Speech and Language Support.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
Specific Learning Disabilities in Plain English Specific Learning Disabilities in Plain English Children with specific learning disabilities (SLD) have.
1 Implementation of the New Part C Eligibility Criteria Effective 7/1/2010.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
April 24, 2015 MAER Conference Kathy SleeLaura HommingaSpecial Ed SupervisorCalhoun ISD.
The Nuts & Bolts in developing an Eligibility IEP Charter School Institute.
Eligibility ARC Chairperson Training 1. Special Education Cycle Interventions EligibilityIEPPlacementInstruction Annual Review InterventionsReferralEvaluation.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Orientation to Special Education From Referral to Eligibility.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
Charlevoix-Emmet ISD Eligibility Guidelines
Arizona Early Intervention Program IDEA 2011 Requirements -Assessment -
Response to Intervention within IDEIA 2004: Get Ready South Carolina Bradley S. Witzel, PhD Department of Curriculum and Instruction Richard W. Riley College.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Special Education 101  Special education is:  general and special education teachers working together to meet the needs of a disabled student.  provisions.
+ PPBOCES Leadership Team: Corridor Training October 2015 Digging Deeper into evaluation, eligibility and IEP Development IEP: Present Levels IEP: Service.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Under 34 CFR , the public agency must conduct a full and individual evaluation Under 34 CFR , the public agency must ensure: The child is.
Presented by Damon Watts.  Students who receive special education are a very diverse group.  Special education is not a separate program or place-it.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
Module 3 Early ACCESS Process Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Iowa Department of Education.
Advocacy Using Assessment of FASD in Schools
Understanding the IEP Process
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Introduction to Evaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Using Standards and Assessment in Early Childhood Education
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Introduction to Special Education
Early Childhood Special Education
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Presentation transcript:

1. Suspicion of Disability = Obligation to seek informed parental consent to evaluate 2. Consideration of performance domains assures a “full and individual evaluation” 3. Meets “breadth of the mandate” and assures consideration of “procedural safeguards”

Suspicion of Disability = Pursue Evaluation  When disability is suspected  Required to pursue timely evaluation without delay  Obtain informed, written parent consent

 Parent informed of all relevant information  Parent understands reasons for evaluation and agrees in writing  Granting consent is voluntary  Parent may revoke consent for evaluation

 Review existing data - Include parent input  Consider Performance Domains  Determine need, if any, for additional assessment  Present and review Procedural Safeguards Manual for Parents

 Present to and review with parents  Use of a summary can assist but not replace  Presented in a language parents understand  Not construed as consent for initial services

Consideration of Performance Domains and Comprehensive Evaluation  Ensures assessment of all areas related to suspected disability  Identifies all special education and related service needs  Identifies needed interventions to resolve the area(s) of concern or suspected disability

Breadth of Mandate  7 Performance Domains are inclusive of the 13 Federal disability categories  Assures identification of all children with disabilities who need special education  Supports Iowa’s non-categorical identification of eligible individuals

 Thoughtful consideration of all Performance Domains  Review existing data, including parent input  Use multiple methods (RIOT)  Convergent data from multiple sources  Rule out or evaluate each domain  Evaluate when evidence of discrepancy and limited progress exists despite supplemental instruction

Formative Assessment Performance Monitoring History (family, Health, etc.) Outside Provider Reports Observations Progress toward IFSP outcomes Interviews with others Additional Student Records

 Review and analyze data obtained through the Disability Suspected process  Review and analyze existing data for Performance Domains that were not considered through the Disability Suspected process

 All decisions regarding domains to be included as part of the evaluation need to be: ◦ based on educationally relevant data ◦ not based on opinion or conjecture ◦ based on data gathered through questions related to the standards for including the domains in the evaluation

Does existing evidence (RIOT, multiple sources) suggest;  the individual’s performance is persistently below standards or expectations despite appropriate instruction and supports?  the individual’s performance is significantly unique to warrant evaluation?  presence or absence of other more plausible reasons (including lack of appropriate core and supplemental instruction) for the lack of performance? OR

 The child is affected by a health or physical condition or functional limitation, or has experienced a sudden status change that adversely affects educational performance, or  The child has an obvious and immediate need for service that may exceed the capacity of general education to provide

 The level of rigor required to meet a standard of “suspicion” in a domain area is relatively low.  If there is a difference of opinion among team members and the available data are unclear, it is better to err on the side of caution and evaluate the domain.

What is it? Grade level achievement standards related to:  Listening comprehension  Oral expression  Reading comprehension  Reading fluency  Math calculation  Mathematical problem solving  Written expression

What is it? Grade level achievement standards or expectations related to:  Awareness of self (e.g. identity relative to others, personal space)  Identification & expression of emotions  Self-regulation  Interaction with others

What is it? Grade level achievement standards or expectations related to:  Gross Motor Skills  Fine Motor Skills  Mobility for living, learning & working

What is it?  General condition of the body or mind  Presence or absence of illness, injury or impairments

What is it?  Ability to perceive sound  Ability to see

What is it? Grade level achievement standards or expectations related to receptive & expressive language, including:  Language for social communication  Vocabulary  Speech sound production  Voice  Fluency

What is it? Grade level achievement standards or expectations related to:  Everyday living skills  School Functioning skills  Skills that children learn in “adapting” to their surroundings

Digging Deeper into the Consent for FIE Form

 Accuracy is important!  Be sure the individual’s legal name and resident district are complete and accurate

 Conversation with parents should focus on how we will meet the student’s needs  Explain the purposes of evaluation: 1. Determine interventions needed to resolve concern(s) 2. Determine whether or not Special Education resources are required to address the needs

Explain the definition of an educational disability to parents A Disability is a skills deficit, a health or physical condition, a functional limitation, or a pattern of behavior that adversely affects educational performance.

 Results in educational performance that is significantly & consistently different, diminished, or inappropriate when compared to the expectations for peers, AND  Significantly interferes with: ◦ Access to general education settings & opportunities, ◦ Developmental progress, ◦ Involvement & progress in general curriculum, or ◦ Interpersonal relationships or personal adjustment

Explain to parents that information will be collected about: Educational Progress Educational Progress Educational Discrepancy Educational Discrepancy Educational Need Educational Need

 Describe why disability is suspected

 Once disability is suspected, no other option is considered

 Discuss the information (documented on the Disability Suspected form) that led to conclusion that a disability is suspected  Identify which performance domains will be the focus of the evaluation  Identify which performance domains need additional assessment data as part of the evaluation

 “Consider” ALL seven performance domains.  Indicate the performance domains that are determined to be potential areas of disability and will be a focus of the evaluation

 Consider the domains chosen for evaluation in the left column  Of the domains checked in the left column, determine which, if any, need additional assessment

 Explain the use of Review, Interview, Observation and Test/Task assessment methods to gather information in the evaluation process  Will consider information to make evaluative judgments about each of the performance domains checked

 60 day timeline starts when the signed consent is received by the public agency  Parent or guardian signature is always required for initial evaluations  Remember, Consent for Evaluation is NOT the same as consent for “services”

 Not required for reviewing existing data  Not required for assessments that are administered to all children  When parents do not provide consent, the public agency may pursue evaluation through procedural safeguards (i.e. Due Process)

 Parents revoking consent once it has been given, is not retroactive  Prior Written Notice provided  Eligibility Determination Worksheet completed  Evaluation data collected are summarized  Procedures when child is a ward of the State  Procedures when child has reached the age of majority

Scenario 1 (James)

Reflection… What information really “squared up” with you today? What “point” really stuck with you today? What information is still “rolling around” in your head?