An Inter-Agency Audit Office of the Chief Inspector General ROAD MAP TO EXCELLENCE IN CONTRACTING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Contract Management Planning
Advertisements

1  AGA-DC and GWSPCA 6 th ANNUAL CONFERENCE OMB Circular A-123, Appendix A Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Innovative Approaches Jerome A. Vaiana.
Criminal Justice Organizations: Administration and Management
Contract Administrators’ Meeting February 10, :00 P.M. State Purchasing.
IS 700.a NIMS An Introduction. The NIMS Mandate HSPD-5 requires all Federal departments and agencies to: Adopt and use NIMS in incident management programs.
PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Mr. Jonas Vaitkevičius Head of Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology and Monitoring.
Standards for Internal Control in the Government Going Green Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government 1.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Principal Investigator Effort Training Created 07/2010 by Sponsored Projects Administration.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
Purpose of the Standards
Supplier Ethics: Program Checklist
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
Section 1 Guidelines for Office of Inspector General Quality Control and Assurance Programs Peer Review Training – National Science Foundation August 16,
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Division of Purchasing Strengthening Contract Management in Idaho Office of Performance Evaluation Report Legislative Response Division of Purchasing Response.
Certification/Qualification Program. Certification Program What is it? Who is involved? What should be considered? Where can a Certification Program work.
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Contract Administrators’ Meeting January 13, :00 P.M. State Purchasing.
Policy 7003 Review BCPS Facilities Task Force – Policy Subcommittee Report July 16, 2015.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
Principals’ Council Meetings May  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify.
SQA Architecture Software Quality By: MSMZ.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GRANTS AND CONTRACTS Effort Reporting System Departmental Coordinator Training Updated 01/11/2012.
Minnesota’s Internal Control Initiative National Association of State Comptrollers March 25, 2011 Speaker Jeanine Kuwik, MBA, CPA, CISA Director of Internal.
PMP® Exam Preparation Course
Module 2.1 Finance and Administration Cabinet Organizational Changes and Agency Impact March
Purchasing Directors’ Meeting December 9, :00 P.M. State Purchasing.
DAS: State Controller's Division1January 2010 Department of Administrative Services State Controller’s Division Updated January, 2010.
STATE OF FLORIDA Department of Management Services State Purchasing Training and Certification Program September 26, 2007.
Quick Guide to help your transition
Institutional Research Compliance Juliann Tenney, JD Research Compliance and Privacy Officer Director, Institutional Research Compliance Program.
Information Assurance The Coordinated Approach To Improving Enterprise Data Quality.
Monitoring Internal Control Systems Johann Rieser Senior Auditor, Ministry of Finance, Vienna.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. 1 Part Four: Implementing Business Ethics in a Global Economy Chapter 9: Managing and Controlling Ethics.
I Have Been Notified That A School in My District Needs an "ESCA"? What Does that Mean? Regional Workshop for Differentiated Accountability New York State.
9-1-1 From an Auditor’s View Point Navarre Beach, Florida October 8, 2003.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
Office of Policy and Management State of Connecticut Presentation to the State Contracting Standards Board January 18, 2006 Office of Policy and Management.
BPR PHASE IV IMPLEMENTATION NOAA Business Process Re-Engineering Current Status: June 21, 2006 NESDIS Cooperative Institute Directors and Administrators.
AUDITOR-GENERAL Presentation to the Public Service and Administration Portfolio Committee on the appointment and utilisation of consultants Report of the.
Procurement Division Procurement Reform Recommendation #19  “DGS shall authorize individual signature authority for contracting and procurement officials.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
PUBLIC PURCHASING IN FLORIDA ROLES IN THE PURCHASING PROCESS (rev. 05/27/2008)
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
FAPPO Meeting Ft. Lauderdale April 20, 2004 State Purchasing.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia by Gay & Simnett Slides prepared by Roger Simnett.
FAPPO Meeting November 5, 2004 Jacksonville, FL. 2 DMS Mission FY To become a customer focused agency providing effective and efficient services.
Recent Changes in State Purchasing Policies August 24, 2004 State Purchasing.
1 Planning and Programming for Effective Use of External Audit Resources Victor Rezendes Managing Director Strategic Issues U.S. General Accounting Office.
OSAE sets the PACE: Premier Auditing Consulting and Evaluations! American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Readiness Review.
ISO 9001 Quality Management System implementation experience in the Agency on Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (ASRK) Zhasser Jarkinbayev, ASRK.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Subrecipient Monitoring
Safety Accountabilities
How Does a State Make an Award to Eligible Providers?
Project Management Process Groups
Centralization of Texas State Contract Compliance Functions
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Police Audit outcomes of the Police portfolio for the financial year 13 October 2015.
System Safety Regulation
Presentation transcript:

An Inter-Agency Audit Office of the Chief Inspector General ROAD MAP TO EXCELLENCE IN CONTRACTING

Background zContract Accountability, Who does it? yContract Manager yContract Monitor yQuality Assurance yAuditors xAuditor General xOPPAGA xCPA (A-133 Single Audit) xInternal Audit (Inspector General)

Background zContract Accountability, Who does it? yContract Manager yContract Monitor yContractor/Provider

Background zContract Accountability, Who does it? yQuality Assurance xMedical or clinical xInternal or external

Background zContract Accountability, Who does it? Auditors xAuditor General xOPPAGA

Background zContract Accountability, Who does it? Auditors xCPA (A-133 Single Audit) xInternal Audit (Inspector General)

zDepartment of Management Services zDepartment of Transportation zDepartment of Corrections zDepartment of Education zExecutive Office of the Governor zDepartment of Juvenile Justice zDepartment of Children and Families Working Together Seven Governor’s Agencies

A Different Approach What Do We Already Know? zDo not duplicate prior work. zAdd value zIdentify source of problems.

A Collective Analysis Based on Each Agencies knowledge of the contracting Problems. zApproximately 100 reports examined zSeven Governor’s Agencies zIncluded Auditor General and OPPAGA zThree year period z493 Findings analyzed and classified

The Contracting Process Where are the Problems? zNeeds Assessment zProcurement Methodology zContract Writing zPerformance Monitoring zPayment zContract Closure

What it Means and What Do We Do. In-put from procurement staff at seven agencies. zMet with each agency contracting staff zValidated findings zRoot causes Identified by agency staff and Auditors.

Report Recommendations. Based on agency staff and auditors analysis zWE FOUND: Procurement Rules, Statutes, Policy, Procedure developed piece meal over time in response to specific abuses or problems. zWE RECOMMEND: The replacement of the myriad overlapping and conflicting statutes and guidelines with one unified, effective system of controls. zMANAGEMENT RESPONDED: We agree and work has already begun. “MyFloridaMarketPlace” is in place and we have a goal to overhaul Chapter 287 which will result in a consistent and unified system of procurement controls.

Report Recommendations. Based on agency staff and auditors analysis zWE FOUND: The lack of centralized statewide direction in the procurement area has led to inconsistent and deficient contracting practices both among and within agencies zWE RECOMMEND: Department of Management Services accept the leadership bestowed by Florida Statute. zMANAGEMENT RESPONDED: We agree and we are in the process of filling the Directors position and have a renewed focus on our leadership and service role.

Report Recommendations. Based on agency staff and auditors analysis zWE FOUND: There is no statewide system to train or certify agency contracting personnel, nor are there incentives to encourage professional development zWE RECOMMEND: A statewide training initiative led by DMS be developed. In addition, we recommend incentives to encourage professionalism and certification for administrators, negotiators, monitors and managers. zMANAGEMENT RESPONDED: We agree, we will use our Office of Organizational Development in coordination with other state agencies to assess training needs and develop appropriate programs and incentives.

Report Recommendations. Based on agency staff and auditors analysis zWE FOUND: The state's corporate culture does not foster the sharing of best contracting practices among agencies. z WE RECOMMEND: DMS create and foster user groups of professional procurement staff that meet on a regular basis to share best practices and common problems. zMANAGEMENT RESPONDED: We agree, in conjunction with MyMarketPlace we have a created a “super-user” group to focus on and address common issues.

Report Recommendations. Based on agency staff and auditors analysis  WE FOUND: Agencies’ use of different processes and procedures in awarding and managing contracts causes the contract documents to vary considerably in format and content. zWE RECOMMEND: DMS, with the assistance of other agencies, develop standard contract formats for use by all state agencies. zMANAGEMENT RESPONDED: We agree and will revise many currently required forms and develop new ones as part of the formal rulemaking planned for the second half of 2003.

Report Recommendations. Based on agency staff and auditors analysis  WE FOUND: Inadequate systems exist for monitoring and rating vendor performance.  WE RECOMMEND: A uniform vendor monitoring and rating system be created which incorporates links to contract monitoring reports, vendor websites, closeout evaluations, and a method for other agencies to access performance evaluations. zMANAGEMENT RESPONDED: We agree and with assistance from other state agencies we will consider ways to develop and implement a uniform vendor monitoring system.

Report Recommendations. Based on agency staff and auditors analysis  WE FOUND: A formal procedure for agencies to perform and document needs assessments has not been developed by DMS. zWE RECOMMEND: DMS fulfill the statutory mandate to develop formal procedures for agencies to perform and document needs assessment. zMANAGEMENT RESPONDED: We agree, with input from state agency experts we will develop needs assessment procedures.

Report Recommendations. Based on agency staff and auditors analysis  WE FOUND: Lack of Expertise in Negotiating Contracts. zWE RECOMMEND: that legislation be proposed similar to the Truth in Negotiations Act to assist contract negotiators in determining whether the contractor’s proposal is reasonable.  WE ALSO RECOMMEND: that DMS offer a negotiating training program for state employees. zMANAGEMENT RESPONDED: Agreement with a discussion of issues but no commitment to action. However will develop a training program for employees.

Conclusion. What we want to happen. zAppoint a point person to review this report and its supporting documentation zDraft the directives needed to implement those recommendations authorized under existing legislation zDraft legislation, as needed, to enable implementation of those recommendations requiring statutory changes zTrack the implementation process and report its progress to the Governor

An Inter-Agency Audit Office of the Chief Inspector General ROAD MAP TO EXCELLENCE IN CONTRACTING