The Virtual Learning Magnet Education Policy Briefing United States Department of Education 23 July 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

STEM ACTION CENTER HB 150 Applied Science 7 th and 8 th Grade STEM Pathways and Certification.
PRESENTED BY: LINDSAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT THOMAS L. ROONEY, SUPERINTENDENT LANA BROWN, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION High School Transition.
The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.
Dual Certification MAT Program: Focus on Inclusive iSTeM Education.
Hillsmeade Primary School Term Teacher Professional Leave These PD and focus group sessions are designed to assist all staff to gain an understanding.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
Cambridge International Examinations
School College Work Initiative: Phase May 11, 2006.
Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
6/2/20151 Making the Case for Online Professional Development Linda Pittenger Kentucky Department of Education Online Learning Institute 22 March 2006.
LEARNING FOR THE 21st CENTURY
Promoting Learning Styles Through ICT By Miss T.Magi (E-learning Specialist: Butterworth)
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
INTEGRATED LEARNING: STAGE 4 (SECONDARY COGS) Principles and process.
Advancing Excellence in STEM Education ___________________________________________________________________________________________ The Teacher is the Key.
Learners Districts Cities Charters Home School Virtual School Libraries.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
The Virtual Learning Magnet Update Deputies Meeting March 8, 2009.
University of Maryland Baltimore County Department of Psychology Psyc100: Introductory Psychology Eileen O’Brien, Ph.D.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Transforming lives through learning Curriculum Expectations Sadie Cushley HMIE Feb 2014.
Marion H. Martinez, Ed.D. Associate Commissioner for Teaching, Learning and Instructional Leadership August 25,
21st Century Skills: Just what are they?. Student Outcomes.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
21st Century Methodology (Improving English) for Teachers and Administrators – 05 MAY-10 MAY 2013 PRAG.
The Kentucky Virtual High School Linda A. Pittenger, Director SEIR-TEC April 2001.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
What is a 21st Century Learner?
LESSONS LEARNED IN PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEADERSHIP for CHSI 2 ND National High School Leadership Summit Archived Information.
A Focus on Health and Wellbeing Wendy Halliday Learning and Teaching Scotland.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
UDL: Sharing Ideas, Building Resources Julie Luton Walden University Sherry Lamberston EDUC 6714: Reaching and Engaging All Learner Through Technology.
Key Elements of Curricula. In all curricula you will find: Evidence of the common curricula framework Subject specific goals Grade specific outcomes and.
Bricks and Clicks: Training Teachers Online Barbara Treacy, Director, EdTech Leaders Online OSEP Project Directors Meeting July 20, 2010.
SIIA Vision K-20 TECHNOLOGY ► EDUCATION ► AMERICA’S Future.
July 2013 Dr. Elizabeth Aitken, Senior Executive Director of Academics Mr. Ryan Imbriale, Executive Director of Digital Learning.
October 25, 2014 Differentiated Implementation of the Problem Based Task High School Integrated Math I, II, III.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
Chapter 1 Integrating UBD and DI An Essential Partnership.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Building Schools for the Future Transforming the Learning Landscape in Birmingham.
Elementary Math Work – Spring 2013 Des Moines Public Schools Mathematics Expectation: All students will demonstrate mastery of the rigorous Common Core.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Coaching For Math GAINS Summary of Board Action Plans and Survey Monkey.
Making a lasting difference: Program sustainability/ scalability and infrastructure Jeff Kelly, University of Oklahoma, and Cathleen Barczys Simons, Evaluation.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Intel ® Teach Program Copyright © 2010 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative and Intel Teach Program.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION Cynthia Eason EDU 673 Instruction, Strategy for Differentiated Teaching & Learning.
Alignment between Curriculum and Teaching in Cambodia Presenter : Dr. Kreng Heng.
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
INCLUSIVE PRACTICES Co-Teaching Models
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
A Fully Integrated Print and Digital Program
Building the future Workshop 3 24 November 2017
The CCPS Strategic Plan
Adapting and Building for the Future
PD Goals Program Overview December, 2012
PD Goals Program Overview December, 2012
Presentation transcript:

The Virtual Learning Magnet Education Policy Briefing United States Department of Education 23 July 2009

Elements Guiding Precepts Broad overview of the VLM The VLM for Space, Science and Mathematics The Proof of Concept Broad Lessons Learned

Guiding Precepts In the 21 st century, geography and time must no longer be allowed to be determine a child’s ability to learn at the highest levels. The best teachers, content resources, and tools for learning can be made available to every child 24/7/365. Innovative learning opportunities will be dependent on open, systems that accommodate change, expansion, and rapid technological advances. New technologies can overcome barriers of equity and access.

Guiding Precepts We have the potential to reach every single child, from the traditionally successful to those who fail in or are failed by our system. We can challenge students to the same high levels of rigor and success regardless of their school or state. Students will learn and are most successful when they exercise appropriate control over decisions about their learning. Every child should experience the excitement of becoming a successful learner. Paradigm-breaking innovations which are learner centered rather than school centered are possible.

The Virtual Learning Magnet How the design meets the guiding precepts: –Personalization & mass customization of learning –Interest-driven curriculum –Differentiated levels of student self-directed learning content, depth, breadth, time –Non-linear course design with highly modularized content –Assessment for learning –Performance-based credits

The Virtual Learning Magnet How the design meets the guiding precepts (continued): –Use of Open Educational Resources to provide scalability at lower costs –Shift of teaching role from delivering content to supporting self- directed learning, providing feedback, and coaching for success –New opportunities for public and private sector to partner around the needs of students

The Virtual Learning Magnet for Space Science and Mathematics Meets STEM-related priorities A suite of 6-8 courses similar to a magnet school focus –Reach from “middle school” to dual credit –Physics chosen as a pivotal course in the suite –VLM courses replace traditional courses for credit towards graduation Innovative cross-state collaboration –Sharing content, teaching, and infrastructure –Brings students and teachers with similar interests together to learn Overwhelming support and enthusiasm from the Chiefs

The Proof of Concept (Feb – May 2009) Made possible through National Aeronautics and Space Administration, unsolicited proposal for $250K Introductory Physics – organized around eight “Big Ideas” using NASA and OER content No textbook/ all materials online Learning Team: 50 students from 8 states and DC supported by 2 experienced online teachers Use of Social Networking Smithsonian engagement after POC began demonstrates magnet- like nature of the VLM to attract those who can contribute content, context, and subject matter expertise –Business and industry, military, non-profits, governmental

Broad Lessons Learned Although the Proof of Concept was very limited, it affirmed basic design: It is possible through collective state action to provide unique learning opportunities that cannot be replicated by every school or every state. Potential of shared standards or a common core –Standards mean interoperability –Foundation for differentiating instruction –Enables choice in learning and demonstrating learning If standards and expectations are clear, it is possible for students and teachers to work across geographic boundaries and in new roles to meet specialized needs and interests.

Broad Lessons Learned The VLM can supplement existing state virtual schools and traditional brick and mortar schools. Use of OER resources reduces costs and expands student choice. Innovating with technology opens new opportunities to work with government and industry to ensure 21 st century global competitiveness.

Contact: Linda Pittenger, Tom Welch,