2006 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Matt Prusak - Team Leader Wes Barrett – Vice President.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Snowmobile Modifications Appeal to Snowmobile Enthusiasts Dealers Perspective Engine Control Strategy Emissions Control Noise Reduction Conclusion.
Advertisements

2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2001 Seth MillhornDon Hancock Shawn KimbleyHeber Lemmon Zack BeelerJeremy Staab Patrick HessPhil Auth Karen DenBraven Making.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Justin Johnson.
University of Buffalo, SUNY 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
PIGGYBACK DIVISION MATTHEW MENARD CRAIG FORTIER NOISE VIBRATION AND HARSHNESS DIVISION JOSHUA AYERS DANIELLE MCCAFFERTY NOAH WRIGHT DUSTIN MCCANN COMPOSITE.
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Spark plug Inlet valve Exhaust valve CylinderPiston The four-stroke engine.
University of Minnesota – Duluth Design Presentation 2006 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
UAF Bristol Bay Campus Design of a meaningful Snuukuuq Frank Nicholson, Ryan Giordano, Tiarna Bartman, University Alaska Fairbanks - Bristol Bay Campus.
Design and Testing of a Four-Stroke Snowmobile with Catalytic Exhaust Treatment Scott Miers and Ryan Hayes.
University of New Hampshire Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2006.
U NIVERSITY O F W ATERLOO T EAM E CO -S NOW. T EAM B ACKGROUND Team Eco-Snow is a student organization at the University of Waterloo The project is managed.
1 Presenters: Ozzie Goodman Zak Parker. Design Objectives  Create Efficient Snowmobile Fueled by 16%-32% Isobutanol  Emissions Reductions  Noise 
Design Intent  Improve upon the Best Available Technology (BAT) standard of the power sports industry to enhance fuel efficiency while reducing emissions.
North Dakota State University Ross Larson Justin Omdalen.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION.
Minnesota State University, Mankato X treme  AET Program  1989  TAC-ABET Accredited  140 Majors  The Team  Seven Seniors  Ten Undergraduates 
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Kettering University Clean Snowmobile Challenge March 23 rd – April 1 st, 2001 Presented by: Kyle Schwulst and Andrew Stahr.
University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation.
2005 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Greg Davis David Meyer Advisor: Dr. Bernhard Bettig Incorporation of a High Performance, Four-Cylinder, Four-Stroke.
2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Rich Stueber Pryce Nutting.
Kettering University Presenters: Chad Swartz John Stimpson.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Joe Lofgren Brandon Salaba Kyle Schroer Kyle Levanen Dylan Dahlheimer UMD University.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Russell Schiermeier.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Dylan Dahlheimer Ryan Schefers Brenden Bungert Mark Boeckmann UMD University.
2015 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy  Develop a platform that meets competition objectives while providing a significant design challenge.
Michigan Technological University Bill GieldaMax Farrell Development and Implementation of Flex Fuel Technology of a 2014 Yamaha Phazer 500.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
2006 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Team Members: Steve Battaglia, Brian Belmont, Dan Bughbee, Kevin Gastle Mike Ide, Kelly McRory, Eric Peckham, Dan Sweeney,
Minnesota State University Mankato Dylan Brandt, Nick Perkins, Abdulsalam Hamud, Wayne Minnichsoffer, Andrew Pickle.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2005 Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Competition Presented by: Pryce McDaniel, Josh McCoy, Mike Waloch 3/7/16.
2016 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy ●Embrace design challenges ●Engage students and public through originality ●Open and safe learning.
University of Waterloo 2014 Clean Snowmobile. Strategy Four-stroke engine Weber MPE 750 Turbo (2 cyl) Lightweight cross-country chassis Better control.
Iowa State University Clean Snowmobile Club Iowa State University 2016 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
SPECIFICATIONS: ENGINE & TRANSMISSION
Hybrid Electric Vehicles
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
Jeff Robinson Eric Gleich
Introduction to the Clean Snowmobile Competition
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
Team Members Jacob Schofield - President Nels Eide – Driveline / Testing Mark Boeckmann - Engine Keith Propson – Sound / Exhaust.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2017 Clean Snowmobile Team
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2001
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy
Modified 4-stroke Engine
A Systems Approach Automotive Technology PowerPoint® Presentation
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Iowa State Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
2018 IC Design Presentation
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Who We Are Samuel Wick – President Blake Thurnbeck – Engine Packaging
2018 North Dakota State University Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
University of Wisconsin-Platteville Clean Snowmobile
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University of Wisconsin – Platteville 2019 SI Snowmobile Team
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Last Year’s Foundation
Automotive Technology Principles, Diagnosis, and Service
Presentation transcript:

2006 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Matt Prusak - Team Leader Wes Barrett – Vice President

Concept “Design and build a clean, quiet, reliable, high-performance snowmobile that is enjoyable to ride in a wide variety of conditions, and can be operated by a wide range of enthusiasts.”

Outline -Why is the MTU Clean Snowmobile superior to current technology? -Consumer Perspective -High-Performance -Environmental Perspective -Low Noise -Low Emissions -Dealer/Outfitter Perspective -Durable -Low Cost -High Resale Value

Performance - Engine Consumer Perspective ’03 Honda CBR 954RR –4-cycle –4-cylinder –4 valves per cylinder –Electronic Fuel Injection –113kW (152 rwhp) in OEM trim

Performance – Chassis Consumer Perspective Premium suspension components –Fox Float front shocks used Highly tunable –Rear suspension spring and damping rates modified Extensive on-trail Calibration –Multiple-rider input for 200 miles –Calibrated for best possible compromise between bump absorption, and weight transfer for a wide range of users, from beginner to expert

Emissions Development Environmental Perspective Why use a four-stroke engine? –The numbers don’t lie

Emissions Strategy Team-Designed Exhaust System –Emitec Catalytic Converter Installed Power Commander Piggyback EFI Modifier –Used to Modify OEM Fuel Map Significant reductions in tailpipe emissions compared to OEM engine calibration –96.6% Average Reduction in HC –97.2% Average Reduction in CO –93.1% Average Reduction in NOx –Stoichiometric Operating Conditions

Emissions Development

Noise Reduction Environmental Perspective How? Team designed Helical Gearbox Intake silencer 2 piece muffling system –Primary Supercritical muffler –Secondary glass pack to absorb high frequency noise Closed off hood vents Sound absorbing material in belly-pan Minimized idler wheels in rear suspension Made Use of Arctic Cat style Quiet Track Technology

Noise Reduction Testing Environmental Perspective Secondary Muffler Testing Selections: –Long Red GP – 83.1 dBA –Good combination of noise and power output

J-192 Field Testing Noise Reduction Testing Environmental Perspective Selections from testing: –Covered Silenced Intake – 74.5 dBA –Closed Hood Vents – 73.5 dBA

Built on a Polaris Pro-X race driven Chassis – Torture tested for over 200 miles on ungroomed trails Powered by a race proven Honda 954cc High Performance street bike engine –Dyno Tested for over 100 hrs –Constant 10 minute intervals at mode 1 calibration point Durability Dealer/Outfitter Perspective

Cost Analysis Dealer/Outfitter Perspective 2006 TICA –Total Implementation Cost Analysis (TICA) of $ –Coming in at around $ makes it cheaper than the new 4- strokes when added to price of Stock 600 Polaris Highly tuned 4-stroke Engine –Consumes Less fuel than stock – Approx. 14 mpg Maintenance Free –Fouling spark plugs isn’t even considered –Uses no oil, changing oil/filter seasonally

Questions?